-
Graph Pattern Polynomials
Authors:
Markus Bläser,
Balagopal Komarath,
Karteek Sreenivasaiah
Abstract:
We study the time complexity of induced subgraph isomorphism problems where the pattern graph is fixed. The earliest known example of an improvement over trivial algorithms is by Itai and Rodeh (1978) who sped up triangle detection in graphs using fast matrix multiplication. This algorithm was generalized by Nešetřil and Poljak (1985) to speed up detection of k-cliques.
Improved algorithms are k…
▽ More
We study the time complexity of induced subgraph isomorphism problems where the pattern graph is fixed. The earliest known example of an improvement over trivial algorithms is by Itai and Rodeh (1978) who sped up triangle detection in graphs using fast matrix multiplication. This algorithm was generalized by Nešetřil and Poljak (1985) to speed up detection of k-cliques.
Improved algorithms are known for certain small-sized patterns. For example, a linear-time algorithm is known for detecting length-4 paths. In this paper, we give the first pattern detection algorithm that improves upon Nešetřil and Poljak's algorithm for arbitrarily large pattern graphs (not cliques). The algorithm is obtained by reducing the induced subgraph isomorphism problem to the problem of detecting multilinear terms in constant-degree polynomials.
We show that the same technique can be used to reduce the induced subgraph isomorphism problem of many pattern graphs to constructing arithmetic circuits computing homomorphism polynomials of these pattern graphs. Using this, we obtain faster combinatorial algorithms (algorithms that do not use fast matrix multiplication) for k-paths and k-cycles. We also obtain faster algorithms for 5-paths and 5-cycles that match the runtime for triangle detection.
We show that these algorithms are expressible using polynomial families that we call graph pattern polynomial families. We then define a notion of reduction among these polynomials that allows us to compare the complexity of various pattern detection problems within this framework. For example, we show that the induced subgraph isomorphism polynomial for any pattern that contains a k-clique is harder than the induced subgraph isomorphism polynomial for k-clique. An analogue of this theorem is not known with respect to general algorithmic hardness.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
A Fixed-Depth Size-Hierarchy Theorem for AC$^0[\oplus]$ via the Coin Problem
Authors:
Nutan Limaye,
Karteek Sreenivasaiah,
Srikanth Srinivasan,
Utkarsh Tripathi,
S. Venkitesh
Abstract:
We prove the first Fixed-depth Size-hierarchy Theorem for uniform AC$^0[\oplus]$ circuits; in particular, for fixed $d$, the class $\mathcal{C}_{d,k}$ of uniform AC$^0[\oplus]$ formulas of depth $d$ and size $n^k$ form an infinite hierarchy. For this, we find the first class of explicit functions giving (up to polynomial factor) matching upper and lower bounds for AC$^0[\oplus]$ formulas, derived…
▽ More
We prove the first Fixed-depth Size-hierarchy Theorem for uniform AC$^0[\oplus]$ circuits; in particular, for fixed $d$, the class $\mathcal{C}_{d,k}$ of uniform AC$^0[\oplus]$ formulas of depth $d$ and size $n^k$ form an infinite hierarchy. For this, we find the first class of explicit functions giving (up to polynomial factor) matching upper and lower bounds for AC$^0[\oplus]$ formulas, derived from the $δ$-Coin Problem, the computational problem of distinguishing between coins that are heads with probability $(1+δ)/2$ or $(1-δ)/2,$ where $δ$ is a parameter going to $0$. We study this problem's complexity and make progress on both upper bounds and lower bounds.
Upper bounds. We find explicit monotone AC$^0$ formulas solving the $δ$-coin problem, having depth $d$, size $\exp(O(d(1/δ)^{1/(d-1)}))$, and sample complexity poly$(1/δ)$, for constant $d\ge2$. This matches previous upper bounds of O'Donnell and Wimmer (ICALP 2007) and Amano (ICALP 2009) in terms of size and improves the sample complexity.
Lower bounds. The upper bounds are nearly tight even for the stronger model of AC$^0[\oplus]$ formulas (which allow NOT and Parity gates): any AC$^0[\oplus]$ formula solving the $δ$-coin problem must have size $\exp(Ω(d(1/δ)^{1/(d-1)})).$ This strengthens a result of Cohen, Ganor and Raz (APPROX-RANDOM 2014), who prove a similar result for AC$^0$, and a result of Shaltiel and Viola (SICOMP 2010), who give a superpolynomially weaker (still exponential) lower bound.
The upper bound is a derandomization involving a use of Janson's inequality (as far as we know, the first such use of the inequality) and classical combinatorial designs. For the lower bound, we prove an optimal (up to constant factor) degree lower bound for multivariate polynomials over $\mathbb{F}_2$ solving the $δ$-coin problem, which may be of independent interest.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2019; v1 submitted 11 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
On the complexity of hazard-free circuits
Authors:
Christian Ikenmeyer,
Balagopal Komarath,
Christoph Lenzen,
Vladimir Lysikov,
Andrey Mokhov,
Karteek Sreenivasaiah
Abstract:
The problem of constructing hazard-free Boolean circuits dates back to the 1940s and is an important problem in circuit design. Our main lower-bound result unconditionally shows the existence of functions whose circuit complexity is polynomially bounded while every hazard-free implementation is provably of exponential size. Previous lower bounds on the hazard-free complexity were only valid for de…
▽ More
The problem of constructing hazard-free Boolean circuits dates back to the 1940s and is an important problem in circuit design. Our main lower-bound result unconditionally shows the existence of functions whose circuit complexity is polynomially bounded while every hazard-free implementation is provably of exponential size. Previous lower bounds on the hazard-free complexity were only valid for depth 2 circuits. The same proof method yields that every subcubic implementation of Boolean matrix multiplication must have hazards.
These results follow from a crucial structural insight: Hazard-free complexity is a natural generalization of monotone complexity to all (not necessarily monotone) Boolean functions. Thus, we can apply known monotone complexity lower bounds to find lower bounds on the hazard-free complexity. We also lift these methods from the monotone setting to prove exponential hazard-free complexity lower bounds for non-monotone functions.
As our main upper-bound result we show how to efficiently convert a Boolean circuit into a bounded-bit hazard-free circuit with only a polynomially large blow-up in the number of gates. Previously, the best known method yielded exponentially large circuits in the worst case, so our algorithm gives an exponential improvement.
As a side result we establish the NP-completeness of several hazard detection problems.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2018; v1 submitted 6 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
Small Depth Proof Systems
Authors:
Andreas Krebs,
Nutan Limaye,
Meena Mahajan,
Karteek Sreenivasaiah
Abstract:
A proof system for a language L is a function f such that Range(f) is exactly L. In this paper, we look at proofsystems from a circuit complexity point of view and study proof systems that are computationally very restricted. The restriction we study is: they can be computed by bounded fanin circuits of constant depth (NC^0), or of O(log log n) depth but with O(1) alternations (polylog AC^0). Each…
▽ More
A proof system for a language L is a function f such that Range(f) is exactly L. In this paper, we look at proofsystems from a circuit complexity point of view and study proof systems that are computationally very restricted. The restriction we study is: they can be computed by bounded fanin circuits of constant depth (NC^0), or of O(log log n) depth but with O(1) alternations (polylog AC^0). Each output bit depends on very few input bits; thus such proof systems correspond to a kind of local error-correction on a theorem-proof pair.
We identify exactly how much power we need for proof systems to capture all regular languages. We show that all regular language have polylog AC^0 proof systems, and from a previous result (Beyersdorff et al, MFCS 2011, where NC^0 proof systems were first introduced), this is tight. Our technique also shows that MAJ has polylog AC^0 proof system. We explore the question of whether TAUT has NC^0 proof systems. Addressing this question about 2TAUT, and since 2TAUT is closely related to reachability in graphs, we ask the same question about Reachability. We show that both Undirected Reachability and Directed UnReachability have NC^0 proof systems, but Directed Reachability is still open.
In the context of how much power is needed for proof systems for languages in NP, we observe that proof systems for a good fraction of languages in NP do not need the full power of AC^0; they have SAC^0 or coSAC^0 proof systems.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2013;
originally announced July 2013.
