tf.data service: A Case for Disaggregating ML Input Data Processing
Authors:
Andrew Audibert,
Yang Chen,
Dan Graur,
Ana Klimovic,
Jiri Simsa,
Chandramohan A. Thekkath
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) computations commonly execute on expensive specialized hardware, such as GPUs and TPUs, which provide high FLOPs and performance-per-watt. For cost efficiency, it is essential to keep these accelerators highly utilized. This requires preprocessing input data at the rate at which the accelerators can ingest and perform ML computations on the data. To avoid data stalls, the hos…
▽ More
Machine learning (ML) computations commonly execute on expensive specialized hardware, such as GPUs and TPUs, which provide high FLOPs and performance-per-watt. For cost efficiency, it is essential to keep these accelerators highly utilized. This requires preprocessing input data at the rate at which the accelerators can ingest and perform ML computations on the data. To avoid data stalls, the host CPU and RAM required for input data processing per accelerator core used for ML computations varies across jobs. Hence, the traditional approach of processing input data on ML accelerator hosts with a fixed hardware ratio leads to either under-utilizing the accelerators or the host CPU and RAM. In this paper, we address these concerns by building a disaggregated ML data processing system.
We present tf.data service, an open-source disaggregated input data processing service built on top of tf.data in TensorFlow. We show that disaggregating data preprocessing has three key advantages for large-scale ML training jobs. First, the service can horizontally scale-out to right-size CPU/RAM host resources for data processing in each job, saving 32x training time and 26x cost, on average. Second, the service can share ephemeral preprocessed data results across jobs, to optimize CPU usage and reduce redundant computations. Finally, the service supports coordinated reads, a technique that avoids stragglers due to different input sizes in distributed training, reducing training time by 2.2x, on average. Our design is inspired by lessons learned from deploying tf.data service in production, including relaxing data visitation guarantees without impacting model accuracy.
△ Less
Submitted 2 January, 2024; v1 submitted 26 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
Pathways: Asynchronous Distributed Dataflow for ML
Authors:
Paul Barham,
Aakanksha Chowdhery,
Jeff Dean,
Sanjay Ghemawat,
Steven Hand,
Dan Hurt,
Michael Isard,
Hyeontaek Lim,
Ruoming Pang,
Sudip Roy,
Brennan Saeta,
Parker Schuh,
Ryan Sepassi,
Laurent El Shafey,
Chandramohan A. Thekkath,
Yonghui Wu
Abstract:
We present the design of a new large scale orchestration layer for accelerators. Our system, Pathways, is explicitly designed to enable exploration of new systems and ML research ideas, while retaining state of the art performance for current models. Pathways uses a sharded dataflow graph of asynchronous operators that consume and produce futures, and efficiently gang-schedules heterogeneous paral…
▽ More
We present the design of a new large scale orchestration layer for accelerators. Our system, Pathways, is explicitly designed to enable exploration of new systems and ML research ideas, while retaining state of the art performance for current models. Pathways uses a sharded dataflow graph of asynchronous operators that consume and produce futures, and efficiently gang-schedules heterogeneous parallel computations on thousands of accelerators while coordinating data transfers over their dedicated interconnects. Pathways makes use of a novel asynchronous distributed dataflow design that lets the control plane execute in parallel despite dependencies in the data plane. This design, with careful engineering, allows Pathways to adopt a single-controller model that makes it easier to express complex new parallelism patterns. We demonstrate that Pathways can achieve performance parity (~100% accelerator utilization) with state-of-the-art systems when running SPMD computations over 2048 TPUs, while also delivering throughput comparable to the SPMD case for Transformer models that are pipelined across 16 stages, or sharded across two islands of accelerators connected over a data center network.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
