Municipal cyber risk modeling using cryptographic computing to inform cyber policymaking
Authors:
Avital Baral,
Taylor Reynolds,
Lawrence Susskind,
Daniel J. Weitzner,
Angelina Wu
Abstract:
Municipalities are vulnerable to cyberattacks with devastating consequences, but they lack key information to evaluate their own risk and compare their security posture to peers. Using data from 83 municipalities collected via a cryptographically secure computation platform about their security posture, incidents, security control failures, and losses, we build data-driven cyber risk models and cy…
▽ More
Municipalities are vulnerable to cyberattacks with devastating consequences, but they lack key information to evaluate their own risk and compare their security posture to peers. Using data from 83 municipalities collected via a cryptographically secure computation platform about their security posture, incidents, security control failures, and losses, we build data-driven cyber risk models and cyber security benchmarks for municipalities. We produce benchmarks of the security posture in a sector, the frequency of cyber incidents, forecasted annual losses for organizations based on their defensive posture, and a weighting of cyber controls based on their individual failure rates and associated losses. Combined, these four items can help guide cyber policymaking by quantifying the cyber risk in a sector, identifying gaps that need to be addressed, prioritizing policy interventions, and tracking progress of those interventions over time. In the case of the municipalities, these newly derived risk measures highlight the need for continuous measured improvement of cybersecurity readiness, show clear areas of weakness and strength, and provide governments with some early targets for policy focus such as security education, incident response, and focusing efforts first on municipalities at the lowest security levels that have the highest risk reduction per security dollar invested.
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2024; v1 submitted 1 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
Cyber Crossroads: A Global Research Collaborative on Cyber Risk Governance
Authors:
Gregory Falco,
Paul Cornish,
Sadie Creese,
Madeline Carr,
Myriam Dunn Cavelty,
Claudia Eckert,
Herbert Lin,
Gen Goto,
Jamie Saunders,
Andrew Grotto,
Howard Shrobe,
Sean Kanuck,
Lawrence Susskind,
Arvind Parthasarathi
Abstract:
Spending on cybersecurity products and services is expected to top 123 billion U.S. dollars for 2020, more than double the 55 billion U.S. dollars spent in 2011.1 In that same period, cyber breaches quadrupled. Organizations globally face increasing liabilities, while boards of directors grapple with a seemingly Sisyphean challenge. Cyber Crossroads was born out of these alarming trends and a real…
▽ More
Spending on cybersecurity products and services is expected to top 123 billion U.S. dollars for 2020, more than double the 55 billion U.S. dollars spent in 2011.1 In that same period, cyber breaches quadrupled. Organizations globally face increasing liabilities, while boards of directors grapple with a seemingly Sisyphean challenge. Cyber Crossroads was born out of these alarming trends and a realization that the world cannot go on funneling finite resources into an indefinite, intractable problem. Cyber Crossroads brings together expertise from across the world, spanning aspects of the cyber problem (including technology, legal, risk, and economic) with the goal of creating a Cyber Standard of Care built through a global, not-for-profit research collaborative with no commercial interests. A Cyber Standard of Care should be applicable across industries and regardless of the organization size. It should be practical and implementable, with no requirement to purchase any product/service. Cyber Standard of Care should be woven into the existing governance fabric of the organization and it should not be yet another technical checklist, but a process/governance framework that can stand over time. To achieve this, we engaged with cyber risk experts and practitioners with a variety of relevant expertise, secured the advice/guidance of regulators and legal experts across jurisdictions, and interviewed leaders from 56 organizations globally to understand their challenges and identify best practices.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
