-
iGEM: a model system for team science and innovation
Authors:
Marc Santolini,
Leo Blondel,
Megan J. Palmer,
Robert N. Ward,
Rathin Jeyaram,
Kathryn R. Brink,
Abhijeet Krishna,
Albert-Laszlo Barabasi
Abstract:
Teams are a primary source of innovation in science and technology. Rather than examining the lone genius, scholarly and policy attention has shifted to understanding how team interactions produce new and useful ideas. Yet the organizational roots of innovation remain unclear, in part because of the limitations of current data. This paper introduces the international Genetically Engineered Machine…
▽ More
Teams are a primary source of innovation in science and technology. Rather than examining the lone genius, scholarly and policy attention has shifted to understanding how team interactions produce new and useful ideas. Yet the organizational roots of innovation remain unclear, in part because of the limitations of current data. This paper introduces the international Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) competition, a model system for studying team science and innovation. By combining digital laboratory notebooks with performance data from 2,406 teams over multiple years of participation, we reveal shared dynamical and organizational patterns across teams and identify features associated with team performance and success. This dataset makes visible organizational behavior that is typically hidden, and thus understudied, creating new opportunities for the science of science and innovation.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Charting mobility patterns in the scientific knowledge landscape
Authors:
Chakresh Kumar Singh,
Liubov Tupikina,
Fabrice Lécuyer,
Michele Starnini,
Marc Santolini
Abstract:
From small steps to great leaps, metaphors of spatial mobility abound to describe discovery processes. Here, we ground these ideas in formal terms by systematically studying scientific knowledge mobility patterns. We use low-dimensional embedding techniques to create a knowledge space made up of 1.5 million articles from the fields of physics, computer science, and mathematics. By analyzing the pu…
▽ More
From small steps to great leaps, metaphors of spatial mobility abound to describe discovery processes. Here, we ground these ideas in formal terms by systematically studying scientific knowledge mobility patterns. We use low-dimensional embedding techniques to create a knowledge space made up of 1.5 million articles from the fields of physics, computer science, and mathematics. By analyzing the publication histories of individual researchers, we discover patterns of knowledge mobility that closely resemble physical mobility. In aggregate, the trajectories form mobility flows that can be described by a gravity model, with jumps more likely to occur in areas of high density and less likely to occur over longer distances. We identify two types of researchers from their individual mobility patterns: interdisciplinary explorers who pioneer new fields, and exploiters who are more likely to stay within their specific areas of expertise. Our results suggest that spatial mobility analysis is a valuable tool for understanding knowledge evolution.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Quantifying the rise and fall of scientific fields
Authors:
Chakresh Singh,
Emma Barme,
Robert Ward,
Liubov Tupikina,
Marc Santolini
Abstract:
Science advances by pushing the boundaries of the adjacent possible. While the global scientific enterprise grows at an exponential pace, at the mesoscopic level the exploration and exploitation of research ideas is reflected through the rise and fall of research fields. The empirical literature has largely studied such dynamics on a case-by-case basis, with a focus on explaining how and why commu…
▽ More
Science advances by pushing the boundaries of the adjacent possible. While the global scientific enterprise grows at an exponential pace, at the mesoscopic level the exploration and exploitation of research ideas is reflected through the rise and fall of research fields. The empirical literature has largely studied such dynamics on a case-by-case basis, with a focus on explaining how and why communities of knowledge production evolve. Although fields rise and fall on different temporal and population scales, they are generally argued to pass through a common set of evolutionary stages. To understand the social processes that drive these stages beyond case studies, we need a way to quantify and compare different fields on the same terms. In this paper we develop techniques for identifying scale-invariant patterns in the evolution of scientific fields, and demonstrate their usefulness using 1.5 million preprints from the arXiv repository covering 175 research fields spanning Physics, Mathematics, Computer Science, Quantitative Biology and Quantitative Finance. We show that fields consistently follows a rise and fall pattern captured by a two parameters right-tailed Gumbel temporal distribution. We introduce a field-specific rescaled time and explore the generic properties shared by articles and authors at the creation, adoption, peak, and decay evolutionary phases. We find that the early phase of a field is characterized by the mixing of cognitively distant fields by small teams of interdisciplinary authors, while late phases exhibit the role of specialized, large teams building on the previous works in the field. This method provides foundations to quantitatively explore the generic patterns underlying the evolution of research fields in science, with general implications in innovation studies.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2021; v1 submitted 8 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Uncovering the fragility of large-scale engineering project networks
Authors:
Marc Santolini,
Christos Ellinas,
Christos Nicolaides
Abstract:
Engineering projects are notoriously hard to complete on-time, with project delays often theorised to propagate across interdependent activities. Here, we use a novel dataset consisting of activity networks from 14 diverse, large-scale engineering projects to uncover network properties that impact timely project completion. We provide the first empirical evidence of the infectious nature of activi…
▽ More
Engineering projects are notoriously hard to complete on-time, with project delays often theorised to propagate across interdependent activities. Here, we use a novel dataset consisting of activity networks from 14 diverse, large-scale engineering projects to uncover network properties that impact timely project completion. We provide the first empirical evidence of the infectious nature of activity deviations, where perturbations in the delivery of a single activity can impact up to 4 activities downstream, leading to large perturbation cascades. We further show that perturbation clustering significantly affects project overall delays. Finally, we find that poorly performing projects have their highest perturbations in high reach nodes, which can lead to largest cascades, while well performing projects have perturbations in low reach nodes, resulting in localised cascades. Altogether, these findings pave the way for a network-science framework that can materially enhance the delivery of large-scale engineering projects.
△ Less
Submitted 24 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
