-
Data navigation on the ENCODE portal
Authors:
Meenakshi S. Kagda,
Bonita Lam,
Casey Litton,
Corinn Small,
Cricket A. Sloan,
Emma Spragins,
Forrest Tanaka,
Ian Whaling,
Idan Gabdank,
Ingrid Youngworth,
J. Seth Strattan,
Jason Hilton,
Jennifer Jou,
Jessica Au,
**-Wook Lee,
Kalina Andreeva,
Keenan Graham,
Khine Lin,
Matt Simison,
Otto Jolanki,
Paul Sud,
Pedro Assis,
Philip Adenekan,
Eric Douglas,
Mingjie Li
, et al. (9 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Spanning two decades, the Encyclopaedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) is a collaborative research project that aims to identify all the functional elements in the human and mouse genomes. To best serve the scientific community, all data generated by the consortium is shared through a web-portal (https://www.encodeproject.org/) with no access restrictions. The fourth and final phase of the project added…
▽ More
Spanning two decades, the Encyclopaedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) is a collaborative research project that aims to identify all the functional elements in the human and mouse genomes. To best serve the scientific community, all data generated by the consortium is shared through a web-portal (https://www.encodeproject.org/) with no access restrictions. The fourth and final phase of the project added a diverse set of new samples (including those associated with human disease), and a wide range of new assays aimed at detection, characterization and validation of functional genomic elements. The ENCODE data portal hosts results from over 23,000 functional genomics experiments, over 800 functional elements characterization experiments (including in vivo transgenic enhancer assays, reporter assays and CRISPR screens) along with over 60,000 results of computational and integrative analyses (including imputations, predictions and genome annotations). The ENCODE Data Coordination Center (DCC) is responsible for development and maintenance of the data portal, along with the implementation and utilisation of the ENCODE uniform processing pipelines to generate uniformly processed data. Here we report recent updates to the data portal. Specifically, we have completely redesigned the home page, improved search interface, added several new pages to highlight collections of biologically related data (deeply profiled cell lines, immune cells, Alzheimer's Disease, RNA-Protein interactions, degron matrix and a matrix of experiments organised by human donors), added single-cell experiments, and enhanced the cart interface for visualisation and download of user-selected datasets.
△ Less
Submitted 4 May, 2023; v1 submitted 27 April, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Gender and Research Publishing in India: Uniformly high inequality?
Authors:
Mike Thelwall,
Carol Bailey,
Meiko Makita,
Pardeep Sud,
Devika P. Madalli
Abstract:
Women's access to academic careers has been historically limited by discrimination and cultural constraints. Comprehensive information about gender inequality within disciplines is needed to understand the problem and target remedial action. India is the fifth largest research producer but has a low international index of gender inequality and so is an important case. This study assesses gender in…
▽ More
Women's access to academic careers has been historically limited by discrimination and cultural constraints. Comprehensive information about gender inequality within disciplines is needed to understand the problem and target remedial action. India is the fifth largest research producer but has a low international index of gender inequality and so is an important case. This study assesses gender inequalities in Indian journal article publishing in 2017 for 186 research fields. It also seeks overall gender differences in interests across academia by comparing the terms used in 27,710 articles with an Indian male or female first author. The data show that there are at least 1.5 male first authors per female first author in each of 26 broad fields and 2.8 male first authors per female first author overall. Compared to the USA, India has a much lower share of female first authors but smaller variations in gender differences between broad fields. Dentistry, Economics and Maths are all more female in India, but Veterinary is much less female than in the USA. There is a tendency for males to research thing-oriented topics and for females to research hel** people and some life science topics. More initiatives to promote gender equality in science are needed to address the overall imbalance, but care should be taken to avoid creating the larger between-field gender differences found in the USA.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
National, disciplinary and temporal variations in the extent to which articles with more authors have more impact: Evidence from a geometric field normalised citation indicator
Authors:
Mike Thelwall,
Pardeep Sud
Abstract:
The importance of collaboration in research is widely accepted, as is the fact that articles with more authors tend to be more cited. Nevertheless, although previous studies have investigated whether the apparent advantage of collaboration varies by country, discipline, and number of co-authors, this study introduces a more fine-grained method to identify differences: the geometric Mean Normalized…
▽ More
The importance of collaboration in research is widely accepted, as is the fact that articles with more authors tend to be more cited. Nevertheless, although previous studies have investigated whether the apparent advantage of collaboration varies by country, discipline, and number of co-authors, this study introduces a more fine-grained method to identify differences: the geometric Mean Normalized Citation Score (gMNCS). Based on comparisons between disciplines, years and countries for two million journal articles, the average citation impact of articles increases with the number of authors, even when international collaboration is excluded. This apparent advantage of collaboration varies substantially by discipline and country and changes a little over time. Against the trend, however, in Russia solo articles have more impact. Across the four broad disciplines examined, collaboration had by far the strongest association with impact in the arts and humanities. Although international comparisons are limited by the availability of systematic data for author country affiliations, the new indicator is the most precise yet and can give statistical evidence rather than estimates.
△ Less
Submitted 23 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
