Showing 1–22 of 22 results for author: Sheffet, O

A Differentially Private Linear-Time fPTAS for the Minimum Enclosing Ball Problem

Authors: Bar Mahpud, Or Sheffet

Abstract: The Minimum Enclosing Ball (MEB) problem is one of the most fundamental problems in clustering, with applications in operations research, statistics and computational geometry. In this works, we give the first differentially private (DP) fPTAS for the Minimum Enclosing Ball problem, improving both on the runtime and the utility bound of the best known DP-PTAS for the problem, of Ghazi et al. (2020… ▽ More The Minimum Enclosing Ball (MEB) problem is one of the most fundamental problems in clustering, with applications in operations research, statistics and computational geometry. In this works, we give the first differentially private (DP) fPTAS for the Minimum Enclosing Ball problem, improving both on the runtime and the utility bound of the best known DP-PTAS for the problem, of Ghazi et al. (2020). Given $n$ points in $\R^d$ that are covered by the ball $B(θ_{opt},r_{opt})$, our simple iterative DP-algorithm returns a ball $B(θ,r)$ where $r\leq (1+γ)r_{opt}$ and which leaves at most $\tilde O(\frac{\sqrt d}{γε})$ points uncovered in $\tilde O(\nicefrac n {γ^2})$-time. We also give a local-model version of our algorithm, that leaves at most $\tilde O(\frac{\sqrt {nd}}{γε})$ points uncovered, improving on the $n^{0.67}$-bound of Nissim and Stemmer (2018) (at the expense of other parameters). In addition, we test our algorithm empirically and discuss future open problems. △ Less

Submitted 23 December, 2022; v1 submitted 7 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Transfer Learning In Differential Privacy's Hybrid-Model

Authors: Refael Kohen, Or Sheffet

Abstract: The hybrid-model (Avent et al 2017) in Differential Privacy is a an augmentation of the local-model where in addition to N local-agents we are assisted by one special agent who is in fact a curator holding the sensitive details of n additional individuals. Here we study the problem of machine learning in the hybrid-model where the n individuals in the curators dataset are drawn from a different di… ▽ More The hybrid-model (Avent et al 2017) in Differential Privacy is a an augmentation of the local-model where in addition to N local-agents we are assisted by one special agent who is in fact a curator holding the sensitive details of n additional individuals. Here we study the problem of machine learning in the hybrid-model where the n individuals in the curators dataset are drawn from a different distribution than the one of the general population (the local-agents). We give a general scheme -- Subsample-Test-Reweigh -- for this transfer learning problem, which reduces any curator-model DP-learner to a hybrid-model learner in this setting using iterative subsampling and reweighing of the n examples held by the curator based on a smooth variation of the Multiplicative-Weights algorithm (introduced by Bun et al, 2020). Our scheme has a sample complexity which relies on the chi-squared divergence between the two distributions. We give worst-case analysis bounds on the sample complexity required for our private reduction. Aiming to reduce said sample complexity, we give two specific instances our sample complexity can be drastically reduced (one instance is analyzed mathematically, while the other - empirically) and pose several directions for follow-up work. △ Less

Submitted 16 June, 2022; v1 submitted 28 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Private Approximations of a Convex Hull in Low Dimensions

Authors: Yue Gao, Or Sheffet

Abstract: We give the first differentially private algorithms that estimate a variety of geometric features of points in the Euclidean space, such as diameter, width, volume of convex hull, min-bounding box, min-enclosing ball etc. Our work relies heavily on the notion of \emph{Tukey-depth}. Instead of (non-privately) approximating the convex-hull of the given set of points $P$, our algorithms approximate t… ▽ More We give the first differentially private algorithms that estimate a variety of geometric features of points in the Euclidean space, such as diameter, width, volume of convex hull, min-bounding box, min-enclosing ball etc. Our work relies heavily on the notion of \emph{Tukey-depth}. Instead of (non-privately) approximating the convex-hull of the given set of points $P$, our algorithms approximate the geometric features of the $κ$-Tukey region induced by $P$ (all points of Tukey-depth $κ$ or greater). Moreover, our approximations are all bi-criteria: for any geometric feature $μ$ our $(α,Δ)$-approximation is a value "sandwiched" between $(1-α)μ(D_P(κ))$ and $(1+α)μ(D_P(κ-Δ))$. Our work is aimed at producing a \emph{$(α,Δ)$-kernel of $D_P(κ)$}, namely a set $\mathcal{S}$ such that (after a shift) it holds that $(1-α)D_P(κ)\subset \mathsf{CH}(\mathcal{S}) \subset (1+α)D_P(κ-Δ)$. We show that an analogous notion of a bi-critera approximation of a directional kernel, as originally proposed by Agarwal et al~[2004], \emph{fails} to give a kernel, and so we result to subtler notions of approximations of projections that do yield a kernel. First, we give differentially private algorithms that find $(α,Δ)$-kernels for a "fat" Tukey-region. Then, based on a private approximation of the min-bounding box, we find a transformation that does turn $D_P(κ)$ into a "fat" region \emph{but only if} its volume is proportional to the volume of $D_P(κ-Δ)$. Lastly, we give a novel private algorithm that finds a depth parameter $κ$ for which the volume of $D_P(κ)$ is comparable to $D_P(κ-Δ)$. We hope this work leads to the further study of the intersection of differential privacy and computational geometry. △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2020; v1 submitted 16 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Quantile Multi-Armed Bandits: Optimal Best-Arm Identification and a Differentially Private Scheme

Authors: Kontantinos E. Nikolakakis, Dionysios S. Kalogerias, Or Sheffet, Anand D. Sarwate

Abstract: We study the best-arm identification problem in multi-armed bandits with stochastic, potentially private rewards, when the goal is to identify the arm with the highest quantile at a fixed, prescribed level. First, we propose a (non-private) successive elimination algorithm for strictly optimal best-arm identification, we show that our algorithm is $δ$-PAC and we characterize its sample complexity.… ▽ More We study the best-arm identification problem in multi-armed bandits with stochastic, potentially private rewards, when the goal is to identify the arm with the highest quantile at a fixed, prescribed level. First, we propose a (non-private) successive elimination algorithm for strictly optimal best-arm identification, we show that our algorithm is $δ$-PAC and we characterize its sample complexity. Further, we provide a lower bound on the expected number of pulls, showing that the proposed algorithm is essentially optimal up to logarithmic factors. Both upper and lower complexity bounds depend on a special definition of the associated suboptimality gap, designed in particular for the quantile bandit problem, as we show when the gap approaches zero, best-arm identification is impossible. Second, motivated by applications where the rewards are private, we provide a differentially private successive elimination algorithm whose sample complexity is finite even for distributions with infinite support-size, and we characterize its sample complexity. Our algorithms do not require prior knowledge of either the suboptimality gap or other statistical information related to the bandit problem at hand. △ Less

Submitted 4 December, 2022; v1 submitted 11 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

Comments: 18 pages, 4 figures

The power of synergy in differential privacy: Combining a small curator with local randomizers

Authors: Amos Beimel, Aleksandra Korolova, Kobbi Nissim, Or Sheffet, Uri Stemmer

Abstract: Motivated by the desire to bridge the utility gap between local and trusted curator models of differential privacy for practical applications, we initiate the theoretical study of a hybrid model introduced by "Blender" [Avent et al.,\ USENIX Security '17], in which differentially private protocols of n agents that work in the local-model are assisted by a differentially private curator that has ac… ▽ More Motivated by the desire to bridge the utility gap between local and trusted curator models of differential privacy for practical applications, we initiate the theoretical study of a hybrid model introduced by "Blender" [Avent et al.,\ USENIX Security '17], in which differentially private protocols of n agents that work in the local-model are assisted by a differentially private curator that has access to the data of m additional users. We focus on the regime where m << n and study the new capabilities of this (m,n)-hybrid model. We show that, despite the fact that the hybrid model adds no significant new capabilities for the basic task of simple hypothesis-testing, there are many other tasks (under a wide range of parameters) that can be solved in the hybrid model yet cannot be solved either by the curator or by the local-users separately. Moreover, we exhibit additional tasks where at least one round of interaction between the curator and the local-users is necessary -- namely, no hybrid model protocol without such interaction can solve these tasks. Taken together, our results show that the combination of the local model with a small curator can become part of a promising toolkit for designing and implementing differential privacy. △ Less

Submitted 20 December, 2019; v1 submitted 18 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Differentially Private Algorithms for Learning Mixtures of Separated Gaussians

Authors: Gautam Kamath, Or Sheffet, Vikrant Singhal, Jonathan Ullman

Abstract: Learning the parameters of Gaussian mixture models is a fundamental and widely studied problem with numerous applications. In this work, we give new algorithms for learning the parameters of a high-dimensional, well separated, Gaussian mixture model subject to the strong constraint of differential privacy. In particular, we give a differentially private analogue of the algorithm of Achlioptas and… ▽ More Learning the parameters of Gaussian mixture models is a fundamental and widely studied problem with numerous applications. In this work, we give new algorithms for learning the parameters of a high-dimensional, well separated, Gaussian mixture model subject to the strong constraint of differential privacy. In particular, we give a differentially private analogue of the algorithm of Achlioptas and McSherry. Our algorithm has two key properties not achieved by prior work: (1) The algorithm's sample complexity matches that of the corresponding non-private algorithm up to lower order terms in a wide range of parameters. (2) The algorithm does not require strong a priori bounds on the parameters of the mixture components. △ Less

Submitted 15 October, 2019; v1 submitted 9 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Comments: To appear in NeurIPS 2019

An Optimal Private Stochastic-MAB Algorithm Based on an Optimal Private Stop** Rule

Authors: Touqir Sajed, Or Sheffet

Abstract: We present a provably optimal differentially private algorithm for the stochastic multi-arm bandit problem, as opposed to the private analogue of the UCB-algorithm [Mishra and Thakurta, 2015; Tossou and Dimitrakakis, 2016] which doesn't meet the recently discovered lower-bound of $Ω\left(\frac{K\log(T)}ε \right)$ [Shariff and Sheffet, 2018]. Our construction is based on a different algorithm, Succ… ▽ More We present a provably optimal differentially private algorithm for the stochastic multi-arm bandit problem, as opposed to the private analogue of the UCB-algorithm [Mishra and Thakurta, 2015; Tossou and Dimitrakakis, 2016] which doesn't meet the recently discovered lower-bound of $Ω\left(\frac{K\log(T)}ε \right)$ [Shariff and Sheffet, 2018]. Our construction is based on a different algorithm, Successive Elimination [Even-Dar et al. 2002], that repeatedly pulls all remaining arms until an arm is found to be suboptimal and is then eliminated. In order to devise a private analogue of Successive Elimination we visit the problem of private stop** rule, that takes as input a stream of i.i.d samples from an unknown distribution and returns a multiplicative $(1 \pm α)$-approximation of the distribution's mean, and prove the optimality of our private stop** rule. We then present the private Successive Elimination algorithm which meets both the non-private lower bound [Lai and Robbins, 1985] and the above-mentioned private lower bound. We also compare empirically the performance of our algorithm with the private UCB algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Locally Private Mean Estimation: Z-test and Tight Confidence Intervals

Authors: Marco Gaboardi, Ryan Rogers, Or Sheffet

Abstract: This work provides tight upper- and lower-bounds for the problem of mean estimation under $ε$-differential privacy in the local model, when the input is composed of $n$ i.i.d. drawn samples from a normal distribution with variance $σ$. Our algorithms result in a $(1-β)$-confidence interval for the underlying distribution's mean $μ$ of length… ▽ More This work provides tight upper- and lower-bounds for the problem of mean estimation under $ε$-differential privacy in the local model, when the input is composed of $n$ i.i.d. drawn samples from a normal distribution with variance $σ$. Our algorithms result in a $(1-β)$-confidence interval for the underlying distribution's mean $μ$ of length $\tilde O\left( \frac{σ\sqrt{\log(\frac 1 β)}}{ε\sqrt n} \right)$. In addition, our algorithms leverage binary search using local differential privacy for quantile estimation, a result which may be of separate interest. Moreover, we prove a matching lower-bound (up to poly-log factors), showing that any one-shot (each individual is presented with a single query) local differentially private algorithm must return an interval of length $Ω\left( \frac{σ\sqrt{\log(1/β)}}{ε\sqrt{n}}\right)$. △ Less

Submitted 10 April, 2019; v1 submitted 18 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Differentially Private Contextual Linear Bandits

Authors: Roshan Shariff, Or Sheffet

Abstract: We study the contextual linear bandit problem, a version of the standard stochastic multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem where a learner sequentially selects actions to maximize a reward which depends also on a user provided per-round context. Though the context is chosen arbitrarily or adversarially, the reward is assumed to be a stochastic function of a feature vector that encodes the context and se… ▽ More We study the contextual linear bandit problem, a version of the standard stochastic multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem where a learner sequentially selects actions to maximize a reward which depends also on a user provided per-round context. Though the context is chosen arbitrarily or adversarially, the reward is assumed to be a stochastic function of a feature vector that encodes the context and selected action. Our goal is to devise private learners for the contextual linear bandit problem. We first show that using the standard definition of differential privacy results in linear regret. So instead, we adopt the notion of joint differential privacy, where we assume that the action chosen on day $t$ is only revealed to user $t$ and thus needn't be kept private that day, only on following days. We give a general scheme converting the classic linear-UCB algorithm into a joint differentially private algorithm using the tree-based algorithm. We then apply either Gaussian noise or Wishart noise to achieve joint-differentially private algorithms and bound the resulting algorithms' regrets. In addition, we give the first lower bound on the additional regret any private algorithms for the MAB problem must incur. △ Less

Submitted 28 September, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: 21 pages, 5 figures; to appear in NIPS 2018

Locally Private Hypothesis Testing

Authors: Or Sheffet

Abstract: We initiate the study of differentially private hypothesis testing in the local-model, under both the standard (symmetric) randomized-response mechanism (Warner, 1965, Kasiviswanathan et al, 2008) and the newer (non-symmetric) mechanisms (Bassily and Smith, 2015, Bassily et al, 2017). First, we study the general framework of map** each user's type into a signal and show that the problem of findi… ▽ More We initiate the study of differentially private hypothesis testing in the local-model, under both the standard (symmetric) randomized-response mechanism (Warner, 1965, Kasiviswanathan et al, 2008) and the newer (non-symmetric) mechanisms (Bassily and Smith, 2015, Bassily et al, 2017). First, we study the general framework of map** each user's type into a signal and show that the problem of finding the maximum-likelihood distribution over the signals is feasible. Then we discuss the randomized-response mechanism and show that, in essence, it maps the null- and alternative-hypotheses onto new sets, an affine translation of the original sets. We then give sample complexity bounds for identity and independence testing under randomized-response. We then move to the newer non-symmetric mechanisms and show that there too the problem of finding the maximum-likelihood distribution is feasible. Under the mechanism of Bassily et al (2007) we give identity and independence testers with better sample complexity than the testers in the symmetric case, and we also propose a $χ^2$-based identity tester which we investigate empirically. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Differentially Private Ordinary Least Squares

Authors: Or Sheffet

Abstract: Linear regression is one of the most prevalent techniques in machine learning, however, it is also common to use linear regression for its \emph{explanatory} capabilities rather than label prediction. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) is often used in statistics to establish a correlation between an attribute (e.g. gender) and a label (e.g. income) in the presence of other (potentially correlated) feat… ▽ More Linear regression is one of the most prevalent techniques in machine learning, however, it is also common to use linear regression for its \emph{explanatory} capabilities rather than label prediction. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) is often used in statistics to establish a correlation between an attribute (e.g. gender) and a label (e.g. income) in the presence of other (potentially correlated) features. OLS assumes a particular model that randomly generates the data, and derives \emph{$t$-values} --- representing the likelihood of each real value to be the true correlation. Using $t$-values, OLS can release a \emph{confidence interval}, which is an interval on the reals that is likely to contain the true correlation, and when this interval does not intersect the origin, we can \emph{reject the null hypothesis} as it is likely that the true correlation is non-zero. Our work aims at achieving similar guarantees on data under differentially private estimators. First, we show that for well-spread data, the Gaussian Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform (JLT) gives a very good approximation of $t$-values, secondly, when JLT approximates Ridge regression (linear regression with $l_2$-regularization) we derive, under certain conditions, confidence intervals using the projected data, lastly, we derive, under different conditions, confidence intervals for the "Analyze Gauss" algorithm (Dwork et al, STOC 2014). △ Less

Submitted 21 August, 2017; v1 submitted 9 July, 2015; originally announced July 2015.

Private Approximations of the 2nd-Moment Matrix Using Existing Techniques in Linear Regression

Authors: Or Sheffet

Abstract: We introduce three differentially-private algorithms that approximates the 2nd-moment matrix of the data. These algorithm, which in contrast to existing algorithms output positive-definite matrices, correspond to existing techniques in linear regression literature. Specifically, we discuss the following three techniques. (i) For Ridge Regression, we propose setting the regularization coefficient s… ▽ More We introduce three differentially-private algorithms that approximates the 2nd-moment matrix of the data. These algorithm, which in contrast to existing algorithms output positive-definite matrices, correspond to existing techniques in linear regression literature. Specifically, we discuss the following three techniques. (i) For Ridge Regression, we propose setting the regularization coefficient so that by approximating the solution using Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform we preserve privacy. (ii) We show that adding a small batch of random samples to our data preserves differential privacy. (iii) We show that sampling the 2nd-moment matrix from a Bayesian posterior inverse-Wishart distribution is differentially private provided the prior is set correctly. We also evaluate our techniques experimentally and compare them to the existing "Analyze Gauss" algorithm of Dwork et al. △ Less

Submitted 24 November, 2015; v1 submitted 30 June, 2015; originally announced July 2015.

Learning Mixtures of Ranking Models

Authors: Pranjal Awasthi, Avrim Blum, Or Sheffet, Aravindan Vijayaraghavan

Abstract: This work concerns learning probabilistic models for ranking data in a heterogeneous population. The specific problem we study is learning the parameters of a Mallows Mixture Model. Despite being widely studied, current heuristics for this problem do not have theoretical guarantees and can get stuck in bad local optima. We present the first polynomial time algorithm which provably learns the param… ▽ More This work concerns learning probabilistic models for ranking data in a heterogeneous population. The specific problem we study is learning the parameters of a Mallows Mixture Model. Despite being widely studied, current heuristics for this problem do not have theoretical guarantees and can get stuck in bad local optima. We present the first polynomial time algorithm which provably learns the parameters of a mixture of two Mallows models. A key component of our algorithm is a novel use of tensor decomposition techniques to learn the top-k prefix in both the rankings. Before this work, even the question of identifiability in the case of a mixture of two Mallows models was unresolved. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2014; originally announced October 2014.

Privacy Games

Authors: Yiling Chen, Or Sheffet, Salil Vadhan

Abstract: The problem of analyzing the effect of privacy concerns on the behavior of selfish utility-maximizing agents has received much attention lately. Privacy concerns are often modeled by altering the utility functions of agents to consider also their privacy loss. Such privacy aware agents prefer to take a randomized strategy even in very simple games in which non-privacy aware agents play pure strate… ▽ More The problem of analyzing the effect of privacy concerns on the behavior of selfish utility-maximizing agents has received much attention lately. Privacy concerns are often modeled by altering the utility functions of agents to consider also their privacy loss. Such privacy aware agents prefer to take a randomized strategy even in very simple games in which non-privacy aware agents play pure strategies. In some cases, the behavior of privacy aware agents follows the framework of Randomized Response, a well-known mechanism that preserves differential privacy. Our work is aimed at better understanding the behavior of agents in settings where their privacy concerns are explicitly given. We consider a toy setting where agent A, in an attempt to discover the secret type of agent B, offers B a gift that one type of B agent likes and the other type dislikes. As opposed to previous works, B's incentive to keep her type a secret isn't the result of "hardwiring" B's utility function to consider privacy, but rather takes the form of a payment between B and A. We investigate three different types of payment functions and analyze B's behavior in each of the resulting games. As we show, under some payments, B's behavior is very different than the behavior of agents with hardwired privacy concerns and might even be deterministic. Under a different payment we show that B's BNE strategy does fall into the framework of Randomized Response. △ Less

Submitted 7 October, 2014; originally announced October 2014.

Optimizing Password Composition Policies

Authors: Jeremiah Blocki, Saranga Komanduri, Ariel Procaccia, Or Sheffet

Abstract: A password composition policy restricts the space of allowable passwords to eliminate weak passwords that are vulnerable to statistical guessing attacks. Usability studies have demonstrated that existing password composition policies can sometimes result in weaker password distributions; hence a more principled approach is needed. We introduce the first theoretical model for optimizing password co… ▽ More A password composition policy restricts the space of allowable passwords to eliminate weak passwords that are vulnerable to statistical guessing attacks. Usability studies have demonstrated that existing password composition policies can sometimes result in weaker password distributions; hence a more principled approach is needed. We introduce the first theoretical model for optimizing password composition policies. We study the computational and sample complexity of this problem under different assumptions on the structure of policies and on users' preferences over passwords. Our main positive result is an algorithm that -- with high probability --- constructs almost optimal policies (which are specified as a union of subsets of allowed passwords), and requires only a small number of samples of users' preferred passwords. We complement our theoretical results with simulations using a real-world dataset of 32 million passwords. △ Less

Submitted 25 February, 2013; v1 submitted 20 February, 2013; originally announced February 2013.

Differentially Private Data Analysis of Social Networks via Restricted Sensitivity

Authors: Jeremiah Blocki, Avrim Blum, Anupam Datta, Or Sheffet

Abstract: We introduce the notion of restricted sensitivity as an alternative to global and smooth sensitivity to improve accuracy in differentially private data analysis. The definition of restricted sensitivity is similar to that of global sensitivity except that instead of quantifying over all possible datasets, we take advantage of any beliefs about the dataset that a querier may have, to quantify over… ▽ More We introduce the notion of restricted sensitivity as an alternative to global and smooth sensitivity to improve accuracy in differentially private data analysis. The definition of restricted sensitivity is similar to that of global sensitivity except that instead of quantifying over all possible datasets, we take advantage of any beliefs about the dataset that a querier may have, to quantify over a restricted class of datasets. Specifically, given a query f and a hypothesis H about the structure of a dataset D, we show generically how to transform f into a new query f_H whose global sensitivity (over all datasets including those that do not satisfy H) matches the restricted sensitivity of the query f. Moreover, if the belief of the querier is correct (i.e., D is in H) then f_H(D) = f(D). If the belief is incorrect, then f_H(D) may be inaccurate. We demonstrate the usefulness of this notion by considering the task of answering queries regarding social-networks, which we model as a combination of a graph and a labeling of its vertices. In particular, while our generic procedure is computationally inefficient, for the specific definition of H as graphs of bounded degree, we exhibit efficient ways of constructing f_H using different projection-based techniques. We then analyze two important query classes: subgraph counting queries (e.g., number of triangles) and local profile queries (e.g., number of people who know a spy and a computer-scientist who know each other). We demonstrate that the restricted sensitivity of such queries can be significantly lower than their smooth sensitivity. Thus, using restricted sensitivity we can maintain privacy whether or not D is in H, while providing more accurate results in the event that H holds true. △ Less

Submitted 1 February, 2013; v1 submitted 22 August, 2012; originally announced August 2012.

Predicting Preference Flips in Commerce Search

Authors: Or Sheffet, Nina Mishra, Samuel Ieong

Abstract: Traditional approaches to ranking in web search follow the paradigm of rank-by-score: a learned function gives each query-URL combination an absolute score and URLs are ranked according to this score. This paradigm ensures that if the score of one URL is better than another then one will always be ranked higher than the other. Scoring contradicts prior work in behavioral economics that showed that… ▽ More Traditional approaches to ranking in web search follow the paradigm of rank-by-score: a learned function gives each query-URL combination an absolute score and URLs are ranked according to this score. This paradigm ensures that if the score of one URL is better than another then one will always be ranked higher than the other. Scoring contradicts prior work in behavioral economics that showed that users' preferences between two items depend not only on the items but also on the presented alternatives. Thus, for the same query, users' preference between items A and B depends on the presence/absence of item C. We propose a new model of ranking, the Random Shopper Model, that allows and explains such behavior. In this model, each feature is viewed as a Markov chain over the items to be ranked, and the goal is to find a weighting of the features that best reflects their importance. We show that our model can be learned under the empirical risk minimization framework, and give an efficient learning algorithm. Experiments on commerce search logs demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms scoring-based approaches including regression and listwise ranking. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2012; originally announced June 2012.

Comments: Appears in Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2012)

Additive Approximation for Near-Perfect Phylogeny Construction

Authors: Pranjal Awasthi, Avrim Blum, Jamie Morgenstern, Or Sheffet

Abstract: We study the problem of constructing phylogenetic trees for a given set of species. The problem is formulated as that of finding a minimum Steiner tree on $n$ points over the Boolean hypercube of dimension $d$. It is known that an optimal tree can be found in linear time if the given dataset has a perfect phylogeny, i.e. cost of the optimal phylogeny is exactly $d$. Moreover, if the data has a nea… ▽ More We study the problem of constructing phylogenetic trees for a given set of species. The problem is formulated as that of finding a minimum Steiner tree on $n$ points over the Boolean hypercube of dimension $d$. It is known that an optimal tree can be found in linear time if the given dataset has a perfect phylogeny, i.e. cost of the optimal phylogeny is exactly $d$. Moreover, if the data has a near-perfect phylogeny, i.e. the cost of the optimal Steiner tree is $d+q$, it is known that an exact solution can be found in running time which is polynomial in the number of species and $d$, yet exponential in $q$. In this work, we give a polynomial-time algorithm (in both $d$ and $q$) that finds a phylogenetic tree of cost $d+O(q^2)$. This provides the best guarantees known - namely, a $(1+o(1))$-approximation - for the case $\log(d) \ll q \ll \sqrt{d}$, broadening the range of settings for which near-optimal solutions can be efficiently found. We also discuss the motivation and reasoning for studying such additive approximations. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2012; originally announced June 2012.

Improved Spectral-Norm Bounds for Clustering

Authors: Pranjal Awasthi, Or Sheffet

Abstract: Aiming to unify known results about clustering mixtures of distributions under separation conditions, Kumar and Kannan[2010] introduced a deterministic condition for clustering datasets. They showed that this single deterministic condition encompasses many previously studied clustering assumptions. More specifically, their proximity condition requires that in the target $k$-clustering, the project… ▽ More Aiming to unify known results about clustering mixtures of distributions under separation conditions, Kumar and Kannan[2010] introduced a deterministic condition for clustering datasets. They showed that this single deterministic condition encompasses many previously studied clustering assumptions. More specifically, their proximity condition requires that in the target $k$-clustering, the projection of a point $x$ onto the line joining its cluster center $μ$ and some other center $μ'$, is a large additive factor closer to $μ$ than to $μ'$. This additive factor can be roughly described as $k$ times the spectral norm of the matrix representing the differences between the given (known) dataset and the means of the (unknown) target clustering. Clearly, the proximity condition implies center separation -- the distance between any two centers must be as large as the above mentioned bound. In this paper we improve upon the work of Kumar and Kannan along several axes. First, we weaken the center separation bound by a factor of $\sqrt{k}$, and secondly we weaken the proximity condition by a factor of $k$. Using these weaker bounds we still achieve the same guarantees when all points satisfy the proximity condition. We also achieve better guarantees when only $(1-ε)$-fraction of the points satisfy the weaker proximity condition. The bulk of our analysis relies only on center separation under which one can produce a clustering which (i) has low error, (ii) has low $k$-means cost, and (iii) has centers very close to the target centers. Our improved separation condition allows us to match the results of the Planted Partition Model of McSherry[2001], improve upon the results of Ostrovsky et al[2006], and improve separation results for mixture of Gaussian models in a particular setting. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2012; v1 submitted 14 June, 2012; originally announced June 2012.

The Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transform Itself Preserves Differential Privacy

Authors: Jeremiah Blocki, Avrim Blum, Anupam Datta, Or Sheffet

Abstract: This paper proves that an "old dog", namely -- the classical Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform, "performs new tricks" -- it gives a novel way of preserving differential privacy. We show that if we take two databases, $D$ and $D'$, such that (i) $D'-D$ is a rank-1 matrix of bounded norm and (ii) all singular values of $D$ and $D'$ are sufficiently large, then multiplying either $D$ or $D'$ with a vec… ▽ More This paper proves that an "old dog", namely -- the classical Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform, "performs new tricks" -- it gives a novel way of preserving differential privacy. We show that if we take two databases, $D$ and $D'$, such that (i) $D'-D$ is a rank-1 matrix of bounded norm and (ii) all singular values of $D$ and $D'$ are sufficiently large, then multiplying either $D$ or $D'$ with a vector of iid normal Gaussians yields two statistically close distributions in the sense of differential privacy. Furthermore, a small, deterministic and \emph{public} alteration of the input is enough to assert that all singular values of $D$ are large. We apply the Johnson-Lindenstrauss transform to the task of approximating cut-queries: the number of edges crossing a $(S,\bar S)$-cut in a graph. We show that the JL transform allows us to \emph{publish a sanitized graph} that preserves edge differential privacy (where two graphs are neighbors if they differ on a single edge) while adding only $O(|S|/ε)$ random noise to any given query (w.h.p). Comparing the additive noise of our algorithm to existing algorithms for answering cut-queries in a differentially private manner, we outperform all others on small cuts ($|S| = o(n)$). We also apply our technique to the task of estimating the variance of a given matrix in any given direction. The JL transform allows us to \emph{publish a sanitized covariance matrix} that preserves differential privacy w.r.t bounded changes (each row in the matrix can change by at most a norm-1 vector) while adding random noise of magnitude independent of the size of the matrix (w.h.p). In contrast, existing algorithms introduce an error which depends on the matrix dimensions. △ Less

Submitted 18 August, 2012; v1 submitted 10 April, 2012; originally announced April 2012.

Send Mixed Signals -- Earn More, Work Less

Authors: Peter Bro Miltersen, Or Sheffet

Abstract: Emek et al. presented a model of probabilistic single-item second price auctions where an auctioneer who is informed about the type of an item for sale, broadcasts a signal about this type to uninformed bidders. They proved that finding the optimal (for the purpose of generating revenue) {\em pure} signaling scheme is strongly NP-hard. In contrast, we prove that finding the optimal {\em mixed} sig… ▽ More Emek et al. presented a model of probabilistic single-item second price auctions where an auctioneer who is informed about the type of an item for sale, broadcasts a signal about this type to uninformed bidders. They proved that finding the optimal (for the purpose of generating revenue) {\em pure} signaling scheme is strongly NP-hard. In contrast, we prove that finding the optimal {\em mixed} signaling scheme can be done in polynomial time using linear programming. For the proof, we show that the problem is strongly related to a problem of optimally bundling divisible goods for auctioning. We also prove that a mixed signaling scheme can in some cases generate twice as much revenue as the best pure signaling scheme and we prove a generally applicable lower bound on the revenue generated by the best mixed signaling scheme. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2012; originally announced February 2012.

Center-based Clustering under Perturbation Stability

Authors: Pranjal Awasthi, Avrim Blum, Or Sheffet

Abstract: Clustering under most popular objective functions is NP-hard, even to approximate well, and so unlikely to be efficiently solvable in the worst case. Recently, Bilu and Linial \cite{Bilu09} suggested an approach aimed at bypassing this computational barrier by using properties of instances one might hope to hold in practice. In particular, they argue that instances in practice should be stable to… ▽ More Clustering under most popular objective functions is NP-hard, even to approximate well, and so unlikely to be efficiently solvable in the worst case. Recently, Bilu and Linial \cite{Bilu09} suggested an approach aimed at bypassing this computational barrier by using properties of instances one might hope to hold in practice. In particular, they argue that instances in practice should be stable to small perturbations in the metric space and give an efficient algorithm for clustering instances of the Max-Cut problem that are stable to perturbations of size $O(n^{1/2})$. In addition, they conjecture that instances stable to as little as O(1) perturbations should be solvable in polynomial time. In this paper we prove that this conjecture is true for any center-based clustering objective (such as $k$-median, $k$-means, and $k$-center). Specifically, we show we can efficiently find the optimal clustering assuming only stability to factor-3 perturbations of the underlying metric in spaces without Steiner points, and stability to factor $2+\sqrt{3}$ perturbations for general metrics. In particular, we show for such instances that the popular Single-Linkage algorithm combined with dynamic programming will find the optimal clustering. We also present NP-hardness results under a weaker but related condition. △ Less

Submitted 11 August, 2011; v1 submitted 18 September, 2010; originally announced September 2010.