-
Diversity Embeddings and the Hypergraph Sparsest Cut
Authors:
Adam D. Jozefiak,
F. Bruce Shepherd
Abstract:
Good approximations have been attained for the sparsest cut problem by rounding solutions to convex relaxations via low-distortion metric embeddings. Recently, Bryant and Tupper showed that this approach extends to the hypergraph setting by formulating a linear program whose solutions are so-called diversities which are rounded via diversity embeddings into $\ell_1$. Diversities are a generalizati…
▽ More
Good approximations have been attained for the sparsest cut problem by rounding solutions to convex relaxations via low-distortion metric embeddings. Recently, Bryant and Tupper showed that this approach extends to the hypergraph setting by formulating a linear program whose solutions are so-called diversities which are rounded via diversity embeddings into $\ell_1$. Diversities are a generalization of metric spaces in which the nonnegative function is defined on all subsets as opposed to only on pairs of elements.
We show that this approach yields a polytime $O(\log{n})$-approximation when either the supply or demands are given by a graph. This result improves upon Plotkin et al.'s $O(\log{(kn)}\log{n})$-approximation, where $k$ is the number of demands, for the setting where the supply is given by a graph and the demands are given by a hypergraph. Additionally, we provide a polytime $O(\min{\{r_G,r_H\}}\log{r_H}\log{n})$-approximation for when the supply and demands are given by hypergraphs whose hyperedges are bounded in cardinality by $r_G$ and $r_H$ respectively.
To establish these results we provide an $O(\log{n})$-distortion $\ell_1$ embedding for the class of diversities known as diameter diversities. This improves upon Bryant and Tupper's $O(\log\^2{n})$-distortion embedding. The smallest known distortion with which an arbitrary diversity can be embedded into $\ell_1$ is $O(n)$. We show that for any $ε> 0$ and any $p>0$, there is a family of diversities which cannot be embedded into $\ell_1$ in polynomial time with distortion smaller than $O(n^{1-ε})$ based on querying the diversities on sets of cardinality at most $O(\log^p{n})$, unless $P=NP$. This disproves (an algorithmic refinement of) Bryant and Tupper's conjecture that there exists an $O(\sqrt{n})$-distortion $\ell_1$ embedding based off a diversity's induced metric.
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
A Knapsack Intersection Hierarchy Applied to All-or-Nothing Flow in Trees
Authors:
Adam Jozefiak,
F. Bruce Shepherd,
Noah Weninger
Abstract:
We introduce a natural knapsack intersection hierarchy for strengthening linear programming relaxations of packing integer programs, i.e., $\max\{w^Tx:x\in P\cap\{0,1\}^n\}$ where $P=\{x\in[0,1]^n:Ax \leq b\}$ and $A,b,w\ge0$. The $t^{th}$ level $P^{t}$ corresponds to adding cuts associated with the integer hull of the intersection of any $t$ knapsack constraints (rows of the constraint matrix). T…
▽ More
We introduce a natural knapsack intersection hierarchy for strengthening linear programming relaxations of packing integer programs, i.e., $\max\{w^Tx:x\in P\cap\{0,1\}^n\}$ where $P=\{x\in[0,1]^n:Ax \leq b\}$ and $A,b,w\ge0$. The $t^{th}$ level $P^{t}$ corresponds to adding cuts associated with the integer hull of the intersection of any $t$ knapsack constraints (rows of the constraint matrix). This model captures the maximum possible strength of "$t$-row cuts", an approach often used by solvers for small $t$. If $A$ is $m \times n$, then $P^m$ is the integer hull of $P$ and $P^1$ corresponds to adding cuts for each associated single-row knapsack problem. Thus, even separating over $P^1$ is NP-hard. However, for fixed $t$ and any $ε>0$, results of Pritchard imply there is a polytime $(1+ε)$-approximation for $P^{t}$. We then investigate the hierarchy's strength in the context of the well-studied all-or-nothing flow problem in trees (also called unsplittable flow on trees). For this problem, we show that the integrality gap of $P^t$ is $O(n/t)$ and give examples where the gap is $Ω(n/t)$. We then examine the stronger formulation $P_{\text{rank}}$ where all rank constraints are added. For $P_{\text{rank}}^t$, our best lower bound drops to $Ω(1/c)$ at level $t=n^c$ for any $c>0$. Moreover, on a well-known class of "bad instances" due to Friggstad and Gao, we show that we can achieve this gap; hence a constant integrality gap for these instances is obtained at level $n^c$.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2022; v1 submitted 8 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
When Do Gomory-Hu Subtrees Exist?
Authors:
Guyslain Naves,
F. Bruce Shepherd
Abstract:
Gomory-Hu (GH) Trees are a classical sparsification technique for graph connectivity. It is one of the fundamental models in combinatorial optimization which also continually finds new applications, most recently in social network analysis. For any edge-capacitated undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and any subset of {\em terminals} $Z \subseteq V$, a Gomory-Hu Tree is an edge-capacitated tree…
▽ More
Gomory-Hu (GH) Trees are a classical sparsification technique for graph connectivity. It is one of the fundamental models in combinatorial optimization which also continually finds new applications, most recently in social network analysis. For any edge-capacitated undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and any subset of {\em terminals} $Z \subseteq V$, a Gomory-Hu Tree is an edge-capacitated tree $T=(Z,E(T))$ such that for every $u,v \in Z$, the value of the minimum capacity $uv$ cut in $G$ is the same as in $T$. Moreover, the minimum cuts in $T$ directly identify (in a certain way) those in $G$. It is well-known that we may not always find a GH tree which is a subgraph of $G$. For instance, every GH tree for the vertices of $K_{3,3}$ is a $5$-star. We characterize those graph and terminal pairs $(G,Z)$ which always admit such a tree. We show that these are the graphs which have no \emph{terminal-$K_{2,3}$ minor}. That is, no $K_{2,3}$ minor whose vertices correspond to terminals in $Z$. We also show that the family of pairs $(G,Z)$ which forbid such $K_{2,3}$ "$Z$-minors" arises, roughly speaking, from so-called Okamura-Seymour instances. More precisely, they are subgraphs of {\em $Z$-webs}. A $Z$-web is built from planar graphs with one outside face which contains all the terminals and each inner face is a triangle which may contain an arbitrary graph. This characterization yields an additional consequence for multiflow problems. Fix a graph $G$ and a subset $Z \subseteq V(G)$ of terminals. Call $(G,Z)$ {\em cut-sufficient} if the cut condition is sufficient to characterize the existence of a multiflow for any demands between vertices in $Z$, and any edge capacities on $G$. Then $(G,Z)$ is cut-sufficient if and only if it is terminal-$K_{2,3}$ free.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
Multi-Agent Submodular Optimization
Authors:
Richard Santiago,
F. Bruce Shepherd
Abstract:
Recent years have seen many algorithmic advances in the area of submodular optimization: (SO) $\min/\max~f(S): S \in \mathcal{F}$, where $\mathcal{F}$ is a given family of feasible sets over a ground set $V$ and $f:2^V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is submodular. This progress has been coupled with a wealth of new applications for these models. Our focus is on a more general class of \emph{multi-agent s…
▽ More
Recent years have seen many algorithmic advances in the area of submodular optimization: (SO) $\min/\max~f(S): S \in \mathcal{F}$, where $\mathcal{F}$ is a given family of feasible sets over a ground set $V$ and $f:2^V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is submodular. This progress has been coupled with a wealth of new applications for these models. Our focus is on a more general class of \emph{multi-agent submodular optimization} (MASO) which was introduced by Goel et al. in the minimization setting: $\min \sum_i f_i(S_i): S_1 \uplus S_2 \uplus \cdots \uplus S_k \in \mathcal{F}$. Here we use $\uplus$ to denote disjoint union and hence this model is attractive where resources are being allocated across $k$ agents, each with its own submodular cost function $f_i()$. In this paper we explore the extent to which the approximability of the multi-agent problems are linked to their single-agent {\em primitives}, referred to informally as the {\em multi-agent gap}.
We present different reductions that transform a multi-agent problem into a single-agent one. For maximization we show that (MASO) admits an $O(α)$-approximation whenever (SO) admits an $α$-approximation over the multilinear formulation, and thus substantially expanding the family of tractable models. We also discuss several family classes (such as spanning trees, matroids, and $p$-systems) that have a provable multi-agent gap of 1. In the minimization setting we show that (MASO) has an $O(α\cdot \min \{k, \log^2 (n)\})$-approximation whenever (SO) admits an $α$-approximation over the convex formulation. In addition, we discuss the class of "bounded blocker" families where there is a provably tight O$(\log n)$ gap between (MASO) and (SO).
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2018; v1 submitted 10 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Multivariate Submodular Optimization
Authors:
Richard Santiago,
F. Bruce Shepherd
Abstract:
Submodular functions have found a wealth of new applications in data science and machine learning models in recent years. This has been coupled with many algorithmic advances in the area of submodular optimization: (SO) $\min/\max~f(S): S \in \mathcal{F}$, where $\mathcal{F}$ is a given family of feasible sets over a ground set $V$ and $f:2^V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is submodular. In this work we…
▽ More
Submodular functions have found a wealth of new applications in data science and machine learning models in recent years. This has been coupled with many algorithmic advances in the area of submodular optimization: (SO) $\min/\max~f(S): S \in \mathcal{F}$, where $\mathcal{F}$ is a given family of feasible sets over a ground set $V$ and $f:2^V \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is submodular. In this work we focus on a more general class of \emph{multivariate submodular optimization} (MVSO) problems: $\min/\max~f (S_1,S_2,\ldots,S_k): S_1 \uplus S_2 \uplus \cdots \uplus S_k \in \mathcal{F}$. Here we use $\uplus$ to denote disjoint union and hence this model is attractive where resources are being allocated across $k$ agents, who share a `joint' multivariate nonnegative objective $f(S_1,S_2,\ldots,S_k)$ that captures some type of submodularity (i.e. diminishing returns) property. We provide some explicit examples and potential applications for this new framework.
For maximization, we show that practical algorithms such as accelerated greedy variants and distributed algorithms achieve good approximation guarantees for very general families (such as matroids and $p$-systems). For arbitrary families, we show that monotone (resp. nonmonotone) MVSO admits an $α(1-1/e)$ (resp. $α\cdot 0.385$) approximation whenever monotone (resp. nonmonotone) SO admits an $α$-approximation over the multilinear formulation. This substantially expands the family of tractable models for submodular maximization. For minimization, we show that if SO admits a $β$-approximation over \emph{modular} functions, then MVSO admits a $\frac{β\cdot n}{1+(n-1)(1-c)}$-approximation where $c\in [0,1]$ denotes the curvature of $f$, and this is essentially tight. Finally, we prove that MVSO has an $αk$-approximation whenever SO admits an $α$-approximation over the convex formulation.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2019; v1 submitted 15 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
-
The Inapproximability of Maximum Single-Sink Unsplittable, Priority and Confluent Flow Problems
Authors:
F. Bruce Shepherd,
Adrian Vetta
Abstract:
We consider single-sink network flow problems. An instance consists of a capacitated graph (directed or undirected), a sink node $t$ and a set of demands that we want to send to the sink. Here demand $i$ is located at a node $s_i$ and requests an amount $d_i$ of flow capacity in order to route successfully. Two standard objectives are to maximise (i) the number of demands (cardinality) and (ii) th…
▽ More
We consider single-sink network flow problems. An instance consists of a capacitated graph (directed or undirected), a sink node $t$ and a set of demands that we want to send to the sink. Here demand $i$ is located at a node $s_i$ and requests an amount $d_i$ of flow capacity in order to route successfully. Two standard objectives are to maximise (i) the number of demands (cardinality) and (ii) the total demand (throughput) that can be routed subject to the capacity constraints. Furthermore, we examine these maximisation problems for three specialised types of network flow: unsplittable, confluent and priority flows.
In the {\em unsplittable flow} problem (UFP), we have edge capacities, and the demand for $s_i$ must be routed on a single path. In the {\em confluent flow} problem, we have node capacities, and the final flow must induce a tree. Both of these problems have been studied extensively, primarily in the single-sink setting. However, most of this work imposed the {\em no-bottleneck assumption} (that the maximum demand $d_{max}$ is at most the minimum capacity $u_{min}$). Given the no-bottleneck assumption (NBA), there is a factor $4.43$-approximation algorithm due to Dinitz et al. for the unsplittable flow problem. Under the stronger assumption of uniform capacities, there is a factor $3$-approximation algorithm due to Chen et al. for the confluent flow problem. However, unlike the UFP, we show that a constant factor approximation algorithm cannot be obtained for the single-sink confluent flows even {\bf with} the NBA.
Without NBA, we show that maximum cardinality single-sink UFP is hard to approximate to within a factor $n^{.5-ε}$ even when all demands lie in a small interval $[1,1+Δ]$ where $Δ>0$ (but has polynomial input size). This is very sharp since when $Δ=0$, this becomes a maximum flow problem.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2015; v1 submitted 2 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
-
Dynamic vs Oblivious Routing in Network Design
Authors:
Navin Goyal,
Neil Olver,
F. Bruce Shepherd
Abstract:
Consider the robust network design problem of finding a minimum cost network with enough capacity to route all traffic demand matrices in a given polytope. We investigate the impact of different routing models in this robust setting: in particular, we compare \emph{oblivious} routing, where the routing between each terminal pair must be fixed in advance, to \emph{dynamic} routing, where routings m…
▽ More
Consider the robust network design problem of finding a minimum cost network with enough capacity to route all traffic demand matrices in a given polytope. We investigate the impact of different routing models in this robust setting: in particular, we compare \emph{oblivious} routing, where the routing between each terminal pair must be fixed in advance, to \emph{dynamic} routing, where routings may depend arbitrarily on the current demand. Our main result is a construction that shows that the optimal cost of such a network based on oblivious routing (fractional or integral) may be a factor of $\BigOmega(\log{n})$ more than the cost required when using dynamic routing. This is true even in the important special case of the asymmetric hose model. This answers a question in \cite{chekurisurvey07}, and is tight up to constant factors. Our proof technique builds on a connection between expander graphs and robust design for single-sink traffic patterns \cite{ChekuriHardness07}.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 2013;
originally announced September 2013.
-
Maximum Edge-Disjoint Paths in $k$-sums of Graphs
Authors:
Chandra Chekuri,
Guyslain Naves,
F. Bruce Shepherd
Abstract:
We consider the approximability of the maximum edge-disjoint paths problem (MEDP) in undirected graphs, and in particular, the integrality gap of the natural multicommodity flow based relaxation for it. The integrality gap is known to be $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ even for planar graphs due to a simple topological obstruction and a major focus, following earlier work, has been understanding the gap if some con…
▽ More
We consider the approximability of the maximum edge-disjoint paths problem (MEDP) in undirected graphs, and in particular, the integrality gap of the natural multicommodity flow based relaxation for it. The integrality gap is known to be $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ even for planar graphs due to a simple topological obstruction and a major focus, following earlier work, has been understanding the gap if some constant congestion is allowed.
In this context, it is natural to ask for which classes of graphs does a constant-factor constant-congestion property hold. It is easy to deduce that for given constant bounds on the approximation and congestion, the class of "nice" graphs is nor-closed. Is the converse true? Does every proper minor-closed family of graphs exhibit a constant factor, constant congestion bound relative to the LP relaxation? We conjecture that the answer is yes.
One stumbling block has been that such bounds were not known for bounded treewidth graphs (or even treewidth 3). In this paper we give a polytime algorithm which takes a fractional routing solution in a graph of bounded treewidth and is able to integrally route a constant fraction of the LP solution's value. Note that we do not incur any edge congestion. Previously this was not known even for series parallel graphs which have treewidth 2. The algorithm is based on a more general argument that applies to $k$-sums of graphs in some graph family, as long as the graph family has a constant factor, constant congestion bound. We then use this to show that such bounds hold for the class of $k$-sums of bounded genus graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2013;
originally announced March 2013.
-
Shortest Path versus Multi-Hub Routing in Networks with Uncertain Demand
Authors:
Alexandre Fréchette,
F. Bruce Shepherd,
Marina K. Thottan,
Peter J. Winzer
Abstract:
We study a class of robust network design problems motivated by the need to scale core networks to meet increasingly dynamic capacity demands. Past work has focused on designing the network to support all hose matrices (all matrices not exceeding marginal bounds at the nodes). This model may be too conservative if additional information on traffic patterns is available. Another extreme is the fixe…
▽ More
We study a class of robust network design problems motivated by the need to scale core networks to meet increasingly dynamic capacity demands. Past work has focused on designing the network to support all hose matrices (all matrices not exceeding marginal bounds at the nodes). This model may be too conservative if additional information on traffic patterns is available. Another extreme is the fixed demand model, where one designs the network to support peak point-to-point demands. We introduce a capped hose model to explore a broader range of traffic matrices which includes the above two as special cases. It is known that optimal designs for the hose model are always determined by single-hub routing, and for the fixed- demand model are based on shortest-path routing. We shed light on the wider space of capped hose matrices in order to see which traffic models are more shortest path-like as opposed to hub-like. To address the space in between, we use hierarchical multi-hub routing templates, a generalization of hub and tree routing. In particular, we show that by adding peak capacities into the hose model, the single-hub tree-routing template is no longer cost-effective. This initiates the study of a class of robust network design (RND) problems restricted to these templates. Our empirical analysis is based on a heuristic for this new hierarchical RND problem. We also propose that it is possible to define a routing indicator that accounts for the strengths of the marginals and peak demands and use this information to choose the appropriate routing template. We benchmark our approach against other well-known routing templates, using representative carrier networks and a variety of different capped hose traffic demands, parameterized by the relative importance of their marginals as opposed to their point-to-point peak demands.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2013;
originally announced February 2013.
-
Flow-Cut Gaps for Integer and Fractional Multiflows
Authors:
Chandra Chekuri,
F. Bruce Shepherd,
Christophe Weibel
Abstract:
Consider a routing problem consisting of a demand graph H and a supply graph G. If the pair obeys the cut condition, then the flow-cut gap for this instance is the minimum value C such that there is a feasible multiflow for H if each edge of G is given capacity C. The flow-cut gap can be greater than 1 even when G is the (series-parallel) graph K_{2,3}. In this paper we are primarily interested in…
▽ More
Consider a routing problem consisting of a demand graph H and a supply graph G. If the pair obeys the cut condition, then the flow-cut gap for this instance is the minimum value C such that there is a feasible multiflow for H if each edge of G is given capacity C. The flow-cut gap can be greater than 1 even when G is the (series-parallel) graph K_{2,3}. In this paper we are primarily interested in the "integer" flow-cut gap. What is the minimum value C such that there is a feasible integer valued multiflow for H if each edge of G is given capacity C? We conjecture that the integer flow-cut gap is quantitatively related to the fractional flow-cut gap. This strengthens the well-known conjecture that the flow-cut gap in planar and minor-free graphs is O(1) to suggest that the integer flow-cut gap is O(1). We give several results on non-trivial special classes of graphs supporting this conjecture and further explore the "primal" method for understanding flow-cut gaps. Our results include:
- Let G be obtained by series-parallel operations starting from an edge st, and consider orienting all edges in G in the direction from s to t. A demand is compliant if its endpoints are joined by a directed path in the resulting oriented graph. If the cut condition holds for a compliant instance and G+H is Eulerian, then an integral routing of H exists.
- The integer flow-cut gap in series-parallel graphs is 5. We also give an explicit class of instances that shows via elementary calculations that the flow-cut gap in series-parallel graphs is at least 2-o(1); this simplifies the proof by Lee and Raghavendra.
- The integer flow-cut gap in k-Outerplanar graphs is c^{O(k)} for some fixed constant c.
- A simple proof that the flow-cut gap is O(\log k^*) where k^* is the size of a node-cover in H; this was previously shown by Günlük via a more intricate proof.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2010;
originally announced August 2010.
