Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Sagnol, G

Surgery Scheduling in Flexible Operating Rooms by using a Convex Surrogate Model of Second-Stage Costs

Authors: Mohammed Majthoub Almoghrabi, Guillaume Sagnol

Abstract: We study the elective surgery planning problem in a hospital with operation rooms shared by elective and emergency patients. This problem can be split in two distinct phases. First, a subset of patients to be operated in the next planning period has to be selected, and the selected patients have to be assigned to a block and a tentative starting time. Then, in the online phase of the problem, a po… ▽ More We study the elective surgery planning problem in a hospital with operation rooms shared by elective and emergency patients. This problem can be split in two distinct phases. First, a subset of patients to be operated in the next planning period has to be selected, and the selected patients have to be assigned to a block and a tentative starting time. Then, in the online phase of the problem, a policy decides how to insert the emergency patients in the schedule and may cancel planned surgeries. The overall goal is to minimize the expectation of a cost function representing the assignment of patient to blocks, case cancellations, overtime, waiting time and idle time. We model the offline problem by a two-stage stochastic program, and show that the second-stage costs can be replaced by a convex piecewise linear surrogate model that can be computed in a preprocessing step. This results in a mixed integer program which can be solved in a short amount of time, even for very large instances of the problem. We also describe a greedy policy for the online phase of the problem, and analyze the performance of our approach by comparing it to either heuristic methods or approaches relying on sampling average approximation (SAA) on a large set of benchmarking instances. Our simulations indicate that our approach can reduce the expected costs by as much as 30% compared to heuristic methods and is able to solve problems with $1000$ patients in about one minute, while SAA-approaches fail to obtain near-optimal solutions within 30 minutes, already for $100$ patients. △ Less

Submitted 6 March, 2024; v1 submitted 21 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

MSC Class: 90C15

Improved Analysis of two Algorithms for Min-Weighted Sum Bin Packing

Authors: Guillaume Sagnol

Abstract: We study the Min-Weighted Sum Bin Packing problem, a variant of the classical Bin Packing problem in which items have a weight, and each item induces a cost equal to its weight multiplied by the index of the bin in which it is packed. This is in fact equivalent to a batch scheduling problem that arises in many fields of applications such as appointment scheduling or warehouse logistics. We give im… ▽ More We study the Min-Weighted Sum Bin Packing problem, a variant of the classical Bin Packing problem in which items have a weight, and each item induces a cost equal to its weight multiplied by the index of the bin in which it is packed. This is in fact equivalent to a batch scheduling problem that arises in many fields of applications such as appointment scheduling or warehouse logistics. We give improved lower and upper bounds on the approximation ratio of two simple algorithms for this problem. In particular, we show that the knapsack-batching algorithm, which iteratively solves knapsack problems over the set of remaining items to pack the maximal weight in the current bin, has an approximation ratio of at most 17/10. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

MSC Class: 90C27 ACM Class: F.2.2

Competitive Kill-and-Restart and Preemptive Strategies for Non-Clairvoyant Scheduling

Authors: Sven Jäger, Guillaume Sagnol, Daniel Schmidt genannt Waldschmidt, Philipp Warode

Abstract: We study kill-and-restart and preemptive strategies for the fundamental scheduling problem of minimizing the sum of weighted completion times on a single machine in the non-clairvoyant setting. First, we show a lower bound of~$3$ for any deterministic non-clairvoyant kill-and-restart strategy. Then, we give for any $b > 1$ a tight analysis for the natural $b$-scaling kill-and-restart strategy as w… ▽ More We study kill-and-restart and preemptive strategies for the fundamental scheduling problem of minimizing the sum of weighted completion times on a single machine in the non-clairvoyant setting. First, we show a lower bound of~$3$ for any deterministic non-clairvoyant kill-and-restart strategy. Then, we give for any $b > 1$ a tight analysis for the natural $b$-scaling kill-and-restart strategy as well as for a randomized variant of it. In particular, we show a competitive ratio of $(1+3\sqrt{3})\approx 6.197$ for the deterministic and of $\approx 3.032$ for the randomized strategy, by making use of the largest eigenvalue of a Toeplitz matrix. In addition, we show that the preemptive Weighted Shortest Elapsed Time First (WSETF) rule is $2$-competitive when jobs are released online, matching the lower bound for the unit weight case with trivial release dates for any non-clairvoyant algorithm. Using this result as well as the competitiveness of round-robin for multiple machines, we prove performance guarantees smaller than $10$ for adaptions of the $b$-scaling strategy to online release dates and unweighted jobs on identical parallel machines. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2023; v1 submitted 3 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: An extended abstract occurred in the Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization

Restricted Adaptivity in Stochastic Scheduling

Authors: Guillaume Sagnol, Daniel Schmidt genannt Waldschmidt

Abstract: We consider the stochastic scheduling problem of minimizing the expected makespan on $m$ parallel identical machines. While the (adaptive) list scheduling policy achieves an approximation ratio of $2$, any (non-adaptive) fixed assignment policy has performance guarantee $Ω\left(\frac{\log m}{\log \log m}\right)$. Although the performance of the latter class of policies are worse, there are applica… ▽ More We consider the stochastic scheduling problem of minimizing the expected makespan on $m$ parallel identical machines. While the (adaptive) list scheduling policy achieves an approximation ratio of $2$, any (non-adaptive) fixed assignment policy has performance guarantee $Ω\left(\frac{\log m}{\log \log m}\right)$. Although the performance of the latter class of policies are worse, there are applications in which non-adaptive policies are desired. In this work, we introduce the two classes of $δ$-delay and $τ$-shift policies whose degree of adaptivity can be controlled by a parameter. We present a policy - belonging to both classes - which is an $\mathcal{O}(\log \log m)$-approximation for reasonably bounded parameters. In other words, an exponential improvement on the performance of any fixed assignment policy can be achieved when allowing a small degree of adaptivity. Moreover, we provide a matching lower bound for any $δ$-delay and $τ$-shift policy when both parameters, respectively, are in the order of the expected makespan of an optimal non-anticipatory policy. △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Stochastic Extensible Bin Packing

Authors: Guillaume Sagnol, Daniel Schmidt genannt Waldschmidt

Abstract: We consider the stochastic extensible bin packing problem (SEBP) in which $n$ items of stochastic size are packed into $m$ bins of unit capacity. In contrast to the classical bin packing problem, the number of bins is fixed and they can be extended at extra cost. This problem plays an important role in stochastic environments such as in surgery scheduling: Patients must be assigned to operating ro… ▽ More We consider the stochastic extensible bin packing problem (SEBP) in which $n$ items of stochastic size are packed into $m$ bins of unit capacity. In contrast to the classical bin packing problem, the number of bins is fixed and they can be extended at extra cost. This problem plays an important role in stochastic environments such as in surgery scheduling: Patients must be assigned to operating rooms beforehand, such that the regular capacity is fully utilized while the amount of overtime is as small as possible. This paper focuses on essential ratios between different classes of policies: First, we consider the price of non-splittability, in which we compare the optimal non-anticipatory policy against the optimal fractional assignment policy. We show that this ratio has a tight upper bound of $2$. Moreover, we develop an analysis of a fixed assignment variant of the LEPT rule yielding a tight approximation ratio of $(1+e^{-1}) \approx 1.368$. Furthermore, we prove that the price of fixed assignments, related to the benefit of adaptivity, which describes the loss when restricting to fixed assignment policies, is within the same factor. This shows that in some sense, LEPT is the best fixed assignment policy we can hope for. We also provide a lower bound on the performance of this policy comparing against an optimal fixed assignment policy. Finally, we obtain improved bounds for the case where the processing times are drawn from a particular family of distributions, with either a bounded Pietra index or when the familly is stochastically dominated at the second order. △ Less

Submitted 4 March, 2022; v1 submitted 31 January, 2020; originally announced February 2020.