Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Stimper, V

SE(3) Equivariant Augmented Coupling Flows

Authors: Laurence I. Midgley, Vincent Stimper, Javier Antorán, Emile Mathieu, Bernhard Schölkopf, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: Coupling normalizing flows allow for fast sampling and density evaluation, making them the tool of choice for probabilistic modeling of physical systems. However, the standard coupling architecture precludes endowing flows that operate on the Cartesian coordinates of atoms with the SE(3) and permutation invariances of physical systems. This work proposes a coupling flow that preserves SE(3) and pe… ▽ More Coupling normalizing flows allow for fast sampling and density evaluation, making them the tool of choice for probabilistic modeling of physical systems. However, the standard coupling architecture precludes endowing flows that operate on the Cartesian coordinates of atoms with the SE(3) and permutation invariances of physical systems. This work proposes a coupling flow that preserves SE(3) and permutation equivariance by performing coordinate splits along additional augmented dimensions. At each layer, the flow maps atoms' positions into learned SE(3) invariant bases, where we apply standard flow transformations, such as monotonic rational-quadratic splines, before returning to the original basis. Crucially, our flow preserves fast sampling and density evaluation, and may be used to produce unbiased estimates of expectations with respect to the target distribution via importance sampling. When trained on the DW4, LJ13, and QM9-positional datasets, our flow is competitive with equivariant continuous normalizing flows and diffusion models, while allowing sampling more than an order of magnitude faster. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, we are the first to learn the full Boltzmann distribution of alanine dipeptide by only modeling the Cartesian positions of its atoms. Lastly, we demonstrate that our flow can be trained to approximately sample from the Boltzmann distribution of the DW4 and LJ13 particle systems using only their energy functions. △ Less

Submitted 5 March, 2024; v1 submitted 20 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

normflows: A PyTorch Package for Normalizing Flows

Authors: Vincent Stimper, David Liu, Andrew Campbell, Vincent Berenz, Lukas Ryll, Bernhard Schölkopf, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: Normalizing flows model probability distributions through an expressive tractable density. They transform a simple base distribution, such as a Gaussian, through a sequence of invertible functions, which are referred to as layers. These layers typically use neural networks to become very expressive. Flows are ubiquitous in machine learning and have been applied to image generation, text modeling,… ▽ More Normalizing flows model probability distributions through an expressive tractable density. They transform a simple base distribution, such as a Gaussian, through a sequence of invertible functions, which are referred to as layers. These layers typically use neural networks to become very expressive. Flows are ubiquitous in machine learning and have been applied to image generation, text modeling, variational inference, approximating Boltzmann distributions, and many other problems. Here, we present normflows, a Python package for normalizing flows. It allows to build normalizing flow models from a suite of base distributions, flow layers, and neural networks. The package is implemented in the popular deep learning framework PyTorch, which simplifies the integration of flows in larger machine learning models or pipelines. It supports most of the common normalizing flow architectures, such as Real NVP, Glow, Masked Autoregressive Flows, Neural Spline Flows, Residual Flows, and many more. The package can be easily installed via pip and the code is publicly available on GitHub. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2023; v1 submitted 26 January, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Journal ref: Journal of Open Source Software, 8(86), 5361 (2023)

Flow Annealed Importance Sampling Bootstrap

Authors: Laurence Illing Midgley, Vincent Stimper, Gregor N. C. Simm, Bernhard Schölkopf, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: Normalizing flows are tractable density models that can approximate complicated target distributions, e.g. Boltzmann distributions of physical systems. However, current methods for training flows either suffer from mode-seeking behavior, use samples from the target generated beforehand by expensive MCMC methods, or use stochastic losses that have high variance. To avoid these problems, we augment… ▽ More Normalizing flows are tractable density models that can approximate complicated target distributions, e.g. Boltzmann distributions of physical systems. However, current methods for training flows either suffer from mode-seeking behavior, use samples from the target generated beforehand by expensive MCMC methods, or use stochastic losses that have high variance. To avoid these problems, we augment flows with annealed importance sampling (AIS) and minimize the mass-covering $α$-divergence with $α=2$, which minimizes importance weight variance. Our method, Flow AIS Bootstrap (FAB), uses AIS to generate samples in regions where the flow is a poor approximation of the target, facilitating the discovery of new modes. We apply FAB to multimodal targets and show that we can approximate them very accurately where previous methods fail. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to learn the Boltzmann distribution of the alanine dipeptide molecule using only the unnormalized target density, without access to samples generated via Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations: FAB produces better results than training via maximum likelihood on MD samples while using 100 times fewer target evaluations. After reweighting the samples, we obtain unbiased histograms of dihedral angles that are almost identical to the ground truth. △ Less

Submitted 7 March, 2023; v1 submitted 3 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Probing the Robustness of Independent Mechanism Analysis for Representation Learning

Authors: Joanna Sliwa, Shubhangi Ghosh, Vincent Stimper, Luigi Gresele, Bernhard Schölkopf

Abstract: One aim of representation learning is to recover the original latent code that generated the data, a task which requires additional information or inductive biases. A recently proposed approach termed Independent Mechanism Analysis (IMA) postulates that each latent source should influence the observed mixtures independently, complementing standard nonlinear independent component analysis, and taki… ▽ More One aim of representation learning is to recover the original latent code that generated the data, a task which requires additional information or inductive biases. A recently proposed approach termed Independent Mechanism Analysis (IMA) postulates that each latent source should influence the observed mixtures independently, complementing standard nonlinear independent component analysis, and taking inspiration from the principle of independent causal mechanisms. While it was shown in theory and experiments that IMA helps recovering the true latents, the method's performance was so far only characterized when the modeling assumptions are exactly satisfied. Here, we test the method's robustness to violations of the underlying assumptions. We find that the benefits of IMA-based regularization for recovering the true sources extend to mixing functions with various degrees of violation of the IMA principle, while standard regularizers do not provide the same merits. Moreover, we show that unregularized maximum likelihood recovers mixing functions which systematically deviate from the IMA principle, and provide an argument elucidating the benefits of IMA-based regularization. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: 10 pages, 14 figures, UAI CRL 2022 final camera-ready version

AutoML Two-Sample Test

Authors: Jonas M. Kübler, Vincent Stimper, Simon Buchholz, Krikamol Muandet, Bernhard Schölkopf

Abstract: Two-sample tests are important in statistics and machine learning, both as tools for scientific discovery as well as to detect distribution shifts. This led to the development of many sophisticated test procedures going beyond the standard supervised learning frameworks, whose usage can require specialized knowledge about two-sample testing. We use a simple test that takes the mean discrepancy of… ▽ More Two-sample tests are important in statistics and machine learning, both as tools for scientific discovery as well as to detect distribution shifts. This led to the development of many sophisticated test procedures going beyond the standard supervised learning frameworks, whose usage can require specialized knowledge about two-sample testing. We use a simple test that takes the mean discrepancy of a witness function as the test statistic and prove that minimizing a squared loss leads to a witness with optimal testing power. This allows us to leverage recent advancements in AutoML. Without any user input about the problems at hand, and using the same method for all our experiments, our AutoML two-sample test achieves competitive performance on a diverse distribution shift benchmark as well as on challenging two-sample testing problems. We provide an implementation of the AutoML two-sample test in the Python package autotst. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2023; v1 submitted 17 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: NeurIPS 2022

Bootstrap Your Flow

Authors: Laurence Illing Midgley, Vincent Stimper, Gregor N. C. Simm, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: Normalizing flows are flexible, parameterized distributions that can be used to approximate expectations from intractable distributions via importance sampling. However, current flow-based approaches are limited on challenging targets where they either suffer from mode seeking behaviour or high variance in the training loss, or rely on samples from the target distribution, which may not be availab… ▽ More Normalizing flows are flexible, parameterized distributions that can be used to approximate expectations from intractable distributions via importance sampling. However, current flow-based approaches are limited on challenging targets where they either suffer from mode seeking behaviour or high variance in the training loss, or rely on samples from the target distribution, which may not be available. To address these challenges, we combine flows with annealed importance sampling (AIS), while using the $α$-divergence as our objective, in a novel training procedure, FAB (Flow AIS Bootstrap). Thereby, the flow and AIS improve each other in a bootstrap** manner. We demonstrate that FAB can be used to produce accurate approximations to complex target distributions, including Boltzmann distributions, in problems where previous flow-based methods fail. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2022; v1 submitted 22 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Resampling Base Distributions of Normalizing Flows

Authors: Vincent Stimper, Bernhard Schölkopf, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato

Abstract: Normalizing flows are a popular class of models for approximating probability distributions. However, their invertible nature limits their ability to model target distributions whose support have a complex topological structure, such as Boltzmann distributions. Several procedures have been proposed to solve this problem but many of them sacrifice invertibility and, thereby, tractability of the log… ▽ More Normalizing flows are a popular class of models for approximating probability distributions. However, their invertible nature limits their ability to model target distributions whose support have a complex topological structure, such as Boltzmann distributions. Several procedures have been proposed to solve this problem but many of them sacrifice invertibility and, thereby, tractability of the log-likelihood as well as other desirable properties. To address these limitations, we introduce a base distribution for normalizing flows based on learned rejection sampling, allowing the resulting normalizing flow to model complicated distributions without giving up bijectivity. Furthermore, we develop suitable learning algorithms using both maximizing the log-likelihood and the optimization of the Kullback-Leibler divergence, and apply them to various sample problems, i.e. approximating 2D densities, density estimation of tabular data, image generation, and modeling Boltzmann distributions. In these experiments our method is competitive with or outperforms the baselines. △ Less

Submitted 24 February, 2022; v1 submitted 29 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Journal ref: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS) 2022

Independent mechanism analysis, a new concept?

Authors: Luigi Gresele, Julius von Kügelgen, Vincent Stimper, Bernhard Schölkopf, Michel Besserve

Abstract: Independent component analysis provides a principled framework for unsupervised representation learning, with solid theory on the identifiability of the latent code that generated the data, given only observations of mixtures thereof. Unfortunately, when the mixing is nonlinear, the model is provably nonidentifiable, since statistical independence alone does not sufficiently constrain the problem.… ▽ More Independent component analysis provides a principled framework for unsupervised representation learning, with solid theory on the identifiability of the latent code that generated the data, given only observations of mixtures thereof. Unfortunately, when the mixing is nonlinear, the model is provably nonidentifiable, since statistical independence alone does not sufficiently constrain the problem. Identifiability can be recovered in settings where additional, typically observed variables are included in the generative process. We investigate an alternative path and consider instead including assumptions reflecting the principle of independent causal mechanisms exploited in the field of causality. Specifically, our approach is motivated by thinking of each source as independently influencing the mixing process. This gives rise to a framework which we term independent mechanism analysis. We provide theoretical and empirical evidence that our approach circumvents a number of nonidentifiability issues arising in nonlinear blind source separation. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2022; v1 submitted 9 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: NeurIPS 2021 final camera-ready version