Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Saldamli, G
-
Albatross: a Privacy-Preserving Location Sharing System
Authors:
Gokay Saldamli,
Richard Chow,
Hongxia **
Abstract:
Social networking services are increasingly accessed through mobile devices. This trend has prompted services such as Facebook and Google+ to incorporate location as a de facto feature of user interaction. At the same time, services based on location such as Foursquare and Shopkick are also growing as smartphone market penetration increases. In fact, this growth is happening despite concerns (grow…
▽ More
Social networking services are increasingly accessed through mobile devices. This trend has prompted services such as Facebook and Google+ to incorporate location as a de facto feature of user interaction. At the same time, services based on location such as Foursquare and Shopkick are also growing as smartphone market penetration increases. In fact, this growth is happening despite concerns (growing at a similar pace) about security and third-party use of private location information (e.g., for advertising). Nevertheless, service providers have been unwilling to build truly private systems in which they do not have access to location information. In this paper, we describe an architecture and a trial implementation of a privacy-preserving location sharing system called Albatross. The system protects location information from the service provider and yet enables fine-grained location-sharing. One main feature of the system is to protect an individual's social network structure. The pattern of location sharing preferences towards contacts can reveal this structure without any knowledge of the locations themselves. Albatross protects locations sharing preferences through protocol unification and masking. Albatross has been implemented as a standalone solution, but the technology can also be integrated into location-based services to enhance privacy.
△ Less
Submitted 11 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
-
Differential Data Analysis for Recommender Systems
Authors:
Richard Chow,
Hongxia **,
Bart Knijnenburg,
Gokay Saldamli
Abstract:
We present techniques to characterize which data is important to a recommender system and which is not. Important data is data that contributes most to the accuracy of the recommendation algorithm, while less important data contributes less to the accuracy or even decreases it. Characterizing the importance of data has two potential direct benefits: (1) increased privacy and (2) reduced data manag…
▽ More
We present techniques to characterize which data is important to a recommender system and which is not. Important data is data that contributes most to the accuracy of the recommendation algorithm, while less important data contributes less to the accuracy or even decreases it. Characterizing the importance of data has two potential direct benefits: (1) increased privacy and (2) reduced data management costs, including storage. For privacy, we enable increased recommendation accuracy for comparable privacy levels using existing data obfuscation techniques. For storage, our results indicate that we can achieve large reductions in recommendation data and yet maintain recommendation accuracy.
Our main technique is called differential data analysis. The name is inspired by other sorts of differential analysis, such as differential power analysis and differential cryptanalysis, where insight comes through analysis of slightly differing inputs. In differential data analysis we chunk the data and compare results in the presence or absence of each chunk. We present results applying differential data analysis to two datasets and three different kinds of attributes. The first attribute is called user hardship. This is a novel attribute, particularly relevant to location datasets, that indicates how burdensome a data point was to achieve. The second and third attributes are more standard: timestamp and user rating. For user rating, we confirm previous work concerning the increased importance to the recommender of data corresponding to high and low user ratings.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2013;
originally announced October 2013.
