-
Explaining Reinforcement Learning with Shapley Values
Authors:
Daniel Beechey,
Thomas M. S. Smith,
Özgür Şimşek
Abstract:
For reinforcement learning systems to be widely adopted, their users must understand and trust them. We present a theoretical analysis of explaining reinforcement learning using Shapley values, following a principled approach from game theory for identifying the contribution of individual players to the outcome of a cooperative game. We call this general framework Shapley Values for Explaining Rei…
▽ More
For reinforcement learning systems to be widely adopted, their users must understand and trust them. We present a theoretical analysis of explaining reinforcement learning using Shapley values, following a principled approach from game theory for identifying the contribution of individual players to the outcome of a cooperative game. We call this general framework Shapley Values for Explaining Reinforcement Learning (SVERL). Our analysis exposes the limitations of earlier uses of Shapley values in reinforcement learning. We then develop an approach that uses Shapley values to explain agent performance. In a variety of domains, SVERL produces meaningful explanations that match and supplement human intuition.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
The MOMMS Family of Matrix Multiplication Algorithms
Authors:
Tyler M. Smith,
Robert A. van de Geijn
Abstract:
As the ratio between the rate of computation and rate with which data can be retrieved from various layers of memory continues to deteriorate, a question arises: Will the current best algorithms for computing matrix-matrix multiplication on future CPUs continue to be (near) optimal? This paper provides compelling analytical and empirical evidence that the answer is "no". The analytical results gui…
▽ More
As the ratio between the rate of computation and rate with which data can be retrieved from various layers of memory continues to deteriorate, a question arises: Will the current best algorithms for computing matrix-matrix multiplication on future CPUs continue to be (near) optimal? This paper provides compelling analytical and empirical evidence that the answer is "no". The analytical results guide us to a new family of algorithms of which the current state-of-the-art "Goto's algorithm" is but one member. The empirical results, on architectures that were custom built to reduce the amount of bandwidth to main memory, show that under different circumstances, different and particular members of the family become more superior. Thus, this family will likely start playing a prominent role going forward.
△ Less
Submitted 11 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
A Tight I/O Lower Bound for Matrix Multiplication
Authors:
Tyler Michael Smith,
Bradley Lowery,
Julien Langou,
Robert A. van de Geijn
Abstract:
A tight lower bound for required I/O when computing an ordinary matrix-matrix multiplication on a processor with two layers of memory is established. Prior work obtained weaker lower bounds by reasoning about the number of segments needed to perform $C:=AB$, for distinct matrices $A$, $B$, and $C$, where each segment is a series of operations involving $M$ reads and writes to and from fast memory,…
▽ More
A tight lower bound for required I/O when computing an ordinary matrix-matrix multiplication on a processor with two layers of memory is established. Prior work obtained weaker lower bounds by reasoning about the number of segments needed to perform $C:=AB$, for distinct matrices $A$, $B$, and $C$, where each segment is a series of operations involving $M$ reads and writes to and from fast memory, and $M$ is the size of fast memory. A lower bound on the number of segments was then determined by obtaining an upper bound on the number of elementary multiplications performed per segment. This paper follows the same high level approach, but improves the lower bound by (1) transforming algorithms for MMM so that they perform all computation via fused multiply-add instructions (FMAs) and using this to reason about only the cost associated with reading the matrices, and (2) decoupling the per-segment I/O cost from the size of fast memory. For $n \times n$ matrices, the lower bound's leading-order term is $2n^3/\sqrt{M}$. A theoretical algorithm whose leading terms attains this is introduced. To what extent the state-of-the-art Goto's Algorithm attains the lower bound is discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2019; v1 submitted 3 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
Automating the Last-Mile for High Performance Dense Linear Algebra
Authors:
Richard Michael Veras,
Tze Meng Low,
Tyler Michael Smith,
Robert van de Geijn,
Franz Franchetti
Abstract:
High performance dense linear algebra (DLA) libraries often rely on a general matrix multiply (Gemm) kernel that is implemented using assembly or with vector intrinsics. In particular, the real-valued Gemm kernels provide the overwhelming fraction of performance for the complex-valued Gemm kernels, along with the entire level-3 BLAS and many of the real and complex LAPACK routines. Thus,achieving…
▽ More
High performance dense linear algebra (DLA) libraries often rely on a general matrix multiply (Gemm) kernel that is implemented using assembly or with vector intrinsics. In particular, the real-valued Gemm kernels provide the overwhelming fraction of performance for the complex-valued Gemm kernels, along with the entire level-3 BLAS and many of the real and complex LAPACK routines. Thus,achieving high performance for the Gemm kernel translates into a high performance linear algebra stack above this kernel. However, it is a monumental task for a domain expert to manually implement the kernel for every library-supported architecture. This leads to the belief that the craft of a Gemm kernel is more dark art than science. It is this premise that drives the popularity of autotuning with code generation in the domain of DLA.
This paper, instead, focuses on an analytical approach to code generation of the Gemm kernel for different architecture, in order to shed light on the details or voo-doo required for implementing a high performance Gemm kernel. We distill the implementation of the kernel into an even smaller kernel, an outer-product, and analytically determine how available SIMD instructions can be used to compute the outer-product efficiently. We codify this approach into a system to automatically generate a high performance SIMD implementation of the Gemm kernel. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach yields generated kernels with performance that is competitive with kernels implemented manually or using empirical search.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2017; v1 submitted 23 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Implementing Strassen's Algorithm with BLIS
Authors:
Jianyu Huang,
Tyler M. Smith,
Greg M. Henry,
Robert A. van de Geijn
Abstract:
We dispel with "street wisdom" regarding the practical implementation of Strassen's algorithm for matrix-matrix multiplication (DGEMM). Conventional wisdom: it is only practical for very large matrices. Our implementation is practical for small matrices. Conventional wisdom: the matrices being multiplied should be relatively square. Our implementation is practical for rank-k updates, where k is re…
▽ More
We dispel with "street wisdom" regarding the practical implementation of Strassen's algorithm for matrix-matrix multiplication (DGEMM). Conventional wisdom: it is only practical for very large matrices. Our implementation is practical for small matrices. Conventional wisdom: the matrices being multiplied should be relatively square. Our implementation is practical for rank-k updates, where k is relatively small (a shape of importance for libraries like LAPACK). Conventional wisdom: it inherently requires substantial workspace. Our implementation requires no workspace beyond buffers already incorporated into conventional high-performance DGEMM implementations. Conventional wisdom: a Strassen DGEMM interface must pass in workspace. Our implementation requires no such workspace and can be plug-compatible with the standard DGEMM interface. Conventional wisdom: it is hard to demonstrate speedup on multi-core architectures. Our implementation demonstrates speedup over conventional DGEMM even on an Intel(R) Xeon Phi(TM) coprocessor utilizing 240 threads. We show how a distributed memory matrix-matrix multiplication also benefits from these advances.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
