-
MedShapeNet -- A Large-Scale Dataset of 3D Medical Shapes for Computer Vision
Authors:
Jianning Li,
Zongwei Zhou,
Jiancheng Yang,
Antonio Pepe,
Christina Gsaxner,
Gijs Luijten,
Chongyu Qu,
Tiezheng Zhang,
Xiaoxi Chen,
Wenxuan Li,
Marek Wodzinski,
Paul Friedrich,
Kangxian Xie,
Yuan **,
Narmada Ambigapathy,
Enrico Nasca,
Naida Solak,
Gian Marco Melito,
Viet Duc Vu,
Afaque R. Memon,
Christopher Schlachta,
Sandrine De Ribaupierre,
Rajnikant Patel,
Roy Eagleson,
Xiaojun Chen
, et al. (132 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Prior to the deep learning era, shape was commonly used to describe the objects. Nowadays, state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms in medical imaging are predominantly diverging from computer vision, where voxel grids, meshes, point clouds, and implicit surface models are used. This is seen from numerous shape-related publications in premier vision conferences as well as the growing popularity of Shape…
▽ More
Prior to the deep learning era, shape was commonly used to describe the objects. Nowadays, state-of-the-art (SOTA) algorithms in medical imaging are predominantly diverging from computer vision, where voxel grids, meshes, point clouds, and implicit surface models are used. This is seen from numerous shape-related publications in premier vision conferences as well as the growing popularity of ShapeNet (about 51,300 models) and Princeton ModelNet (127,915 models). For the medical domain, we present a large collection of anatomical shapes (e.g., bones, organs, vessels) and 3D models of surgical instrument, called MedShapeNet, created to facilitate the translation of data-driven vision algorithms to medical applications and to adapt SOTA vision algorithms to medical problems. As a unique feature, we directly model the majority of shapes on the imaging data of real patients. As of today, MedShapeNet includes 23 dataset with more than 100,000 shapes that are paired with annotations (ground truth). Our data is freely accessible via a web interface and a Python application programming interface (API) and can be used for discriminative, reconstructive, and variational benchmarks as well as various applications in virtual, augmented, or mixed reality, and 3D printing. Exemplary, we present use cases in the fields of classification of brain tumors, facial and skull reconstructions, multi-class anatomy completion, education, and 3D printing. In future, we will extend the data and improve the interfaces. The project pages are: https://medshapenet.ikim.nrw/ and https://github.com/Jianningli/medshapenet-feedback
△ Less
Submitted 12 December, 2023; v1 submitted 30 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
The MICCAI Hackathon on reproducibility, diversity, and selection of papers at the MICCAI conference
Authors:
Fabian Balsiger,
Alain Jungo,
Naren Akash R J,
Jianan Chen,
Ivan Ezhov,
Shengnan Liu,
Jun Ma,
Johannes C. Paetzold,
Vishva Saravanan R,
Anjany Sekuboyina,
Suprosanna Shit,
Yannick Suter,
Moshood Yekini,
Guodong Zeng,
Markus Rempfler
Abstract:
The MICCAI conference has encountered tremendous growth over the last years in terms of the size of the community, as well as the number of contributions and their technical success. With this growth, however, come new challenges for the community. Methods are more difficult to reproduce and the ever-increasing number of paper submissions to the MICCAI conference poses new questions regarding the…
▽ More
The MICCAI conference has encountered tremendous growth over the last years in terms of the size of the community, as well as the number of contributions and their technical success. With this growth, however, come new challenges for the community. Methods are more difficult to reproduce and the ever-increasing number of paper submissions to the MICCAI conference poses new questions regarding the selection process and the diversity of topics. To exchange, discuss, and find novel and creative solutions to these challenges, a new format of a hackathon was initiated as a satellite event at the MICCAI 2020 conference: The MICCAI Hackathon. The first edition of the MICCAI Hackathon covered the topics reproducibility, diversity, and selection of MICCAI papers. In the manner of a small think-tank, participants collaborated to find solutions to these challenges. In this report, we summarize the insights from the MICCAI Hackathon into immediate and long-term measures to address these challenges. The proposed measures can be seen as starting points and guidelines for discussions and actions to possibly improve the MICCAI conference with regards to reproducibility, diversity, and selection of papers.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2021; v1 submitted 4 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Deep Learning versus Classical Regression for Brain Tumor Patient Survival Prediction
Authors:
Yannick Suter,
Alain Jungo,
Michael Rebsamen,
Urspeter Knecht,
Evelyn Herrmann,
Roland Wiest,
Mauricio Reyes
Abstract:
Deep learning for regression tasks on medical imaging data has shown promising results. However, compared to other approaches, their power is strongly linked to the dataset size. In this study, we evaluate 3D-convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and classical regression methods with hand-crafted features for survival time regression of patients with high grade brain tumors. The tested CNNs for reg…
▽ More
Deep learning for regression tasks on medical imaging data has shown promising results. However, compared to other approaches, their power is strongly linked to the dataset size. In this study, we evaluate 3D-convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and classical regression methods with hand-crafted features for survival time regression of patients with high grade brain tumors. The tested CNNs for regression showed promising but unstable results. The best performing deep learning approach reached an accuracy of 51.5% on held-out samples of the training set. All tested deep learning experiments were outperformed by a Support Vector Classifier (SVC) using 30 radiomic features. The investigated features included intensity, shape, location and deep features. The submitted method to the BraTS 2018 survival prediction challenge is an ensemble of SVCs, which reached a cross-validated accuracy of 72.2% on the BraTS 2018 training set, 57.1% on the validation set, and 42.9% on the testing set. The results suggest that more training data is necessary for a stable performance of a CNN model for direct regression from magnetic resonance images, and that non-imaging clinical patient information is crucial along with imaging information.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
Identifying the Best Machine Learning Algorithms for Brain Tumor Segmentation, Progression Assessment, and Overall Survival Prediction in the BRATS Challenge
Authors:
Spyridon Bakas,
Mauricio Reyes,
Andras Jakab,
Stefan Bauer,
Markus Rempfler,
Alessandro Crimi,
Russell Takeshi Shinohara,
Christoph Berger,
Sung Min Ha,
Martin Rozycki,
Marcel Prastawa,
Esther Alberts,
Jana Lipkova,
John Freymann,
Justin Kirby,
Michel Bilello,
Hassan Fathallah-Shaykh,
Roland Wiest,
Jan Kirschke,
Benedikt Wiestler,
Rivka Colen,
Aikaterini Kotrotsou,
Pamela Lamontagne,
Daniel Marcus,
Mikhail Milchenko
, et al. (402 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles dissem…
▽ More
Gliomas are the most common primary brain malignancies, with different degrees of aggressiveness, variable prognosis and various heterogeneous histologic sub-regions, i.e., peritumoral edematous/invaded tissue, necrotic core, active and non-enhancing core. This intrinsic heterogeneity is also portrayed in their radio-phenotype, as their sub-regions are depicted by varying intensity profiles disseminated across multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans, reflecting varying biological properties. Their heterogeneous shape, extent, and location are some of the factors that make these tumors difficult to resect, and in some cases inoperable. The amount of resected tumor is a factor also considered in longitudinal scans, when evaluating the apparent tumor for potential diagnosis of progression. Furthermore, there is mounting evidence that accurate segmentation of the various tumor sub-regions can offer the basis for quantitative image analysis towards prediction of patient overall survival. This study assesses the state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) methods used for brain tumor image analysis in mpMRI scans, during the last seven instances of the International Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenge, i.e., 2012-2018. Specifically, we focus on i) evaluating segmentations of the various glioma sub-regions in pre-operative mpMRI scans, ii) assessing potential tumor progression by virtue of longitudinal growth of tumor sub-regions, beyond use of the RECIST/RANO criteria, and iii) predicting the overall survival from pre-operative mpMRI scans of patients that underwent gross total resection. Finally, we investigate the challenge of identifying the best ML algorithms for each of these tasks, considering that apart from being diverse on each instance of the challenge, the multi-institutional mpMRI BraTS dataset has also been a continuously evolving/growing dataset.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2019; v1 submitted 5 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
