ModelHub.AI: Dissemination Platform for Deep Learning Models
Authors:
Ahmed Hosny,
Michael Schwier,
Christoph Berger,
Evin P Örnek,
Mehmet Turan,
Phi V Tran,
Leon Weninger,
Fabian Isensee,
Klaus H Maier-Hein,
Richard McKinley,
Michael T Lu,
Udo Hoffmann,
Bjoern Menze,
Spyridon Bakas,
Andriy Fedorov,
Hugo JWL Aerts
Abstract:
Recent advances in artificial intelligence research have led to a profusion of studies that apply deep learning to problems in image analysis and natural language processing among others. Additionally, the availability of open-source computational frameworks has lowered the barriers to implementing state-of-the-art methods across multiple domains. Albeit leading to major performance breakthroughs…
▽ More
Recent advances in artificial intelligence research have led to a profusion of studies that apply deep learning to problems in image analysis and natural language processing among others. Additionally, the availability of open-source computational frameworks has lowered the barriers to implementing state-of-the-art methods across multiple domains. Albeit leading to major performance breakthroughs in some tasks, effective dissemination of deep learning algorithms remains challenging, inhibiting reproducibility and benchmarking studies, impeding further validation, and ultimately hindering their effectiveness in the cumulative scientific progress. In develo** a platform for sharing research outputs, we present ModelHub.AI (www.modelhub.ai), a community-driven container-based software engine and platform for the structured dissemination of deep learning models. For contributors, the engine controls data flow throughout the inference cycle, while the contributor-facing standard template exposes model-specific functions including inference, as well as pre- and post-processing. Python and RESTful Application programming interfaces (APIs) enable users to interact with models hosted on ModelHub.AI and allows both researchers and developers to utilize models out-of-the-box. ModelHub.AI is domain-, data-, and framework-agnostic, catering to different workflows and contributors' preferences.
△ Less
Submitted 26 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
Repeatability of Multiparametric Prostate MRI Radiomics Features
Authors:
Michael Schwier,
Joost van Griethuysen,
Mark G Vangel,
Steve Pieper,
Sharon Peled,
Clare M Tempany,
Hugo JWL Aerts,
Ron Kikinis,
Fiona M Fennessy,
Andrey Fedorov
Abstract:
In this study we assessed the repeatability of the values of radiomics features for small prostate tumors using test-retest Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) images. The premise of radiomics is that quantitative image features can serve as biomarkers characterizing disease. For such biomarkers to be useful, repeatability is a basic requirement, meaning its value must remain stable…
▽ More
In this study we assessed the repeatability of the values of radiomics features for small prostate tumors using test-retest Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) images. The premise of radiomics is that quantitative image features can serve as biomarkers characterizing disease. For such biomarkers to be useful, repeatability is a basic requirement, meaning its value must remain stable between two scans, if the conditions remain stable. We investigated repeatability of radiomics features under various preprocessing and extraction configurations including various image normalization schemes, different image pre-filtering, 2D vs 3D texture computation, and different bin widths for image discretization. Image registration as means to re-identify regions of interest across time points was evaluated against human-expert segmented regions in both time points. Even though we found many radiomics features and preprocessing combinations with a high repeatability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) > 0.85), our results indicate that overall the repeatability is highly sensitive to the processing parameters (under certain configurations, it can be below 0.0). Image normalization, using a variety of approaches considered, did not result in consistent improvements in repeatability. There was also no consistent improvement of repeatability through the use of pre-filtering options, or by using image registration between timepoints to improve consistency of the region of interest localization. Based on these results we urge caution when interpreting radiomics features and advise paying close attention to the processing configuration details of reported results. Furthermore, we advocate reporting all processing details in radiomics studies and strongly recommend making the implementation available.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2018; v1 submitted 16 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
