Showing 1–19 of 19 results for author: Scully, Z

Cost-aware Bayesian optimization via the Pandora's Box Gittins index

Authors: Qian Xie, Raul Astudillo, Peter Frazier, Ziv Scully, Alexander Terenin

Abstract: Bayesian optimization is a technique for efficiently optimizing unknown functions in a black-box manner. To handle practical settings where gathering data requires use of finite resources, it is desirable to explicitly incorporate function evaluation costs into Bayesian optimization policies. To understand how to do so, we develop a previously-unexplored connection between cost-aware Bayesian opti… ▽ More Bayesian optimization is a technique for efficiently optimizing unknown functions in a black-box manner. To handle practical settings where gathering data requires use of finite resources, it is desirable to explicitly incorporate function evaluation costs into Bayesian optimization policies. To understand how to do so, we develop a previously-unexplored connection between cost-aware Bayesian optimization and the Pandora's Box problem, a decision problem from economics. The Pandora's Box problem admits a Bayesian-optimal solution based on an expression called the Gittins index, which can be reinterpreted as an acquisition function. We study the use of this acquisition function for cost-aware Bayesian optimization, and demonstrate empirically that it performs well, particularly in medium-high dimensions. We further show that this performance carries over to classical Bayesian optimization without explicit evaluation costs. Our work constitutes a first step towards integrating techniques from Gittins index theory into Bayesian optimization. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Strongly Tail-Optimal Scheduling in the Light-Tailed M/G/1

Authors: George Yu, Ziv Scully

Abstract: We study the problem of scheduling jobs in a queueing system, specifically an M/G/1 with light-tailed job sizes, to asymptotically optimize the response time tail. This means scheduling to make $\mathbf{P}[T > t]$, the chance a job's response time exceeds $t$, decay as quickly as possible in the $t \to \infty$ limit. For some time, the best known policy was First-Come First-Served (FCFS), which ha… ▽ More We study the problem of scheduling jobs in a queueing system, specifically an M/G/1 with light-tailed job sizes, to asymptotically optimize the response time tail. This means scheduling to make $\mathbf{P}[T > t]$, the chance a job's response time exceeds $t$, decay as quickly as possible in the $t \to \infty$ limit. For some time, the best known policy was First-Come First-Served (FCFS), which has an asymptotically exponential tail: $\mathbf{P}[T > t] \sim C e^{-γt}$. FCFS achieves the optimal *decay rate* $γ$, but its *tail constant* $C$ is suboptimal. Only recently have policies that improve upon FCFS's tail constant been discovered. But it is unknown what the optimal tail constant is, let alone what policy might achieve it. In this paper, we derive a closed-form expression for the optimal tail constant $C$, and we introduce *$γ$-Boost*, a new policy that achieves this optimal tail constant. Roughly speaking, $γ$-Boost operates similarly to FCFS, but it pretends that small jobs arrive earlier than their true arrival times. This significantly reduces the response time of small jobs without unduly delaying large jobs, improving upon FCFS's tail constant by up to 50% with only moderate job size variability, with even larger improvements for higher variability. While these results are for systems with full job size information, we also introduce and analyze a version of $γ$-Boost that works in settings with partial job size information, showing it too achieves significant gains over FCFS. Finally, we show via simulation that $γ$-Boost has excellent practical performance. △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: 33 pages, 8 figures. To appear in SIGMETRICS 2024

Heavy-Traffic Optimal Size- and State-Aware Dispatching

Authors: Runhan Xie, Isaac Grosof, Ziv Scully

Abstract: Dispatching systems, where arriving jobs are immediately assigned to one of multiple queues, are ubiquitous in computer systems and service systems. A natural and practically relevant model is one in which each queue serves jobs in FCFS (First-Come First-Served) order. We consider the case where the dispatcher is size-aware, meaning it learns the size (i.e. service time) of each job as it arrives;… ▽ More Dispatching systems, where arriving jobs are immediately assigned to one of multiple queues, are ubiquitous in computer systems and service systems. A natural and practically relevant model is one in which each queue serves jobs in FCFS (First-Come First-Served) order. We consider the case where the dispatcher is size-aware, meaning it learns the size (i.e. service time) of each job as it arrives; and state-aware, meaning it always knows the amount of work (i.e. total remaining service time) at each queue. While size- and state-aware dispatching to FCFS queues has been extensively studied, little is known about optimal dispatching for the objective of minimizing mean delay. A major obstacle is that no nontrivial lower bound on mean delay is known, even in heavy traffic (i.e. the limit as load approaches capacity). This makes it difficult to prove that any given policy is optimal, or even heavy-traffic optimal. In this work, we propose the first size- and state-aware dispatching policy that provably minimizes mean delay in heavy traffic. Our policy, called CARD (Controlled Asymmetry Reduces Delay), keeps all but one of the queues short, then routes as few jobs as possible to the one long queue. We prove an upper bound on CARD's mean delay, and we prove the first nontrivial lower bound on the mean delay of any size- and state-aware dispatching policy. Both results apply to any number of servers. Our bounds match in heavy traffic, implying CARD's heavy-traffic optimality. In particular, CARD's heavy-traffic performance improves upon that of LWL (Least Work Left), SITA (Size Interval Task Assignment), and other policies from the literature whose heavy-traffic performance is known. △ Less

Submitted 28 January, 2024; v1 submitted 26 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Comments: ACM SIGMETRICS / IFIP Performance 2024

Performance of the Gittins Policy in the G/G/1 and G/G/k, With and Without Setup Times

Authors: Yige Hong, Ziv Scully

Abstract: How should we schedule jobs to minimize mean queue length? In the preemptive M/G/1 queue, we know the optimal policy is the Gittins policy, which uses any available information about jobs' remaining service times to dynamically prioritize jobs. For models more complex than the M/G/1, optimal scheduling is generally intractable. This leads us to ask: beyond the M/G/1, does Gittins still perform wel… ▽ More How should we schedule jobs to minimize mean queue length? In the preemptive M/G/1 queue, we know the optimal policy is the Gittins policy, which uses any available information about jobs' remaining service times to dynamically prioritize jobs. For models more complex than the M/G/1, optimal scheduling is generally intractable. This leads us to ask: beyond the M/G/1, does Gittins still perform well? Recent results show Gittins performs well in the M/G/k, meaning that its additive suboptimality gap is bounded by an expression which is negligible in heavy traffic. But allowing multiple servers is just one way to extend the M/G/1, and most other extensions remain open. Does Gittins still perform well with non-Poisson arrival processes? Or if servers require setup times when transitioning from idle to busy? In this paper, we give the first analysis of the Gittins policy that can handle any combination of (a) multiple servers, (b) non-Poisson arrivals, and (c) setup times. Our results thus cover the G/G/1 and G/G/k, with and without setup times, bounding Gittins's suboptimality gap in each case. Each of (a), (b), and (c) adds a term to our bound, but all the terms are negligible in heavy traffic, thus implying Gittins's heavy-traffic optimality in all the systems we consider. Another consequence of our results is that Gittins is optimal in the M/G/1 with setup times at all loads. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2023; v1 submitted 25 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

MSC Class: 60K25; 68M20; 90B22; 90B36 ACM Class: C.4; G.3; I.6

Journal ref: Performance Evaluation 163 (2024), 102377

Optimal Scheduling in the Multiserver-job Model under Heavy Traffic

Authors: Isaac Grosof, Ziv Scully, Mor Harchol-Balter, Alan Scheller-Wolf

Abstract: Multiserver-job systems, where jobs require concurrent service at many servers, occur widely in practice. Essentially all of the theoretical work on multiserver-job systems focuses on maximizing utilization, with almost nothing known about mean response time. In simpler settings, such as various known-size single-server-job settings, minimizing mean response time is merely a matter of prioritizing… ▽ More Multiserver-job systems, where jobs require concurrent service at many servers, occur widely in practice. Essentially all of the theoretical work on multiserver-job systems focuses on maximizing utilization, with almost nothing known about mean response time. In simpler settings, such as various known-size single-server-job settings, minimizing mean response time is merely a matter of prioritizing small jobs. However, for the multiserver-job system, prioritizing small jobs is not enough, because we must also ensure servers are not unnecessarily left idle. Thus, minimizing mean response time requires prioritizing small jobs while simultaneously maximizing throughput. Our question is how to achieve these joint objectives. We devise the ServerFilling-SRPT scheduling policy, which is the first policy to minimize mean response time in the multiserver-job model in the heavy traffic limit. In addition to proving this heavy-traffic result, we present empirical evidence that ServerFilling-SRPT outperforms all existing scheduling policies for all loads, with improvements by orders of magnitude at higher loads. Because ServerFilling-SRPT requires knowing job sizes, we also define the ServerFilling-Gittins policy, which is optimal when sizes are unknown or partially known. △ Less

Submitted 4 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 32 pages, to appear in ACM SIGMETRICS 2023

The Gittins Policy in the M/G/1 Queue

Authors: Ziv Scully, Mor Harchol-Balter

Abstract: The Gittins policy is a highly general scheduling policy that minimizes a wide variety of mean holding cost metrics in the M/G/1 queue. Perhaps most famously, Gittins minimizes mean response time in the M/G/1 when jobs' service times are unknown to the scheduler. Gittins also minimizes weighted versions of mean response time. For example, the well-known "$cμ$ rule", which minimizes class-weighted… ▽ More The Gittins policy is a highly general scheduling policy that minimizes a wide variety of mean holding cost metrics in the M/G/1 queue. Perhaps most famously, Gittins minimizes mean response time in the M/G/1 when jobs' service times are unknown to the scheduler. Gittins also minimizes weighted versions of mean response time. For example, the well-known "$cμ$ rule", which minimizes class-weighted mean response time in the multiclass M/M/1, is a special case of Gittins. However, despite the extensive literature on Gittins in the M/G/1, it contains no fully general proof of Gittins's optimality. This is because Gittins was originally developed for the multi-armed bandit problem. Translating arguments from the multi-armed bandit to the M/G/1 is technically demanding, so it has only been done rigorously in some special cases. The extent of Gittins's optimality in the M/G/1 is thus not entirely clear. In this work we provide the first fully general proof of Gittins's optimality in the M/G/1. The optimality result we obtain is even more general than was previously known. For example, we show that Gittins minimizes mean slowdown in the M/G/1 with unknown or partially known service times, and we show that Gittins's optimality holds under batch arrivals. Our proof uses a novel approach that works directly with the M/G/1, avoiding the difficulties of translating from the multi-armed bandit problem. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: Originally published at WiOpt 2021; this extended and revised version includes additional discussion throughout and fixes a minor error in Section VII

How to Schedule Near-Optimally under Real-World Constraints

Authors: Ziv Scully, Mor Harchol-Balter

Abstract: Scheduling is a critical part of practical computer systems, and scheduling has also been extensively studied from a theoretical perspective. Unfortunately, there is a gap between theory and practice, as the optimal scheduling policies presented by theory can be difficult or impossible to perfectly implement in practice. In this work, we use recent breakthroughs in queueing theory to begin to brid… ▽ More Scheduling is a critical part of practical computer systems, and scheduling has also been extensively studied from a theoretical perspective. Unfortunately, there is a gap between theory and practice, as the optimal scheduling policies presented by theory can be difficult or impossible to perfectly implement in practice. In this work, we use recent breakthroughs in queueing theory to begin to bridge this gap. We show how to translate theoretically optimal policies -- which provably minimize mean response time (a.k.a. latency) -- into near-optimal policies that are easily implemented in practical settings. Specifically, we handle the following real-world constraints: - We show how to schedule in systems where job sizes (a.k.a. running time) are unknown, or only partially known. We do so using simple policies that achieve performance very close to the much more complicated theoretically optimal policies. - We show how to schedule in systems that have only a limited number of priority levels available. We show how to adapt theoretically optimal policies to this constrained setting and determine how many levels we need for near-optimal performance. - We show how to schedule in systems where job preemption can only happen at specific checkpoints. Adding checkpoints allows for smarter scheduling, but each checkpoint incurs time overhead. We give a rule of thumb that near-optimally balances this tradeoff. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

When Does the Gittins Policy Have Asymptotically Optimal Response Time Tail?

Authors: Ziv Scully, Lucas van Kreveld

Abstract: We consider scheduling in the M/G/1 queue with unknown job sizes. It is known that the Gittins policy minimizes mean response time in this setting. However, the behavior of the tail of response time under Gittins is poorly understood, even in the large-response-time limit. Characterizing Gittins's asymptotic tail behavior is important because if Gittins has optimal tail asymptotics, then it simult… ▽ More We consider scheduling in the M/G/1 queue with unknown job sizes. It is known that the Gittins policy minimizes mean response time in this setting. However, the behavior of the tail of response time under Gittins is poorly understood, even in the large-response-time limit. Characterizing Gittins's asymptotic tail behavior is important because if Gittins has optimal tail asymptotics, then it simultaneously provides optimal mean response time and good tail performance. In this work, we give the first comprehensive account of Gittins's asymptotic tail behavior. For heavy-tailed job sizes, we find that Gittins always has asymptotically optimal tail. The story for light-tailed job sizes is less clear-cut: Gittins's tail can be optimal, pessimal, or in between. To remedy this, we show that a modification of Gittins avoids pessimal tail behavior while achieving near-optimal mean response time. △ Less

Submitted 28 January, 2024; v1 submitted 12 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: To appear in Operations Research

Uniform Bounds for Scheduling with Job Size Estimates

Authors: Ziv Scully, Isaac Grosof, Michael Mitzenmacher

Abstract: We consider the problem of scheduling to minimize mean response time in M/G/1 queues where only estimated job sizes (processing times) are known to the scheduler, where a job of true size $s$ has estimated size in the interval $[βs, αs]$ for some $α\geq β> 0$. We evaluate each scheduling policy by its approximation ratio, which we define to be the ratio between its mean response time and that of S… ▽ More We consider the problem of scheduling to minimize mean response time in M/G/1 queues where only estimated job sizes (processing times) are known to the scheduler, where a job of true size $s$ has estimated size in the interval $[βs, αs]$ for some $α\geq β> 0$. We evaluate each scheduling policy by its approximation ratio, which we define to be the ratio between its mean response time and that of Shortest Remaining Processing Time (SRPT), the optimal policy when true sizes are known. Our question: is there a scheduling policy that (a) has approximation ratio near 1 when $α$ and $β$ are near 1, (b) has approximation ratio bounded by some function of $α$ and $β$ even when they are far from 1, and (c) can be implemented without knowledge of $α$ and $β$? We first show that naively running SRPT using estimated sizes in place of true sizes is not such a policy: its approximation ratio can be arbitrarily large for any fixed $β< 1$. We then provide a simple variant of SRPT for estimated sizes that satisfies criteria (a), (b), and (c). In particular, we prove its approximation ratio approaches 1 uniformly as $α$ and $β$ approach 1. This is the first result showing this type of convergence for M/G/1 scheduling. We also study the Preemptive Shortest Job First (PSJF) policy, a cousin of SRPT. We show that, unlike SRPT, naively running PSJF using estimated sizes in place of true sizes satisfies criteria (b) and (c), as well as a weaker version of (a). △ Less

Submitted 23 March, 2022; v1 submitted 1 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: Published at ITCS 2022

Nudge: Stochastically Improving upon FCFS

Authors: Isaac Grosof, Kunhe Yang, Ziv Scully, Mor Harchol-Balter

Abstract: The First-Come First-Served (FCFS) scheduling policy is the most popular scheduling algorithm used in practice. Furthermore, its usage is theoretically validated: for light-tailed job size distributions, FCFS has weakly optimal asymptotic tail of response time. But what if we don't just care about the asymptotic tail? What if we also care about the 99th percentile of response time, or the fraction… ▽ More The First-Come First-Served (FCFS) scheduling policy is the most popular scheduling algorithm used in practice. Furthermore, its usage is theoretically validated: for light-tailed job size distributions, FCFS has weakly optimal asymptotic tail of response time. But what if we don't just care about the asymptotic tail? What if we also care about the 99th percentile of response time, or the fraction of jobs that complete in under one second? Is FCFS still best? Outside of the asymptotic regime, only loose bounds on the tail of FCFS are known, and optimality is completely open. In this paper, we introduce a new policy, Nudge, which is the first policy to provably stochastically improve upon FCFS. We prove that Nudge simultaneously improves upon FCFS at every point along the tail, for light-tailed job size distributions. As a result, Nudge outperforms FCFS for every moment and every percentile of response time. Moreover, Nudge provides a multiplicative improvement over FCFS in the asymptotic tail. This resolves a long-standing open problem by showing that, counter to previous conjecture, FCFS is not strongly asymptotically optimal. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: 29 pages, 4 figures. To appear in SIGMETRICS 2021

Optimal Multiserver Scheduling with Unknown Job Sizes in Heavy Traffic

Authors: Ziv Scully, Isaac Grosof, Mor Harchol-Balter

Abstract: We consider scheduling to minimize mean response time of the M/G/k queue with unknown job sizes. In the single-server case, the optimal policy is the Gittins policy, but it is not known whether Gittins or any other policy is optimal in the multiserver case. Exactly analyzing the M/G/k under any scheduling policy is intractable, and Gittins is a particularly complicated policy that is hard to analy… ▽ More We consider scheduling to minimize mean response time of the M/G/k queue with unknown job sizes. In the single-server case, the optimal policy is the Gittins policy, but it is not known whether Gittins or any other policy is optimal in the multiserver case. Exactly analyzing the M/G/k under any scheduling policy is intractable, and Gittins is a particularly complicated policy that is hard to analyze even in the single-server case. In this work we introduce monotonic Gittins (M-Gittins), a new variation of the Gittins policy, and show that it minimizes mean response time in the heavy-traffic M/G/k for a wide class of finite-variance job size distributions. We also show that the monotonic shortest expected remaining processing time (M-SERPT) policy, which is simpler than M-Gittins, is a 2-approximation for mean response time in the heavy traffic M/G/k under similar conditions. These results constitute the most general optimality results to date for the M/G/k with unknown job sizes. Our techniques build upon work by Grosof et al., who study simple policies, such as SRPT, in the M/G/k; Bansal et al., Kamphorst and Zwart, and Lin et al., who analyze mean response time scaling of simple policies in the heavy-traffic M/G/1; and Aalto et al. and Scully et al., who characterize and analyze the Gittins policy in the M/G/1. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2020; v1 submitted 30 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Simple Near-Optimal Scheduling for the M/G/1

Authors: Ziv Scully, Mor Harchol-Balter, Alan Scheller-Wolf

Abstract: We consider the problem of preemptively scheduling jobs to minimize mean response time of an M/G/1 queue. When we know each job's size, the shortest remaining processing time (SRPT) policy is optimal. Unfortunately, in many settings we do not have access to each job's size. Instead, we know only the job size distribution. In this setting the Gittins policy is known to minimize mean response time,… ▽ More We consider the problem of preemptively scheduling jobs to minimize mean response time of an M/G/1 queue. When we know each job's size, the shortest remaining processing time (SRPT) policy is optimal. Unfortunately, in many settings we do not have access to each job's size. Instead, we know only the job size distribution. In this setting the Gittins policy is known to minimize mean response time, but its complex priority structure can be computationally intractable. A much simpler alternative to Gittins is the shortest expected remaining processing time (SERPT) policy. While SERPT is a natural extension of SRPT to unknown job sizes, it is unknown whether or not SERPT is close to optimal for mean response time. We present a new variant of SERPT called monotonic SERPT (M-SERPT) which is as simple as SERPT but has provably near-optimal mean response time at all loads for any job size distribution. Specifically, we prove the mean response time ratio between M-SERPT and Gittins is at most 3 for load $ρ\leq 8/9$ and at most 5 for any load. This makes M-SERPT the only non-Gittins scheduling policy known to have a constant-factor approximation ratio for mean response time. △ Less

Submitted 22 January, 2020; v1 submitted 24 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: POMACS, 2020 (SIGMETRICS 2020 issue)

Load Balancing Guardrails: Kee** Your Heavy Traffic on the Road to Low Response Times

Authors: Isaac Grosof, Ziv Scully, Mor Harchol-Balter

Abstract: Load balancing systems, comprising a central dispatcher and a scheduling policy at each server, are widely used in practice, and their response time has been extensively studied in the theoretical literature. While much is known about the scenario where the scheduling at the servers is First-Come-First-Served (FCFS), to minimize mean response time we must use Shortest-Remaining-Processing-Time (SR… ▽ More Load balancing systems, comprising a central dispatcher and a scheduling policy at each server, are widely used in practice, and their response time has been extensively studied in the theoretical literature. While much is known about the scenario where the scheduling at the servers is First-Come-First-Served (FCFS), to minimize mean response time we must use Shortest-Remaining-Processing-Time (SRPT) scheduling at the servers. Much less is known about dispatching polices when SRPT scheduling is used. Unfortunately, traditional dispatching policies that are used in practice in systems with FCFS servers often have poor performance in systems with SRPT servers. In this paper, we devise a simple fix that can be applied to any dispatching policy. This fix, called guardrails, ensures that the dispatching policy yields optimal mean response time under heavy traffic when used in a system with SRPT servers. Any dispatching policy, when augmented with guardrails, becomes heavy-traffic optimal. Our results yield the first analytical bounds on mean response time for load balancing systems with SRPT scheduling at the servers. △ Less

Submitted 9 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: 31 pages. To appear in ACM SIGMETRICS 2019

The Markovian Price of Information

Authors: Anupam Gupta, Haotian Jiang, Ziv Scully, Sahil Singla

Abstract: Suppose there are $n$ Markov chains and we need to pay a per-step \emph{price} to advance them. The "destination" states of the Markov chains contain rewards; however, we can only get rewards for a subset of them that satisfy a combinatorial constraint, e.g., at most $k$ of them, or they are acyclic in an underlying graph. What strategy should we choose to advance the Markov chains if our goal is… ▽ More Suppose there are $n$ Markov chains and we need to pay a per-step \emph{price} to advance them. The "destination" states of the Markov chains contain rewards; however, we can only get rewards for a subset of them that satisfy a combinatorial constraint, e.g., at most $k$ of them, or they are acyclic in an underlying graph. What strategy should we choose to advance the Markov chains if our goal is to maximize the total reward \emph{minus} the total price that we pay? In this paper we introduce a Markovian price of information model to capture settings such as the above, where the input parameters of a combinatorial optimization problem are given via Markov chains. We design optimal/approximation algorithms that jointly optimize the value of the combinatorial problem and the total paid price. We also study \emph{robustness} of our algorithms to the distribution parameters and how to handle the \emph{commitment} constraint. Our work brings together two classical lines of investigation: getting optimal strategies for Markovian multi-armed bandits, and getting exact and approximation algorithms for discrete optimization problems using combinatorial as well as linear-programming relaxation ideas. △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

SRPT for Multiserver Systems

Authors: Isaac Grosof, Ziv Scully, Mor Harchol-Balter

Abstract: The Shortest Remaining Processing Time (SRPT) scheduling policy and its variants have been extensively studied in both theoretical and practical settings. While beautiful results are known for single-server SRPT, much less is known for multiserver SRPT. In particular, stochastic analysis of the M/G/k under multiserver SRPT is entirely open. Intuition suggests that multiserver SRPT should be optima… ▽ More The Shortest Remaining Processing Time (SRPT) scheduling policy and its variants have been extensively studied in both theoretical and practical settings. While beautiful results are known for single-server SRPT, much less is known for multiserver SRPT. In particular, stochastic analysis of the M/G/k under multiserver SRPT is entirely open. Intuition suggests that multiserver SRPT should be optimal or near-optimal for minimizing mean response time. However, the only known analysis of multiserver SRPT is in the worst-case adversarial setting, where SRPT can be far from optimal. In this paper, we give the first stochastic analysis bounding mean response time of the M/G/k under multiserver SRPT. Using our response time bound, we show that multiserver SRPT has asymptotically optimal mean response time in the heavy-traffic limit. The key to our bounds is a strategic combination of stochastic and worst-case techniques. Beyond SRPT, we prove similar response time bounds and optimality results for several other multiserver scheduling policies. △ Less

Submitted 19 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Comments: 15 pages. Submitted to IFIP Performance 2018

Optimal Scheduling and Exact Response Time Analysis for Multistage Jobs

Authors: Ziv Scully, Mor Harchol-Balter, Alan Scheller-Wolf

Abstract: Scheduling to minimize mean response time in an M/G/1 queue is a classic problem. The problem is usually addressed in one of two scenarios. In the perfect-information scenario, the scheduler knows each job's exact size, or service requirement. In the zero-information scenario, the scheduler knows only each job's size distribution. The well-known shortest remaining processing time (SRPT) policy is… ▽ More Scheduling to minimize mean response time in an M/G/1 queue is a classic problem. The problem is usually addressed in one of two scenarios. In the perfect-information scenario, the scheduler knows each job's exact size, or service requirement. In the zero-information scenario, the scheduler knows only each job's size distribution. The well-known shortest remaining processing time (SRPT) policy is optimal in the perfect-information scenario, and the more complex Gittins policy is optimal in the zero-information scenario. In real systems the scheduler often has partial but incomplete information about each job's size. We introduce a new job model, that of multistage jobs, to capture this partial-information scenario. A multistage job consists of a sequence of stages, where both the sequence of stages and stage sizes are unknown, but the scheduler always knows which stage of a job is in progress. We give an optimal algorithm for scheduling multistage jobs in an M/G/1 queue and an exact response time analysis of our algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 12 November, 2018; v1 submitted 17 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

SOAP: One Clean Analysis of All Age-Based Scheduling Policies

Authors: Ziv Scully, Mor Harchol-Balter, Alan Scheller-Wolf

Abstract: We consider an extremely broad class of M/G/1 scheduling policies called SOAP: Schedule Ordered by Age-based Priority. The SOAP policies include almost all scheduling policies in the literature as well as an infinite number of variants which have never been analyzed, or maybe not even conceived. SOAP policies range from classic policies, like first-come, first-serve (FCFS), foreground-background (… ▽ More We consider an extremely broad class of M/G/1 scheduling policies called SOAP: Schedule Ordered by Age-based Priority. The SOAP policies include almost all scheduling policies in the literature as well as an infinite number of variants which have never been analyzed, or maybe not even conceived. SOAP policies range from classic policies, like first-come, first-serve (FCFS), foreground-background (FB), class-based priority, and shortest remaining processing time (SRPT); to much more complicated scheduling rules, such as the famously complex Gittins index policy and other policies in which a job's priority changes arbitrarily with its age. While the response time of policies in the former category is well understood, policies in the latter category have resisted response time analysis. We present a universal analysis of all SOAP policies, deriving the mean and Laplace-Stieltjes transform of response time. △ Less

Submitted 17 February, 2018; v1 submitted 3 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

Efficient Calculation of Determinants of Symbolic Matrices with Many Variables

Authors: Tanya Khovanova, Ziv Scully

Abstract: Efficient matrix determinant calculations have been studied since the 19th century. Computers expand the range of determinants that are practically calculable to include matrices with symbolic entries. However, the fastest determinant algorithms for numerical matrices are often not the fastest for symbolic matrices with many variables. We compare the performance of two algorithms, fraction-free Ga… ▽ More Efficient matrix determinant calculations have been studied since the 19th century. Computers expand the range of determinants that are practically calculable to include matrices with symbolic entries. However, the fastest determinant algorithms for numerical matrices are often not the fastest for symbolic matrices with many variables. We compare the performance of two algorithms, fraction-free Gaussian elimination and minor expansion, on symbolic matrices with many variables. We show that, under a simplified theoretical model, minor expansion is faster in most situations. We then propose optimizations for minor expansion and demonstrate their effectiveness with empirical data. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

Comments: 9 pages

ACM Class: I.1.2

Motors and Impossible Firing Patterns in the Parallel Chip-Firing Game

Authors: Tian-Yi Jiang, Ziv Scully, Yan X Zhang

Abstract: The parallel chip-firing game is an automaton on graphs in which vertices "fire" chips to their neighbors when they have enough chips to do so. The game is always periodic, and we concern ourselves with the firing sequences of vertices. We introduce the concepts of motorized parallel chip-firing games and motor vertices, study the effects of motors connected to a tree and show that motorized games… ▽ More The parallel chip-firing game is an automaton on graphs in which vertices "fire" chips to their neighbors when they have enough chips to do so. The game is always periodic, and we concern ourselves with the firing sequences of vertices. We introduce the concepts of motorized parallel chip-firing games and motor vertices, study the effects of motors connected to a tree and show that motorized games can be transformed into ordinary games if the motors' firing sequences occur in some ordinary game. We then characterize exactly which periodic firing patterns can occur in an ordinary game and state some implications of the finding. △ Less

Submitted 20 November, 2014; v1 submitted 28 November, 2012; originally announced November 2012.

Comments: 19 pages; added higher-level explanation of main theorem's proof, typo corrections

MSC Class: 37B15; 82C20