Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Talvitie, E

Bounding-Box Inference for Error-Aware Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Erin J. Talvitie, Zilei Shao, Huiying Li, **ghan Hu, Jacob Boerma, Rory Zhao, Xintong Wang

Abstract: In model-based reinforcement learning, simulated experiences from the learned model are often treated as equivalent to experience from the real environment. However, when the model is inaccurate, it can catastrophically interfere with policy learning. Alternatively, the agent might learn about the model's accuracy and selectively use it only when it can provide reliable predictions. We empirically… ▽ More In model-based reinforcement learning, simulated experiences from the learned model are often treated as equivalent to experience from the real environment. However, when the model is inaccurate, it can catastrophically interfere with policy learning. Alternatively, the agent might learn about the model's accuracy and selectively use it only when it can provide reliable predictions. We empirically explore model uncertainty measures for selective planning and show that best results require distribution insensitive inference to estimate the uncertainty over model-based updates. To that end, we propose and evaluate bounding-box inference, which operates on bounding-boxes around sets of possible states and other quantities. We find that bounding-box inference can reliably support effective selective planning. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: To appear: Reinforcement Learning Conference (RLC), 2024

Selective Dyna-style Planning Under Limited Model Capacity

Authors: Zaheer Abbas, Samuel Sokota, Erin J. Talvitie, Martha White

Abstract: In model-based reinforcement learning, planning with an imperfect model of the environment has the potential to harm learning progress. But even when a model is imperfect, it may still contain information that is useful for planning. In this paper, we investigate the idea of using an imperfect model selectively. The agent should plan in parts of the state space where the model would be helpful but… ▽ More In model-based reinforcement learning, planning with an imperfect model of the environment has the potential to harm learning progress. But even when a model is imperfect, it may still contain information that is useful for planning. In this paper, we investigate the idea of using an imperfect model selectively. The agent should plan in parts of the state space where the model would be helpful but refrain from using the model where it would be harmful. An effective selective planning mechanism requires estimating predictive uncertainty, which arises out of aleatoric uncertainty, parameter uncertainty, and model inadequacy, among other sources. Prior work has focused on parameter uncertainty for selective planning. In this work, we emphasize the importance of model inadequacy. We show that heteroscedastic regression can signal predictive uncertainty arising from model inadequacy that is complementary to that which is detected by methods designed for parameter uncertainty, indicating that considering both parameter uncertainty and model inadequacy may be a more promising direction for effective selective planning than either in isolation. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2021; v1 submitted 5 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Comments: Accepted at ICML 2020

Hallucinating Value: A Pitfall of Dyna-style Planning with Imperfect Environment Models

Authors: Taher Jafferjee, Ehsan Imani, Erin Talvitie, Martha White, Micheal Bowling

Abstract: Dyna-style reinforcement learning (RL) agents improve sample efficiency over model-free RL agents by updating the value function with simulated experience generated by an environment model. However, it is often difficult to learn accurate models of environment dynamics, and even small errors may result in failure of Dyna agents. In this paper, we investigate one type of model error: hallucinated s… ▽ More Dyna-style reinforcement learning (RL) agents improve sample efficiency over model-free RL agents by updating the value function with simulated experience generated by an environment model. However, it is often difficult to learn accurate models of environment dynamics, and even small errors may result in failure of Dyna agents. In this paper, we investigate one type of model error: hallucinated states. These are states generated by the model, but that are not real states of the environment. We present the Hallucinated Value Hypothesis (HVH): updating values of real states towards values of hallucinated states results in misleading state-action values which adversely affect the control policy. We discuss and evaluate four Dyna variants; three which update real states toward simulated -- and therefore potentially hallucinated -- states and one which does not. The experimental results provide evidence for the HVH thus suggesting a fruitful direction toward develo** Dyna algorithms robust to model error. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: 9 pages, 7 figures,

The Effect of Planning Shape on Dyna-style Planning in High-dimensional State Spaces

Authors: G. Zacharias Holland, Erin J. Talvitie, Michael Bowling

Abstract: Dyna is a fundamental approach to model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) that interleaves planning, acting, and learning in an online setting. In the most typical application of Dyna, the dynamics model is used to generate one-step transitions from selected start states from the agent's history, which are used to update the agent's value function or policy as if they were real experiences. In t… ▽ More Dyna is a fundamental approach to model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) that interleaves planning, acting, and learning in an online setting. In the most typical application of Dyna, the dynamics model is used to generate one-step transitions from selected start states from the agent's history, which are used to update the agent's value function or policy as if they were real experiences. In this work, one-step Dyna was applied to several games from the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE). We found that the model-based updates offered surprisingly little benefit over simply performing more updates with the agent's existing experience, even when using a perfect model. We hypothesize that to get the most from planning, the model must be used to generate unfamiliar experience. To test this, we experimented with the "shape" of planning in multiple different concrete instantiations of Dyna, performing fewer, longer rollouts, rather than many short rollouts. We found that planning shape has a profound impact on the efficacy of Dyna for both perfect and learned models. In addition to these findings regarding Dyna in general, our results represent, to our knowledge, the first time that a learned dynamics model has been successfully used for planning in the ALE, suggesting that Dyna may be a viable approach to MBRL in the ALE and other high-dimensional problems. △ Less

Submitted 28 March, 2019; v1 submitted 5 June, 2018; originally announced June 2018.

Learning the Reward Function for a Misspecified Model

Authors: Erik Talvitie

Abstract: In model-based reinforcement learning it is typical to decouple the problems of learning the dynamics model and learning the reward function. However, when the dynamics model is flawed, it may generate erroneous states that would never occur in the true environment. It is not clear a priori what value the reward function should assign to such states. This paper presents a novel error bound that ac… ▽ More In model-based reinforcement learning it is typical to decouple the problems of learning the dynamics model and learning the reward function. However, when the dynamics model is flawed, it may generate erroneous states that would never occur in the true environment. It is not clear a priori what value the reward function should assign to such states. This paper presents a novel error bound that accounts for the reward model's behavior in states sampled from the model. This bound is used to extend the existing Hallucinated DAgger-MC algorithm, which offers theoretical performance guarantees in deterministic MDPs that do not assume a perfect model can be learned. Empirically, this approach to reward learning can yield dramatic improvements in control performance when the dynamics model is flawed. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2018; v1 submitted 29 January, 2018; originally announced January 2018.

Comments: To appear at ICML 2018

ACM Class: I.2.6; I.2.8

Revisiting the Arcade Learning Environment: Evaluation Protocols and Open Problems for General Agents

Authors: Marlos C. Machado, Marc G. Bellemare, Erik Talvitie, Joel Veness, Matthew Hausknecht, Michael Bowling

Abstract: The Arcade Learning Environment (ALE) is an evaluation platform that poses the challenge of building AI agents with general competency across dozens of Atari 2600 games. It supports a variety of different problem settings and it has been receiving increasing attention from the scientific community, leading to some high-profile success stories such as the much publicized Deep Q-Networks (DQN). In t… ▽ More The Arcade Learning Environment (ALE) is an evaluation platform that poses the challenge of building AI agents with general competency across dozens of Atari 2600 games. It supports a variety of different problem settings and it has been receiving increasing attention from the scientific community, leading to some high-profile success stories such as the much publicized Deep Q-Networks (DQN). In this article we take a big picture look at how the ALE is being used by the research community. We show how diverse the evaluation methodologies in the ALE have become with time, and highlight some key concerns when evaluating agents in the ALE. We use this discussion to present some methodological best practices and provide new benchmark results using these best practices. To further the progress in the field, we introduce a new version of the ALE that supports multiple game modes and provides a form of stochasticity we call sticky actions. We conclude this big picture look by revisiting challenges posed when the ALE was introduced, summarizing the state-of-the-art in various problems and highlighting problems that remain open. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2017; v1 submitted 18 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

Self-Correcting Models for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Erik Talvitie

Abstract: When an agent cannot represent a perfectly accurate model of its environment's dynamics, model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) can fail catastrophically. Planning involves composing the predictions of the model; when flawed predictions are composed, even minor errors can compound and render the model useless for planning. Hallucinated Replay (Talvitie 2014) trains the model to "correct" itself… ▽ More When an agent cannot represent a perfectly accurate model of its environment's dynamics, model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) can fail catastrophically. Planning involves composing the predictions of the model; when flawed predictions are composed, even minor errors can compound and render the model useless for planning. Hallucinated Replay (Talvitie 2014) trains the model to "correct" itself when it produces errors, substantially improving MBRL with flawed models. This paper theoretically analyzes this approach, illuminates settings in which it is likely to be effective or ineffective, and presents a novel error bound, showing that a model's ability to self-correct is more tightly related to MBRL performance than one-step prediction error. These results inspire an MBRL algorithm for deterministic MDPs with performance guarantees that are robust to model class limitations. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2017; v1 submitted 18 December, 2016; originally announced December 2016.

Comments: Original paper appeared in Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017. This version incorporates the appendix into document (rather than as supplementary material), corrects a minor error in Lemma 1, and fixes some type-os

ACM Class: I.2.6; I.2.8

Journal ref: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2597-2603 (2017)

State of the Art Control of Atari Games Using Shallow Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Yitao Liang, Marlos C. Machado, Erik Talvitie, Michael Bowling

Abstract: The recently introduced Deep Q-Networks (DQN) algorithm has gained attention as one of the first successful combinations of deep neural networks and reinforcement learning. Its promise was demonstrated in the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE), a challenging framework composed of dozens of Atari 2600 games used to evaluate general competency in AI. It achieved dramatically better results than earli… ▽ More The recently introduced Deep Q-Networks (DQN) algorithm has gained attention as one of the first successful combinations of deep neural networks and reinforcement learning. Its promise was demonstrated in the Arcade Learning Environment (ALE), a challenging framework composed of dozens of Atari 2600 games used to evaluate general competency in AI. It achieved dramatically better results than earlier approaches, showing that its ability to learn good representations is quite robust and general. This paper attempts to understand the principles that underlie DQN's impressive performance and to better contextualize its success. We systematically evaluate the importance of key representational biases encoded by DQN's network by proposing simple linear representations that make use of these concepts. Incorporating these characteristics, we obtain a computationally practical feature set that achieves competitive performance to DQN in the ALE. Besides offering insight into the strengths and weaknesses of DQN, we provide a generic representation for the ALE, significantly reducing the burden of learning a representation for each game. Moreover, we also provide a simple, reproducible benchmark for the sake of comparison to future work in the ALE. △ Less

Submitted 21 April, 2016; v1 submitted 4 December, 2015; originally announced December 2015.

Comments: A shorter version of this paper appears in the Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2016)

Learning to Make Predictions In Partially Observable Environments Without a Generative Model

Authors: Erik Talvitie, Satinder Singh

Abstract: When faced with the problem of learning a model of a high-dimensional environment, a common approach is to limit the model to make only a restricted set of predictions, thereby simplifying the learning problem. These partial models may be directly useful for making decisions or may be combined together to form a more complete, structured model. However, in partially observable (non-Markov) environ… ▽ More When faced with the problem of learning a model of a high-dimensional environment, a common approach is to limit the model to make only a restricted set of predictions, thereby simplifying the learning problem. These partial models may be directly useful for making decisions or may be combined together to form a more complete, structured model. However, in partially observable (non-Markov) environments, standard model-learning methods learn generative models, i.e. models that provide a probability distribution over all possible futures (such as POMDPs). It is not straightforward to restrict such models to make only certain predictions, and doing so does not always simplify the learning problem. In this paper we present prediction profile models: non-generative partial models for partially observable systems that make only a given set of predictions, and are therefore far simpler than generative models in some cases. We formalize the problem of learning a prediction profile model as a transformation of the original model-learning problem, and show empirically that one can learn prediction profile models that make a small set of important predictions even in systems that are too complex for standard generative models. △ Less

Submitted 16 January, 2014; originally announced January 2014.

Journal ref: Journal Of Artificial Intelligence Research, Volume 42, pages 353-392, 2011