Showing 1–50 of 65 results for author: Suomela, J

Local Advice and Local Decompression

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Fabian Kuhn, Krzysztof Nowicki, Dennis Olivetti, Eva Rotenberg, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Algorithms with advice have received ample attention in the distributed and online settings, and they have recently proven useful also in dynamic settings. In this work we study local computation with advice: the goal is to solve a graph problem $Π$ with a distributed algorithm in $f(Δ)$ communication rounds, for some function $f$ that only depends on the maximum degree $Δ$ of the graph, and the k… ▽ More Algorithms with advice have received ample attention in the distributed and online settings, and they have recently proven useful also in dynamic settings. In this work we study local computation with advice: the goal is to solve a graph problem $Π$ with a distributed algorithm in $f(Δ)$ communication rounds, for some function $f$ that only depends on the maximum degree $Δ$ of the graph, and the key question is how many bits of advice per node are needed. Our main results are: - Any locally checkable labeling problem can be solved in graphs with sub-exponential growth with only $1$ bit of advice per node. Moreover, we can make the set of nodes that carry advice bits arbitrarily sparse, that is, we can make arbitrarily small the ratio between nodes carrying a 1 and the nodes carrying a 0. - The assumption of sub-exponential growth is necessary: assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, there are LCLs that cannot be solved in general with any constant number of bits per node. - In any graph we can find an almost-balanced orientation (indegrees and outdegrees differ by at most one) with $1$ bit of advice per node, and again we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. - As a corollary, we can also compress an arbitrary subset of edges so that a node of degree $d$ stores only $d/2 + 2$ bits, and we can decompress it locally, in $f(Δ)$ rounds. - In any graph of maximum degree $Δ$, we can find a $Δ$-coloring (if it exists) with $1$ bit of advice per node, and again, we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. - In any $3$-colorable graph, we can find a $3$-coloring with $1$ bit of advice per node. Here, it remains open whether we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. Our work shows that for many problems the key threshold is not whether we can achieve, say, $1$ bit of advice per node, but whether we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Low-Bandwidth Matrix Multiplication: Faster Algorithms and More General Forms of Sparsity

Authors: Chetan Gupta, Janne H. Korhonen, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela, Hossein Vahidi

Abstract: In prior work, Gupta et al. (SPAA 2022) presented a distributed algorithm for multiplying sparse $n \times n$ matrices, using $n$ computers. They assumed that the input matrices are uniformly sparse--there are at most $d$ non-zeros in each row and column--and the task is to compute a uniformly sparse part of the product matrix. The sparsity structure is globally known in advance (this is the suppo… ▽ More In prior work, Gupta et al. (SPAA 2022) presented a distributed algorithm for multiplying sparse $n \times n$ matrices, using $n$ computers. They assumed that the input matrices are uniformly sparse--there are at most $d$ non-zeros in each row and column--and the task is to compute a uniformly sparse part of the product matrix. The sparsity structure is globally known in advance (this is the supported setting). As input, each computer receives one row of each input matrix, and each computer needs to output one row of the product matrix. In each communication round each computer can send and receive one $O(\log n)$-bit message. Their algorithm solves this task in $O(d^{1.907})$ rounds, while the trivial bound is $O(d^2)$. We improve on the prior work in two dimensions: First, we show that we can solve the same task faster, in only $O(d^{1.832})$ rounds. Second, we explore what happens when matrices are not uniformly sparse. We consider the following alternative notions of sparsity: row-sparse matrices (at most $d$ non-zeros per row), column-sparse matrices, matrices with bounded degeneracy (we can recursively delete a row or column with at most $d$ non-zeros), average-sparse matrices (at most $dn$ non-zeros in total), and general matrices. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

ACM Class: F.2.1; F.2.2

Online Locality Meets Distributed Quantum Computing

Authors: Amirreza Akbari, Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Francesco d'Amore, François Le Gall, Henrik Lievonen, Darya Melnyk, Augusto Modanese, Shreyas Pai, Marc-Olivier Renou, Václav Rozhoň, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We extend the theory of locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) from the classical LOCAL model to a number of other models that have been studied recently, including the quantum-LOCAL model, finitely-dependent processes, non-signaling model, dynamic-LOCAL model, and online-LOCAL model [e.g. STOC 2024, ICALP 2023]. First, we demonstrate the advantage that finitely-dependent processes have over… ▽ More We extend the theory of locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) from the classical LOCAL model to a number of other models that have been studied recently, including the quantum-LOCAL model, finitely-dependent processes, non-signaling model, dynamic-LOCAL model, and online-LOCAL model [e.g. STOC 2024, ICALP 2023]. First, we demonstrate the advantage that finitely-dependent processes have over the classical LOCAL model. We show that all LCL problems solvable with locality $O(\log^\star n)$ in the LOCAL model admit a finitely-dependent distribution (with constant locality). In particular, this gives a finitely-dependent coloring for regular trees, answering an open question by Holroyd [2023]. This also introduces a new formal barrier for understanding the distributed quantum advantage: it is not possible to exclude quantum advantage for any LCL in the $Θ(\log^\star n)$ complexity class by using non-signaling arguments. Second, we put limits on the capabilities of all of these models. To this end, we introduce a model called randomized online-LOCAL, which is strong enough to simulate e.g. SLOCAL and dynamic-LOCAL, and we show that it is also strong enough to simulate any non-signaling distribution and hence any quantum-LOCAL algorithm. We prove the following result for rooted trees: if we can solve an LCL problem with locality $o(\log \log n)$ in the randomized online-LOCAL model, we can solve it with locality $O(\log^\star n)$ in the classical deterministic LOCAL model. Put together, these results show that in rooted trees the set of LCLs that can be solved with locality $O(\log^\star n)$ is the same across all these models: classical deterministic and randomized LOCAL, quantum-LOCAL, non-signaling model, dynamic-LOCAL, and deterministic and randomized online-LOCAL. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2024; v1 submitted 4 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: 60 pages, 10 figures. This version corrects a mistake in v1

Distributed Binary Labeling Problems in High-Degree Graphs

Authors: Henrik Lievonen, Timothé Picavet, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Balliu et al. (DISC 2020) classified the hardness of solving binary labeling problems with distributed graph algorithms; in these problems the task is to select a subset of edges in a $2$-colored tree in which white nodes of degree $d$ and black nodes of degree $δ$ have constraints on the number of selected incident edges. They showed that the deterministic round complexity of any such problem is… ▽ More Balliu et al. (DISC 2020) classified the hardness of solving binary labeling problems with distributed graph algorithms; in these problems the task is to select a subset of edges in a $2$-colored tree in which white nodes of degree $d$ and black nodes of degree $δ$ have constraints on the number of selected incident edges. They showed that the deterministic round complexity of any such problem is $O_{d,δ}(1)$, $Θ_{d,δ}(\log n)$, or $Θ_{d,δ}(n)$, or the problem is unsolvable. However, their classification only addresses complexity as a function of $n$; here $O_{d,δ}$ hides constants that may depend on parameters $d$ and $δ$. In this work we study the complexity of binary labeling problems as a function of all three parameters: $n$, $d$, and $δ$. To this end, we introduce the family of structurally simple problems, which includes, among others, all binary labeling problems in which cardinality constraints can be represented with a context-free grammar. We classify possible complexities of structurally simple problems. As our main result, we show that if the complexity of a problem falls in the broad class of $Θ_{d,δ}(\log n)$, then the complexity for each $d$ and $δ$ is always either $Θ(\log_d n)$, $Θ(\log_δn)$, or $Θ(\log n)$. To prove our upper bounds, we introduce a new, more aggressive version of the rake-and-compress technique that benefits from high-degree nodes. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

No distributed quantum advantage for approximate graph coloring

Authors: Xavier Coiteux-Roy, Francesco d'Amore, Rishikesh Gajjala, Fabian Kuhn, François Le Gall, Henrik Lievonen, Augusto Modanese, Marc-Olivier Renou, Gustav Schmid, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We give an almost complete characterization of the hardness of $c$-coloring $χ$-chromatic graphs with distributed algorithms, for a wide range of models of distributed computing. In particular, we show that these problems do not admit any distributed quantum advantage. To do that: 1) We give a new distributed algorithm that finds a $c$-coloring in $χ$-chromatic graphs in… ▽ More We give an almost complete characterization of the hardness of $c$-coloring $χ$-chromatic graphs with distributed algorithms, for a wide range of models of distributed computing. In particular, we show that these problems do not admit any distributed quantum advantage. To do that: 1) We give a new distributed algorithm that finds a $c$-coloring in $χ$-chromatic graphs in $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(n^{\frac{1}α})$ rounds, with $α= \bigl\lfloor\frac{c-1}{χ- 1}\bigr\rfloor$. 2) We prove that any distributed algorithm for this problem requires $Ω(n^{\frac{1}α})$ rounds. Our upper bound holds in the classical, deterministic LOCAL model, while the near-matching lower bound holds in the non-signaling model. This model, introduced by Arfaoui and Fraigniaud in 2014, captures all models of distributed graph algorithms that obey physical causality; this includes not only classical deterministic LOCAL and randomized LOCAL but also quantum-LOCAL, even with a pre-shared quantum state. We also show that similar arguments can be used to prove that, e.g., 3-coloring 2-dimensional grids or $c$-coloring trees remain hard problems even for the non-signaling model, and in particular do not admit any quantum advantage. Our lower-bound arguments are purely graph-theoretic at heart; no background on quantum information theory is needed to establish the proofs. △ Less

Submitted 22 March, 2024; v1 submitted 18 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: Accepted to STOC 2024

Distributed derandomization revisited

Authors: Sameep Dahal, Francesco d'Amore, Henrik Lievonen, Timothé Picavet, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: One of the cornerstones of the distributed complexity theory is the derandomization result by Chang, Kopelowitz, and Pettie [FOCS 2016]: any randomized LOCAL algorithm that solves a locally checkable labeling problem (LCL) can be derandomized with at most exponential overhead. The original proof assumes that the number of random bits is bounded by some function of the input size. We give a new, si… ▽ More One of the cornerstones of the distributed complexity theory is the derandomization result by Chang, Kopelowitz, and Pettie [FOCS 2016]: any randomized LOCAL algorithm that solves a locally checkable labeling problem (LCL) can be derandomized with at most exponential overhead. The original proof assumes that the number of random bits is bounded by some function of the input size. We give a new, simple proof that does not make any such assumptions-it holds even if the randomized algorithm uses infinitely many bits. While at it, we also broaden the scope of the result so that it is directly applicable far beyond LCL problems. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2023; v1 submitted 12 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Fast Dynamic Programming in Trees in the MPC Model

Authors: Chetan Gupta, Rustam Latypov, Yannic Maus, Shreyas Pai, Simo Särkkä, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela, Jara Uitto, Hossein Vahidi

Abstract: We present a deterministic algorithm for solving a wide range of dynamic programming problems in trees in $O(\log D)$ rounds in the massively parallel computation model (MPC), with $O(n^δ)$ words of local memory per machine, for any given constant $0 < δ< 1$. Here $D$ is the diameter of the tree and $n$ is the number of nodes--we emphasize that our running time is independent of $n$. Our algorit… ▽ More We present a deterministic algorithm for solving a wide range of dynamic programming problems in trees in $O(\log D)$ rounds in the massively parallel computation model (MPC), with $O(n^δ)$ words of local memory per machine, for any given constant $0 < δ< 1$. Here $D$ is the diameter of the tree and $n$ is the number of nodes--we emphasize that our running time is independent of $n$. Our algorithm can solve many classical graph optimization problems such as maximum weight independent set, maximum weight matching, minimum weight dominating set, and minimum weight vertex cover. It can also be used to solve many accumulation tasks in which some aggregate information is propagated upwards or downwards in the tree--this includes, for example, computing the sum, minimum, or maximum of the input labels in each subtree, as well as many inference tasks commonly solved with belief propagation. Our algorithm can also solve any locally checkable labeling problem (LCLs) in trees. Our algorithm works for any reasonable representation of the input tree; for example, the tree can be represented as a list of edges or as a string with nested parentheses or tags. The running time of $O(\log D)$ rounds is also known to be necessary, assuming the widely-believed $2$-cycle conjecture. Our algorithm strictly improves on two prior algorithms: (i) Bateni, Behnezhad, Derakhshan, Hajiaghayi, and Mirrokni [ICALP'18] solve problems of these flavors in $O(\log n)$ rounds, while our algorithm is much faster in low-diameter trees. Furthermore, their algorithm also uses randomness, while our algorithm is deterministic. (ii) Balliu, Latypov, Maus, Olivetti, and Uitto [SODA'23] solve only locally checkable labeling problems in $O(\log D)$ rounds, while our algorithm can be applied to a much broader family of problems. △ Less

Submitted 5 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Distributed Half-Integral Matching and Beyond

Authors: Sameep Dahal, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: By prior work, it is known that any distributed graph algorithm that finds a maximal matching requires $Ω(\log^* n)$ communication rounds, while it is possible to find a maximal fractional matching in $O(1)$ rounds in bounded-degree graphs. However, all prior $O(1)$-round algorithms for maximal fractional matching use arbitrarily fine-grained fractional values. In particular, none of them is able… ▽ More By prior work, it is known that any distributed graph algorithm that finds a maximal matching requires $Ω(\log^* n)$ communication rounds, while it is possible to find a maximal fractional matching in $O(1)$ rounds in bounded-degree graphs. However, all prior $O(1)$-round algorithms for maximal fractional matching use arbitrarily fine-grained fractional values. In particular, none of them is able to find a half-integral solution, using only values from $\{0, \frac12, 1\}$. We show that the use of fine-grained fractional values is necessary, and moreover we give a complete characterization on exactly how small values are needed: if we consider maximal fractional matching in graphs of maximum degree $Δ= 2d$, and any distributed graph algorithm with round complexity $T(Δ)$ that only depends on $Δ$ and is independent of $n$, we show that the algorithm has to use fractional values with a denominator at least $2^d$. We give a new algorithm that shows that this is also sufficient. △ Less

Submitted 16 July, 2023; v1 submitted 9 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Mending Partial Solutions with Few Changes

Authors: Darya Melnyk, Jukka Suomela, Neven Villani

Abstract: In this paper, we study the notion of mending, i.e. given a partial solution to a graph problem, we investigate how much effort is needed to turn it into a proper solution. For example, if we have a partial coloring of a graph, how hard is it to turn it into a proper coloring? In prior work (SIROCCO 2022), this question was formalized and studied from the perspective of mending radius: if there… ▽ More In this paper, we study the notion of mending, i.e. given a partial solution to a graph problem, we investigate how much effort is needed to turn it into a proper solution. For example, if we have a partial coloring of a graph, how hard is it to turn it into a proper coloring? In prior work (SIROCCO 2022), this question was formalized and studied from the perspective of mending radius: if there is a hole that we need to patch, how far do we need to modify the solution? In this work, we investigate a complementary notion of mending volume: how many nodes need to be modified to patch a hole? We focus on the case of locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) in trees, and show that already in this setting there are two infinite hierarchies of problems: for infinitely many values $0 < α\le 1$, there is an LCL problem with mending volume $Θ(n^α)$, and for infinitely many values $k \ge 1$, there is an LCL problem with mending volume $Θ(\log^k n)$. Hence the mendability of LCL problems on trees is a much more fine-grained question than what one would expect based on the mending radius alone. We define three variants of the theme: (1) existential mending volume, i.e., how many nodes need to be modified, (2) expected mending volume, i.e., how many nodes we need to explore to find a patch if we use randomness, and (3) deterministic mending volume, i.e., how many nodes we need to explore if we use a deterministic algorithm. We show that all three notions are distinct from each other, and we analyze the landscape of the complexities of LCL problems for the respective models. △ Less

Submitted 12 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Sparse Matrix Multiplication in the Low-Bandwidth Model

Authors: Chetan Gupta, Juho Hirvonen, Janne H. Korhonen, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We study matrix multiplication in the low-bandwidth model: There are $n$ computers, and we need to compute the product of two $n \times n$ matrices. Initially computer $i$ knows row $i$ of each input matrix. In one communication round each computer can send and receive one $O(\log n)$-bit message. Eventually computer $i$ has to output row $i$ of the product matrix. We seek to understand the comp… ▽ More We study matrix multiplication in the low-bandwidth model: There are $n$ computers, and we need to compute the product of two $n \times n$ matrices. Initially computer $i$ knows row $i$ of each input matrix. In one communication round each computer can send and receive one $O(\log n)$-bit message. Eventually computer $i$ has to output row $i$ of the product matrix. We seek to understand the complexity of this problem in the uniformly sparse case: each row and column of each input matrix has at most $d$ non-zeros and in the product matrix we only need to know the values of at most $d$ elements in each row or column. This is exactly the setting that we have, e.g., when we apply matrix multiplication for triangle detection in graphs of maximum degree $d$. We focus on the supported setting: the structure of the matrices is known in advance; only the numerical values of nonzero elements are unknown. There is a trivial algorithm that solves the problem in $O(d^2)$ rounds, but for a large $d$, better algorithms are known to exist; in the moderately dense regime the problem can be solved in $O(dn^{1/3})$ communication rounds, and for very large $d$, the dominant solution is the fast matrix multiplication algorithm using $O(n^{1.158})$ communication rounds (for matrix multiplication over fields and rings supporting fast matrix multiplication). In this work we show that it is possible to overcome quadratic barrier for all values of $d$: we present an algorithm that solves the problem in $O(d^{1.907})$ rounds for fields and rings supporting fast matrix multiplication and $O(d^{1.927})$ rounds for semirings, independent of $n$. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2022; v1 submitted 2 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Efficient Classification of Locally Checkable Problems in Regular Trees

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Yi-Jun Chang, Dennis Olivetti, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We give practical, efficient algorithms that automatically determine the asymptotic distributed round complexity of a given locally checkable graph problem in the $[Θ(\log n), Θ(n)]$ region, in two settings. We present one algorithm for unrooted regular trees and another algorithm for rooted regular trees. The algorithms take the description of a locally checkable labeling problem as input, and th… ▽ More We give practical, efficient algorithms that automatically determine the asymptotic distributed round complexity of a given locally checkable graph problem in the $[Θ(\log n), Θ(n)]$ region, in two settings. We present one algorithm for unrooted regular trees and another algorithm for rooted regular trees. The algorithms take the description of a locally checkable labeling problem as input, and the running time is polynomial in the size of the problem description. The algorithms decide if the problem is solvable in $O(\log n)$ rounds. If not, it is known that the complexity has to be $Θ(n^{1/k})$ for some $k = 1, 2, \dotsc$, and in this case the algorithms also output the right value of the exponent $k$. In rooted trees in the $O(\log n)$ case we can then further determine the exact complexity class by using algorithms from prior work; for unrooted trees the more fine-grained classification in the $O(\log n)$ region remains an open question. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2022; v1 submitted 17 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Locality in online, dynamic, sequential, and distributed graph algorithms

Authors: Amirreza Akbari, Navid Eslami, Henrik Lievonen, Darya Melnyk, Joona Särkijärvi, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: In this work, we give a unifying view of locality in four settings: distributed algorithms, sequential greedy algorithms, dynamic algorithms, and online algorithms. We introduce a new model of computing, called the online-LOCAL model: the adversary reveals the nodes of the input graph one by one, in the same way as in classical online algorithms, but for each new node we get to see its radius-T ne… ▽ More In this work, we give a unifying view of locality in four settings: distributed algorithms, sequential greedy algorithms, dynamic algorithms, and online algorithms. We introduce a new model of computing, called the online-LOCAL model: the adversary reveals the nodes of the input graph one by one, in the same way as in classical online algorithms, but for each new node we get to see its radius-T neighborhood before choosing the output. We compare the online-LOCAL model with three other models: the LOCAL model of distributed computing, where each node produces its output based on its radius-T neighborhood, its sequential counterpart SLOCAL, and the dynamic-LOCAL model, where changes in the dynamic input graph only influence the radius-T neighborhood of the point of change. The SLOCAL and dynamic-LOCAL models are sandwiched between the LOCAL and online-LOCAL models, with LOCAL being the weakest and online-LOCAL the strongest model. In general, all models are distinct, but we study in particular locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs), which is a family of graph problems studied in the context of distributed graph algorithms. We prove that for LCL problems in paths, cycles, and rooted trees, all models are roughly equivalent: the locality of any LCL problem falls in the same broad class - $O(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ - in all four models. In particular, this result enables one to generalize prior lower-bound results from the LOCAL model to all four models, and it also allows one to simulate e.g. dynamic-LOCAL algorithms efficiently in the LOCAL model. We also show that this equivalence does not hold in general bipartite graphs. We provide an online-LOCAL algorithm with locality $O(\log n)$ for the $3$-coloring problem in bipartite graphs - this is a problem with locality $Ω(n^{1/2})$ in the LOCAL model and $Ω(n^{1/10})$ in the SLOCAL model. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2022; v1 submitted 14 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Sinkless Orientation Made Simple

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Janne H. Korhonen, Fabian Kuhn, Henrik Lievonen, Dennis Olivetti, Shreyas Pai, Ami Paz, Joel Rybicki, Stefan Schmid, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela, Jara Uitto

Abstract: The sinkless orientation problem plays a key role in understanding the foundations of distributed computing. The problem can be used to separate two fundamental models of distributed graph algorithms, LOCAL and SLOCAL: the locality of sinkless orientation is $Ω(\log n)$ in the deterministic LOCAL model and $O(\log \log n)$ in the deterministic SLOCAL model. Both of these results are known by prior… ▽ More The sinkless orientation problem plays a key role in understanding the foundations of distributed computing. The problem can be used to separate two fundamental models of distributed graph algorithms, LOCAL and SLOCAL: the locality of sinkless orientation is $Ω(\log n)$ in the deterministic LOCAL model and $O(\log \log n)$ in the deterministic SLOCAL model. Both of these results are known by prior work, but here we give new simple, self-contained proofs for them. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2022; v1 submitted 5 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: Parts of this work appeared in DISC 2021 as a brief announcement, under the title "Sinkless orientation is hard also in the supported LOCAL model"

Locally Checkable Labelings with Small Messages

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Keren Censor-Hillel, Yannic Maus, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: A rich line of work has been addressing the computational complexity of locally checkable labelings (LCLs), illustrating the landscape of possible complexities. In this paper, we study the landscape of LCL complexities under bandwidth restrictions. Our main results are twofold. First, we show that on trees, the CONGEST complexity of an LCL problem is asymptotically equal to its complexity in the L… ▽ More A rich line of work has been addressing the computational complexity of locally checkable labelings (LCLs), illustrating the landscape of possible complexities. In this paper, we study the landscape of LCL complexities under bandwidth restrictions. Our main results are twofold. First, we show that on trees, the CONGEST complexity of an LCL problem is asymptotically equal to its complexity in the LOCAL model. An analog statement for general (non-LCL) problems is known to be false. Second, we show that for general graphs this equivalence does not hold, by providing an LCL problem for which we show that it can be solved in $O(\log n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model, but requires $\tildeΩ(n^{1/2})$ rounds in the CONGEST model. △ Less

Submitted 16 May, 2021; v1 submitted 12 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: fixed typos

Temporal Locality in Online Algorithms

Authors: Maciej Pacut, Mahmoud Parham, Joel Rybicki, Stefan Schmid, Jukka Suomela, Aleksandr Tereshchenko

Abstract: Online algorithms make decisions based on past inputs. In general, the decision may depend on the entire history of inputs. If many computers run the same online algorithm with the same input stream but are started at different times, they do not necessarily make consistent decisions. In this work we introduce time-local online algorithms. These are online algorithms where the output at a given… ▽ More Online algorithms make decisions based on past inputs. In general, the decision may depend on the entire history of inputs. If many computers run the same online algorithm with the same input stream but are started at different times, they do not necessarily make consistent decisions. In this work we introduce time-local online algorithms. These are online algorithms where the output at a given time only depends on $T = O(1)$ latest inputs. The use of (deterministic) time-local algorithms in a distributed setting automatically leads to globally consistent decisions. Our key observation is that time-local online algorithms (in which the output at a given time only depends on local inputs in the temporal dimension) are closely connected to local distributed graph algorithms (in which the output of a given node only depends on local inputs in the spatial dimension). This makes it possible to interpret prior work on distributed graph algorithms from the perspective of online algorithms. We describe an algorithm synthesis method that one can use to design optimal time-local online algorithms for small values of $T$. We demonstrate the power of the technique in the context of a variant of the online file migration problem, and show that e.g. for two nodes and unit migration costs there exists a $3$-competitive time-local algorithm with horizon $T=4$, while no deterministic online algorithm (in the classic sense) can do better. We also derive upper and lower bounds for a more general version of the problem; we show that there is a $6$-competitive deterministic time-local algorithm and a $2.62$-competitive randomized time-local algorithm for any migration cost $α\ge 1$. △ Less

Submitted 13 October, 2022; v1 submitted 18 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: 46 pages, 4 figures

Locally Checkable Problems in Rooted Trees

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Yi-Jun Chang, Dennis Olivetti, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela, Aleksandr Tereshchenko

Abstract: Consider any locally checkable labeling problem $Π$ in rooted regular trees: there is a finite set of labels $Σ$, and for each label $x \in Σ$ we specify what are permitted label combinations of the children for an internal node of label $x$ (the leaf nodes are unconstrained). This formalism is expressive enough to capture many classic problems studied in distributed computing, including vertex co… ▽ More Consider any locally checkable labeling problem $Π$ in rooted regular trees: there is a finite set of labels $Σ$, and for each label $x \in Σ$ we specify what are permitted label combinations of the children for an internal node of label $x$ (the leaf nodes are unconstrained). This formalism is expressive enough to capture many classic problems studied in distributed computing, including vertex coloring, edge coloring, and maximal independent set. We show that the distributed computational complexity of any such problem $Π$ falls in one of the following classes: it is $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ rounds in trees with $n$ nodes (and all of these classes are nonempty). We show that the complexity of any given problem is the same in all four standard models of distributed graph algorithms: deterministic $\mathsf{LOCAL}$, randomized $\mathsf{LOCAL}$, deterministic $\mathsf{CONGEST}$, and randomized $\mathsf{CONGEST}$ model. In particular, we show that randomness does not help in this setting, and the complexity class $Θ(\log \log n)$ does not exist (while it does exist in the broader setting of general trees). We also show how to systematically determine the complexity class of any such problem $Π$, i.e., whether $Π$ takes $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ rounds. While the algorithm may take exponential time in the size of the description of $Π$, it is nevertheless practical: we provide a freely available implementation of the classifier algorithm, and it is fast enough to classify many problems of interest. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2022; v1 submitted 18 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Local Mending

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Juho Hirvonen, Darya Melnyk, Dennis Olivetti, Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: In this work we introduce the graph-theoretic notion of mendability: for each locally checkable graph problem we can define its mending radius, which captures the idea of how far one needs to modify a partial solution in order to "patch a hole." We explore how mendability is connected to the existence of efficient algorithms, especially in distributed, parallel, and fault-tolerant settings. It i… ▽ More In this work we introduce the graph-theoretic notion of mendability: for each locally checkable graph problem we can define its mending radius, which captures the idea of how far one needs to modify a partial solution in order to "patch a hole." We explore how mendability is connected to the existence of efficient algorithms, especially in distributed, parallel, and fault-tolerant settings. It is easy to see that $O(1)$-mendable problems are also solvable in $O(\log^* n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. One of the surprises is that in paths and cycles, a converse also holds in the following sense: if a problem $Π$ can be solved in $O(\log^* n)$, there is always a restriction $Π' \subseteq Π$ that is still efficiently solvable but that is also $O(1)$-mendable. We also explore the structure of the landscape of mendability. For example, we show that in trees, the mending radius of any locally checkable problem is $O(1)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $Θ(n)$, while in general graphs the structure is much more diverse. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2021; v1 submitted 17 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Efficient Load-Balancing through Distributed Token Drop**

Authors: Sebastian Brandt, Barbara Keller, Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela, Jara Uitto

Abstract: We introduce a new graph problem, the token drop** game, and we show how to solve it efficiently in a distributed setting. We use the token drop** game as a tool to design an efficient distributed algorithm for stable orientations and more generally for locally optimal semi-matchings. The prior work by Czygrinow et al. (DISC 2012) finds a stable orientation in $O(Δ^5)$ rounds in graphs of maxi… ▽ More We introduce a new graph problem, the token drop** game, and we show how to solve it efficiently in a distributed setting. We use the token drop** game as a tool to design an efficient distributed algorithm for stable orientations and more generally for locally optimal semi-matchings. The prior work by Czygrinow et al. (DISC 2012) finds a stable orientation in $O(Δ^5)$ rounds in graphs of maximum degree $Δ$, while we improve it to $O(Δ^4)$ and also prove a lower bound of $Ω(Δ)$. △ Less

Submitted 17 February, 2021; v1 submitted 15 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: 19 pages, 3 figures, revised version

Distributed graph problems through an automata-theoretic lens

Authors: Yi-Jun Chang, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: The locality of a graph problem is the smallest distance $T$ such that each node can choose its own part of the solution based on its radius-$T$ neighborhood. In many settings, a graph problem can be solved efficiently with a distributed or parallel algorithm if and only if it has a small locality. In this work we seek to automate the study of solvability and locality: given the description of a… ▽ More The locality of a graph problem is the smallest distance $T$ such that each node can choose its own part of the solution based on its radius-$T$ neighborhood. In many settings, a graph problem can be solved efficiently with a distributed or parallel algorithm if and only if it has a small locality. In this work we seek to automate the study of solvability and locality: given the description of a graph problem $Π$, we would like to determine if $Π$ is solvable and what is the asymptotic locality of $Π$ as a function of the size of the graph. Put otherwise, we seek to automatically synthesize efficient distributed and parallel algorithms for solving $Π$. We focus on locally checkable graph problems; these are problems in which a solution is globally feasible if it looks feasible in all constant-radius neighborhoods. Prior work on such problems has brought primarily bad news: questions related to locality are undecidable in general, and even if we focus on the case of labeled paths and cycles, determining locality is $\mathsf{PSPACE}$-hard (Balliu et al., PODC 2019). We complement prior negative results with efficient algorithms for the cases of unlabeled paths and cycles and, as an extension, for rooted trees. We introduce a new automata-theoretic perspective for studying locally checkable graph problems. We represent a locally checkable problem $Π$ as a nondeterministic finite automaton $\mathcal{M}$ over a unary alphabet. We identify polynomial-time-computable properties of the automaton $\mathcal{M}$ that near-completely capture the solvability and locality of $Π$ in cycles and paths, with the exception of one specific case that is $\mbox{co-$\mathsf{NP}$}$-complete. △ Less

Submitted 13 December, 2021; v1 submitted 18 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Classification of distributed binary labeling problems

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Yuval Efron, Juho Hirvonen, Yannic Maus, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We present a complete classification of the deterministic distributed time complexity for a family of graph problems: binary labeling problems in trees. These are locally checkable problems that can be encoded with an alphabet of size two in the edge labeling formalism. Examples of binary labeling problems include sinkless orientation, sinkless and sourceless orientation, 2-vertex coloring, perfec… ▽ More We present a complete classification of the deterministic distributed time complexity for a family of graph problems: binary labeling problems in trees. These are locally checkable problems that can be encoded with an alphabet of size two in the edge labeling formalism. Examples of binary labeling problems include sinkless orientation, sinkless and sourceless orientation, 2-vertex coloring, perfect matching, and the task of coloring edges red and blue such that all nodes are incident to at least one red and at least one blue edge. More generally, we can encode e.g. any cardinality constraints on indegrees and outdegrees. We study the deterministic time complexity of solving a given binary labeling problem in trees, in the usual LOCAL model of distributed computing. We show that the complexity of any such problem is in one of the following classes: $O(1)$, $Θ(\log n)$, $Θ(n)$, or unsolvable. In particular, a problem that can be represented in the binary labeling formalism cannot have time complexity $Θ(\log^* n)$, and hence we know that e.g. any encoding of maximal matchings has to use at least three labels (which is tight). Furthermore, given the description of any binary labeling problem, we can easily determine in which of the four classes it is and what is an asymptotically optimal algorithm for solving it. Hence the distributed time complexity of binary labeling problems is decidable, not only in principle, but also in practice: there is a simple and efficient algorithm that takes the description of a binary labeling problem and outputs its distributed time complexity. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2020; v1 submitted 29 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Seeing Far vs. Seeing Wide: Volume Complexity of Local Graph Problems

Authors: Will Rosenbaum, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Consider a graph problem that is locally checkable but not locally solvable: given a solution we can check that it is feasible by verifying all constant-radius neighborhoods, but to find a solution each node needs to explore the input graph at least up to distance $Ω(\log n)$ in order to produce its output. We consider the complexity of such problems from the perspective of volume: how large a sub… ▽ More Consider a graph problem that is locally checkable but not locally solvable: given a solution we can check that it is feasible by verifying all constant-radius neighborhoods, but to find a solution each node needs to explore the input graph at least up to distance $Ω(\log n)$ in order to produce its output. We consider the complexity of such problems from the perspective of volume: how large a subgraph does a node need to see in order to produce its output. We study locally checkable graph problems on bounded-degree graphs. We give a number of constructions that exhibit tradeoffs between deterministic distance, randomized distance, deterministic volume, and randomized volume: - If the deterministic distance is linear, it is also known that randomized distance is near-linear. In contrast, we show that there are problems with linear deterministic volume but only logarithmic randomized volume. - We prove a volume hierarchy theorem for randomized complexity: among problems with linear deterministic volume complexity, there are infinitely many distinct randomized volume complexity classes between $Ω(\log n)$ and $O(n)$. This hierarchy persists even when restricting to problems whose randomized and deterministic distance complexities are $Θ(\log n)$. - Similar hierarchies exist for polynomial distance complexities: for any $k, \ell \in N$ with $k \leq \ell$, there are problems whose randomized and deterministic distance complexities are $Θ(n^{1/\ell})$, randomized volume complexities are $Θ(n^{1/k})$, and whose deterministic volume complexities are $Θ(n)$. Additionally, we consider connections between our volume model and massively parallel computation (MPC). We give a general simulation argument that any volume-efficient algorithm can be transformed into a space-efficient MPC algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 17 February, 2020; v1 submitted 18 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: various improvement; expanded discussion of MPC model and simulation; more open questions and directions for further research

Locality of not-so-weak coloring

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Juho Hirvonen, Christoph Lenzen, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Many graph problems are locally checkable: a solution is globally feasible if it looks valid in all constant-radius neighborhoods. This idea is formalized in the concept of locally checkable labelings (LCLs), introduced by Naor and Stockmeyer (1995). Recently, Chang et al. (2016) showed that in bounded-degree graphs, every LCL problem belongs to one of the following classes: - "Easy": solvable i… ▽ More Many graph problems are locally checkable: a solution is globally feasible if it looks valid in all constant-radius neighborhoods. This idea is formalized in the concept of locally checkable labelings (LCLs), introduced by Naor and Stockmeyer (1995). Recently, Chang et al. (2016) showed that in bounded-degree graphs, every LCL problem belongs to one of the following classes: - "Easy": solvable in $O(\log^* n)$ rounds with both deterministic and randomized distributed algorithms. - "Hard": requires at least $Ω(\log n)$ rounds with deterministic and $Ω(\log \log n)$ rounds with randomized distributed algorithms. Hence for any parameterized LCL problem, when we move from local problems towards global problems, there is some point at which complexity suddenly jumps from easy to hard. For example, for vertex coloring in $d$-regular graphs it is now known that this jump is at precisely $d$ colors: coloring with $d+1$ colors is easy, while coloring with $d$ colors is hard. However, it is currently poorly understood where this jump takes place when one looks at defective colorings. To study this question, we define $k$-partial $c$-coloring as follows: nodes are labeled with numbers between $1$ and $c$, and every node is incident to at least $k$ properly colored edges. It is known that $1$-partial $2$-coloring (a.k.a. weak $2$-coloring) is easy for any $d \ge 1$. As our main result, we show that $k$-partial $2$-coloring becomes hard as soon as $k \ge 2$, no matter how large a $d$ we have. We also show that this is fundamentally different from $k$-partial $3$-coloring: no matter which $k \ge 3$ we choose, the problem is always hard for $d = k$ but it becomes easy when $d \gg k$. The same was known previously for partial $c$-coloring with $c \ge 4$, but the case of $c < 4$ was open. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

How much does randomness help with locally checkable problems?

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) are distributed graph problems in which a solution is globally feasible if it is locally feasible in all constant-radius neighborhoods. Vertex colorings, maximal independent sets, and maximal matchings are examples of LCLs. On the one hand, it is known that some LCLs benefit exponentially from randomness---for example, any deterministic distributed algo… ▽ More Locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) are distributed graph problems in which a solution is globally feasible if it is locally feasible in all constant-radius neighborhoods. Vertex colorings, maximal independent sets, and maximal matchings are examples of LCLs. On the one hand, it is known that some LCLs benefit exponentially from randomness---for example, any deterministic distributed algorithm that finds a sinkless orientation requires $Θ(\log n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model, while the randomized complexity of the problem is $Θ(\log \log n)$ rounds. On the other hand, there are also many LCLs in which randomness is useless. Previously, it was not known if there are any LCLs that benefit from randomness, but only subexponentially. We show that such problems exist: for example, there is an LCL with deterministic complexity $Θ(\log^2 n)$ rounds and randomized complexity $Θ(\log n \log \log n)$ rounds. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2020; v1 submitted 18 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Lower bounds for maximal matchings and maximal independent sets

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Juho Hirvonen, Dennis Olivetti, Mikaël Rabie, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: There are distributed graph algorithms for finding maximal matchings and maximal independent sets in $O(Δ+ \log^* n)$ communication rounds; here $n$ is the number of nodes and $Δ$ is the maximum degree. The lower bound by Linial (1987, 1992) shows that the dependency on $n$ is optimal: these problems cannot be solved in $o(\log^* n)$ rounds even if $Δ= 2$. However, the dependency on $Δ$ is a long-… ▽ More There are distributed graph algorithms for finding maximal matchings and maximal independent sets in $O(Δ+ \log^* n)$ communication rounds; here $n$ is the number of nodes and $Δ$ is the maximum degree. The lower bound by Linial (1987, 1992) shows that the dependency on $n$ is optimal: these problems cannot be solved in $o(\log^* n)$ rounds even if $Δ= 2$. However, the dependency on $Δ$ is a long-standing open question, and there is currently an exponential gap between the upper and lower bounds. We prove that the upper bounds are tight. We show that any algorithm that finds a maximal matching or maximal independent set with probability at least $1-1/n$ requires $Ω(\min\{Δ,\log \log n / \log \log \log n\})$ rounds in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. As a corollary, it follows that any deterministic algorithm that finds a maximal matching or maximal independent set requires $Ω(\min\{Δ, \log n / \log \log n\})$ rounds; this is an improvement over prior lower bounds also as a function of $n$. △ Less

Submitted 10 December, 2021; v1 submitted 8 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

On the Power of Preprocessing in Decentralized Network Optimization

Authors: Klaus-Tycho Foerster, Juho Hirvonen, Stefan Schmid, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: As communication networks are growing at a fast pace, the need for more scalable approaches to operate such networks is pressing. Decentralization and locality are key concepts to provide scalability. Existing models for which local algorithms are designed fail to model an important aspect of many modern communication networks such as software-defined networks: the possibility to precompute distri… ▽ More As communication networks are growing at a fast pace, the need for more scalable approaches to operate such networks is pressing. Decentralization and locality are key concepts to provide scalability. Existing models for which local algorithms are designed fail to model an important aspect of many modern communication networks such as software-defined networks: the possibility to precompute distributed network state. We take this as an opportunity to study the fundamental question of how and to what extent local algorithms can benefit from preprocessing. In particular, we show that preprocessing allows for significant speedups of various networking problems. A main benefit is the precomputation of structural primitives, where purely distributed algorithms have to start from scratch. Maybe surprisingly, we also show that there are strict limitations on how much preprocessing can help in different scenarios. To this end, we provide approximation bounds for the maximum independent set problem---which however show that our obtained speedups are asymptotically optimal. Even though we show that physical link failures in general hinder the power of preprocessing, we can still facilitate the precomputation of symmetry breaking processes to bypass various runtime barriers. We believe that our model and results are of interest beyond the scope of this paper and apply to other dynamic networks as well. △ Less

Submitted 3 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

The distributed complexity of locally checkable problems on paths is decidable

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Yi-Jun Chang, Dennis Olivetti, Mikaël Rabie, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Consider a computer network that consists of a path with $n$ nodes. The nodes are labeled with inputs from a constant-sized set, and the task is to find output labels from a constant-sized set subject to some local constraints---more formally, we have an LCL (locally checkable labeling) problem. How many communication rounds are needed (in the standard LOCAL model of computing) to solve this probl… ▽ More Consider a computer network that consists of a path with $n$ nodes. The nodes are labeled with inputs from a constant-sized set, and the task is to find output labels from a constant-sized set subject to some local constraints---more formally, we have an LCL (locally checkable labeling) problem. How many communication rounds are needed (in the standard LOCAL model of computing) to solve this problem? It is well known that the answer is always either $O(1)$ rounds, or $Θ(\log^* n)$ rounds, or $Θ(n)$ rounds. In this work we show that this question is decidable (albeit PSPACE-hard): we present an algorithm that, given any LCL problem defined on a path, outputs the distributed computational complexity of this problem and the corresponding asymptotically optimal algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2019; v1 submitted 5 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Hardness of minimal symmetry breaking in distributed computing

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Juho Hirvonen, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: A graph is weakly $2$-colored if the nodes are labeled with colors black and white such that each black node is adjacent to at least one white node and vice versa. In this work we study the distributed computational complexity of weak $2$-coloring in the standard LOCAL model of distributed computing, and how it is related to the distributed computational complexity of other graph problems. First,… ▽ More A graph is weakly $2$-colored if the nodes are labeled with colors black and white such that each black node is adjacent to at least one white node and vice versa. In this work we study the distributed computational complexity of weak $2$-coloring in the standard LOCAL model of distributed computing, and how it is related to the distributed computational complexity of other graph problems. First, we show that weak $2$-coloring is a minimal distributed symmetry-breaking problem for regular even-degree trees and high-girth graphs: if there is any non-trivial locally checkable labeling problem that is solvable in $o(\log^* n)$ rounds with a distributed graph algorithm in the middle of a regular even-degree tree, then weak $2$-coloring is also solvable in $o(\log^* n)$ rounds there. Second, we prove a tight lower bound of $Ω(\log^* n)$ for the distributed computational complexity of weak $2$-coloring in regular trees; previously only a lower bound of $Ω(\log \log^* n)$ was known. By minimality, the same lower bound holds for any non-trivial locally checkable problem inside regular even-degree trees. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2019; v1 submitted 5 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Almost Global Problems in the LOCAL Model

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: The landscape of the distributed time complexity is nowadays well-understood for subpolynomial complexities. When we look at deterministic algorithms in the LOCAL model and locally checkable problems (LCLs) in bounded-degree graphs, the following picture emerges: - There are lots of problems with time complexities of $Θ(\log^* n)$ or $Θ(\log n)$. - It is not possible to have a problem with com… ▽ More The landscape of the distributed time complexity is nowadays well-understood for subpolynomial complexities. When we look at deterministic algorithms in the LOCAL model and locally checkable problems (LCLs) in bounded-degree graphs, the following picture emerges: - There are lots of problems with time complexities of $Θ(\log^* n)$ or $Θ(\log n)$. - It is not possible to have a problem with complexity between $ω(\log^* n)$ and $o(\log n)$. - In general graphs, we can construct LCL problems with infinitely many complexities between $ω(\log n)$ and $n^{o(1)}$. - In trees, problems with such complexities do not exist. However, the high end of the complexity spectrum was left open by prior work. In general graphs there are LCL problems with complexities of the form $Θ(n^α)$ for any rational $0 < α\le 1/2$, while for trees only complexities of the form $Θ(n^{1/k})$ are known. No LCL problem with complexity between $ω(\sqrt{n})$ and $o(n)$ is known, and neither are there results that would show that such problems do not exist. We show that: - In general graphs, we can construct LCL problems with infinitely many complexities between $ω(\sqrt{n})$ and $o(n)$. - In trees, problems with such complexities do not exist. Put otherwise, we show that any LCL with a complexity $o(n)$ can be solved in time $O(\sqrt{n})$ in trees, while the same is not true in general graphs. △ Less

Submitted 25 March, 2020; v1 submitted 12 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Distributed Recoloring

Authors: Marthe Bonamy, Paul Ouvrard, Mikaël Rabie, Jukka Suomela, Jara Uitto

Abstract: Given two colorings of a graph, we consider the following problem: can we recolor the graph from one coloring to the other through a series of elementary changes, such that the graph is properly colored after each step? We introduce the notion of distributed recoloring: The input graph represents a network of computers that needs to be recolored. Initially, each node is aware of its own input co… ▽ More Given two colorings of a graph, we consider the following problem: can we recolor the graph from one coloring to the other through a series of elementary changes, such that the graph is properly colored after each step? We introduce the notion of distributed recoloring: The input graph represents a network of computers that needs to be recolored. Initially, each node is aware of its own input color and target color. The nodes can exchange messages with each other, and eventually each node has to stop and output its own recoloring schedule, indicating when and how the node changes its color. The recoloring schedules have to be globally consistent so that the graph remains properly colored at each point, and we require that adjacent nodes do not change their colors simultaneously. We are interested in the following questions: How many communication rounds are needed (in the LOCAL model of distributed computing) to find a recoloring schedule? What is the length of the recoloring schedule? And how does the picture change if we can use extra colors to make recoloring easier? The main contributions of this work are related to distributed recoloring with one extra color in the following graph classes: trees, $3$-regular graphs, and toroidal grids. △ Less

Submitted 17 January, 2019; v1 submitted 19 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

New Classes of Distributed Time Complexity

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Juho Hirvonen, Janne H. Korhonen, Tuomo Lempiäinen, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: A number of recent papers -- e.g. Brandt et al. (STOC 2016), Chang et al. (FOCS 2016), Ghaffari & Su (SODA 2017), Brandt et al. (PODC 2017), and Chang & Pettie (FOCS 2017) -- have advanced our understanding of one of the most fundamental questions in theory of distributed computing: what are the possible time complexity classes of LCL problems in the LOCAL model? In essence, we have a graph proble… ▽ More A number of recent papers -- e.g. Brandt et al. (STOC 2016), Chang et al. (FOCS 2016), Ghaffari & Su (SODA 2017), Brandt et al. (PODC 2017), and Chang & Pettie (FOCS 2017) -- have advanced our understanding of one of the most fundamental questions in theory of distributed computing: what are the possible time complexity classes of LCL problems in the LOCAL model? In essence, we have a graph problem $Π$ in which a solution can be verified by checking all radius-$O(1)$ neighbourhoods, and the question is what is the smallest $T$ such that a solution can be computed so that each node chooses its own output based on its radius-$T$ neighbourhood. Here $T$ is the distributed time complexity of $Π$. The time complexity classes for deterministic algorithms in bounded-degree graphs that are known to exist by prior work are $Θ(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, $Θ(n^{1/k})$, and $Θ(n)$. It is also known that there are two gaps: one between $ω(1)$ and $o(\log \log^* n)$, and another between $ω(\log^* n)$ and $o(\log n)$. It has been conjectured that many more gaps exist, and that the overall time hierarchy is relatively simple -- indeed, this is known to be the case in restricted graph families such as cycles and grids. We show that the picture is much more diverse than previously expected. We present a general technique for engineering LCL problems with numerous different deterministic time complexities, including $Θ(\log^αn)$ for any $α\ge1$, $2^{Θ(\log^αn)}$ for any $α\le 1$, and $Θ(n^α)$ for any $α<1/2$ in the high end of the complexity spectrum, and $Θ(\log^α\log^* n)$ for any $α\ge 1$, $\smash{2^{Θ(\log^α\log^* n)}}$ for any $α\le 1$, and $Θ((\log^* n)^α)$ for any $α\le 1$ in the low end; here $α$ is a positive rational number. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2018; v1 submitted 6 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Distributed Colour Reduction Revisited

Authors: Jukka Kohonen, Janne H. Korhonen, Christopher Purcell, Jukka Suomela, Przemysław Uznański

Abstract: We give a new, simple distributed algorithm for graph colouring in paths and cycles. Our algorithm is fast and self-contained, it does not need any globally consistent orientation, and it reduces the number of colours from $10^{100}$ to $3$ in three iterations. We give a new, simple distributed algorithm for graph colouring in paths and cycles. Our algorithm is fast and self-contained, it does not need any globally consistent orientation, and it reduces the number of colours from $10^{100}$ to $3$ in three iterations. △ Less

Submitted 4 September, 2017; originally announced September 2017.

MSC Class: 68W15 ACM Class: C.2.4

Improved Distributed Degree Splitting and Edge Coloring

Authors: Mohsen Ghaffari, Juho Hirvonen, Fabian Kuhn, Yannic Maus, Jukka Suomela, Jara Uitto

Abstract: The degree splitting problem requires coloring the edges of a graph red or blue such that each node has almost the same number of edges in each color, up to a small additive discrepancy. The directed variant of the problem requires orienting the edges such that each node has almost the same number of incoming and outgoing edges, again up to a small additive discrepancy. We present deterministic… ▽ More The degree splitting problem requires coloring the edges of a graph red or blue such that each node has almost the same number of edges in each color, up to a small additive discrepancy. The directed variant of the problem requires orienting the edges such that each node has almost the same number of incoming and outgoing edges, again up to a small additive discrepancy. We present deterministic distributed algorithms for both variants, which improve on their counterparts presented by Ghaffari and Su [SODA'17]: our algorithms are significantly simpler and faster, and have a much smaller discrepancy. This also leads to a faster and simpler deterministic algorithm for $(2+o(1))Δ$-edge-coloring, improving on that of Ghaffari and Su. △ Less

Submitted 3 January, 2019; v1 submitted 15 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Constant Space and Non-Constant Time in Distributed Computing

Authors: Tuomo Lempiäinen, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: While the relationship of time and space is an established topic in traditional centralised complexity theory, this is not the case in distributed computing. We aim to remedy this by studying the time and space complexity of algorithms in a weak message-passing model of distributed computing. While a constant number of communication rounds implies a constant number of states visited during the exe… ▽ More While the relationship of time and space is an established topic in traditional centralised complexity theory, this is not the case in distributed computing. We aim to remedy this by studying the time and space complexity of algorithms in a weak message-passing model of distributed computing. While a constant number of communication rounds implies a constant number of states visited during the execution, the other direction is not clear at all. We consider several graph families and show that indeed, there exist non-trivial graph problems that are solvable by constant-space algorithms but that require a non-constant running time. This provides us with a new complexity class for distributed computing and raises interesting questions about the existence of further combinations of time and space complexity. △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: 13 pages, 1 figure

MSC Class: 68Q15 (Primary) 68Q25 (Secondary) ACM Class: F.1.3; F.2.2

Towards a complexity theory for the congested clique

Authors: Janne H. Korhonen, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: The congested clique model of distributed computing has been receiving attention as a model for densely connected distributed systems. While there has been significant progress on the side of upper bounds, we have very little in terms of lower bounds for the congested clique; indeed, it is now know that proving explicit congested clique lower bounds is as difficult as proving circuit lower bounds.… ▽ More The congested clique model of distributed computing has been receiving attention as a model for densely connected distributed systems. While there has been significant progress on the side of upper bounds, we have very little in terms of lower bounds for the congested clique; indeed, it is now know that proving explicit congested clique lower bounds is as difficult as proving circuit lower bounds. In this work, we use various more traditional complexity-theoretic tools to build a clearer picture of the complexity landscape of the congested clique: -- Nondeterminism and beyond: We introduce the nondeterministic congested clique model (analogous to NP) and show that there is a natural canonical problem family that captures all problems solvable in constant time with nondeterministic algorithms. We further generalise these notions by introducing the constant-round decision hierarchy (analogous to the polynomial hierarchy). -- Non-constructive lower bounds: We lift the prior non-uniform counting arguments to a general technique for proving non-constructive uniform lower bounds for the congested clique. In particular, we prove a time hierarchy theorem for the congested clique, showing that there are decision problems of essentially all complexities, both in the deterministic and nondeterministic settings. -- Fine-grained complexity: We map out relationships between various natural problems in the congested clique model, arguing that a reduction-based complexity theory currently gives us a fairly good picture of the complexity landscape of the congested clique. △ Less

Submitted 24 April, 2018; v1 submitted 9 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

LCL problems on grids

Authors: Sebastian Brandt, Juho Hirvonen, Janne H. Korhonen, Tuomo Lempiäinen, Patric R. J. Östergård, Christopher Purcell, Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela, Przemysław Uznański

Abstract: LCLs or locally checkable labelling problems (e.g. maximal independent set, maximal matching, and vertex colouring) in the LOCAL model of computation are very well-understood in cycles (toroidal 1-dimensional grids): every problem has a complexity of $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, or $Θ(n)$, and the design of optimal algorithms can be fully automated. This work develops the complexity theory of LCL prob… ▽ More LCLs or locally checkable labelling problems (e.g. maximal independent set, maximal matching, and vertex colouring) in the LOCAL model of computation are very well-understood in cycles (toroidal 1-dimensional grids): every problem has a complexity of $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, or $Θ(n)$, and the design of optimal algorithms can be fully automated. This work develops the complexity theory of LCL problems for toroidal 2-dimensional grids. The complexity classes are the same as in the 1-dimensional case: $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, and $Θ(n)$. However, given an LCL problem it is undecidable whether its complexity is $Θ(\log^* n)$ or $Θ(n)$ in 2-dimensional grids. Nevertheless, if we correctly guess that the complexity of a problem is $Θ(\log^* n)$, we can completely automate the design of optimal algorithms. For any problem we can find an algorithm that is of a normal form $A' \circ S_k$, where $A'$ is a finite function, $S_k$ is an algorithm for finding a maximal independent set in $k$th power of the grid, and $k$ is a constant. Finally, partially with the help of automated design tools, we classify the complexity of several concrete LCL problems related to colourings and orientations. △ Less

Submitted 24 May, 2017; v1 submitted 17 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Randomized algorithms for finding a majority element

Authors: Paweł Gawrychowski, Jukka Suomela, Przemysław Uznański

Abstract: Given $n$ colored balls, we want to detect if more than $\lfloor n/2\rfloor$ of them have the same color, and if so find one ball with such majority color. We are only allowed to choose two balls and compare their colors, and the goal is to minimize the total number of such operations. A well-known exercise is to show how to find such a ball with only $2n$ comparisons while using only a logarithmi… ▽ More Given $n$ colored balls, we want to detect if more than $\lfloor n/2\rfloor$ of them have the same color, and if so find one ball with such majority color. We are only allowed to choose two balls and compare their colors, and the goal is to minimize the total number of such operations. A well-known exercise is to show how to find such a ball with only $2n$ comparisons while using only a logarithmic number of bits for bookkee**. The resulting algorithm is called the Boyer--Moore majority vote algorithm. It is known that any deterministic method needs $\lceil 3n/2\rceil-2$ comparisons in the worst case, and this is tight. However, it is not clear what is the required number of comparisons if we allow randomization. We construct a randomized algorithm which always correctly finds a ball of the majority color (or detects that there is none) using, with high probability, only $7n/6+o(n)$ comparisons. We also prove that the expected number of comparisons used by any such randomized method is at least $1.019n$. △ Less

Submitted 28 April, 2016; v1 submitted 4 March, 2016; originally announced March 2016.

Non-Local Probes Do Not Help with Graph Problems

Authors: Mika Göös, Juho Hirvonen, Reut Levi, Moti Medina, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: This work bridges the gap between distributed and centralised models of computing in the context of sublinear-time graph algorithms. A priori, typical centralised models of computing (e.g., parallel decision trees or centralised local algorithms) seem to be much more powerful than distributed message-passing algorithms: centralised algorithms can directly probe any part of the input, while in dist… ▽ More This work bridges the gap between distributed and centralised models of computing in the context of sublinear-time graph algorithms. A priori, typical centralised models of computing (e.g., parallel decision trees or centralised local algorithms) seem to be much more powerful than distributed message-passing algorithms: centralised algorithms can directly probe any part of the input, while in distributed algorithms nodes can only communicate with their immediate neighbours. We show that for a large class of graph problems, this extra freedom does not help centralised algorithms at all: for example, efficient stateless deterministic centralised local algorithms can be simulated with efficient distributed message-passing algorithms. In particular, this enables us to transfer existing lower bound results from distributed algorithms to centralised local algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 16 December, 2015; originally announced December 2015.

Improved Approximation Algorithms for Relay Placement

Authors: Alon Efrat, Sándor P. Fekete, Joseph S. B. Mitchell, Valentin Polishchuk, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: In the relay placement problem the input is a set of sensors and a number $r \ge 1$, the communication range of a relay. In the one-tier version of the problem the objective is to place a minimum number of relays so that between every pair of sensors there is a path through sensors and/or relays such that the consecutive vertices of the path are within distance $r$ if both vertices are relays and… ▽ More In the relay placement problem the input is a set of sensors and a number $r \ge 1$, the communication range of a relay. In the one-tier version of the problem the objective is to place a minimum number of relays so that between every pair of sensors there is a path through sensors and/or relays such that the consecutive vertices of the path are within distance $r$ if both vertices are relays and within distance 1 otherwise. The two-tier version adds the restrictions that the path must go through relays, and not through sensors. We present a 3.11-approximation algorithm for the one-tier version and a PTAS for the two-tier version. We also show that the one-tier version admits no PTAS, assuming P $\ne$ NP. △ Less

Submitted 8 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Comments: 1+29 pages, 12 figures

A Lower Bound for the Distributed Lovász Local Lemma

Authors: Sebastian Brandt, Orr Fischer, Juho Hirvonen, Barbara Keller, Tuomo Lempiäinen, Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela, Jara Uitto

Abstract: We show that any randomised Monte Carlo distributed algorithm for the Lovász local lemma requires $Ω(\log \log n)$ communication rounds, assuming that it finds a correct assignment with high probability. Our result holds even in the special case of $d = O(1)$, where $d$ is the maximum degree of the dependency graph. By prior work, there are distributed algorithms for the Lovász local lemma with a… ▽ More We show that any randomised Monte Carlo distributed algorithm for the Lovász local lemma requires $Ω(\log \log n)$ communication rounds, assuming that it finds a correct assignment with high probability. Our result holds even in the special case of $d = O(1)$, where $d$ is the maximum degree of the dependency graph. By prior work, there are distributed algorithms for the Lovász local lemma with a running time of $O(\log n)$ rounds in bounded-degree graphs, and the best lower bound before our work was $Ω(\log^* n)$ rounds [Chung et al. 2014]. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2015; originally announced November 2015.

Comments: 17 pages, 3 figures

Efficient counting with optimal resilience

Authors: Christoph Lenzen, Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Consider a complete communication network of $n$ nodes, where the nodes receive a common clock pulse. We study the synchronous $c$-counting problem: given any starting state and up to $f$ faulty nodes with arbitrary behaviour, the task is to eventually have all correct nodes labeling the pulses with increasing values modulo $c$ in agreement. Thus, we are considering algorithms that are self-stabil… ▽ More Consider a complete communication network of $n$ nodes, where the nodes receive a common clock pulse. We study the synchronous $c$-counting problem: given any starting state and up to $f$ faulty nodes with arbitrary behaviour, the task is to eventually have all correct nodes labeling the pulses with increasing values modulo $c$ in agreement. Thus, we are considering algorithms that are self-stabilising despite Byzantine failures. In this work, we give new algorithms for the synchronous counting problem that (1) are deterministic, (2) have optimal resilience, (3) have a linear stabilisation time in $f$ (asymptotically optimal), (4) use a small number of states, and consequently, (5) communicate a small number of bits per round. Prior algorithms either resort to randomisation, use a large number of states and need high communication bandwidth, or have suboptimal resilience. In particular, we achieve an exponential improvement in both state complexity and message size for deterministic algorithms. Moreover, we present two complementary approaches for reducing the number of bits communicated during and after stabilisation. △ Less

Submitted 18 May, 2017; v1 submitted 11 August, 2015; originally announced August 2015.

Comments: 25 pages, 1 figure. Extended and revised version of two conference reports

Node Labels in Local Decision

Authors: Pierre Fraigniaud, Juho Hirvonen, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: The role of unique node identifiers in network computing is well understood as far as symmetry breaking is concerned. However, the unique identifiers also leak information about the computing environment - in particular, they provide some nodes with information related to the size of the network. It was recently proved that in the context of local decision, there are some decision problems such th… ▽ More The role of unique node identifiers in network computing is well understood as far as symmetry breaking is concerned. However, the unique identifiers also leak information about the computing environment - in particular, they provide some nodes with information related to the size of the network. It was recently proved that in the context of local decision, there are some decision problems such that (1) they cannot be solved without unique identifiers, and (2) unique node identifiers leak a sufficient amount of information such that the problem becomes solvable (PODC 2013). In this work we give study what is the minimal amount of information that we need to leak from the environment to the nodes in order to solve local decision problems. Our key results are related to scalar oracles $f$ that, for any given $n$, provide a multiset $f(n)$ of $n$ labels; then the adversary assigns the labels to the $n$ nodes in the network. This is a direct generalisation of the usual assumption of unique node identifiers. We give a complete characterisation of the weakest oracle that leaks at least as much information as the unique identifiers. Our main result is the following dichotomy: we classify scalar oracles as large and small, depending on their asymptotic behaviour, and show that (1) any large oracle is at least as powerful as the unique identifiers in the context of local decision problems, while (2) for any small oracle there are local decision problems that still benefit from unique identifiers. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2015; originally announced July 2015.

Comments: Conference version to appear in the proceedings of SIROCCO 2015

Towards Optimal Synchronous Counting

Authors: Christoph Lenzen, Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Consider a complete communication network of $n$ nodes, where the nodes receive a common clock pulse. We study the synchronous $c$-counting problem: given any starting state and up to $f$ faulty nodes with arbitrary behaviour, the task is to eventually have all correct nodes counting modulo $c$ in agreement. Thus, we are considering algorithms that are self-stabilizing despite Byzantine failures.… ▽ More Consider a complete communication network of $n$ nodes, where the nodes receive a common clock pulse. We study the synchronous $c$-counting problem: given any starting state and up to $f$ faulty nodes with arbitrary behaviour, the task is to eventually have all correct nodes counting modulo $c$ in agreement. Thus, we are considering algorithms that are self-stabilizing despite Byzantine failures. In this work, we give new algorithms for the synchronous counting problem that (1) are deterministic, (2) have linear stabilisation time in $f$, (3) use a small number of states, and (4) achieve almost-optimal resilience. Prior algorithms either resort to randomisation, use a large number of states, or have poor resilience. In particular, we achieve an exponential improvement in the space complexity of deterministic algorithms, while still achieving linear stabilisation time and almost-linear resilience. △ Less

Submitted 23 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Comments: 17 pages, 2 figures

Algebraic Methods in the Congested Clique

Authors: Keren Censor-Hillel, Petteri Kaski, Janne H. Korhonen, Christoph Lenzen, Ami Paz, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: In this work, we use algebraic methods for studying distance computation and subgraph detection tasks in the congested clique model. Specifically, we adapt parallel matrix multiplication implementations to the congested clique, obtaining an $O(n^{1-2/ω})$ round matrix multiplication algorithm, where $ω< 2.3728639$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication. In conjunction with known techniques from… ▽ More In this work, we use algebraic methods for studying distance computation and subgraph detection tasks in the congested clique model. Specifically, we adapt parallel matrix multiplication implementations to the congested clique, obtaining an $O(n^{1-2/ω})$ round matrix multiplication algorithm, where $ω< 2.3728639$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication. In conjunction with known techniques from centralised algorithmics, this gives significant improvements over previous best upper bounds in the congested clique model. The highlight results include: -- triangle and 4-cycle counting in $O(n^{0.158})$ rounds, improving upon the $O(n^{1/3})$ triangle detection algorithm of Dolev et al. [DISC 2012], -- a $(1 + o(1))$-approximation of all-pairs shortest paths in $O(n^{0.158})$ rounds, improving upon the $\tilde{O} (n^{1/2})$-round $(2 + o(1))$-approximation algorithm of Nanongkai [STOC 2014], and -- computing the girth in $O(n^{0.158})$ rounds, which is the first non-trivial solution in this model. In addition, we present a novel constant-round combinatorial algorithm for detecting 4-cycles. △ Less

Submitted 17 March, 2015; originally announced March 2015.

Comments: This is work is a merger of arxiv:1412.2109 and arxiv:1412.2667

Exact bounds for distributed graph colouring

Authors: Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We prove exact bounds on the time complexity of distributed graph colouring. If we are given a directed path that is properly coloured with $n$ colours, by prior work it is known that we can find a proper 3-colouring in $\frac{1}{2} \log^*(n) \pm O(1)$ communication rounds. We close the gap between upper and lower bounds: we show that for infinitely many $n$ the time complexity is precisely… ▽ More We prove exact bounds on the time complexity of distributed graph colouring. If we are given a directed path that is properly coloured with $n$ colours, by prior work it is known that we can find a proper 3-colouring in $\frac{1}{2} \log^*(n) \pm O(1)$ communication rounds. We close the gap between upper and lower bounds: we show that for infinitely many $n$ the time complexity is precisely $\frac{1}{2} \log^* n$ communication rounds. △ Less

Submitted 26 February, 2015; v1 submitted 17 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: 16 pages, 3 figures

Locally Optimal Load Balancing

Authors: Laurent Feuilloley, Juho Hirvonen, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: This work studies distributed algorithms for locally optimal load-balancing: We are given a graph of maximum degree $Δ$, and each node has up to $L$ units of load. The task is to distribute the load more evenly so that the loads of adjacent nodes differ by at most $1$. If the graph is a path ($Δ= 2$), it is easy to solve the fractional version of the problem in $O(L)$ communication rounds, indep… ▽ More This work studies distributed algorithms for locally optimal load-balancing: We are given a graph of maximum degree $Δ$, and each node has up to $L$ units of load. The task is to distribute the load more evenly so that the loads of adjacent nodes differ by at most $1$. If the graph is a path ($Δ= 2$), it is easy to solve the fractional version of the problem in $O(L)$ communication rounds, independently of the number of nodes. We show that this is tight, and we show that it is possible to solve also the discrete version of the problem in $O(L)$ rounds in paths. For the general case ($Δ> 2$), we show that fractional load balancing can be solved in $\operatorname{poly}(L,Δ)$ rounds and discrete load balancing in $f(L,Δ)$ rounds for some function $f$, independently of the number of nodes. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Comments: 19 pages, 11 figures

Algebrisation in Distributed Graph Algorithms: Fast Matrix Multiplication in the Congested Clique

Authors: Petteri Kaski, Janne H. Korhonen, Christoph Lenzen, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: While algebrisation constitutes a powerful technique in the design and analysis of centralised algorithms, to date there have been hardly any applications of algebraic techniques in the context of distributed graph algorithms. This work is a case study that demonstrates the potential of algebrisation in the distributed context. We will focus on distributed graph algorithms in the congested clique… ▽ More While algebrisation constitutes a powerful technique in the design and analysis of centralised algorithms, to date there have been hardly any applications of algebraic techniques in the context of distributed graph algorithms. This work is a case study that demonstrates the potential of algebrisation in the distributed context. We will focus on distributed graph algorithms in the congested clique model; the graph problems that we will consider include, e.g., the triangle detection problem and the all-pairs shortest path problem (APSP). There is plenty of prior work on combinatorial algorithms in the congested clique model: for example, Dolev et al. (DISC 2012) gave an algorithm for triangle detection with a running time of $\tilde O(n^{1/3})$, and Nanongkai (STOC 2014) gave an approximation algorithm for APSP with a running time of $\tilde O(n^{1/2})$. In this work, we will use algebraic techniques -- in particular, algorithms based on fast matrix multiplication -- to solve both triangle detection and the unweighted APSP in time $O(n^{0.15715})$; for weighted APSP, we give a $(1+o(1))$-approximation with this running time, as well as an exact $\tilde O(n^{1/3})$ solution. △ Less

Submitted 18 March, 2015; v1 submitted 5 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

Comments: This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. This paper has been superseded by arXiv:1503.04963 (merged from arXiv:1412.2109 and arXiv:1412.2667)

Median Filtering is Equivalent to Sorting

Authors: Jukka Suomela

Abstract: This work shows that the following problems are equivalent, both in theory and in practice: - median filtering: given an $n$-element vector, compute the sliding window median with window size $k$, - piecewise sorting: given an $n$-element vector, divide it in $n/k$ blocks of length $k$ and sort each block. By prior work, median filtering is known to be at least as hard as piecewise sorting:… ▽ More This work shows that the following problems are equivalent, both in theory and in practice: - median filtering: given an $n$-element vector, compute the sliding window median with window size $k$, - piecewise sorting: given an $n$-element vector, divide it in $n/k$ blocks of length $k$ and sort each block. By prior work, median filtering is known to be at least as hard as piecewise sorting: with a single median filter operation we can sort $Θ(n/k)$ blocks of length $Θ(k)$. The present work shows that median filtering is also as easy as piecewise sorting: we can do median filtering with one piecewise sorting operation and linear-time postprocessing. In particular, median filtering can directly benefit from the vast literature on sorting algorithms---for example, adaptive sorting algorithms imply adaptive median filtering algorithms. The reduction is very efficient in practice---for random inputs the performance of the new sorting-based algorithm is on a par with the fastest heap-based algorithms, and for benign data distributions it typically outperforms prior algorithms. The key technical idea is that we can represent the sliding window with a pair of sorted doubly-linked lists: we delete items from one list and add items to the other list. Deletions are easy; additions can be done efficiently if we reverse the time twice: First we construct the full list and delete the items in the reverse order. Then we undo each deletion with Knuth's dancing links technique. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2014; originally announced June 2014.

Comments: 1 + 24 pages, 13 figures

Linial's Lower Bound Made Easy

Authors: Juhana Laurinharju, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Linial's seminal result shows that any deterministic distributed algorithm that finds a $3$-colouring of an $n$-cycle requires at least $\log^*(n)/2 - 1$ communication rounds. We give a new simpler proof of this theorem. Linial's seminal result shows that any deterministic distributed algorithm that finds a $3$-colouring of an $n$-cycle requires at least $\log^*(n)/2 - 1$ communication rounds. We give a new simpler proof of this theorem. △ Less

Submitted 11 February, 2014; originally announced February 2014.

Comments: 3 pages, 1 figure

Local Approximability of Minimum Dominating Set on Planar Graphs

Authors: Miikka Hilke, Christoph Lenzen, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We show that there is no deterministic local algorithm (constant-time distributed graph algorithm) that finds a $(7-ε)$-approximation of a minimum dominating set on planar graphs, for any positive constant $ε$. In prior work, the best lower bound on the approximation ratio has been $5-ε$; there is also an upper bound of $52$. We show that there is no deterministic local algorithm (constant-time distributed graph algorithm) that finds a $(7-ε)$-approximation of a minimum dominating set on planar graphs, for any positive constant $ε$. In prior work, the best lower bound on the approximation ratio has been $5-ε$; there is also an upper bound of $52$. △ Less

Submitted 11 February, 2014; originally announced February 2014.

Comments: 3 pages, 1 figure

Large Cuts with Local Algorithms on Triangle-Free Graphs

Authors: Juho Hirvonen, Joel Rybicki, Stefan Schmid, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We study the problem of finding large cuts in $d$-regular triangle-free graphs. In prior work, Shearer (1992) gives a randomised algorithm that finds a cut of expected size $(1/2 + 0.177/\sqrt{d})m$, where $m$ is the number of edges. We give a simpler algorithm that does much better: it finds a cut of expected size $(1/2 + 0.28125/\sqrt{d})m$. As a corollary, this shows that in any $d$-regular tri… ▽ More We study the problem of finding large cuts in $d$-regular triangle-free graphs. In prior work, Shearer (1992) gives a randomised algorithm that finds a cut of expected size $(1/2 + 0.177/\sqrt{d})m$, where $m$ is the number of edges. We give a simpler algorithm that does much better: it finds a cut of expected size $(1/2 + 0.28125/\sqrt{d})m$. As a corollary, this shows that in any $d$-regular triangle-free graph there exists a cut of at least this size. Our algorithm can be interpreted as a very efficient randomised distributed algorithm: each node needs to produce only one random bit, and the algorithm runs in one synchronous communication round. This work is also a case study of applying computational techniques in the design of distributed algorithms: our algorithm was designed by a computer program that searched for optimal algorithms for small values of $d$. △ Less

Submitted 11 February, 2014; originally announced February 2014.

Comments: 1+17 pages, 8 figures