-
Instance-Optimal Private Density Estimation in the Wasserstein Distance
Authors:
Vitaly Feldman,
Audra McMillan,
Satchit Sivakumar,
Kunal Talwar
Abstract:
Estimating the density of a distribution from samples is a fundamental problem in statistics. In many practical settings, the Wasserstein distance is an appropriate error metric for density estimation. For example, when estimating population densities in a geographic region, a small Wasserstein distance means that the estimate is able to capture roughly where the population mass is. In this work w…
▽ More
Estimating the density of a distribution from samples is a fundamental problem in statistics. In many practical settings, the Wasserstein distance is an appropriate error metric for density estimation. For example, when estimating population densities in a geographic region, a small Wasserstein distance means that the estimate is able to capture roughly where the population mass is. In this work we study differentially private density estimation in the Wasserstein distance. We design and analyze instance-optimal algorithms for this problem that can adapt to easy instances.
For distributions $P$ over $\mathbb{R}$, we consider a strong notion of instance-optimality: an algorithm that uniformly achieves the instance-optimal estimation rate is competitive with an algorithm that is told that the distribution is either $P$ or $Q_P$ for some distribution $Q_P$ whose probability density function (pdf) is within a factor of 2 of the pdf of $P$. For distributions over $\mathbb{R}^2$, we use a different notion of instance optimality. We say that an algorithm is instance-optimal if it is competitive with an algorithm that is given a constant-factor multiplicative approximation of the density of the distribution. We characterize the instance-optimal estimation rates in both these settings and show that they are uniformly achievable (up to polylogarithmic factors). Our approach for $\mathbb{R}^2$ extends to arbitrary metric spaces as it goes via hierarchically separated trees. As a special case our results lead to instance-optimal private learning in TV distance for discrete distributions.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
TRACE: A Time-Relational Approximate Cubing Engine for Fast Data Insights
Authors:
Suharsh Sivakumar,
Jonathan Shen,
Rajat Monga
Abstract:
A large class of data questions can be modeled as identifying important slices of data driven by user defined metrics. This paper presents TRACE, a Time-Relational Approximate Cubing Engine that enables interactive analysis on such slices with a low upfront cost - both in space and computation. It does this by materializing the most important parts of the cube over time enabling interactive queryi…
▽ More
A large class of data questions can be modeled as identifying important slices of data driven by user defined metrics. This paper presents TRACE, a Time-Relational Approximate Cubing Engine that enables interactive analysis on such slices with a low upfront cost - both in space and computation. It does this by materializing the most important parts of the cube over time enabling interactive querying for a large class of analytical queries e.g. what part of my business has the highest revenue growth ([SubCategory=Sports Equipment, Gender=Female]), what slices are lagging in revenue per user ([State=CA, Age=20-30]). Many user defined metrics are supported including common aggregations such as SUM, COUNT, DISTINCT COUNT and more complex ones such as AVERAGE. We implemented and deployed TRACE for a variety of business use cases.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Counting Distinct Elements in the Turnstile Model with Differential Privacy under Continual Observation
Authors:
Palak Jain,
Iden Kalemaj,
Sofya Raskhodnikova,
Satchit Sivakumar,
Adam Smith
Abstract:
Privacy is a central challenge for systems that learn from sensitive data sets, especially when a system's outputs must be continuously updated to reflect changing data. We consider the achievable error for differentially private continual release of a basic statistic -- the number of distinct items -- in a stream where items may be both inserted and deleted (the turnstile model). With only insert…
▽ More
Privacy is a central challenge for systems that learn from sensitive data sets, especially when a system's outputs must be continuously updated to reflect changing data. We consider the achievable error for differentially private continual release of a basic statistic -- the number of distinct items -- in a stream where items may be both inserted and deleted (the turnstile model). With only insertions, existing algorithms have additive error just polylogarithmic in the length of the stream $T$. We uncover a much richer landscape in the turnstile model, even without considering memory restrictions. We show that every differentially private mechanism that handles insertions and deletions has worst-case additive error at least $T^{1/4}$ even under a relatively weak, event-level privacy definition. Then, we identify a parameter of the input stream, its maximum flippancy, that is low for natural data streams and for which we give tight parameterized error guarantees. Specifically, the maximum flippancy is the largest number of times that the contribution of a single item to the distinct elements count changes over the course of the stream. We present an item-level differentially private mechanism that, for all turnstile streams with maximum flippancy $w$, continually outputs the number of distinct elements with an $O(\sqrt{w} \cdot poly\log T)$ additive error, without requiring prior knowledge of $w$. We prove that this is the best achievable error bound that depends only on $w$, for a large range of values of $w$. When $w$ is small, the error of our mechanism is similar to the polylogarithmic in $T$ error in the insertion-only setting, bypassing the hardness in the turnstile model.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2023; v1 submitted 11 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Detection and Classification of Glioblastoma Brain Tumor
Authors:
Utkarsh Maurya,
Appisetty Krishna Kalyan,
Swapnil Bohidar,
Dr. S. Sivakumar
Abstract:
Glioblastoma brain tumors are highly malignant and often require early detection and accurate segmentation for effective treatment. We are proposing two deep learning models in this paper, namely UNet and Deeplabv3, for the detection and segmentation of glioblastoma brain tumors using preprocessed brain MRI images. The performance evaluation is done for these models in terms of accuracy and comput…
▽ More
Glioblastoma brain tumors are highly malignant and often require early detection and accurate segmentation for effective treatment. We are proposing two deep learning models in this paper, namely UNet and Deeplabv3, for the detection and segmentation of glioblastoma brain tumors using preprocessed brain MRI images. The performance evaluation is done for these models in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. Our experimental results demonstrate that both UNet and Deeplabv3 models achieve accurate detection and segmentation of glioblastoma brain tumors. However, Deeplabv3 outperforms UNet in terms of accuracy, albeit at the cost of requiring more computational resources. Our proposed models offer a promising approach for the early detection and segmentation of glioblastoma brain tumors, which can aid in effective treatment strategies. Further research can focus on optimizing the computational efficiency of the Deeplabv3 model while maintaining its high accuracy for real-world clinical applications. Overall, our approach works and contributes to the field of medical image analysis and deep learning-based approaches for brain tumor detection and segmentation. Our suggested models can have a major influence on the prognosis and treatment of people with glioblastoma, a fatal form of brain cancer. It is necessary to conduct more research to examine the practical use of these models in real-life healthcare settings.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Stability is Stable: Connections between Replicability, Privacy, and Adaptive Generalization
Authors:
Mark Bun,
Marco Gaboardi,
Max Hopkins,
Russell Impagliazzo,
Rex Lei,
Toniann Pitassi,
Satchit Sivakumar,
Jessica Sorrell
Abstract:
The notion of replicable algorithms was introduced in Impagliazzo et al. [STOC '22] to describe randomized algorithms that are stable under the resampling of their inputs. More precisely, a replicable algorithm gives the same output with high probability when its randomness is fixed and it is run on a new i.i.d. sample drawn from the same distribution. Using replicable algorithms for data analysis…
▽ More
The notion of replicable algorithms was introduced in Impagliazzo et al. [STOC '22] to describe randomized algorithms that are stable under the resampling of their inputs. More precisely, a replicable algorithm gives the same output with high probability when its randomness is fixed and it is run on a new i.i.d. sample drawn from the same distribution. Using replicable algorithms for data analysis can facilitate the verification of published results by ensuring that the results of an analysis will be the same with high probability, even when that analysis is performed on a new data set.
In this work, we establish new connections and separations between replicability and standard notions of algorithmic stability. In particular, we give sample-efficient algorithmic reductions between perfect generalization, approximate differential privacy, and replicability for a broad class of statistical problems. Conversely, we show any such equivalence must break down computationally: there exist statistical problems that are easy under differential privacy, but that cannot be solved replicably without breaking public-key cryptography. Furthermore, these results are tight: our reductions are statistically optimal, and we show that any computational separation between DP and replicability must imply the existence of one-way functions.
Our statistical reductions give a new algorithmic framework for translating between notions of stability, which we instantiate to answer several open questions in replicability and privacy. This includes giving sample-efficient replicable algorithms for various PAC learning, distribution estimation, and distribution testing problems, algorithmic amplification of $δ$ in approximate DP, conversions from item-level to user-level privacy, and the existence of private agnostic-to-realizable learning reductions under structured distributions.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2023; v1 submitted 22 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Differentially Private Sampling from Distributions
Authors:
Sofya Raskhodnikova,
Satchit Sivakumar,
Adam Smith,
Marika Swanberg
Abstract:
We initiate an investigation of private sampling from distributions. Given a dataset with $n$ independent observations from an unknown distribution $P$, a sampling algorithm must output a single observation from a distribution that is close in total variation distance to $P$ while satisfying differential privacy. Sampling abstracts the goal of generating small amounts of realistic-looking data. We…
▽ More
We initiate an investigation of private sampling from distributions. Given a dataset with $n$ independent observations from an unknown distribution $P$, a sampling algorithm must output a single observation from a distribution that is close in total variation distance to $P$ while satisfying differential privacy. Sampling abstracts the goal of generating small amounts of realistic-looking data. We provide tight upper and lower bounds for the dataset size needed for this task for three natural families of distributions: arbitrary distributions on $\{1,\ldots ,k\}$, arbitrary product distributions on $\{0,1\}^d$, and product distributions on $\{0,1\}^d$ with bias in each coordinate bounded away from 0 and 1. We demonstrate that, in some parameter regimes, private sampling requires asymptotically fewer observations than learning a description of $P$ nonprivately; in other regimes, however, private sampling proves to be as difficult as private learning. Notably, for some classes of distributions, the overhead in the number of observations needed for private learning compared to non-private learning is completely captured by the number of observations needed for private sampling.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
The Price of Differential Privacy under Continual Observation
Authors:
Palak Jain,
Sofya Raskhodnikova,
Satchit Sivakumar,
Adam Smith
Abstract:
We study the accuracy of differentially private mechanisms in the continual release model. A continual release mechanism receives a sensitive dataset as a stream of $T$ inputs and produces, after receiving each input, an accurate output on the obtained inputs. In contrast, a batch algorithm receives the data as one batch and produces a single output.
We provide the first strong lower bounds on t…
▽ More
We study the accuracy of differentially private mechanisms in the continual release model. A continual release mechanism receives a sensitive dataset as a stream of $T$ inputs and produces, after receiving each input, an accurate output on the obtained inputs. In contrast, a batch algorithm receives the data as one batch and produces a single output.
We provide the first strong lower bounds on the error of continual release mechanisms. In particular, for two fundamental problems that are widely studied and used in the batch model, we show that the worst case error of every continual release algorithm is $\tilde Ω(T^{1/3})$ times larger than that of the best batch algorithm. Previous work shows only a polylogarithimic (in $T$) gap between the worst case error achievable in these two models; further, for many problems, including the summation of binary attributes, the polylogarithmic gap is tight (Dwork et al., 2010; Chan et al., 2010). Our results show that problems closely related to summation -- specifically, those that require selecting the largest of a set of sums -- are fundamentally harder in the continual release model than in the batch model.
Our lower bounds assume only that privacy holds for streams fixed in advance (the "nonadaptive" setting). However, we provide matching upper bounds that hold in a model where privacy is required even for adaptively selected streams. This model may be of independent interest.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2022; v1 submitted 1 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
ExCode-Mixed: Explainable Approaches towards Sentiment Analysis on Code-Mixed Data using BERT models
Authors:
Aman Priyanshu,
Aleti Vardhan,
Sudarshan Sivakumar,
Supriti Vijay,
Nipuna Chhabra
Abstract:
The increasing use of social media sites in countries like India has given rise to large volumes of code-mixed data. Sentiment analysis of this data can provide integral insights into people's perspectives and opinions. Develo** robust explainability techniques which explain why models make their predictions becomes essential. In this paper, we propose an adequate methodology to integrate explai…
▽ More
The increasing use of social media sites in countries like India has given rise to large volumes of code-mixed data. Sentiment analysis of this data can provide integral insights into people's perspectives and opinions. Develo** robust explainability techniques which explain why models make their predictions becomes essential. In this paper, we propose an adequate methodology to integrate explainable approaches into code-mixed sentiment analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 25 September, 2021; v1 submitted 7 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Multiclass versus Binary Differentially Private PAC Learning
Authors:
Mark Bun,
Marco Gaboardi,
Satchit Sivakumar
Abstract:
We show a generic reduction from multiclass differentially private PAC learning to binary private PAC learning. We apply this transformation to a recently proposed binary private PAC learner to obtain a private multiclass learner with sample complexity that has a polynomial dependence on the multiclass Littlestone dimension and a poly-logarithmic dependence on the number of classes. This yields an…
▽ More
We show a generic reduction from multiclass differentially private PAC learning to binary private PAC learning. We apply this transformation to a recently proposed binary private PAC learner to obtain a private multiclass learner with sample complexity that has a polynomial dependence on the multiclass Littlestone dimension and a poly-logarithmic dependence on the number of classes. This yields an exponential improvement in the dependence on both parameters over learners from previous work. Our proof extends the notion of $Ψ$-dimension defined in work of Ben-David et al. [JCSS '95] to the online setting and explores its general properties.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.