SVC-onGoing: Signature Verification Competition
Authors:
Ruben Tolosana,
Ruben Vera-Rodriguez,
Carlos Gonzalez-Garcia,
Julian Fierrez,
Aythami Morales,
Javier Ortega-Garcia,
Juan Carlos Ruiz-Garcia,
Sergio Romero-Tapiador,
Santiago Rengifo,
Miguel Caruana,
Jiajia Jiang,
Songxuan Lai,
Lianwen **,
Yecheng Zhu,
Javier Galbally,
Moises Diaz,
Miguel Angel Ferrer,
Marta Gomez-Barrero,
Ilya Hodashinsky,
Konstantin Sarin,
Artem Slezkin,
Marina Bardamova,
Mikhail Svetlakov,
Mohammad Saleem,
Cintia Lia Szucs
, et al. (7 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This article presents SVC-onGoing, an on-going competition for on-line signature verification where researchers can easily benchmark their systems against the state of the art in an open common platform using large-scale public databases, such as DeepSignDB and SVC2021_EvalDB, and standard experimental protocols. SVC-onGoing is based on the ICDAR 2021 Competition on On-Line Signature Verification…
▽ More
This article presents SVC-onGoing, an on-going competition for on-line signature verification where researchers can easily benchmark their systems against the state of the art in an open common platform using large-scale public databases, such as DeepSignDB and SVC2021_EvalDB, and standard experimental protocols. SVC-onGoing is based on the ICDAR 2021 Competition on On-Line Signature Verification (SVC 2021), which has been extended to allow participants anytime. The goal of SVC-onGoing is to evaluate the limits of on-line signature verification systems on popular scenarios (office/mobile) and writing inputs (stylus/finger) through large-scale public databases. Three different tasks are considered in the competition, simulating realistic scenarios as both random and skilled forgeries are simultaneously considered on each task. The results obtained in SVC-onGoing prove the high potential of deep learning methods in comparison with traditional methods. In particular, the best signature verification system has obtained Equal Error Rate (EER) values of 3.33% (Task 1), 7.41% (Task 2), and 6.04% (Task 3). Future studies in the field should be oriented to improve the performance of signature verification systems on the challenging mobile scenarios of SVC-onGoing in which several mobile devices and the finger are used during the signature acquisition.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2022; v1 submitted 13 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
ICDAR 2021 Competition on On-Line Signature Verification
Authors:
Ruben Tolosana,
Ruben Vera-Rodriguez,
Carlos Gonzalez-Garcia,
Julian Fierrez,
Santiago Rengifo,
Aythami Morales,
Javier Ortega-Garcia,
Juan Carlos Ruiz-Garcia,
Sergio Romero-Tapiador,
Jiajia Jiang,
Songxuan Lai,
Lianwen **,
Yecheng Zhu,
Javier Galbally,
Moises Diaz,
Miguel Angel Ferrer,
Marta Gomez-Barrero,
Ilya Hodashinsky,
Konstantin Sarin,
Artem Slezkin,
Marina Bardamova,
Mikhail Svetlakov,
Mohammad Saleem,
Cintia Lia Szücs,
Bence Kovari
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper describes the experimental framework and results of the ICDAR 2021 Competition on On-Line Signature Verification (SVC 2021). The goal of SVC 2021 is to evaluate the limits of on-line signature verification systems on popular scenarios (office/mobile) and writing inputs (stylus/finger) through large-scale public databases. Three different tasks are considered in the competition, simulati…
▽ More
This paper describes the experimental framework and results of the ICDAR 2021 Competition on On-Line Signature Verification (SVC 2021). The goal of SVC 2021 is to evaluate the limits of on-line signature verification systems on popular scenarios (office/mobile) and writing inputs (stylus/finger) through large-scale public databases. Three different tasks are considered in the competition, simulating realistic scenarios as both random and skilled forgeries are simultaneously considered on each task. The results obtained in SVC 2021 prove the high potential of deep learning methods. In particular, the best on-line signature verification system of SVC 2021 obtained Equal Error Rate (EER) values of 3.33% (Task 1), 7.41% (Task 2), and 6.04% (Task 3).
SVC 2021 will be established as an on-going competition, where researchers can easily benchmark their systems against the state of the art in an open common platform using large-scale public databases such as DeepSignDB and SVC2021_EvalDB, and standard experimental protocols.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
