Showing 1–50 of 50 results for author: Smarandache, F

Improved, Extended, and Total Impact Factor of a Journal

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this short paper we recall the (Garfield) Impact Factor of a Journal, we improve and extend it, and eventually we present the Total Impact Factor that reflects the most accurate impact factor. In this short paper we recall the (Garfield) Impact Factor of a Journal, we improve and extend it, and eventually we present the Total Impact Factor that reflects the most accurate impact factor. △ Less

Submitted 26 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: 5 pages

MSC Class: 00A69

Improved Definition of NonStandard Neutrosophic Logic and Introduction to Neutrosophic Hyperreals

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: O the third version of this response-paper to Imamura criticism, we recall that NonStandard Neutrosophic Logic was never used by neutrosophic community in no application, that the quarter of century old neutrosophic operators (1995) criticized by Imamura were never utilized since they were improved shortly after but he omits to tell their development, and that in real world applications we need to… ▽ More O the third version of this response-paper to Imamura criticism, we recall that NonStandard Neutrosophic Logic was never used by neutrosophic community in no application, that the quarter of century old neutrosophic operators (1995) criticized by Imamura were never utilized since they were improved shortly after but he omits to tell their development, and that in real world applications we need to convert/approximate the NonStandard Analysis hyperreals, monads and binads to tiny intervals with the desired accuracy, otherwise they would be inapplicable. We point out several errors and false statements by Imamura with respect to the inf/sup of nonstandard subsets, also Imamura 'rigorous definition of neutrosophic logic' is wrong and the same for his definition of nonstandard unit interval, and we prove that there is not a total order on the set of hyperreals (because of the newly introduced Neutrosophic Hyperreals that are indeterminate), whence the transfer principle is questionable. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2022; v1 submitted 24 November, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Comments: 19 pages

MSC Class: 03B52

Plithogeny, Plithogenic Set, Logic, Probability, and Statistics

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this book we introduce the plithogenic set (as generalization of crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets), plithogenic logic (as generalization of classical, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic logics), plithogenic probability (as generalization of classical, imprecise, and neutrosophic probabilities), and plithogenic statistics (as generalization of classical, and n… ▽ More In this book we introduce the plithogenic set (as generalization of crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets), plithogenic logic (as generalization of classical, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic logics), plithogenic probability (as generalization of classical, imprecise, and neutrosophic probabilities), and plithogenic statistics (as generalization of classical, and neutrosophic statistics). Plithogenic Set is a set whose elements are characterized by one or more attributes, and each attribute may have many values. An attribute value v has a corresponding (fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, or neutrosophic) degree of appurtenance d(x,v) of the element x, to the set P, with respect to some given criteria. In order to obtain a better accuracy for the plithogenic aggregation operators in the plithogenic set, logic, probability and for a more exact inclusion (partial order), a (fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, or neutrosophic) contradiction (dissimilarity) degree is defined between each attribute value and the dominant (most important) attribute value. The plithogenic intersection and union are linear combinations of the fuzzy operators tnorm and tconorm, while the plithogenic complement, inclusion, equality are influenced by the attribute values contradiction (dissimilarity) degrees. Formal definitions of plithogenic set, logic, probability, statistics are presented into the book, followed by plithogenic aggregation operators, various theorems related to them, and afterwards examples and applications of these new concepts in our everyday life. △ Less

Submitted 12 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

Comments: 141 pages, Physical Plithogenic Set (approved), 71st Annual Gaseous Electronics Conference, American Physical Society, November 2018, Portland, Oregon, and Pons, Brussels, 2017

MSC Class: 03Bxx

New Trends in Neutrosophic Theory and Applications

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Surapati Pramanik

Abstract: Neutrosophic theory and applications have been expanding in all directions at an astonishing rate especially after the introduction the journal entitled Neutrosophic Sets and Systems. New theories, techniques, algorithms have been rapidly developed. One of the most striking trends in the neutrosophic theory is the hybridization of neutrosophic set with other potential sets such as rough set, bipol… ▽ More Neutrosophic theory and applications have been expanding in all directions at an astonishing rate especially after the introduction the journal entitled Neutrosophic Sets and Systems. New theories, techniques, algorithms have been rapidly developed. One of the most striking trends in the neutrosophic theory is the hybridization of neutrosophic set with other potential sets such as rough set, bipolar set, soft set, hesitant fuzzy set, etc. The different hybrid structure such as rough neutrosophic set, single valued neutrosophic rough set, bipolar neutrosophic set, single valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy set, etc. are proposed in the literature in a short period of time. Neutrosophic set has been a very important tool in all various areas of data mining, decision making, e-learning, engineering, medicine, social science, and some more. The book New Trends in Neutrosophic Theories and Applications focuses on theories, methods, algorithms for decision making and also applications involving neutrosophic information. Some topics deal with data mining, decision making, e-learning, graph theory, medical diagnosis, probability theory, topology, and some more. △ Less

Submitted 23 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Comments: 424 pages

MSC Class: I.2.3

Journal ref: Pons asbl, Brussels, 2016

Strong Neutrosophic Graphs and Subgraph Topological Subspaces

Authors: W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, Ilanthenral K, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this book authors for the first time introduce the notion of strong neutrosophic graphs. They are very different from the usual graphs and neutrosophic graphs. Using these new structures special subgraph topological spaces are defined. Further special lattice graph of subgraphs of these graphs are defined and described. Several interesting properties using subgraphs of a strong neutrosophic gra… ▽ More In this book authors for the first time introduce the notion of strong neutrosophic graphs. They are very different from the usual graphs and neutrosophic graphs. Using these new structures special subgraph topological spaces are defined. Further special lattice graph of subgraphs of these graphs are defined and described. Several interesting properties using subgraphs of a strong neutrosophic graph are obtained. Several open conjectures are proposed. These new class of strong neutrosophic graphs will certainly find applications in Neutrosophic Cognitive Maps (NCM), Neutrosophic Relational Maps (NRM) and Neutrosophic Relational Equations (NRE) with appropriate modifications. △ Less

Submitted 30 October, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Comments: 226 pages, many graphs, Europa Belgique, 2016

MSC Class: I.2.3

Neutrosophic Overset, Neutrosophic Underset, and Neutrosophic Offset. Similarly for Neutrosophic Over-/Under-/Off- Logic, Probability, and Statistics

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: Neutrosophic Over-/Under-/Off-Set and -Logic were defined by the author in 1995 and published for the first time in 2007. We extended the neutrosophic set respectively to Neutrosophic Overset {when some neutrosophic component is over 1}, Neutrosophic Underset {when some neutrosophic component is below 0}, and to Neutrosophic Offset {when some neutrosophic components are off the interval [0, 1], i.… ▽ More Neutrosophic Over-/Under-/Off-Set and -Logic were defined by the author in 1995 and published for the first time in 2007. We extended the neutrosophic set respectively to Neutrosophic Overset {when some neutrosophic component is over 1}, Neutrosophic Underset {when some neutrosophic component is below 0}, and to Neutrosophic Offset {when some neutrosophic components are off the interval [0, 1], i.e. some neutrosophic component over 1 and other neutrosophic component below 0}. This is no surprise with respect to the classical fuzzy set/logic, intuitionistic fuzzy set/logic, or classical/imprecise probability, where the values are not allowed outside the interval [0, 1], since our real-world has numerous examples and applications of over-/under-/off-neutrosophic components. For example, person working overtime deserves a membership degree over 1, while a person producing more damage than benefit to a company deserves a membership below 0. Then, similarly, the Neutrosophic Logic/Measure/Probability/Statistics etc. were extended to respectively Neutrosophic Over-/Under-/Off-Logic, -Measure, -Probability, -Statistics etc. [Smarandache, 2007]. △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Comments: 170 pages

MSC Class: 94D05

Journal ref: Pons Editions, Bruxelles, 2016

Symbolic Neutrosophic Theory

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: Symbolic (or Literal) Neutrosophic Theory is referring to the use of abstract symbols (i.e. the letters T, I, F, or their refined indexed letters Tj, Ik, Fl) in neutrosophics. We extend the dialectical triad thesis-antithesis-synthesis to the neutrosophic tetrad thesis-antithesis-neutrothesis-neutrosynthesis. The we introduce the neutrosophic system that is a quasi or (t,i,f) classical system, in… ▽ More Symbolic (or Literal) Neutrosophic Theory is referring to the use of abstract symbols (i.e. the letters T, I, F, or their refined indexed letters Tj, Ik, Fl) in neutrosophics. We extend the dialectical triad thesis-antithesis-synthesis to the neutrosophic tetrad thesis-antithesis-neutrothesis-neutrosynthesis. The we introduce the neutrosophic system that is a quasi or (t,i,f) classical system, in the sense that the neutrosophic system deals with quasi-terms (concepts, attributes, etc.). Then the notions of Neutrosophic Axiom, Neutrosophic Deducibility, Degree of Contradiction (Dissimilarity) of Two Neutrosophic Axioms, etc. Afterwards a new type of structures, called (t, i, f) Neutrosophic Structures, and we show particular cases of such structures in geometry and in algebra. Also, a short history of the neutrosophic set, neutrosophic numerical components and neutrosophic literal components, neutrosophic numbers, etc. We construct examples of splitting the literal indeterminacy (I) into literal subindeterminacies (I1, I2, and so on, Ir), and to define a multiplication law of these literal subindeterminacies in order to be able to build refined I neutrosophic algebraic structures. We define three neutrosophic actions and their properties. We then introduce the prevalence order on T,I,F with respect to a given neutrosophic operator. And the refinement of neutrosophic entities A, neutA, and antiA. Then we extend the classical logical operators to neutrosophic literal (symbolic) logical operators and to refined literal (symbolic) logical operators, and we define the refinement neutrosophic literal (symbolic) space. We introduce the neutrosophic quadruple numbers (a+bT+cI+dF) and the refined neutrosophic quadruple numbers. Then we define an absorbance law, based on a prevalence order, in order to multiply the neutrosophic quadruple numbers. △ Less

Submitted 17 October, 2015; originally announced December 2015.

Comments: 195 pages, several graphs, Published as book in Bruxelles, 2015

ACM Class: I.2.1

Unification of Fusion Theories, Rules, Filters, Image Fusion and Target Tracking Methods (UFT)

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: The author has pledged in various papers, conference or seminar presentations, and scientific grant applications (between 2004-2015) for the unification of fusion theories, combinations of fusion rules, image fusion procedures, filter algorithms, and target tracking methods for more accurate applications to our real world problems - since neither fusion theory nor fusion rule fully satisfy all nee… ▽ More The author has pledged in various papers, conference or seminar presentations, and scientific grant applications (between 2004-2015) for the unification of fusion theories, combinations of fusion rules, image fusion procedures, filter algorithms, and target tracking methods for more accurate applications to our real world problems - since neither fusion theory nor fusion rule fully satisfy all needed applications. For each particular application, one selects the most appropriate fusion space and fusion model, then the fusion rules, and the algorithms of implementation. He has worked in the Unification of the Fusion Theories (UFT), which looks like a cooking recipe, better one could say like a logical chart for a computer programmer, but one does not see another method to comprise/unify all things. The unification scenario presented herein, which is now in an incipient form, should periodically be updated incorporating new discoveries from the fusion and engineering research. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2015; originally announced July 2015.

Comments: 79 pages, a diagram. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:cs/0409040, arXiv:0901.1289, arXiv:cs/0410033

ACM Class: I.2.6

Journal ref: International Journal of Applied Mathematics & Statistics, Vol. 2, 1-14, 2004

Soft Neutrosophic Algebraic Structures and Their Generalization

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Mumtaz Ali, Muhammad Shabir

Abstract: Study of soft sets was first proposed by Molodtsov in 1999 to deal with uncertainty in a non-parametric manner. The researchers did not pay attention to soft set theory at that time but now the soft set theory has been developed in many areas of mathematics. Algebraic structures using soft set theory are very rapidly developed. In this book we developed soft neutrosophic algebraic structures by us… ▽ More Study of soft sets was first proposed by Molodtsov in 1999 to deal with uncertainty in a non-parametric manner. The researchers did not pay attention to soft set theory at that time but now the soft set theory has been developed in many areas of mathematics. Algebraic structures using soft set theory are very rapidly developed. In this book we developed soft neutrosophic algebraic structures by using soft sets and neutrosophic algebraic structures. In this book we study soft neutrosophic groups, soft neutrosophic semigroups, soft neutrosophic loops, soft neutrosophic LA-semigroups, and their generalizations respectively. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2014; originally announced August 2014.

Comments: 264 pages

ACM Class: I.2.3

n-Valued Refined Neutrosophic Logic and Its Applications to Physics

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this paper we present a short history of logics: from particular cases of 2-symbol or numerical valued logic to the general case of n-symbol or numerical valued logic. We show generalizations of 2-valued Boolean logic to fuzzy logic, also from the Kleene and Lukasiewicz 3-symbol valued logics or Belnap 4-symbol valued logic to the most general n-symbol or numerical valued refined neutrosophic l… ▽ More In this paper we present a short history of logics: from particular cases of 2-symbol or numerical valued logic to the general case of n-symbol or numerical valued logic. We show generalizations of 2-valued Boolean logic to fuzzy logic, also from the Kleene and Lukasiewicz 3-symbol valued logics or Belnap 4-symbol valued logic to the most general n-symbol or numerical valued refined neutrosophic logic. Two classes of neutrosophic norm (n-norm) and neutrosophic conorm (n-conorm) are defined. Examples of applications of neutrosophic logic to physics are listed in the last section. Similar generalizations can be done for n-Valued Refined Neutrosophic Set, and respectively n- Valued Refined Neutrosopjhic Probability. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2014; originally announced July 2014.

Comments: 9 pages

MSC Class: 28E10

Journal ref: Progress in Physics, 143-146, Vol. 4, 2013

Introduction to Neutrosophic Statistics

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: Neutrosophic Statistics means statistical analysis of population or sample that has indeterminate (imprecise, ambiguous, vague, incomplete, unknown) data. For example, the population or sample size might not be exactly determinate because of some individuals that partially belong to the population or sample, and partially they do not belong, or individuals whose appurtenance is completely unknown.… ▽ More Neutrosophic Statistics means statistical analysis of population or sample that has indeterminate (imprecise, ambiguous, vague, incomplete, unknown) data. For example, the population or sample size might not be exactly determinate because of some individuals that partially belong to the population or sample, and partially they do not belong, or individuals whose appurtenance is completely unknown. Also, there are population or sample individuals whose data could be indeterminate. In this book, we develop the 1995 notion of neutrosophic statistics. We present various practical examples. It is possible to define the neutrosophic statistics in many ways, because there are various types of indeterminacies, depending on the problem to solve. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2014; originally announced June 2014.

Comments: 122 pages, many geometrical figures, many tables

MSC Class: 28E10

Journal ref: Published as a book by Sitech in 2014

Introduction to Neutrosophic Measure, Neutrosophic Integral, and Neutrosophic Probability

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce for the first time the notions of neutrosophic measure and neutrosophic integral, and we develop the 1995 notion of neutrosophic probability. We present many practical examples. It is possible to define the neutrosophic measure and consequently the neutrosophic integral and neutrosophic probability in many ways, because there are various types of indeterminacies, depend… ▽ More In this paper, we introduce for the first time the notions of neutrosophic measure and neutrosophic integral, and we develop the 1995 notion of neutrosophic probability. We present many practical examples. It is possible to define the neutrosophic measure and consequently the neutrosophic integral and neutrosophic probability in many ways, because there are various types of indeterminacies, depending on the problem we need to solve. Neutrosophics study the indeterminacy. Indeterminacy is different from randomness. It can be caused by physical space materials and type of construction, by items involved in the space, etc. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2013; originally announced November 2013.

Comments: 140 pages. 10 figures

MSC Class: 28E10

Journal ref: Published as a book by Sitech in 2013

Intuitionistic Neutrosophic Soft Set

Authors: Broumi Said, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this paper we study the concept of intuitionistic neutrosophic set of Bhowmik and Pal. We have introduced this concept in soft sets and defined intuitionistic neutrosophic soft set. Some definitions and operations have been introduced on intuitionistic neutrosophic soft set. Some properties of this concept have been established. In this paper we study the concept of intuitionistic neutrosophic set of Bhowmik and Pal. We have introduced this concept in soft sets and defined intuitionistic neutrosophic soft set. Some definitions and operations have been introduced on intuitionistic neutrosophic soft set. Some properties of this concept have been established. △ Less

Submitted 14 November, 2013; originally announced November 2013.

Comments: 10 pages. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1305.2724

Journal ref: ISSN 1746-7659, England, UK Journal of Information and Computing Science Vol. 8, No. 2, 2013, pp.130-140

Contradiction measures and specificity degrees of basic belief assignments

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Arnaud Martin, Christophe Osswald

Abstract: In the theory of belief functions, many measures of uncertainty have been introduced. However, it is not always easy to understand what these measures really try to represent. In this paper, we re-interpret some measures of uncertainty in the theory of belief functions. We present some interests and drawbacks of the existing measures. On these observations, we introduce a measure of contradiction.… ▽ More In the theory of belief functions, many measures of uncertainty have been introduced. However, it is not always easy to understand what these measures really try to represent. In this paper, we re-interpret some measures of uncertainty in the theory of belief functions. We present some interests and drawbacks of the existing measures. On these observations, we introduce a measure of contradiction. Therefore, we present some degrees of non-specificity and Bayesianity of a mass. We propose a degree of specificity based on the distance between a mass and its most specific associated mass. We also show how to use the degree of specificity to measure the specificity of a fusion rule. Illustrations on simple examples are given. △ Less

Submitted 16 September, 2011; originally announced September 2011.

Journal ref: International Conference on Information Fusion, Chicago : United States (2011)

Threat assessment of a possible Vehicle-Born Improvised Explosive Device using DSmT

Authors: Jean Dezert, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: This paper presents the solution about the threat of a VBIED (Vehicle-Born Improvised Explosive Device) obtained with the DSmT (Dezert-Smarandache Theory). This problem has been proposed recently to the authors by Simon Maskell and John Lavery as a typical illustrative example to try to compare the different approaches for dealing with uncertainty for decision-making support. The purpose of this p… ▽ More This paper presents the solution about the threat of a VBIED (Vehicle-Born Improvised Explosive Device) obtained with the DSmT (Dezert-Smarandache Theory). This problem has been proposed recently to the authors by Simon Maskell and John Lavery as a typical illustrative example to try to compare the different approaches for dealing with uncertainty for decision-making support. The purpose of this paper is to show in details how a solid justified solution can be obtained from DSmT approach and its fusion rules thanks to a proper modeling of the belief functions involved in this problem. △ Less

Submitted 2 August, 2010; originally announced August 2010.

Comments: 26 pages

Journal ref: Fusion 2010, Edinburgh : United Kingdom (2010)

Importance of Sources using the Repeated Fusion Method and the Proportional Conflict Redistribution Rules #5 and #6

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: We present in this paper some examples of how to compute by hand the PCR5 fusion rule for three sources, so the reader will better understand its mechanism. We also take into consideration the importance of sources, which is different from the classical discounting of sources. We present in this paper some examples of how to compute by hand the PCR5 fusion rule for three sources, so the reader will better understand its mechanism. We also take into consideration the importance of sources, which is different from the classical discounting of sources. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2010; originally announced April 2010.

$α$-Discounting Multi-Criteria Decision Making ($α$-D MCDM)

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this book we introduce a new procedure called α-Discounting Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making (α-D MCDM), which is as an alternative and extension of Saaty Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). It works for any number of preferences that can be transformed into a system of homogeneous linear equations. A degree of consistency (and implicitly a degree of inconsistency) of a decision-making… ▽ More In this book we introduce a new procedure called α-Discounting Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making (α-D MCDM), which is as an alternative and extension of Saaty Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). It works for any number of preferences that can be transformed into a system of homogeneous linear equations. A degree of consistency (and implicitly a degree of inconsistency) of a decision-making problem are defined. α-D MCDM is afterwards generalized to a set of preferences that can be transformed into a system of linear and or non-linear homogeneous and or non-homogeneous equations and or inequalities. The general idea of α-D MCDM is to assign non-null positive parameters α_1, α_2, and so on α_p to the coefficients in the right-hand side of each preference that diminish or increase them in order to transform the above linear homogeneous system of equations which has only the null-solution, into a system having a particular non-null solution. After finding the general solution of this system, the principles used to assign particular values to all parameters αis the second important part of α-D, yet to be deeper investigated in the future. In the current book we propose the Fairness Principle, i.e. each coefficient should be discounted with the same percentage (we think this is fair: not making any favoritism or unfairness to any coefficient), but the reader can propose other principles. For consistent decision-making problems with pairwise comparisons, α-Discounting Method together with the Fairness Principle give the same result as AHP. But for weak inconsistent decision-making problem, α-Discounting together with the Fairness Principle give a different result from AHP. Many consistent, weak inconsistent, and strong inconsistent examples are given in this book. △ Less

Submitted 2 October, 2015; v1 submitted 30 January, 2010; originally announced February 2010.

Comments: 62 pages

ACM Class: I.2.3

Journal ref: Proceedings of Fusion 2010 International Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, 26-29 July, 2010

Tracking object's type changes with fuzzy based fusion rule

Authors: Albena Tchamova, Jean Dezert, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this paper the behavior of three combinational rules for temporal/sequential attribute data fusion for target type estimation are analyzed. The comparative analysis is based on: Dempster's fusion rule proposed in Dempster-Shafer Theory; Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule no. 5 (PCR5), proposed in Dezert-Smarandache Theory and one alternative class fusion rule, connecting the combinatio… ▽ More In this paper the behavior of three combinational rules for temporal/sequential attribute data fusion for target type estimation are analyzed. The comparative analysis is based on: Dempster's fusion rule proposed in Dempster-Shafer Theory; Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule no. 5 (PCR5), proposed in Dezert-Smarandache Theory and one alternative class fusion rule, connecting the combination rules for information fusion with particular fuzzy operators, focusing on the t-norm based Conjunctive rule as an analog of the ordinary conjunctive rule and t-conorm based Disjunctive rule as an analog of the ordinary disjunctive rule. The way how different t-conorms and t-norms functions within TCN fusion rule influence over target type estimation performance is studied and estimated. △ Less

Submitted 8 October, 2009; originally announced October 2009.

Journal ref: First International Conference on Modelling and Development of Intelligent Systems, Sibiu : Romania (2009)

A Class of DSm Conditional Rules

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Mark Alford

Abstract: In this paper we introduce two new DSm fusion conditioning rules with example, and as a generalization of them a class of DSm fusion conditioning rules, and then extend them to a class of DSm conditioning rules. In this paper we introduce two new DSm fusion conditioning rules with example, and as a generalization of them a class of DSm fusion conditioning rules, and then extend them to a class of DSm conditioning rules. △ Less

Submitted 1 August, 2009; originally announced August 2009.

Comments: 9 pages. SUbmitted to COGIS 2009 International Conference in PAris

ACM Class: I.2.3

Journal ref: Proceedings of COGIS 2009 International Conference, Paris, France, 16-18 November 2009. Also, presented at this conference

Comments on "A new combination of evidence based on compromise" by K. Yamada

Authors: Jean Dezert, Arnaud Martin, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: Comments on ``A new combination of evidence based on compromise'' by K. Yamada Comments on ``A new combination of evidence based on compromise'' by K. Yamada △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2009; originally announced June 2009.

ACM Class: I.4; I.5

Journal ref: Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160, 6 (2009) 853-855

General combination rules for qualitative and quantitative beliefs

Authors: Arnaud Martin, Christophe Osswald, Jean Dezert, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: Martin and Osswald \cite{Martin07} have recently proposed many generalizations of combination rules on quantitative beliefs in order to manage the conflict and to consider the specificity of the responses of the experts. Since the experts express themselves usually in natural language with linguistic labels, Smarandache and Dezert \cite{Li07} have introduced a mathematical framework for dealing… ▽ More Martin and Osswald \cite{Martin07} have recently proposed many generalizations of combination rules on quantitative beliefs in order to manage the conflict and to consider the specificity of the responses of the experts. Since the experts express themselves usually in natural language with linguistic labels, Smarandache and Dezert \cite{Li07} have introduced a mathematical framework for dealing directly also with qualitative beliefs. In this paper we recall some element of our previous works and propose the new combination rules, developed for the fusion of both qualitative or quantitative beliefs. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2009; originally announced June 2009.

Journal ref: Journal of Advances in Information Fusion 3, 2 (2008) 67-89

An introduction to DSmT

Authors: Jean Dezert, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been, and still remains today, of primal importance for the development of reliable modern information systems involving artificial reasoning. In this introduction, we present a survey of our recent theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning, known as Dezert… ▽ More The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been, and still remains today, of primal importance for the development of reliable modern information systems involving artificial reasoning. In this introduction, we present a survey of our recent theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning, known as Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT), developed for dealing with imprecise, uncertain and conflicting sources of information. We focus our presentation on the foundations of DSmT and on its most important rules of combination, rather than on browsing specific applications of DSmT available in literature. Several simple examples are given throughout this presentation to show the efficiency and the generality of this new approach. △ Less

Submitted 2 March, 2009; originally announced March 2009.

N-norm and N-conorm in Neutrosophic Logic and Set, and the Neutrosophic Topologies

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this paper we present the N-norms/N-conorms in neutrosophic logic and set as extensions of T-norms/T-conorms in fuzzy logic and set. Also, as an extension of the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topology we present the Neutrosophic Topologies. In this paper we present the N-norms/N-conorms in neutrosophic logic and set as extensions of T-norms/T-conorms in fuzzy logic and set. Also, as an extension of the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topology we present the Neutrosophic Topologies. △ Less

Submitted 9 January, 2009; originally announced January 2009.

Comments: 11 pages, 3 diagrams

ACM Class: I.2.3

Journal ref: In author's book A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic; Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability and Statistics (fourth edition), 2005; Review of the Air Force Academy, No. 1 (14), pp. 05-11, 2009.

n-ary Fuzzy Logic and Neutrosophic Logic Operators

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, V. Christianto

Abstract: We extend Knuth's 16 Boolean binary logic operators to fuzzy logic and neutrosophic logic binary operators. Then we generalize them to n-ary fuzzy logic and neutrosophic logic operators using the smarandache codification of the Venn diagram and a defined vector neutrosophic law. In such way, new operators in neutrosophic logic/set/probability are built. We extend Knuth's 16 Boolean binary logic operators to fuzzy logic and neutrosophic logic binary operators. Then we generalize them to n-ary fuzzy logic and neutrosophic logic operators using the smarandache codification of the Venn diagram and a defined vector neutrosophic law. In such way, new operators in neutrosophic logic/set/probability are built. △ Less

Submitted 18 November, 2008; v1 submitted 22 August, 2008; originally announced August 2008.

Comments: 15 pages, 2 fuzzy and neutrosophic value tables, many diagrams

ACM Class: I.2.3

Journal ref: Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rethoric [Belarus], 17 (30), pp. 1-16, 2009.

A new probabilistic transformation of belief mass assignment

Authors: Jean Dezert, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this paper, we propose in Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) framework, a new probabilistic transformation, called DSmP, in order to build a subjective probability measure from any basic belief assignment defined on any model of the frame of discernment. Several examples are given to show how the DSmP transformation works and we compare it to main existing transformations proposed in the litera… ▽ More In this paper, we propose in Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) framework, a new probabilistic transformation, called DSmP, in order to build a subjective probability measure from any basic belief assignment defined on any model of the frame of discernment. Several examples are given to show how the DSmP transformation works and we compare it to main existing transformations proposed in the literature so far. We show the advantages of DSmP over classical transformations in term of Probabilistic Information Content (PIC). The direct extension of this transformation for dealing with qualitative belief assignments is also presented. △ Less

Submitted 23 July, 2008; originally announced July 2008.

Journal ref: Fusion 2008 International Conference on Information Fusion, Cologne : Allemagne (2008)

Extension of Inagaki General Weighted Operators and A New Fusion Rule Class of Proportional Redistribution of Intersection Masses

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this paper we extend Inagaki Weighted Operators fusion rule (WO) in information fusion by doing redistribution of not only the conflicting mass, but also of masses of non-empty intersections, that we call Double Weighted Operators (DWO). Then we propose a new fusion rule Class of Proportional Redistribution of Intersection Masses (CPRIM), which generates many interesting particular fusion rul… ▽ More In this paper we extend Inagaki Weighted Operators fusion rule (WO) in information fusion by doing redistribution of not only the conflicting mass, but also of masses of non-empty intersections, that we call Double Weighted Operators (DWO). Then we propose a new fusion rule Class of Proportional Redistribution of Intersection Masses (CPRIM), which generates many interesting particular fusion rules in information fusion. Both formulas are presented for any number of sources of information. An application and comparison with other fusion rules are given in the last section. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2008; v1 submitted 11 July, 2008; originally announced July 2008.

Comments: 6 pages; SWIFT 2008 - Skovde Workshop on Information Fusion Topics, Sweden;

ACM Class: I.4.8

Journal ref: International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 3, No. A09, 79-85, 2009

Neutrosophic Relational Data Model

Authors: Haibin Wang, Rajshekhar Sunderraman, Florentin Smarandache, Andre Rogatko

Abstract: In this paper, we present a generalization of the relational data model based on interval neutrosophic set. Our data model is capable of manipulating incomplete as well as inconsistent information. Fuzzy relation or intuitionistic fuzzy relation can only handle incomplete information. Associated with each relation are two membership functions one is called truth-membership function T which keeps… ▽ More In this paper, we present a generalization of the relational data model based on interval neutrosophic set. Our data model is capable of manipulating incomplete as well as inconsistent information. Fuzzy relation or intuitionistic fuzzy relation can only handle incomplete information. Associated with each relation are two membership functions one is called truth-membership function T which keeps track of the extent to which we believe the tuple is in the relation, another is called falsity-membership function F which keeps track of the extent to which we believe that it is not in the relation. A neutrosophic relation is inconsistent if there exists one tuple a such that T(a) + F(a) > 1 . In order to handle inconsistent situation, we propose an operator called "split" to transform inconsistent neutrosophic relations into pseudo-consistent neutrosophic relations and do the set-theoretic and relation-theoretic operations on them and finally use another operator called "combine" to transform the result back to neutrosophic relation. For this data model, we define algebraic operators that are generalizations of the usual operators such as intersection, union, selection, join on fuzzy relations. Our data model can underlie any database and knowledge-base management system that deals with incomplete and inconsistent information. △ Less

Submitted 29 October, 2007; originally announced October 2007.

Enrichment of Qualitative Beliefs for Reasoning under Uncertainty

Authors: Xinde Li, Xinhan Huang, Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: This paper deals with enriched qualitative belief functions for reasoning under uncertainty and for combining information expressed in natural language through linguistic labels. In this work, two possible enrichments (quantitative and/or qualitative) of linguistic labels are considered and operators (addition, multiplication, division, etc) for dealing with them are proposed and explained. We d… ▽ More This paper deals with enriched qualitative belief functions for reasoning under uncertainty and for combining information expressed in natural language through linguistic labels. In this work, two possible enrichments (quantitative and/or qualitative) of linguistic labels are considered and operators (addition, multiplication, division, etc) for dealing with them are proposed and explained. We denote them $qe$-operators, $qe$ standing for "qualitative-enriched" operators. These operators can be seen as a direct extension of the classical qualitative operators ($q$-operators) proposed recently in the Dezert-Smarandache Theory of plausible and paradoxist reasoning (DSmT). $q$-operators are also justified in details in this paper. The quantitative enrichment of linguistic label is a numerical supporting degree in $[0,\infty)$, while the qualitative enrichment takes its values in a finite ordered set of linguistic values. Quantitative enrichment is less precise than qualitative enrichment, but it is expected more close with what human experts can easily provide when expressing linguistic labels with supporting degrees. Two simple examples are given to show how the fusion of qualitative-enriched belief assignments can be done. △ Less

Submitted 11 September, 2007; originally announced September 2007.

Comments: 12 pages

Qualitative Belief Conditioning Rules (QBCR)

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: In this paper we extend the new family of (quantitative) Belief Conditioning Rules (BCR) recently developed in the Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) to their qualitative counterpart for belief revision. Since the revision of quantitative as well as qualitative belief assignment given the occurrence of a new event (the conditioning constraint) can be done in many possible ways, we present here onl… ▽ More In this paper we extend the new family of (quantitative) Belief Conditioning Rules (BCR) recently developed in the Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) to their qualitative counterpart for belief revision. Since the revision of quantitative as well as qualitative belief assignment given the occurrence of a new event (the conditioning constraint) can be done in many possible ways, we present here only what we consider as the most appealing Qualitative Belief Conditioning Rules (QBCR) which allow to revise the belief directly with words and linguistic labels and thus avoids the introduction of ad-hoc translations of quantitative beliefs into quantitative ones for solving the problem. △ Less

Submitted 4 September, 2007; originally announced September 2007.

Comments: 13 pages. Presented at Fusion 2007 International Conference, Quebec City, Canada, July 2007

ACM Class: I.2.3

Journal ref: Proceedings of Fusion 2007 International Conference, Quebec City, Canada, July 2007

Neutrality and Many-Valued Logics

Authors: Andrew Schumann, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: In this book, we consider various many-valued logics: standard, linear, hyperbolic, parabolic, non-Archimedean, p-adic, interval, neutrosophic, etc. We survey also results which show the tree different proof-theoretic frameworks for many-valued logics, e.g. frameworks of the following deductive calculi: Hilbert's style, sequent, and hypersequent. We present a general way that allows to construct… ▽ More In this book, we consider various many-valued logics: standard, linear, hyperbolic, parabolic, non-Archimedean, p-adic, interval, neutrosophic, etc. We survey also results which show the tree different proof-theoretic frameworks for many-valued logics, e.g. frameworks of the following deductive calculi: Hilbert's style, sequent, and hypersequent. We present a general way that allows to construct systematically analytic calculi for a large family of non-Archimedean many-valued logics: hyperrational-valued, hyperreal-valued, and p-adic valued logics characterized by a special format of semantics with an appropriate rejection of Archimedes' axiom. These logics are built as different extensions of standard many-valued logics (namely, Lukasiewicz's, Goedel's, Product, and Post's logics). The informal sense of Archimedes' axiom is that anything can be measured by a ruler. Also logical multiple-validity without Archimedes' axiom consists in that the set of truth values is infinite and it is not well-founded and well-ordered. On the base of non-Archimedean valued logics, we construct non-Archimedean valued interval neutrosophic logic INL by which we can describe neutrality phenomena. △ Less

Submitted 21 July, 2007; originally announced July 2007.

Comments: 119 pages

ACM Class: F.4.1; I.2.3; I.2.4

Journal ref: A. Schumann, F. Smarandache, Neutrality and Many-Valued Logics. American Research Press, 2007

Redesigning Decision Matrix Method with an indeterminacy-based inference process

Authors: Jose L. Salmeron, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: For academics and practitioners concerned with computers, business and mathematics, one central issue is supporting decision makers. In this paper, we propose a generalization of Decision Matrix Method (DMM), using Neutrosophic logic. It emerges as an alternative to the existing logics and it represents a mathematical model of uncertainty and indeterminacy. This paper proposes the Neutrosophic D… ▽ More For academics and practitioners concerned with computers, business and mathematics, one central issue is supporting decision makers. In this paper, we propose a generalization of Decision Matrix Method (DMM), using Neutrosophic logic. It emerges as an alternative to the existing logics and it represents a mathematical model of uncertainty and indeterminacy. This paper proposes the Neutrosophic Decision Matrix Method as a more realistic tool for decision making. In addition, a de-neutrosophication process is included. △ Less

Submitted 12 March, 2007; originally announced March 2007.

Comments: 12 pages, 4 figures, one table

ACM Class: I.2.11

Journal ref: A short version published in Advances in Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 1(2), 263-271, 2006

Uniform and Partially Uniform Redistribution Rules

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: This short paper introduces two new fusion rules for combining quantitative basic belief assignments. These rules although very simple have not been proposed in literature so far and could serve as useful alternatives because of their low computation cost with respect to the recent advanced Proportional Conflict Redistribution rules developed in the DSmT framework. This short paper introduces two new fusion rules for combining quantitative basic belief assignments. These rules although very simple have not been proposed in literature so far and could serve as useful alternatives because of their low computation cost with respect to the recent advanced Proportional Conflict Redistribution rules developed in the DSmT framework. △ Less

Submitted 21 July, 2011; v1 submitted 5 February, 2007; originally announced February 2007.

Comments: 4 pages; "Advances and Applications of DSmT for Plausible and Paradoxical reasoning for Information Fusion", International Workshop organized by the Bulgarian IST Centre of Competence in 21st Century, December 14, 2006, Bulg. Acad. of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria

ACM Class: I.4.8

Journal ref: International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems (IJUFKS), World Scientific, Vol. 19, No. 6, 921-937, 2011

A Neutrosophic Description Logic

Authors: Haibin Wang, Andre Rogatko, Florentin Smarandache, Rajshekhar Sunderraman

Abstract: Description Logics (DLs) are appropriate, widely used, logics for managing structured knowledge. They allow reasoning about individuals and concepts, i.e. set of individuals with common properties. Typically, DLs are limited to dealing with crisp, well defined concepts. That is, concepts for which the problem whether an individual is an instance of it is yes/no question. More often than not, the… ▽ More Description Logics (DLs) are appropriate, widely used, logics for managing structured knowledge. They allow reasoning about individuals and concepts, i.e. set of individuals with common properties. Typically, DLs are limited to dealing with crisp, well defined concepts. That is, concepts for which the problem whether an individual is an instance of it is yes/no question. More often than not, the concepts encountered in the real world do not have a precisely defined criteria of membership: we may say that an individual is an instance of a concept only to a certain degree, depending on the individual's properties. The DLs that deal with such fuzzy concepts are called fuzzy DLs. In order to deal with fuzzy, incomplete, indeterminate and inconsistent concepts, we need to extend the fuzzy DLs, combining the neutrosophic logic with a classical DL. In particular, concepts become neutrosophic (here neutrosophic means fuzzy, incomplete, indeterminate, and inconsistent), thus reasoning about neutrosophic concepts is supported. We'll define its syntax, its semantics, and describe its properties. △ Less

Submitted 13 March, 2008; v1 submitted 22 November, 2006; originally announced November 2006.

Comments: 18 pages. Presented at the IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA, May 2006

ACM Class: F.4.1

Journal ref: Proceedings of 2006 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, edited by Yan-Qing Zhang and Tsau Young Lin, Georgia State University, Atlanta, pp. 305-308, 2006

DSmT: A new paradigm shift for information fusion

Authors: Jean Dezert, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been and still remains of primal importance for the development of reliable information fusion systems. In this short survey paper, we present the theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning, known as DSmT (Dezert-Smarandache Theory) in literature, developed… ▽ More The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been and still remains of primal importance for the development of reliable information fusion systems. In this short survey paper, we present the theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning, known as DSmT (Dezert-Smarandache Theory) in literature, developed for dealing with imprecise, uncertain and potentially highly conflicting sources of information. DSmT is a new paradigm shift for information fusion and recent publications have shown the interest and the potential ability of DSmT to solve fusion problems where Dempster's rule used in Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST) provides counter-intuitive results or fails to provide useful result at all. This paper is focused on the foundations of DSmT and on its main rules of combination (classic, hybrid and Proportional Conflict Redistribution rules). Shafer's model on which is based DST appears as a particular and specific case of DSm hybrid model which can be easily handled by DSmT as well. Several simple but illustrative examples are given throughout this paper to show the interest and the generality of this new theory. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2006; originally announced October 2006.

Comments: 11 pages. Presented to Cogis06 International Conference, Paris, France, 2006

ACM Class: I.4.8

An Introduction to the DSm Theory for the Combination of Paradoxical, Uncertain, and Imprecise Sources of Information

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been, and still remains today, of primal importance for the development of reliable modern information systems involving artificial reasoning. In this introduction, we present a survey of our recent theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning, known as Dezert… ▽ More The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been, and still remains today, of primal importance for the development of reliable modern information systems involving artificial reasoning. In this introduction, we present a survey of our recent theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning, known as Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) in the literature, developed for dealing with imprecise, uncertain and paradoxical sources of information. We focus our presentation here rather on the foundations of DSmT, and on the two important new rules of combination, than on browsing specific applications of DSmT available in literature. Several simple examples are given throughout the presentation to show the efficiency and the generality of this new approach. △ Less

Submitted 1 August, 2006; originally announced August 2006.

Comments: 21 pages, many tables, figures. To appear in Information&Security International Journal, 2006

ACM Class: I.4.8

Journal ref: Presented at 13th International Congress of Cybernetics and Systems, Maribor, Slovenia, July 6-10, 2005.

Fusion of qualitative beliefs using DSmT

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: This paper introduces the notion of qualitative belief assignment to model beliefs of human experts expressed in natural language (with linguistic labels). We show how qualitative beliefs can be efficiently combined using an extension of Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) of plausible and paradoxical quantitative reasoning to qualitative reasoning. We propose a new arithmetic on linguistic labels… ▽ More This paper introduces the notion of qualitative belief assignment to model beliefs of human experts expressed in natural language (with linguistic labels). We show how qualitative beliefs can be efficiently combined using an extension of Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) of plausible and paradoxical quantitative reasoning to qualitative reasoning. We propose a new arithmetic on linguistic labels which allows a direct extension of classical DSm fusion rule or DSm Hybrid rules. An approximate qualitative PCR5 rule is also proposed jointly with a Qualitative Average Operator. We also show how crisp or interval map**s can be used to deal indirectly with linguistic labels. A very simple example is provided to illustrate our qualitative fusion rules. △ Less

Submitted 29 November, 2006; v1 submitted 31 July, 2006; originally announced July 2006.

Comments: 13 pages. To appear in "Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion", collected works, second volume, 2006

ACM Class: I.4.8

Journal ref: Presented as an extended version (Tutorial MO2) to the Fusion 2006 International Conference, Florence, Italy, July 10-13, 2006

Target Type Tracking with PCR5 and Dempster's rules: A Comparative Analysis

Authors: Jean Dezert, Albena Tchamova, Florentin Smarandache, Pavlina Konstantinova

Abstract: In this paper we consider and analyze the behavior of two combinational rules for temporal (sequential) attribute data fusion for target type estimation. Our comparative analysis is based on Dempster's fusion rule proposed in Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST) and on the Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule no. 5 (PCR5) recently proposed in Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT). We show through very s… ▽ More In this paper we consider and analyze the behavior of two combinational rules for temporal (sequential) attribute data fusion for target type estimation. Our comparative analysis is based on Dempster's fusion rule proposed in Dempster-Shafer Theory (DST) and on the Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule no. 5 (PCR5) recently proposed in Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT). We show through very simple scenario and Monte-Carlo simulation, how PCR5 allows a very efficient Target Type Tracking and reduces drastically the latency delay for correct Target Type decision with respect to Demspter's rule. For cases presenting some short Target Type switches, Demspter's rule is proved to be unable to detect the switches and thus to track correctly the Target Type changes. The approach proposed here is totally new, efficient and promising to be incorporated in real-time Generalized Data Association - Multi Target Tracking systems (GDA-MTT) and provides an important result on the behavior of PCR5 with respect to Dempster's rule. The MatLab source code is provided in △ Less

Submitted 31 July, 2006; originally announced July 2006.

Comments: 10 pages, 5 diagrams. Presented to Fusion 2006 International Conference, Florence, Italy, July 2006

ACM Class: I.4.8

Journal ref: Proceedings of Fusion 2006 International Conference, Florence, Italy, July 2006

Belief Conditioning Rules (BCRs)

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: In this paper we propose a new family of Belief Conditioning Rules (BCRs) for belief revision. These rules are not directly related with the fusion of several sources of evidence but with the revision of a belief assignment available at a given time according to the new truth (i.e. conditioning constraint) one has about the space of solutions of the problem. In this paper we propose a new family of Belief Conditioning Rules (BCRs) for belief revision. These rules are not directly related with the fusion of several sources of evidence but with the revision of a belief assignment available at a given time according to the new truth (i.e. conditioning constraint) one has about the space of solutions of the problem. △ Less

Submitted 29 November, 2006; v1 submitted 2 July, 2006; originally announced July 2006.

Comments: 26 pages

ACM Class: I.4.8

Computational Modeling in Applied Problems: collected papers on econometrics, operations research, game theory and simulation

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Sukanto Bhattacharya, Mohammad Khoshnevisan, Housila P. Singh, Rajesh Singh, F. Kaymram, S. Malakar, Jose L. Salmeron

Abstract: Computational models pervade all branches of the exact sciences and have in recent times also started to prove to be of immense utility in some of the traditionally 'soft' sciences like ecology, sociology and politics. This volume is a collection of a few cutting-edge research papers on the application of variety of computational models and tools in the analysis, interpretation and solution of v… ▽ More Computational models pervade all branches of the exact sciences and have in recent times also started to prove to be of immense utility in some of the traditionally 'soft' sciences like ecology, sociology and politics. This volume is a collection of a few cutting-edge research papers on the application of variety of computational models and tools in the analysis, interpretation and solution of vexing real-world problems and issues in economics, management, ecology and global politics by some prolific researchers in the field. △ Less

Submitted 4 May, 2006; originally announced May 2006.

Comments: 108 pages, many figures

ACM Class: I.2.0; I.2.1; C.2.3

Journal ref: Hexis, 2006.

Adaptative combination rule and proportional conflict redistribution rule for information fusion

Authors: M. C. Florea, J. Dezert, P. Valin, F. Smarandache, Anne-Laure Jousselme

Abstract: This paper presents two new promising rules of combination for the fusion of uncertain and potentially highly conflicting sources of evidences in the framework of the theory of belief functions in order to palliate the well-know limitations of Dempster's rule and to work beyond the limits of applicability of the Dempster-Shafer theory. We present both a new class of adaptive combination rules (A… ▽ More This paper presents two new promising rules of combination for the fusion of uncertain and potentially highly conflicting sources of evidences in the framework of the theory of belief functions in order to palliate the well-know limitations of Dempster's rule and to work beyond the limits of applicability of the Dempster-Shafer theory. We present both a new class of adaptive combination rules (ACR) and a new efficient Proportional Conflict Redistribution (PCR) rule allowing to deal with highly conflicting sources for static and dynamic fusion applications. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2006; originally announced April 2006.

Comments: Presented at Cogis '06 Conference, Paris, March 2006

ACM Class: I.4.8

Processing Uncertainty and Indeterminacy in Information Systems success map**

Authors: Jose L. Salmeron, Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: IS success is a complex concept, and its evaluation is complicated, unstructured and not readily quantifiable. Numerous scientific publications address the issue of success in the IS field as well as in other fields. But, little efforts have been done for processing indeterminacy and uncertainty in success research. This paper shows a formal method for map** success using Neutrosophic Success… ▽ More IS success is a complex concept, and its evaluation is complicated, unstructured and not readily quantifiable. Numerous scientific publications address the issue of success in the IS field as well as in other fields. But, little efforts have been done for processing indeterminacy and uncertainty in success research. This paper shows a formal method for map** success using Neutrosophic Success Map. This is an emerging tool for processing indeterminacy and uncertainty in success research. EIS success have been analyzed using this tool. △ Less

Submitted 15 December, 2005; v1 submitted 12 December, 2005; originally announced December 2005.

Comments: 13 pages, 2 figures

ACM Class: I.2.11

Interval Neutrosophic Sets and Logic: Theory and Applications in Computing

Authors: Haibin Wang, Florentin Smarandache, Yan-Qing Zhang, Rajshekhar Sunderraman

Abstract: This book presents the advancements and applications of neutrosophics. Chapter 1 first introduces the interval neutrosophic sets which is an instance of neutrosophic sets. In this chapter, the definition of interval neutrosophic sets and set-theoretic operators are given and various properties of interval neutrosophic set are proved. Chapter 2 defines the interval neutrosophic logic based on int… ▽ More This book presents the advancements and applications of neutrosophics. Chapter 1 first introduces the interval neutrosophic sets which is an instance of neutrosophic sets. In this chapter, the definition of interval neutrosophic sets and set-theoretic operators are given and various properties of interval neutrosophic set are proved. Chapter 2 defines the interval neutrosophic logic based on interval neutrosophic sets including the syntax and semantics of first order interval neutrosophic propositional logic and first order interval neutrosophic predicate logic. The interval neutrosophic logic can reason and model fuzzy, incomplete and inconsistent information. In this chapter, we also design an interval neutrosophic inference system based on first order interval neutrosophic predicate logic. The interval neutrosophic inference system can be applied to decision making. Chapter 3 gives one application of interval neutrosophic sets and logic in the field of relational databases. Neutrosophic data model is the generalization of fuzzy data model and paraconsistent data model. Here, we generalize various set-theoretic and relation-theoretic operations of fuzzy data model to neutrosophic data model. Chapter 4 gives another application of interval neutrosophic logic. A soft semantic Web Services agent framework is proposed to faciliate the registration and discovery of high quality semantic Web Services agent. The intelligent inference engine module of soft Semantic Web Services agent is implemented using interval neutrosophic logic. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2005; originally announced May 2005.

Comments: 12 figures, 100 pages, book in press

The Combination of Paradoxical, Uncertain, and Imprecise Sources of Information based on DSmT and Neutro-Fuzzy Inference

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been, and still remains today, of primal importance for the development of reliable modern information systems involving artificial reasoning. In this chapter, we present a survey of our recent theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning, known as Dezert-Smar… ▽ More The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been, and still remains today, of primal importance for the development of reliable modern information systems involving artificial reasoning. In this chapter, we present a survey of our recent theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning, known as Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) in the literature, developed for dealing with imprecise, uncertain and paradoxical sources of information. We focus our presentation here rather on the foundations of DSmT, and on the two important new rules of combination, than on browsing specific applications of DSmT available in literature. Several simple examples are given throughout the presentation to show the efficiency and the generality of this new approach. The last part of this chapter concerns the presentation of the neutrosophic logic, the neutro-fuzzy inference and its connection with DSmT. Fuzzy logic and neutrosophic logic are useful tools in decision making after fusioning the information using the DSm hybrid rule of combination of masses. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2004; originally announced December 2004.

Comments: 20 pages

ACM Class: I.2.4

Journal ref: A version of this paper published in Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Fuzzy Theory and Technology (FT&T 2005), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, July 21-26, 2005.

Interval Neutrosophic Logics: Theory and Applications

Authors: Haibin Wang, Florentin Smarandache, Yanqing Zhang, Rajshekhar Sunderraman

Abstract: In this paper, we present the interval neutrosophic logics which generalizes the fuzzy logic, paraconsistent logic, intuitionistic fuzzy logic and many other non-classical and non-standard logics. We will give the formal definition of interval neutrosophic propositional calculus and interval neutrosophic predicate calculus. Then we give one application of interval neutrosophic logics to do appro… ▽ More In this paper, we present the interval neutrosophic logics which generalizes the fuzzy logic, paraconsistent logic, intuitionistic fuzzy logic and many other non-classical and non-standard logics. We will give the formal definition of interval neutrosophic propositional calculus and interval neutrosophic predicate calculus. Then we give one application of interval neutrosophic logics to do approximate reasoning. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2004; v1 submitted 21 October, 2004; originally announced October 2004.

Comments: 18 pages, 4 figures

An In-Depth Look at Information Fusion Rules & the Unification of Fusion Theories

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: This paper may look like a glossary of the fusion rules and we also introduce new ones presenting their formulas and examples: Conjunctive, Disjunctive, Exclusive Disjunctive, Mixed Conjunctive-Disjunctive rules, Conditional rule, Dempster's, Yager's, Smets' TBM rule, Dubois-Prade's, Dezert-Smarandache classical and hybrid rules, Murphy's average rule, Inagaki-Lefevre-Colot-Vannoorenberghe Unifi… ▽ More This paper may look like a glossary of the fusion rules and we also introduce new ones presenting their formulas and examples: Conjunctive, Disjunctive, Exclusive Disjunctive, Mixed Conjunctive-Disjunctive rules, Conditional rule, Dempster's, Yager's, Smets' TBM rule, Dubois-Prade's, Dezert-Smarandache classical and hybrid rules, Murphy's average rule, Inagaki-Lefevre-Colot-Vannoorenberghe Unified Combination rules [and, as particular cases: Iganaki's parameterized rule, Weighting Average Operator, minC (M. Daniel), and newly Proportional Conflict Redistribution rules (Smarandache-Dezert) among which PCR5 is the most exact way of redistribution of the conflicting mass to non-empty sets following the path of the conjunctive rule], Zhang's Center Combination rule, Convolutive x-Averaging, Consensus Operator (Josang), Cautious Rule (Smets), ?-junctions rules (Smets), etc. and three new T-norm & T-conorm rules adjusted from fuzzy and neutrosophic sets to information fusion (Tchamova-Smarandache). Introducing the degree of union and degree of inclusion with respect to the cardinal of sets not with the fuzzy set point of view, besides that of intersection, many fusion rules can be improved. There are corner cases where each rule might have difficulties working or may not get an expected result. △ Less

Submitted 27 October, 2004; v1 submitted 14 October, 2004; originally announced October 2004.

Comments: 27 pages. To be presented at NASA Langley Research Center (Hampton, Virginia), on November 5th, 2004

ACM Class: I.2.3

Journal ref: Partially published in Review of the Air Force Academy (The Scientific Informative Review), Brasov, No. 2, pp. 31-40, 2006.

Unification of Fusion Theories

Authors: Florentin Smarandache

Abstract: Since no fusion theory neither rule fully satisfy all needed applications, the author proposes a Unification of Fusion Theories and a combination of fusion rules in solving problems/applications. For each particular application, one selects the most appropriate model, rule(s), and algorithm of implementation. We are working in the unification of the fusion theories and rules, which looks like a… ▽ More Since no fusion theory neither rule fully satisfy all needed applications, the author proposes a Unification of Fusion Theories and a combination of fusion rules in solving problems/applications. For each particular application, one selects the most appropriate model, rule(s), and algorithm of implementation. We are working in the unification of the fusion theories and rules, which looks like a cooking recipe, better we'd say like a logical chart for a computer programmer, but we don't see another method to comprise/unify all things. The unification scenario presented herein, which is now in an incipient form, should periodically be updated incorporating new discoveries from the fusion and engineering research. △ Less

Submitted 29 October, 2004; v1 submitted 22 September, 2004; originally announced September 2004.

Comments: 14 pages

ACM Class: I.2.3

Journal ref: Presented at NATO Advanced Study Institute, Albena, Bulgaria, 16-27 May 2005. International Journal of Applied Mathematics & Statistics, Vol. 2, 1-14, 2004.

The Generalized Pignistic Transformation

Authors: Jean Dezert, Florentin Smarandache, Milan Daniel

Abstract: This paper presents in detail the generalized pignistic transformation (GPT) succinctly developed in the Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) framework as a tool for decision process. The GPT allows to provide a subjective probability measure from any generalized basic belief assignment given by any corpus of evidence. We mainly focus our presentation on the 3D case and provide the complete result o… ▽ More This paper presents in detail the generalized pignistic transformation (GPT) succinctly developed in the Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) framework as a tool for decision process. The GPT allows to provide a subjective probability measure from any generalized basic belief assignment given by any corpus of evidence. We mainly focus our presentation on the 3D case and provide the complete result obtained by the GPT and its validation drawn from the probability theory. △ Less

Submitted 6 September, 2004; originally announced September 2004.

Comments: 8 pages, 3 graphs, many tables. The Seventh International Conference on Information Fusion, Stockholm, Sweden, 28 June - 1 July 2004

ACM Class: I.2.4

Journal ref: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Fusion, International Society for Information Fusion, Stockholm, Sweden, 384-391, 2004

Proportional Conflict Redistribution Rules for Information Fusion

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: In this paper we propose five versions of a Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule (PCR) for information fusion together with several examples. From PCR1 to PCR2, PCR3, PCR4, PCR5 one increases the complexity of the rules and also the exactitude of the redistribution of conflicting masses. PCR1 restricted from the hyper-power set to the power set and without degenerate cases gives the same re… ▽ More In this paper we propose five versions of a Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule (PCR) for information fusion together with several examples. From PCR1 to PCR2, PCR3, PCR4, PCR5 one increases the complexity of the rules and also the exactitude of the redistribution of conflicting masses. PCR1 restricted from the hyper-power set to the power set and without degenerate cases gives the same result as the Weighted Average Operator (WAO) proposed recently by Jøsang, Daniel and Vannoorenberghe but does not satisfy the neutrality property of vacuous belief assignment. That's why improved PCR rules are proposed in this paper. PCR4 is an improvement of minC and Dempster's rules. The PCR rules redistribute the conflicting mass, after the conjunctive rule has been applied, proportionally with some functions depending on the masses assigned to their corresponding columns in the mass matrix. There are infinitely many ways these functions (weighting factors) can be chosen depending on the complexity one wants to deal with in specific applications and fusion systems. Any fusion combination rule is at some degree ad-hoc. △ Less

Submitted 25 March, 2005; v1 submitted 27 August, 2004; originally announced August 2004.

Comments: 41 pages

ACM Class: I.2.4

Journal ref: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Fusion, Philadelphia, 25-29 July, 2005; IEEE Catalog Number: 05EX1120C, ISBN: 0-7803-9287-6.

An Algorithm for Quasi-Associative and Quasi-Markovian Rules of Combination in Information Fusion

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: In this paper one proposes a simple algorithm of combining the fusion rules, those rules which first use the conjunctive rule and then the transfer of conflicting mass to the non-empty sets, in such a way that they gain the property of associativity and fulfill the Markovian requirement for dynamic fusion. Also, a new rule, SDL-improved, is presented. In this paper one proposes a simple algorithm of combining the fusion rules, those rules which first use the conjunctive rule and then the transfer of conflicting mass to the non-empty sets, in such a way that they gain the property of associativity and fulfill the Markovian requirement for dynamic fusion. Also, a new rule, SDL-improved, is presented. △ Less

Submitted 14 August, 2004; v1 submitted 8 August, 2004; originally announced August 2004.

Comments: 9 pages

ACM Class: I.2.4

Journal ref: International Journal of Applied Mathematics & Statistics, Vol. 22, No. S11 (Special Issue on Soft Computing), 33-42, 2011

A Simple Proportional Conflict Redistribution Rule

Authors: Florentin Smarandache, Jean Dezert

Abstract: One proposes a first alternative rule of combination to WAO (Weighted Average Operator) proposed recently by Josang, Daniel and Vannoorenberghe, called Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule (denoted PCR1). PCR1 and WAO are particular cases of WO (the Weighted Operator) because the conflicting mass is redistributed with respect to some weighting factors. In this first PCR rule, the proportion… ▽ More One proposes a first alternative rule of combination to WAO (Weighted Average Operator) proposed recently by Josang, Daniel and Vannoorenberghe, called Proportional Conflict Redistribution rule (denoted PCR1). PCR1 and WAO are particular cases of WO (the Weighted Operator) because the conflicting mass is redistributed with respect to some weighting factors. In this first PCR rule, the proportionalization is done for each non-empty set with respect to the non-zero sum of its corresponding mass matrix - instead of its mass column average as in WAO, but the results are the same as Ph. Smets has pointed out. Also, we extend WAO (which herein gives no solution) for the degenerate case when all column sums of all non-empty sets are zero, and then the conflicting mass is transferred to the non-empty disjunctive form of all non-empty sets together; but if this disjunctive form happens to be empty, then one considers an open world (i.e. the frame of discernment might contain new hypotheses) and thus all conflicting mass is transferred to the empty set. In addition to WAO, we propose a general formula for PCR1 (WAO for non-degenerate cases). △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2004; v1 submitted 3 August, 2004; originally announced August 2004.

Comments: 21 pages

ACM Class: I.2.3

Journal ref: International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 3, No. J05, 1-36, 2005.