-
On Measuring Fairness in Generative Models
Authors:
Christopher T. H. Teo,
Milad Abdollahzadeh,
Ngai-Man Cheung
Abstract:
Recently, there has been increased interest in fair generative models. In this work, we conduct, for the first time, an in-depth study on fairness measurement, a critical component in gauging progress on fair generative models. We make three contributions. First, we conduct a study that reveals that the existing fairness measurement framework has considerable measurement errors, even when highly a…
▽ More
Recently, there has been increased interest in fair generative models. In this work, we conduct, for the first time, an in-depth study on fairness measurement, a critical component in gauging progress on fair generative models. We make three contributions. First, we conduct a study that reveals that the existing fairness measurement framework has considerable measurement errors, even when highly accurate sensitive attribute (SA) classifiers are used. These findings cast doubts on previously reported fairness improvements. Second, to address this issue, we propose CLassifier Error-Aware Measurement (CLEAM), a new framework which uses a statistical model to account for inaccuracies in SA classifiers. Our proposed CLEAM reduces measurement errors significantly, e.g., 4.98% $\rightarrow$ 0.62% for StyleGAN2 w.r.t. Gender. Additionally, CLEAM achieves this with minimal additional overhead. Third, we utilize CLEAM to measure fairness in important text-to-image generator and GANs, revealing considerable biases in these models that raise concerns about their applications. Code and more resources: https://sutd-visual-computing-group.github.io/CLEAM/.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
A Survey on Generative Modeling with Limited Data, Few Shots, and Zero Shot
Authors:
Milad Abdollahzadeh,
Touba Malekzadeh,
Christopher T. H. Teo,
Keshigeyan Chandrasegaran,
Guimeng Liu,
Ngai-Man Cheung
Abstract:
In machine learning, generative modeling aims to learn to generate new data statistically similar to the training data distribution. In this paper, we survey learning generative models under limited data, few shots and zero shot, referred to as Generative Modeling under Data Constraint (GM-DC). This is an important topic when data acquisition is challenging, e.g. healthcare applications. We discus…
▽ More
In machine learning, generative modeling aims to learn to generate new data statistically similar to the training data distribution. In this paper, we survey learning generative models under limited data, few shots and zero shot, referred to as Generative Modeling under Data Constraint (GM-DC). This is an important topic when data acquisition is challenging, e.g. healthcare applications. We discuss background, challenges, and propose two taxonomies: one on GM-DC tasks and another on GM-DC approaches. Importantly, we study interactions between different GM-DC tasks and approaches. Furthermore, we highlight research gaps, research trends, and potential avenues for future exploration. Project website: https://gmdc-survey.github.io.
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Measuring Fairness in Generative Models
Authors:
Christopher T. H Teo,
Ngai-Man Cheung
Abstract:
Deep generative models have made much progress in improving training stability and quality of generated data. Recently there has been increased interest in the fairness of deep-generated data. Fairness is important in many applications, e.g. law enforcement, as biases will affect efficacy. Central to fair data generation are the fairness metrics for the assessment and evaluation of different gener…
▽ More
Deep generative models have made much progress in improving training stability and quality of generated data. Recently there has been increased interest in the fairness of deep-generated data. Fairness is important in many applications, e.g. law enforcement, as biases will affect efficacy. Central to fair data generation are the fairness metrics for the assessment and evaluation of different generative models. In this paper, we first review fairness metrics proposed in previous works and highlight potential weaknesses. We then discuss a performance benchmark framework along with the assessment of alternative metrics.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
