Simulating Vision Impairment in Virtual Reality -- A Comparison of Visual Task Performance with Real and Simulated Tunnel Vision
Authors:
Alexander Neugebauer,
Nora Castner,
Björn Severitt,
Katarina Stingl,
Iliya Ivanov,
Siegfried Wahl
Abstract:
Purpose: In this work, we explore the potential and limitations of simulating gaze-contingent tunnel vision conditions using Virtual Reality (VR) with built-in eye tracking technology. This approach promises an easy and accessible way of expanding study populations and test groups for visual training, visual aids, or accessibility evaluations. However, it is crucial to assess the validity and reli…
▽ More
Purpose: In this work, we explore the potential and limitations of simulating gaze-contingent tunnel vision conditions using Virtual Reality (VR) with built-in eye tracking technology. This approach promises an easy and accessible way of expanding study populations and test groups for visual training, visual aids, or accessibility evaluations. However, it is crucial to assess the validity and reliability of simulating these types of visual impairments and evaluate the extend to which participants with simulated tunnel vision can represent real patients. Methods: Two age-matched participant groups were acquired: The first group (n=8 aged 20-60, average 49.1, sd 13.2) consisted of patients diagnosed with Retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The second group (n=8, aged 27-59, average 46.5, sd 10.8) consisted of visually healthy participants with simulated tunnel vision. Both groups carried out different visual tasks in a virtual environment for 30 minutes per day over the course of four weeks. Task performances as well as gaze characteristics were evaluated in both groups over the course of the study. Results: Using the "two one-sided tests for equivalence" method, the two groups were found to perform similar in all three visual tasks. Significant differences between groups were found in different aspects of their gaze behavior, though most of these aspects seem to converge over time. Conclusion: Our study evaluates the potential and limitations of using Virtual Reality technology to simulate the effects of tunnel vision within controlled virtual environments. We find that the simulation accurately represents performance of RP patients in the context of group averages, but fails to fully replicate effects on gaze behavior.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
How to Tune Autofocals: A Comparative Study of Advanced Tuning Methods
Authors:
Benedikt W. Hosp,
Yannick Sauer,
Björn Severitt,
Rajat Agarwala,
Siegfried Wahl
Abstract:
This study comprehensively evaluates tuning methods for autofocal glasses using virtual reality (VR), addressing the challenge of presbyopia. With aging, presbyopia diminishes the eye's ability to focus on nearby objects, impacting the quality of life for billions. Autofocals, employing focus-tunable lenses, dynamically adjust optical power for each fixation, promising a more natural visual experi…
▽ More
This study comprehensively evaluates tuning methods for autofocal glasses using virtual reality (VR), addressing the challenge of presbyopia. With aging, presbyopia diminishes the eye's ability to focus on nearby objects, impacting the quality of life for billions. Autofocals, employing focus-tunable lenses, dynamically adjust optical power for each fixation, promising a more natural visual experience than traditional bifocal or multifocal lenses. Our research contrasts the most common tuning methods - manual, gaze-based, and vergence - within a VR setup to mimic real-world scenarios. Utilizing the XTAL VR headset equipped with eye-tracking, the study replicated autofocal scenarios, measuring performance and usability through psychophysical tasks and NASA TLX surveys. Results show varying strengths and weaknesses across methods, with gaze control excelling in precision but not necessarily comfort and manual control providing stability and predictability. The findings guide the selection of tuning methods based on task requirements and user preferences, highlighting a balance between precision and ease of use.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
