Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Shajari, M
-
A Fair Model of Identity Information Exchange Leveraging Zero-Knowledge
Authors:
Mohsen Rahnamaei,
Saeid Tousi Saeidi,
Siavash Khorsandi,
Mehdi Shajari
Abstract:
Many companies use identity information for different goals. There are a lot of marketplaces for identity information. These markets have some practical issues such as privacy, mutual trust and fairing exchange. The management of identity information is one of the most important applications for blockchain, for which researchers have proposed a large number of models. In the present paper, an atte…
▽ More
Many companies use identity information for different goals. There are a lot of marketplaces for identity information. These markets have some practical issues such as privacy, mutual trust and fairing exchange. The management of identity information is one of the most important applications for blockchain, for which researchers have proposed a large number of models. In the present paper, an attempt has been made to solve the problems that mentioned earlier to exchange identity information on the blockchain. By using the game theory we propose a fair model of selling authorized identity information in an environment that include untrusted parties. Moreover, we employ ZK-SNARK to protect users' privacy. Also, we use proxy re-encryption to record these informations in IPFS.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Trust Evaluation using an Improved Context Similarity Measurement
Authors:
Mohsen Raeesi,
Mohammad Amin Morid,
Mehdi Shajari
Abstract:
In context-aware trust evaluation, using ontology tree is a popular approach to represent the relation between contexts. Usually, similarity between two contexts is computed using these trees. Therefore, the performance of trust evaluation highly depends on the quality of ontology trees. Fairness or granularity consistency is one of the major limitations affecting the quality of ontology tree. Thi…
▽ More
In context-aware trust evaluation, using ontology tree is a popular approach to represent the relation between contexts. Usually, similarity between two contexts is computed using these trees. Therefore, the performance of trust evaluation highly depends on the quality of ontology trees. Fairness or granularity consistency is one of the major limitations affecting the quality of ontology tree. This limitation refers to inequality of semantic similarity in the most ontology trees. In other words, semantic similarity of every two adjacent nodes is unequal in these trees. It deteriorates the performance of contexts similarity computation. We overcome this limitation by weighting tree edges based on their semantic similarity. Weight of each edge is computed using Normalized Similarity Score (NSS) method. This method is based on frequencies of concepts (words) co-occurrences in the pages indexed by search engines. Our experiments represent the better performance of the proposed approach in comparison with established trust evaluation approaches. The suggested approach can enhance efficiency of any solution which models semantic relations by ontology tree.
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2014;
originally announced April 2014.
