-
ARMORY: Fully Automated and Exhaustive Fault Simulation on ARM-M Binaries
Authors:
Max Hoffmann,
Falk Schellenberg,
Christof Paar
Abstract:
Embedded systems are ubiquitous. However, physical access of users and likewise attackers makes them often threatened by fault attacks: a single fault during the computation of a cryptographic primitive can lead to a total loss of system security. This can have serious consequences, e.g., in safetycritical systems, including bodily harm and catastrophic technical failures. However, countermeasures…
▽ More
Embedded systems are ubiquitous. However, physical access of users and likewise attackers makes them often threatened by fault attacks: a single fault during the computation of a cryptographic primitive can lead to a total loss of system security. This can have serious consequences, e.g., in safetycritical systems, including bodily harm and catastrophic technical failures. However, countermeasures often focus on isolated fault models and high layers of abstraction. This leads to a dangerous sense of security, because exploitable faults that are only visible at machine code level might not be covered by countermeasures. In this work we present ARMORY, a fully automated open source framework for exhaustive fault simulation on binaries of the ubiquitous ARM-M class. It allows engineers and analysts to efficiently scan a binary for potential weaknesses against arbitrary combinations of multi-variate fault injections under a large variety of fault models. Using ARMORY, we demonstrate the power of fully automated fault analysis and the dangerous implications of applying countermeasures without knowledge of physical addresses and offsets. We exemplarily analyze two case studies, which are highly relevant for practice: a DFA on AES (cryptographic) and a secure bootloader (non-cryptographic). Our results show that indeed numerous exploitable faults found by ARMORY which occur in the actual implementations are easily missed in manual inspection. Crucially, most faults are only visible when taking machine code information, i.e., addresses and offsets, into account. Surprisingly, we show that a countermeasure that protects against one type of fault can actually largely increase the vulnerability to other fault models. Our work demonstrates the need for countermeasures that, at least in their evaluation, are not restricted to isolated fault models and consider low-level information [...].
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
SPFA: SFA on Multiple Persistent Faults
Authors:
Susanne Engels,
Falk Schellenberg,
Christof Paar
Abstract:
For classical fault analysis, a transient fault is required to be injected during runtime, e.g., only at a specific round. Instead, Persistent Fault Analysis (PFA) introduces a powerful class of fault attacks that allows for a fault to be present throughout the whole execution. One limitation of original PFA as introduced by Zhang et al. at CHES'18 is that the faulty values need to be known to the…
▽ More
For classical fault analysis, a transient fault is required to be injected during runtime, e.g., only at a specific round. Instead, Persistent Fault Analysis (PFA) introduces a powerful class of fault attacks that allows for a fault to be present throughout the whole execution. One limitation of original PFA as introduced by Zhang et al. at CHES'18 is that the faulty values need to be known to the adversary. While this was addressed at a follow-up work at CHES'20, the solution is only applicable to a single faulty value. Instead, we use the potency of Statistical Fault Analysis (SFA) in the persistent fault setting, presenting Statistical Persistent Fault Analysis (SPFA) as a more general approach of PFA. As a result, any or even a multitude of unknown faults that cause an exploitable bias in the targeted round can be used to recover the cipher's secret key. Indeed, the undesired faults in the other rounds that occur due the persistent nature of the attack converge to a uniform distribution as required by SFA. We verify the effectiveness of our attack against LED and AES.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
SAT-based Reverse Engineering of Gate-Level Schematics using Fault Injection and Probing
Authors:
Shahrzad Keshavarz,
Falk Schellenberg,
Bastian Richter,
Christof Paar,
Daniel Holcomb
Abstract:
Gate camouflaging is a known security enhancement technique that tries to thwart reverse engineering by hiding the functions of gates or the connections between them. A number of works on SAT-based attacks have shown that it is often possible to reverse engineer a circuit function by combining a camouflaged circuit model and the ability to have oracle access to the obfuscated combinational circuit…
▽ More
Gate camouflaging is a known security enhancement technique that tries to thwart reverse engineering by hiding the functions of gates or the connections between them. A number of works on SAT-based attacks have shown that it is often possible to reverse engineer a circuit function by combining a camouflaged circuit model and the ability to have oracle access to the obfuscated combinational circuit. Especially in small circuits it is easy to reverse engineer the circuit function in this way, but SAT-based reverse engineering techniques provide no guarantees of recovering a circuit that is gate-by-gate equivalent to the original design. In this work we show that an attacker who does not know gate functions or connections of an aggressively camouflaged circuit cannot learn the correct gate-level schematic even if able to control inputs and probe all combinational nodes of the circuit. We then present a stronger attack that extends SAT-based reverse engineering with fault analysis to allow an attacker to recover the correct gate-level schematic. We analyze our reverse engineering approach on an S-Box circuit.
△ Less
Submitted 24 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
