-
ANN vs SNN: A case study for Neural Decoding in Implantable Brain-Machine Interfaces
Authors:
Biyan Zhou,
Pao-Sheng Vincent Sun,
Arindam Basu
Abstract:
While it is important to make implantable brain-machine interfaces (iBMI) wireless to increase patient comfort and safety, the trend of increased channel count in recent neural probes poses a challenge due to the concomitant increase in the data rate. Extracting information from raw data at the source by using edge computing is a promising solution to this problem, with integrated intention decode…
▽ More
While it is important to make implantable brain-machine interfaces (iBMI) wireless to increase patient comfort and safety, the trend of increased channel count in recent neural probes poses a challenge due to the concomitant increase in the data rate. Extracting information from raw data at the source by using edge computing is a promising solution to this problem, with integrated intention decoders providing the best compression ratio. In this work, we compare different neural networks (NN) for motor decoding in terms of accuracy and implementation cost. We further show that combining traditional signal processing techniques with machine learning ones deliver surprisingly good performance even with simple NNs. Adding a block Bidirectional Bessel filter provided maximum gains of $\approx 0.05$, $0.04$ and $0.03$ in $R^2$ for ANN\_3d, SNN\_3D and ANN models, while the gains were lower ($\approx 0.02$ or less) for LSTM and SNN\_streaming models. Increasing training data helped improve the $R^2$ of all models by $0.03-0.04$ indicating they have more capacity for future improvement. In general, LSTM and SNN\_streaming models occupy the high and low ends of the pareto curves (for accuracy vs. memory/operations) respectively while SNN\_3D and ANN\_3D occupy intermediate positions. Our work presents state of the art results for this dataset and paves the way for decoder-integrated-implants of the future.
△ Less
Submitted 26 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
NeuroBench: A Framework for Benchmarking Neuromorphic Computing Algorithms and Systems
Authors:
Jason Yik,
Korneel Van den Berghe,
Douwe den Blanken,
Younes Bouhadjar,
Maxime Fabre,
Paul Hueber,
Denis Kleyko,
Noah Pacik-Nelson,
Pao-Sheng Vincent Sun,
Guangzhi Tang,
Shenqi Wang,
Biyan Zhou,
Soikat Hasan Ahmed,
George Vathakkattil Joseph,
Benedetto Leto,
Aurora Micheli,
Anurag Kumar Mishra,
Gregor Lenz,
Tao Sun,
Zergham Ahmed,
Mahmoud Akl,
Brian Anderson,
Andreas G. Andreou,
Chiara Bartolozzi,
Arindam Basu
, et al. (73 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Neuromorphic computing shows promise for advancing computing efficiency and capabilities of AI applications using brain-inspired principles. However, the neuromorphic research field currently lacks standardized benchmarks, making it difficult to accurately measure technological advancements, compare performance with conventional methods, and identify promising future research directions. Prior neu…
▽ More
Neuromorphic computing shows promise for advancing computing efficiency and capabilities of AI applications using brain-inspired principles. However, the neuromorphic research field currently lacks standardized benchmarks, making it difficult to accurately measure technological advancements, compare performance with conventional methods, and identify promising future research directions. Prior neuromorphic computing benchmark efforts have not seen widespread adoption due to a lack of inclusive, actionable, and iterative benchmark design and guidelines. To address these shortcomings, we present NeuroBench: a benchmark framework for neuromorphic computing algorithms and systems. NeuroBench is a collaboratively-designed effort from an open community of nearly 100 co-authors across over 50 institutions in industry and academia, aiming to provide a representative structure for standardizing the evaluation of neuromorphic approaches. The NeuroBench framework introduces a common set of tools and systematic methodology for inclusive benchmark measurement, delivering an objective reference framework for quantifying neuromorphic approaches in both hardware-independent (algorithm track) and hardware-dependent (system track) settings. In this article, we present initial performance baselines across various model architectures on the algorithm track and outline the system track benchmark tasks and guidelines. NeuroBench is intended to continually expand its benchmarks and features to foster and track the progress made by the research community.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2024; v1 submitted 10 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Intelligence Processing Units Accelerate Neuromorphic Learning
Authors:
Pao-Sheng Vincent Sun,
Alexander Titterton,
Anjlee Gopiani,
Tim Santos,
Arindam Basu,
Wei D. Lu,
Jason K. Eshraghian
Abstract:
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) have achieved orders of magnitude improvement in terms of energy consumption and latency when performing inference with deep learning workloads. Error backpropagation is presently regarded as the most effective method for training SNNs, but in a twist of irony, when training on modern graphics processing units (GPUs) this becomes more expensive than non-spiking netwo…
▽ More
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) have achieved orders of magnitude improvement in terms of energy consumption and latency when performing inference with deep learning workloads. Error backpropagation is presently regarded as the most effective method for training SNNs, but in a twist of irony, when training on modern graphics processing units (GPUs) this becomes more expensive than non-spiking networks. The emergence of Graphcore's Intelligence Processing Units (IPUs) balances the parallelized nature of deep learning workloads with the sequential, reusable, and sparsified nature of operations prevalent when training SNNs. IPUs adopt multi-instruction multi-data (MIMD) parallelism by running individual processing threads on smaller data blocks, which is a natural fit for the sequential, non-vectorized steps required to solve spiking neuron dynamical state equations. We present an IPU-optimized release of our custom SNN Python package, snnTorch, which exploits fine-grained parallelism by utilizing low-level, pre-compiled custom operations to accelerate irregular and sparse data access patterns that are characteristic of training SNN workloads. We provide a rigorous performance assessment across a suite of commonly used spiking neuron models, and propose methods to further reduce training run-time via half-precision training. By amortizing the cost of sequential processing into vectorizable population codes, we ultimately demonstrate the potential for integrating domain-specific accelerators with the next generation of neural networks.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
