Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Shirafuji, A

Refactoring Programs Using Large Language Models with Few-Shot Examples

Authors: Atsushi Shirafuji, Yusuke Oda, Jun Suzuki, Makoto Morishita, Yutaka Watanobe

Abstract: A less complex and more straightforward program is a crucial factor that enhances its maintainability and makes writing secure and bug-free programs easier. However, due to its heavy workload and the risks of breaking the working programs, programmers are reluctant to do code refactoring, and thus, it also causes the loss of potential learning experiences. To mitigate this, we demonstrate the appl… ▽ More A less complex and more straightforward program is a crucial factor that enhances its maintainability and makes writing secure and bug-free programs easier. However, due to its heavy workload and the risks of breaking the working programs, programmers are reluctant to do code refactoring, and thus, it also causes the loss of potential learning experiences. To mitigate this, we demonstrate the application of using a large language model (LLM), GPT-3.5, to suggest less complex versions of the user-written Python program, aiming to encourage users to learn how to write better programs. We propose a method to leverage the prompting with few-shot examples of the LLM by selecting the best-suited code refactoring examples for each target programming problem based on the prior evaluation of prompting with the one-shot example. The quantitative evaluation shows that 95.68% of programs can be refactored by generating 10 candidates each, resulting in a 17.35% reduction in the average cyclomatic complexity and a 25.84% decrease in the average number of lines after filtering only generated programs that are semantically correct. Furthermore, the qualitative evaluation shows outstanding capability in code formatting, while unnecessary behaviors such as deleting or translating comments are also observed. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: 10 pages, 10 figures, accepted to the 30th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC 2023)

Rule-Based Error Classification for Analyzing Differences in Frequent Errors

Authors: Atsushi Shirafuji, Taku Matsumoto, Md Faizul Ibne Amin, Yutaka Watanobe

Abstract: Finding and fixing errors is a time-consuming task not only for novice programmers but also for expert programmers. Prior work has identified frequent error patterns among various levels of programmers. However, the differences in the tendencies between novices and experts have yet to be revealed. From the knowledge of the frequent errors in each level of programmers, instructors will be able to p… ▽ More Finding and fixing errors is a time-consuming task not only for novice programmers but also for expert programmers. Prior work has identified frequent error patterns among various levels of programmers. However, the differences in the tendencies between novices and experts have yet to be revealed. From the knowledge of the frequent errors in each level of programmers, instructors will be able to provide helpful advice for each level of learners. In this paper, we propose a rule-based error classification tool to classify errors in code pairs consisting of wrong and correct programs. We classify errors for 95,631 code pairs and identify 3.47 errors on average, which are submitted by various levels of programmers on an online judge system. The classified errors are used to analyze the differences in frequent errors between novice and expert programmers. The analyzed results show that, as for the same introductory problems, errors made by novices are due to the lack of knowledge in programming, and the mistakes are considered an essential part of the learning process. On the other hand, errors made by experts are due to misunderstandings caused by the carelessness of reading problems or the challenges of solving problems differently than usual. The proposed tool can be used to create error-labeled datasets and for further code-related educational research. △ Less

Submitted 1 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: 7 pages, 4 figures, accepted to TALE 2023

Program Repair with Minimal Edits Using CodeT5

Authors: Atsushi Shirafuji, Md. Mostafizer Rahman, Md Faizul Ibne Amin, Yutaka Watanobe

Abstract: Programmers often struggle to identify and fix bugs in their programs. In recent years, many language models (LMs) have been proposed to fix erroneous programs and support error recovery. However, the LMs tend to generate solutions that differ from the original input programs. This leads to potential comprehension difficulties for users. In this paper, we propose an approach to suggest a correct p… ▽ More Programmers often struggle to identify and fix bugs in their programs. In recent years, many language models (LMs) have been proposed to fix erroneous programs and support error recovery. However, the LMs tend to generate solutions that differ from the original input programs. This leads to potential comprehension difficulties for users. In this paper, we propose an approach to suggest a correct program with minimal repair edits using CodeT5. We fine-tune a pre-trained CodeT5 on code pairs of wrong and correct programs and evaluate its performance with several baseline models. The experimental results show that the fine-tuned CodeT5 achieves a pass@100 of 91.95% and an average edit distance of the most similar correct program of 6.84, which indicates that at least one correct program can be suggested by generating 100 candidate programs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of LMs in suggesting program repair with minimal edits for solving introductory programming problems. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: 7 pages, 6 figures, accepted to iCAST 2023

Exploring Automated Code Evaluation Systems and Resources for Code Analysis: A Comprehensive Survey

Authors: Md. Mostafizer Rahman, Yutaka Watanobe, Atsushi Shirafuji, Mohamed Hamada

Abstract: The automated code evaluation system (AES) is mainly designed to reliably assess user-submitted code. Due to their extensive range of applications and the accumulation of valuable resources, AESs are becoming increasingly popular. Research on the application of AES and their real-world resource exploration for diverse coding tasks is still lacking. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive surve… ▽ More The automated code evaluation system (AES) is mainly designed to reliably assess user-submitted code. Due to their extensive range of applications and the accumulation of valuable resources, AESs are becoming increasingly popular. Research on the application of AES and their real-world resource exploration for diverse coding tasks is still lacking. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive survey on AESs and their resources. This survey explores the application areas of AESs, available resources, and resource utilization for coding tasks. AESs are categorized into programming contests, programming learning and education, recruitment, online compilers, and additional modules, depending on their application. We explore the available datasets and other resources of these systems for research, analysis, and coding tasks. Moreover, we provide an overview of machine learning-driven coding tasks, such as bug detection, code review, comprehension, refactoring, search, representation, and repair. These tasks are performed using real-life datasets. In addition, we briefly discuss the Aizu Online Judge platform as a real example of an AES from the perspectives of system design (hardware and software), operation (competition and education), and research. This is due to the scalability of the AOJ platform (programming education, competitions, and practice), open internal features (hardware and software), attention from the research community, open source data (e.g., solution codes and submission documents), and transparency. We also analyze the overall performance of this system and the perceived challenges over the years. △ Less

Submitted 8 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Deduplicating and Ranking Solution Programs for Suggesting Reference Solutions

Authors: Atsushi Shirafuji, Yutaka Watanobe

Abstract: Referring to solution programs written by other users is helpful for learners in programming education. However, current online judge systems just list all solution programs submitted by users for references, and the programs are sorted based on the submission date and time, execution time, or user rating, ignoring to what extent the programs can be helpful to be referenced. In addition, users str… ▽ More Referring to solution programs written by other users is helpful for learners in programming education. However, current online judge systems just list all solution programs submitted by users for references, and the programs are sorted based on the submission date and time, execution time, or user rating, ignoring to what extent the programs can be helpful to be referenced. In addition, users struggle to refer to a variety of solution approaches since there are too many duplicated and near-duplicated programs. To motivate learners to refer to various solutions to learn better solution approaches, in this paper, we propose an approach to deduplicate and rank common solution programs in each programming problem. Inspired by the nature that the many-duplicated program adopts a more common approach and can be a general reference, we remove the near-duplicated solution programs and rank the unique programs based on the duplicate count. The experiments on the solution programs submitted to a real-world online judge system demonstrate that the number of programs is reduced by 60.20%, whereas the baseline only reduces by 29.59% after the deduplication, meaning that users only need to refer to 39.80% of programs on average. Furthermore, our analysis shows that top-10 ranked programs cover 29.95% of programs on average, indicating that users can grasp 29.95% of solution approaches by referring to only 10 programs. The proposed approach shows the potential of reducing the learners' burden of referring to too many solutions and motivating them to learn a variety of solution approaches. △ Less

Submitted 11 September, 2023; v1 submitted 16 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Comments: 7 pages, 5 figures, accepted to ASSE 2023

Exploring the Robustness of Large Language Models for Solving Programming Problems

Authors: Atsushi Shirafuji, Yutaka Watanobe, Takumi Ito, Makoto Morishita, Yuki Nakamura, Yusuke Oda, Jun Suzuki

Abstract: Using large language models (LLMs) for source code has recently gained attention. LLMs, such as Transformer-based models like Codex and ChatGPT, have been shown to be highly capable of solving a wide range of programming problems. However, the extent to which LLMs understand problem descriptions and generate programs accordingly or just retrieve source code from the most relevant problem in traini… ▽ More Using large language models (LLMs) for source code has recently gained attention. LLMs, such as Transformer-based models like Codex and ChatGPT, have been shown to be highly capable of solving a wide range of programming problems. However, the extent to which LLMs understand problem descriptions and generate programs accordingly or just retrieve source code from the most relevant problem in training data based on superficial cues has not been discovered yet. To explore this research question, we conduct experiments to understand the robustness of several popular LLMs, CodeGen and GPT-3.5 series models, capable of tackling code generation tasks in introductory programming problems. Our experimental results show that CodeGen and Codex are sensitive to the superficial modifications of problem descriptions and significantly impact code generation performance. Furthermore, we observe that Codex relies on variable names, as randomized variables decrease the solved rate significantly. However, the state-of-the-art (SOTA) models, such as InstructGPT and ChatGPT, show higher robustness to superficial modifications and have an outstanding capability for solving programming problems. This highlights the fact that slight modifications to the prompts given to the LLMs can greatly affect code generation performance, and careful formatting of prompts is essential for high-quality code generation, while the SOTA models are becoming more robust to perturbations. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.