-
Analyzing IoT Hosts in the IPv6 Internet
Authors:
Peter Jose,
Said Jawad Saidi,
Oliver Gasser
Abstract:
Users and businesses are increasingly deploying Internet of Things (IoT) devices at home, at work, and in factories. At the same time, we see an increase in the use of IPv6 for Internet connectivity. Even though the IoT ecosystem has been the focus of recent studies, there is no comprehensive analysis of IoT end-hosts in the IPv6 Internet to date. In this paper we perform an in-depth analysis of I…
▽ More
Users and businesses are increasingly deploying Internet of Things (IoT) devices at home, at work, and in factories. At the same time, we see an increase in the use of IPv6 for Internet connectivity. Even though the IoT ecosystem has been the focus of recent studies, there is no comprehensive analysis of IoT end-hosts in the IPv6 Internet to date. In this paper we perform an in-depth analysis of IPv6-reachable IoT hosts using active measurements. We run measurements targeting 530M IPv6 addresses on six popular IoT-related protocols. With 36.4K hosts in 156 countries we find 380x fewer IoT-speaking end-hosts compared to IPv4. Moreover, we conduct a security analysis for TLS-enabled IoT-speaking hosts identifying up to 57% untrusted certificates, with up to 32% being self-signed and 25% being expired. Finally, we plan to publish our measurement results, tools, and a website dashboard to foster further research in the area.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Deep Dive into the IoT Backend Ecosystem
Authors:
Said Jawad Saidi,
Srdjan Matic,
Oliver Gasser,
Georgios Smaragdakis,
Anja Feldmann
Abstract:
Internet of Things (IoT) devices are becoming increasingly ubiquitous, e.g., at home, in enterprise environments, and in production lines. To support the advanced functionalities of IoT devices, IoT vendors as well as service and cloud companies operate IoT backends -- the focus of this paper. We propose a methodology to identify and locate them by (a) compiling a list of domains used exclusively…
▽ More
Internet of Things (IoT) devices are becoming increasingly ubiquitous, e.g., at home, in enterprise environments, and in production lines. To support the advanced functionalities of IoT devices, IoT vendors as well as service and cloud companies operate IoT backends -- the focus of this paper. We propose a methodology to identify and locate them by (a) compiling a list of domains used exclusively by major IoT backend providers and (b) then identifying their server IP addresses. We rely on multiple sources, including IoT backend provider documentation, passive DNS data, and active scanning. For analyzing IoT traffic patterns, we rely on passive network flows from a major European ISP.
Our analysis focuses on the top IoT backends and unveils diverse operational strategies -- from operating their own infrastructure to utilizing the public cloud. We find that the majority of the top IoT backend providers are located in multiple locations and countries. Still, a handful are located only in one country, which could raise regulatory scrutiny as the client IoT devices are located in other regions. Indeed, our analysis shows that up to 35% of IoT traffic is exchanged with IoT backend servers located in other continents. We also find that at least six of the top IoT backends rely on other IoT backend providers. We also evaluate if cascading effects among the IoT backend providers are possible in the event of an outage, a misconfiguration, or an attack.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
One Bad Apple Can Spoil Your IPv6 Privacy
Authors:
Said Jawad Saidi,
Oliver Gasser,
Georgios Smaragdakis
Abstract:
IPv6 is being more and more adopted, in part to facilitate the millions of smart devices that have already been installed at home. Unfortunately, we find that the privacy of a substantial fraction of end-users is still at risk, despite the efforts by ISPs and electronic vendors to improve end-user security, e.g., by adopting prefix rotation and IPv6 privacy extensions. By analyzing passive data fr…
▽ More
IPv6 is being more and more adopted, in part to facilitate the millions of smart devices that have already been installed at home. Unfortunately, we find that the privacy of a substantial fraction of end-users is still at risk, despite the efforts by ISPs and electronic vendors to improve end-user security, e.g., by adopting prefix rotation and IPv6 privacy extensions. By analyzing passive data from a large ISP, we find that around 19% of end-users' privacy can be at risk. When we investigate the root causes, we notice that a single device at home that encodes its MAC address into the IPv6 address can be utilized as a tracking identifier for the entire end-user prefix -- even if other devices use IPv6 privacy extensions. Our results show that IoT devices contribute the most to this privacy leakage and, to a lesser extent, personal computers and mobile devices. To our surprise, some of the most popular IoT manufacturers have not yet adopted privacy extensions that could otherwise mitigate this privacy risk. Finally, we show that third-party providers, e.g., hypergiants, can track up to 17% of subscriber lines in our study.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Exploring Network-Wide Flow Data with Flowyager
Authors:
Said Jawad Saidi,
Aniss Maghsoudlou,
Damien Foucard,
Georgios Smaragdakis,
Ingmar Poese,
Anja Feldmann
Abstract:
Many network operations, ranging from attack investigation and mitigation to traffic management, require answering network-wide flow queries in seconds. Although flow records are collected at each router, using available traffic capture utilities, querying the resulting datasets from hundreds of routers across sites and over time, remains a significant challenge due to the sheer traffic volume and…
▽ More
Many network operations, ranging from attack investigation and mitigation to traffic management, require answering network-wide flow queries in seconds. Although flow records are collected at each router, using available traffic capture utilities, querying the resulting datasets from hundreds of routers across sites and over time, remains a significant challenge due to the sheer traffic volume and distributed nature of flow records.
In this paper, we investigate how to improve the response time for a priori unknown network-wide queries. We present Flowyager, a system that is built on top of existing traffic capture utilities. Flowyager generates and analyzes tree data structures, that we call Flowtrees, which are succinct summaries of the raw flow data available by capture utilities. Flowtrees are self-adjusted data structures that drastically reduce space and transfer requirements, by 75% to 95%, compared to raw flow records. Flowyager manages the storage and transfers of Flowtrees, supports Flowtree operators, and provides a structured query language for answering flow queries across sites and time periods. By deploying a Flowyager prototype at both a large Internet Exchange Point and a Tier-1 Internet Service Provider, we showcase its capabilities for networks with hundreds of router interfaces. Our results show that the query response time can be reduced by an order of magnitude when compared with alternative data analytics platforms. Thus, Flowyager enables interactive network-wide queries and offers unprecedented drill-down capabilities to, e.g., identify DDoS culprits, pinpoint the involved sites, and determine the length of the attack.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
A Haystack Full of Needles: Scalable Detection of IoT Devices in the Wild
Authors:
Said Jawad Saidi,
Anna Maria Mandalari,
Roman Kolcun,
Hamed Haddadi,
Daniel J. Dubois,
David Choffnes,
Georgios Smaragdakis,
Anja Feldmann
Abstract:
Consumer Internet of Things (IoT) devices are extremely popular, providing users with rich and diverse functionalities, from voice assistants to home appliances. These functionalities often come with significant privacy and security risks, with notable recent large scale coordinated global attacks disrupting large service providers. Thus, an important first step to address these risks is to know w…
▽ More
Consumer Internet of Things (IoT) devices are extremely popular, providing users with rich and diverse functionalities, from voice assistants to home appliances. These functionalities often come with significant privacy and security risks, with notable recent large scale coordinated global attacks disrupting large service providers. Thus, an important first step to address these risks is to know what IoT devices are where in a network. While some limited solutions exist, a key question is whether device discovery can be done by Internet service providers that only see sampled flow statistics. In particular, it is challenging for an ISP to efficiently and effectively track and trace activity from IoT devices deployed by its millions of subscribers --all with sampled network data.
In this paper, we develop and evaluate a scalable methodology to accurately detect and monitor IoT devices at subscriber lines with limited, highly sampled data in-the-wild. Our findings indicate that millions of IoT devices are detectable and identifiable within hours, both at a major ISP as well as an IXP, using passive, sparsely sampled network flow headers. Our methodology is able to detect devices from more than 77% of the studied IoT manufacturers, including popular devices such as smart speakers. While our methodology is effective for providing network analytics, it also highlights significant privacy consequences.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2020; v1 submitted 3 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Consistent SDNs through Network State Fuzzing
Authors:
Apoorv Shukla,
Said Jawad Saidi,
Stefan Schmid,
Marco Canini,
Thomas Zinner,
Anja Feldmann
Abstract:
The conventional wisdom is that a software-defined network (SDN) operates under the premise that the logically centralized control plane has an accurate representation of the actual data plane state. Unfortunately, bugs, misconfigurations, faults or attacks can introduce inconsistencies that undermine correct operation. Previous work in this area, however, lacks a holistic methodology to tackle th…
▽ More
The conventional wisdom is that a software-defined network (SDN) operates under the premise that the logically centralized control plane has an accurate representation of the actual data plane state. Unfortunately, bugs, misconfigurations, faults or attacks can introduce inconsistencies that undermine correct operation. Previous work in this area, however, lacks a holistic methodology to tackle this problem and thus, addresses only certain parts of the problem. Yet, the consistency of the overall system is only as good as its least consistent part. Motivated by an analogy of network consistency checking with program testing, we propose to add active probe-based network state fuzzing to our consistency check repertoire. Hereby, our system, PAZZ, combines production traffic with active probes to periodically test if the actual forwarding path and decision elements (on the data plane) correspond to the expected ones (on the control plane). Our insight is that active traffic covers the inconsistency cases beyond the ones identified by passive traffic. PAZZ prototype was built and evaluated on topologies of varying scale and complexity. Our results show that PAZZ requires minimal network resources to detect persistent data plane faults through fuzzing and localize them quickly while outperforming baseline approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2020; v1 submitted 18 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
