-
Optimization of phase-only holograms calculated with scaled diffraction calculation through deep neural networks
Authors:
Yoshiyuki Ishii,
Tomoyoshi Shimobaba,
David Blinder,
Tobias Birnbaum,
Peter Schelkens,
Takashi Kakue,
Tomoyoshi Ito
Abstract:
Computer-generated holograms (CGHs) are used in holographic three-dimensional (3D) displays and holographic projections. The quality of the reconstructed images using phase-only CGHs is degraded because the amplitude of the reconstructed image is difficult to control. Iterative optimization methods such as the Gerchberg-Saxton (GS) algorithm are one option for improving image quality. They optimiz…
▽ More
Computer-generated holograms (CGHs) are used in holographic three-dimensional (3D) displays and holographic projections. The quality of the reconstructed images using phase-only CGHs is degraded because the amplitude of the reconstructed image is difficult to control. Iterative optimization methods such as the Gerchberg-Saxton (GS) algorithm are one option for improving image quality. They optimize CGHs in an iterative fashion to obtain a higher image quality. However, such iterative computation is time consuming, and the improvement in image quality is often stagnant. Recently, deep learning-based hologram computation has been proposed. Deep neural networks directly infer CGHs from input image data. However, it is limited to reconstructing images that are the same size as the hologram. In this study, we use deep learning to optimize phase-only CGHs generated using scaled diffraction computations and the random phase-free method. By combining the random phase-free method with the scaled diffraction computation, it is possible to handle a zoomable reconstructed image larger than the hologram. In comparison to the GS algorithm, the proposed method optimizes both high quality and speed.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
QUALINET White Paper on Definitions of Immersive Media Experience (IMEx)
Authors:
Andrew Perkis,
Christian Timmerer,
Sabina Baraković,
Jasmina Baraković Husić,
Søren Bech,
Sebastian Bosse,
Jean Botev,
Kjell Brunnström,
Luis Cruz,
Katrien De Moor,
Andrea de Polo Saibanti,
Wouter Durnez,
Sebastian Egger-Lampl,
Ulrich Engelke,
Tiago H. Falk,
Jesús Gutiérrez,
Asim Hameed,
Andrew Hines,
Tanja Kojic,
Dragan Kukolj,
Eirini Liotou,
Dragorad Milovanovic,
Sebastian Möller,
Niall Murray,
Babak Naderi
, et al. (19 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
With the coming of age of virtual/augmented reality and interactive media, numerous definitions, frameworks, and models of immersion have emerged across different fields ranging from computer graphics to literary works. Immersion is oftentimes used interchangeably with presence as both concepts are closely related. However, there are noticeable interdisciplinary differences regarding definitions,…
▽ More
With the coming of age of virtual/augmented reality and interactive media, numerous definitions, frameworks, and models of immersion have emerged across different fields ranging from computer graphics to literary works. Immersion is oftentimes used interchangeably with presence as both concepts are closely related. However, there are noticeable interdisciplinary differences regarding definitions, scope, and constituents that are required to be addressed so that a coherent understanding of the concepts can be achieved. Such consensus is vital for paving the directionality of the future of immersive media experiences (IMEx) and all related matters. The aim of this white paper is to provide a survey of definitions of immersion and presence which leads to a definition of immersive media experience (IMEx). The Quality of Experience (QoE) for immersive media is described by establishing a relationship between the concepts of QoE and IMEx followed by application areas of immersive media experience. Influencing factors on immersive media experience are elaborated as well as the assessment of immersive media experience. Finally, standardization activities related to IMEx are highlighted and the white paper is concluded with an outlook related to future developments.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2020; v1 submitted 10 June, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
From Adaptive Kernel Density Estimation to Sparse Mixture Models
Authors:
Colas Schretter,
Jianyong Sun,
Peter Schelkens
Abstract:
We introduce a balloon estimator in a generalized expectation-maximization method for estimating all parameters of a Gaussian mixture model given one data sample per mixture component. Instead of limiting explicitly the model size, this regularization strategy yields low-complexity sparse models where the number of effective mixture components reduces with an increase of a smoothing probability pa…
▽ More
We introduce a balloon estimator in a generalized expectation-maximization method for estimating all parameters of a Gaussian mixture model given one data sample per mixture component. Instead of limiting explicitly the model size, this regularization strategy yields low-complexity sparse models where the number of effective mixture components reduces with an increase of a smoothing probability parameter $\mathbf{P>0}$. This semi-parametric method bridges from non-parametric adaptive kernel density estimation (KDE) to parametric ordinary least-squares when $\mathbf{P=1}$. Experiments show that simpler sparse mixture models retain the level of details present in the adaptive KDE solution.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Proceedings of the second "international Traveling Workshop on Interactions between Sparse models and Technology" (iTWIST'14)
Authors:
L. Jacques,
C. De Vleeschouwer,
Y. Boursier,
P. Sudhakar,
C. De Mol,
A. Pizurica,
S. Anthoine,
P. Vandergheynst,
P. Frossard,
C. Bilen,
S. Kitic,
N. Bertin,
R. Gribonval,
N. Boumal,
B. Mishra,
P. -A. Absil,
R. Sepulchre,
S. Bundervoet,
C. Schretter,
A. Dooms,
P. Schelkens,
O. Chabiron,
F. Malgouyres,
J. -Y. Tourneret,
N. Dobigeon
, et al. (42 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The implicit objective of the biennial "international - Traveling Workshop on Interactions between Sparse models and Technology" (iTWIST) is to foster collaboration between international scientific teams by disseminating ideas through both specific oral/poster presentations and free discussions. For its second edition, the iTWIST workshop took place in the medieval and picturesque town of Namur in…
▽ More
The implicit objective of the biennial "international - Traveling Workshop on Interactions between Sparse models and Technology" (iTWIST) is to foster collaboration between international scientific teams by disseminating ideas through both specific oral/poster presentations and free discussions. For its second edition, the iTWIST workshop took place in the medieval and picturesque town of Namur in Belgium, from Wednesday August 27th till Friday August 29th, 2014. The workshop was conveniently located in "The Arsenal" building within walking distance of both hotels and town center. iTWIST'14 has gathered about 70 international participants and has featured 9 invited talks, 10 oral presentations, and 14 posters on the following themes, all related to the theory, application and generalization of the "sparsity paradigm": Sparsity-driven data sensing and processing; Union of low dimensional subspaces; Beyond linear and convex inverse problem; Matrix/manifold/graph sensing/processing; Blind inverse problems and dictionary learning; Sparsity and computational neuroscience; Information theory, geometry and randomness; Complexity/accuracy tradeoffs in numerical methods; Sparsity? What's next?; Sparse machine learning and inference.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2014; v1 submitted 2 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.
