Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Swan, J E

Map** Eye Vergence Angle to the Depth of Real and Virtual Objects as an Objective Measure of Depth Perception

Authors: Mohammed Safayet Arefin, J. Edward Swan II, Russell Cohen Hoffing, Steven Thurman

Abstract: Recently, extended reality (XR) displays including augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) have integrated eye tracking capabilities, which could enable novel ways of interacting with XR content. The vergence angle of the eyes constantly changes according to the distance of fixated objects. Here we measured vergence angle for eye fixations on real and simulated target objects in three diff… ▽ More Recently, extended reality (XR) displays including augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) have integrated eye tracking capabilities, which could enable novel ways of interacting with XR content. The vergence angle of the eyes constantly changes according to the distance of fixated objects. Here we measured vergence angle for eye fixations on real and simulated target objects in three different environments: real objects in the real-world (real), virtual objects in the real-world (AR), and virtual objects in the virtual world (VR) using gaze data from an eye-tracking device. In a repeated-measures design with 13 participants, Gaze-measured Vergence Angle (GVA) was measured while participants fixated on targets at varying distances. As expected, results showed a significant main effect of target depth such that increasing GVA was associated with closer targets. However, there were consistent individual differences in baseline GVA. When these individual differences were controlled for, there was a small but statistically-significant main effect of environment (real, AR, VR). Importantly, GVA was stable with respect to the starting depth of previously fixated targets and invariant to directionality (convergence vs. divergence). In addition, GVA proved to be a more veridical depth estimate than subjective depth judgements. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2023; v1 submitted 12 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Color Blending in Outdoor Optical See-through AR: The Effect of Real-world Backgrounds on User Interface Color

Authors: Joseph L. Gabbard, J. Edward Swan II, Adam Zarger

Abstract: It has been noted anecdotally and through a small number of formal studies that ambient lighting conditions and dynamic real-world backgrounds affect the usability of optical see-through augmented reality (AR) displays; especially so in outdoor environments. Our previous work examined these effects using painted posters as representative real-world backgrounds. In this paper, we present a study th… ▽ More It has been noted anecdotally and through a small number of formal studies that ambient lighting conditions and dynamic real-world backgrounds affect the usability of optical see-through augmented reality (AR) displays; especially so in outdoor environments. Our previous work examined these effects using painted posters as representative real-world backgrounds. In this paper, we present a study that employs an experimental testbed that allows AR graphics to be overlaid onto real-world backgrounds as well as painted posters. Our results indicate that color blending effects of physical materials as backgrounds are nearly the same as their corresponding poster backgrounds, even though the colors of each pair are only a metameric match. More importantly, our results suggest that given the current capabilities of optical see-through head-mounted displays (oHMDs), the implications are, at a minimum, a reduced color gamut available to user interface (UI) designers. In worse cases, there are unknown or unexpected color interactions that no UI or system designers can plan for; significantly crippling the usability of the UI or altering the semantic interpretation of graphical elements. Further, our results support the concept of an adaptive AR system which can dynamically alter the color of UI elements based on predicted background color interactions. These interactions can be studied and predicted through methods such as those presented in this work. △ Less

Submitted 25 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Design, Assembly, Calibration, and Measurement of an Augmented Reality Haploscope

Authors: Nate Phillips, Kristen Massey, Mohammed Safayet Arefin, J. Edward Swan II

Abstract: A haploscope is an optical system which produces a carefully controlled virtual image. Since the development of Wheatstone's original stereoscope in 1838, haploscopes have been used to measure perceptual properties of human stereoscopic vision. This paper presents an augmented reality (AR) haploscope, which allows the viewing of virtual objects superimposed against the real world. Our lab has used… ▽ More A haploscope is an optical system which produces a carefully controlled virtual image. Since the development of Wheatstone's original stereoscope in 1838, haploscopes have been used to measure perceptual properties of human stereoscopic vision. This paper presents an augmented reality (AR) haploscope, which allows the viewing of virtual objects superimposed against the real world. Our lab has used generations of this device to make a careful series of perceptual measurements of AR phenomena, which have been described in publications over the previous 8 years. This paper systematically describes the design, assembly, calibration, and measurement of our AR haploscope. These methods have been developed and improved in our lab over the past 10 years. Despite the fact that 180 years have elapsed since the original report of Wheatstone's stereoscope, we have not previously found a paper that describes these kinds of details. △ Less

Submitted 21 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Comments: Accepted and presented at the IEEE VR 2018 Workshop on Perceptual and Cognitive Issues in AR (PERCAR); pre-print version

Journal ref: Proceedings of PERCAR: The Fifth IEEE Virtual Reality Workshop on Perceptual and Cognitive Issues in AR, 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, Osaka, Japan, March 23-27, pages 1770-1774, 2019

The Effect of Focal Distance, Age, and Brightness on Near-Field Augmented Reality Depth Matching

Authors: Gujot Singh, Stephen R. Ellis, J. Edward Swan II

Abstract: Many augmented reality (AR) applications operate within near-field reaching distances, and require matching the depth of a virtual object with a real object. The accuracy of this matching was measured in three experiments, which examined the effect of focal distance, age, and brightness, within distances of 33.3 to 50 cm, using a custom-built AR haploscope. Experiment I examined the effect of foca… ▽ More Many augmented reality (AR) applications operate within near-field reaching distances, and require matching the depth of a virtual object with a real object. The accuracy of this matching was measured in three experiments, which examined the effect of focal distance, age, and brightness, within distances of 33.3 to 50 cm, using a custom-built AR haploscope. Experiment I examined the effect of focal demand, at the levels of collimated (infinite focal distance), consistent with other depth cues, and at the midpoint of reaching distance. Observers were too young to exhibit age-related reductions in accommodative ability. The depth matches of collimated targets were increasingly overestimated with increasing distance, consistent targets were slightly underestimated, and midpoint targets were accurately estimated. Experiment II replicated Experiment I, with older observers. Results were similar to Experiment I. Experiment III replicated Experiment I with dimmer targets, using young observers. Results were again consistent with Experiment I, except that both consistent and midpoint targets were accurately estimated. In all cases, collimated results were explained by a model, where the collimation biases the eyes' vergence angle outwards by a constant amount. Focal demand and brightness affect near-field AR depth matching, while age-related reductions in accommodative ability have no effect. △ Less

Submitted 30 November, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

Comments: 14 pages, 18 figures

A Survey of Calibration Methods for Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays

Authors: Jens Grubert, Yuta Itoh, Kenneth Moser, J. Edward Swan II

Abstract: Optical see-through head-mounted displays (OST HMDs) are a major output medium for Augmented Reality, which have seen significant growth in popularity and usage among the general public due to the growing release of consumer-oriented models, such as the Microsoft Hololens. Unlike Virtual Reality headsets, OST HMDs inherently support the addition of computer-generated graphics directly into the lig… ▽ More Optical see-through head-mounted displays (OST HMDs) are a major output medium for Augmented Reality, which have seen significant growth in popularity and usage among the general public due to the growing release of consumer-oriented models, such as the Microsoft Hololens. Unlike Virtual Reality headsets, OST HMDs inherently support the addition of computer-generated graphics directly into the light path between a user's eyes and their view of the physical world. As with most Augmented and Virtual Reality systems, the physical position of an OST HMD is typically determined by an external or embedded 6-Degree-of-Freedom tracking system. However, in order to properly render virtual objects, which are perceived as spatially aligned with the physical environment, it is also necessary to accurately measure the position of the user's eyes within the tracking system's coordinate frame. For over 20 years, researchers have proposed various calibration methods to determine this needed eye position. However, to date, there has not been a comprehensive overview of these procedures and their requirements. Hence, this paper surveys the field of calibration methods for OST HMDs. Specifically, it provides insights into the fundamentals of calibration techniques, and presents an overview of both manual and automatic approaches, as well as evaluation methods and metrics. Finally, it also identifies opportunities for future research. % relative to the tracking coordinate system, and, hence, its position in 3D space. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.