-
Do Gradient-based Explanations Tell Anything About Adversarial Robustness to Android Malware?
Authors:
Marco Melis,
Michele Scalas,
Ambra Demontis,
Davide Maiorca,
Battista Biggio,
Giorgio Giacinto,
Fabio Roli
Abstract:
While machine-learning algorithms have demonstrated a strong ability in detecting Android malware, they can be evaded by sparse evasion attacks crafted by injecting a small set of fake components, e.g., permissions and system calls, without compromising intrusive functionality. Previous work has shown that, to improve robustness against such attacks, learning algorithms should avoid overemphasizin…
▽ More
While machine-learning algorithms have demonstrated a strong ability in detecting Android malware, they can be evaded by sparse evasion attacks crafted by injecting a small set of fake components, e.g., permissions and system calls, without compromising intrusive functionality. Previous work has shown that, to improve robustness against such attacks, learning algorithms should avoid overemphasizing few discriminant features, providing instead decisions that rely upon a large subset of components. In this work, we investigate whether gradient-based attribution methods, used to explain classifiers' decisions by identifying the most relevant features, can be used to help identify and select more robust algorithms. To this end, we propose to exploit two different metrics that represent the evenness of explanations, and a new compact security measure called Adversarial Robustness Metric. Our experiments conducted on two different datasets and five classification algorithms for Android malware detection show that a strong connection exists between the uniformity of explanations and adversarial robustness. In particular, we found that popular techniques like Gradient*Input and Integrated Gradients are strongly correlated to security when applied to both linear and nonlinear detectors, while more elementary explanation techniques like the simple Gradient do not provide reliable information about the robustness of such classifiers.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021; v1 submitted 4 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Automotive Cybersecurity: Foundations for Next-Generation Vehicles
Authors:
Michele Scalas,
Giorgio Giacinto
Abstract:
The automotive industry is experiencing a serious transformation due to a digitalisation process and the transition to the new paradigm of Mobility-as-a-Service. The next-generation vehicles are going to be very complex cyber-physical systems, whose design must be reinvented to fulfil the increasing demand of smart services, both for safety and entertainment purposes, causing the manufacturers' mo…
▽ More
The automotive industry is experiencing a serious transformation due to a digitalisation process and the transition to the new paradigm of Mobility-as-a-Service. The next-generation vehicles are going to be very complex cyber-physical systems, whose design must be reinvented to fulfil the increasing demand of smart services, both for safety and entertainment purposes, causing the manufacturers' model to converge towards that of IT companies. Connected cars and autonomous driving are the preeminent factors that drive along this route, and they cause the necessity of a new design to address the emerging cybersecurity issues: the "old" automotive architecture relied on a single closed network, with no external communications; modern vehicles are going to be always connected indeed, which means the attack surface will be much more extended. The result is the need for a paradigm shift towards a secure-by-design approach.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
On the Effectiveness of System API-Related Information for Android Ransomware Detection
Authors:
Michele Scalas,
Davide Maiorca,
Francesco Mercaldo,
Corrado Aaron Visaggio,
Fabio Martinelli,
Giorgio Giacinto
Abstract:
Ransomware constitutes a significant threat to the Android operating system. It can either lock or encrypt the target devices, and victims are forced to pay ransoms to restore their data. Hence, the prompt detection of such attacks has a priority in comparison to other malicious threats. Previous works on Android malware detection mainly focused on Machine Learning-oriented approaches that were ta…
▽ More
Ransomware constitutes a significant threat to the Android operating system. It can either lock or encrypt the target devices, and victims are forced to pay ransoms to restore their data. Hence, the prompt detection of such attacks has a priority in comparison to other malicious threats. Previous works on Android malware detection mainly focused on Machine Learning-oriented approaches that were tailored to identifying malware families, without a clear focus on ransomware. More specifically, such approaches resorted to complex information types such as permissions, user-implemented API calls, and native calls. However, this led to significant drawbacks concerning complexity, resilience against obfuscation, and explainability. To overcome these issues, in this paper, we propose and discuss learning-based detection strategies that rely on System API information. These techniques leverage the fact that ransomware attacks heavily resort to System API to perform their actions, and allow distinguishing between generic malware, ransomware and goodware.
We tested three different ways of employing System API information, i.e., through packages, classes, and methods, and we compared their performances to other, more complex state-of-the-art approaches. The attained results showed that systems based on System API could detect ransomware and generic malware with very good accuracy, comparable to systems that employed more complex information. Moreover, the proposed systems could accurately detect novel samples in the wild and showed resilience against static obfuscation attempts. Finally, to guarantee early on-device detection, we developed and released on the Android platform a complete ransomware and malware detector (R-PackDroid) that employed one of the methodologies proposed in this paper.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2019; v1 submitted 24 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
