Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Shamis, A

Dropbear: Machine Learning Marketplaces made Trustworthy with Byzantine Model Agreement

Authors: Alex Shamis, Peter Pietzuch, Antoine Delignat-Lavaud, Andrew Paverd, Manuel Costa

Abstract: Marketplaces for machine learning (ML) models are emerging as a way for organizations to monetize models. They allow model owners to retain control over hosted models by using cloud resources to execute ML inference requests for a fee, preserving model confidentiality. Clients that rely on hosted models require trustworthy inference results, even when models are managed by third parties. While the… ▽ More Marketplaces for machine learning (ML) models are emerging as a way for organizations to monetize models. They allow model owners to retain control over hosted models by using cloud resources to execute ML inference requests for a fee, preserving model confidentiality. Clients that rely on hosted models require trustworthy inference results, even when models are managed by third parties. While the resilience and robustness of inference results can be improved by combining multiple independent models, such support is unavailable in today's marketplaces. We describe Dropbear, the first ML model marketplace that provides clients with strong integrity guarantees by combining results from multiple models in a trustworthy fashion. Dropbear replicates inference computation across a model group, which consists of multiple cloud-based GPU nodes belonging to different model owners. Clients receive inference certificates that prove agreement using a Byzantine consensus protocol, even under model heterogeneity and concurrent model updates. To improve performance, Dropbear batches inference and consensus operations separately: it first performs the inference computation across a model group, before ordering requests and model updates. Despite its strong integrity guarantees, Dropbear's performance matches that of state-of-the-art ML inference systems: deployed across 3 cloud sites, it handles 800 requests/s with ImageNet models. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

CTR: Checkpoint, Transfer, and Restore for Secure Enclaves

Authors: Yoshimichi Nakatsuka, Ercan Ozturk, Alex Shamis, Andrew Paverd, Peter Pietzuch

Abstract: Hardware-based Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in cloud computing, forming the basis for confidential computing. However, the security goals of TEEs sometimes conflict with existing cloud functionality, such as VM or process migration, because TEE memory cannot be read by the hypervisor, OS, or other software on the platform. Whilst some newer TEE architec… ▽ More Hardware-based Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in cloud computing, forming the basis for confidential computing. However, the security goals of TEEs sometimes conflict with existing cloud functionality, such as VM or process migration, because TEE memory cannot be read by the hypervisor, OS, or other software on the platform. Whilst some newer TEE architectures support migration of entire protected VMs, there is currently no practical solution for migrating individual processes containing in-process TEEs. The inability to migrate such processes leads to operational inefficiencies or even data loss if the host platform must be urgently restarted. We present CTR, a software-only design to retrofit migration functionality into existing TEE architectures, whilst maintaining their expected security guarantees. Our design allows TEEs to be interrupted and migrated at arbitrary points in their execution, thus maintaining compatibility with existing VM and process migration techniques. By cooperatively involving the TEE in the migration process, our design also allows application developers to specify stateful migration-related policies, such as limiting the number of times a particular TEE may be migrated. Our prototype implementation for Intel SGX demonstrates that migration latency increases linearly with the size of the TEE memory and is dominated by TEE system operations. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

IA-CCF: Individual Accountability for Permissioned Ledgers

Authors: Alex Shamis, Peter Pietzuch, Miguel Castro, Cédric Fournet, Edward Ashton, Amaury Chamayou, Sylvan Clebsch, Antoine Delignat-Lavaud, Matthew Kerner, Julien Maffre, Manuel Costa, Mark Russinovich

Abstract: Permissioned ledger systems allow a consortium of members that do not trust one another to execute transactions safely on a set of replicas. Such systems typically use Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) protocols to distribute trust, which only ensures safety when fewer than 1/3 of the replicas misbehave. Providing guarantees beyond this threshold is a challenge: current systems assume that the ledge… ▽ More Permissioned ledger systems allow a consortium of members that do not trust one another to execute transactions safely on a set of replicas. Such systems typically use Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) protocols to distribute trust, which only ensures safety when fewer than 1/3 of the replicas misbehave. Providing guarantees beyond this threshold is a challenge: current systems assume that the ledger is corrupt and fail to identify misbehaving replicas or hold the members that operate them accountable -- instead all members share the blame. We describe IA-CCF, a new permissioned ledger system that provides individual accountability. It can assign blame to the individual members that operate misbehaving replicas regardless of the number of misbehaving replicas or members. IA-CCF achieves this by signing and logging BFT protocol messages in the ledger, and by using Merkle trees to provide clients with succinct, universally-verifiable receipts as evidence of successful transaction execution. Anyone can audit the ledger against a set of receipts to discover inconsistencies and identify replicas that signed contradictory statements. IA-CCF also supports changes to consortium membership and replicas by tracking signing keys using a sub-ledger of governance transactions. IA-CCF provides strong disincentives to misbehavior with low overhead: it executes 47,000 tx/s while providing clients with receipts in two network round trips. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2022; v1 submitted 27 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Fast General Distributed Transactions with Opacity using Global Time

Authors: Alex Shamis, Matthew Renzelmann, Stanko Novakovic, Georgios Chatzopoulos, Anders T. Gjerdrum, Dan Alistarh, Aleksandar Dragojevic, Dushyanth Narayanan, Miguel Castro

Abstract: Transactions can simplify distributed applications by hiding data distribution, concurrency, and failures from the application developer. Ideally the developer would see the abstraction of a single large machine that runs transactions sequentially and never fails. This requires the transactional subsystem to provide opacity (strict serializability for both committed and aborted transactions), as w… ▽ More Transactions can simplify distributed applications by hiding data distribution, concurrency, and failures from the application developer. Ideally the developer would see the abstraction of a single large machine that runs transactions sequentially and never fails. This requires the transactional subsystem to provide opacity (strict serializability for both committed and aborted transactions), as well as transparent fault tolerance with high availability. As even the best abstractions are unlikely to be used if they perform poorly, the system must also provide high performance. Existing distributed transactional designs either weaken this abstraction or are not designed for the best performance within a data center. This paper extends the design of FaRM - which provides strict serializability only for committed transactions - to provide opacity while maintaining FaRM's high throughput, low latency, and high availability within a modern data center. It uses timestamp ordering based on real time with clocks synchronized to within tens of microseconds across a cluster, and a failover protocol to ensure correctness across clock master failures. FaRM with opacity can commit 5.4 million neworder transactions per second when running the TPC-C transaction mix on 90 machines with 3-way replication. △ Less

Submitted 25 June, 2020; originally announced June 2020.

A1: A Distributed In-Memory Graph Database

Authors: Chiranjeeb Buragohain, Knut Magne Risvik, Paul Brett, Miguel Castro, Wonhee Cho, Joshua Cowhig, Nikolas Gloy, Karthik Kalyanaraman, Richendra Khanna, John Pao, Matthew Renzelmann, Alex Shamis, Timothy Tan, Shuheng Zheng

Abstract: A1 is an in-memory distributed database used by the Bing search engine to support complex queries over structured data. The key enablers for A1 are availability of cheap DRAM and high speed RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access) networking in commodity hardware. A1 uses FaRM as its underlying storage layer and builds the graph abstraction and query engine on top. The combination of in-memory storage a… ▽ More A1 is an in-memory distributed database used by the Bing search engine to support complex queries over structured data. The key enablers for A1 are availability of cheap DRAM and high speed RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access) networking in commodity hardware. A1 uses FaRM as its underlying storage layer and builds the graph abstraction and query engine on top. The combination of in-memory storage and RDMA access requires rethinking how data is allocated, organized and queried in a large distributed system. A single A1 cluster can store tens of billions of vertices and edges and support a throughput of 350+ million of vertex reads per second with end to end query latency in single digit milliseconds. In this paper we describe the A1 data model, RDMA optimized data structures and query execution. △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

AMP: Authentication of Media via Provenance

Authors: Paul England, Henrique S. Malvar, Eric Horvitz, Jack W. Stokes, Cédric Fournet, Rebecca Burke-Aguero, Amaury Chamayou, Sylvan Clebsch, Manuel Costa, John Deutscher, Shabnam Erfani, Matt Gaylor, Andrew Jenks, Kevin Kane, Elissa Redmiles, Alex Shamis, Isha Sharma, Sam Wenker, Anika Zaman

Abstract: Advances in graphics and machine learning have led to the general availability of easy-to-use tools for modifying and synthesizing media. The proliferation of these tools threatens to cast doubt on the veracity of all media. One approach to thwarting the flow of fake media is to detect modified or synthesized media through machine learning methods. While detection may help in the short term, we be… ▽ More Advances in graphics and machine learning have led to the general availability of easy-to-use tools for modifying and synthesizing media. The proliferation of these tools threatens to cast doubt on the veracity of all media. One approach to thwarting the flow of fake media is to detect modified or synthesized media through machine learning methods. While detection may help in the short term, we believe that it is destined to fail as the quality of fake media generation continues to improve. Soon, neither humans nor algorithms will be able to reliably distinguish fake versus real content. Thus, pipelines for assuring the source and integrity of media will be required---and increasingly relied upon. We propose AMP, a system that ensures the authentication of media via certifying provenance. AMP creates one or more publisher-signed manifests for a media instance uploaded by a content provider. These manifests are stored in a database allowing fast lookup from applications such as browsers. For reference, the manifests are also registered and signed by a permissioned ledger, implemented using the Confidential Consortium Framework (CCF). CCF employs both software and hardware techniques to ensure the integrity and transparency of all registered manifests. AMP, through its use of CCF, enables a consortium of media providers to govern the service while making all its operations auditable. The authenticity of the media can be communicated to the user via visual elements in the browser, indicating that an AMP manifest has been successfully located and verified. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2020; v1 submitted 22 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Comments: Add detailed manifest description, Add provenance, Improve text