Muzzle-Based Cattle Identification System Using Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Authors:
Hasan Zohirul Islam,
Safayet Khan,
Sanjib Kumar Paul,
Sheikh Imtiaz Rahi,
Fahim Hossain Sifat,
Md. Mahadi Hasan Sany,
Md. Shahjahan Ali Sarker,
Tareq Anam,
Ismail Hossain Polas
Abstract:
Absence of tamper-proof cattle identification technology was a significant problem preventing insurance companies from providing livestock insurance. This lack of technology had devastating financial consequences for marginal farmers as they did not have the opportunity to claim compensation for any unexpected events such as the accidental death of cattle in Bangladesh. Using machine learning and…
▽ More
Absence of tamper-proof cattle identification technology was a significant problem preventing insurance companies from providing livestock insurance. This lack of technology had devastating financial consequences for marginal farmers as they did not have the opportunity to claim compensation for any unexpected events such as the accidental death of cattle in Bangladesh. Using machine learning and deep learning algorithms, we have solved the bottleneck of cattle identification by develo** and introducing a muzzle-based cattle identification system. The uniqueness of cattle muzzles has been scientifically established, which resembles human fingerprints. This is the fundamental premise that prompted us to develop a cattle identification system that extracts the uniqueness of cattle muzzles. For this purpose, we collected 32,374 images from 826 cattle. Contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) with sharpening filters was applied in the preprocessing steps to remove noise from images. We used the YOLO algorithm for cattle muzzle detection in the image and the FaceNet architecture to learn unified embeddings from muzzle images using squared $L_2$ distances. Our system performs with an accuracy of $96.489\%$, $F_1$ score of $97.334\%$, and a true positive rate (tpr) of $87.993\%$ at a remarkably low false positive rate (fpr) of $0.098\%$. This reliable and efficient system for identifying cattle can significantly advance livestock insurance and precision farming.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Can artificial intelligence (AI) be used to accurately detect tuberculosis (TB) from chest X-rays? An evaluation of five AI products for TB screening and triaging in a high TB burden setting
Authors:
Zhi Zhen Qin,
Shahriar Ahmed,
Mohammad Shahnewaz Sarker,
Kishor Paul,
Ahammad Shafiq Sikder Adel,
Tasneem Naheyan,
Rachael Barrett,
Sayera Banu,
Jacob Creswell
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence (AI) products can be trained to recognize tuberculosis (TB)-related abnormalities on chest radiographs. Various AI products are available commercially, yet there is lack of evidence on how their performance compared with each other and with radiologists. We evaluated five AI software products for screening and triaging TB using a large dataset that had not been used to trai…
▽ More
Artificial intelligence (AI) products can be trained to recognize tuberculosis (TB)-related abnormalities on chest radiographs. Various AI products are available commercially, yet there is lack of evidence on how their performance compared with each other and with radiologists. We evaluated five AI software products for screening and triaging TB using a large dataset that had not been used to train any commercial AI products. Individuals (>=15 years old) presenting to three TB screening centers in Dhaka, Bangladesh, were recruited consecutively. All CXR were read independently by a group of three Bangladeshi registered radiologists and five commercial AI products: CAD4TB (v7), InferReadDR (v2), Lunit INSIGHT CXR (v4.9.0), JF CXR-1 (v2), and qXR (v3). All five AI products significantly outperformed the Bangladeshi radiologists. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve are qXR: 90.81% (95% CI:90.33-91.29%), CAD4TB: 90.34% (95% CI:89.81-90.87), Lunit INSIGHT CXR: 88.61% (95% CI:88.03%-89.20%), InferReadDR: 84.90% (95% CI: 84.27-85.54%) and JF CXR-1: 84.89% (95% CI:84.26-85.53%). Only qXR met the TPP with 74.3% specificity at 90% sensitivity. Five AI algorithms can reduce the number of Xpert tests required by 50%, while maintaining a sensitivity above 90%. All AI algorithms performed worse among the older age and people with prior TB history. AI products can be highly accurate and useful screening and triage tools for TB detection in high burden regions and outperform human readers.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2021; v1 submitted 9 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
