Wireless Technologies for Agricultural Monitoring using Internet of Things Devices with Energy Harvesting Capabilities
Authors:
Sebastian Sadowski,
Petros Spachos
Abstract:
Technological advances in the Internet of Things (IoT) have lead the way for technology to be used in ways that were never possible before. Through the development of devices with low-power radios, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) can be configured for almost any type of application. Agricultural has been one example where IoT and WSN have been able to increase productivity, efficiency, and output y…
▽ More
Technological advances in the Internet of Things (IoT) have lead the way for technology to be used in ways that were never possible before. Through the development of devices with low-power radios, Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) can be configured for almost any type of application. Agricultural has been one example where IoT and WSN have been able to increase productivity, efficiency, and output yield. Systems that previously required manual operation can be easily replaced with sensors and actuators to automate the process such as irrigation and disease management. Powering these devices is a concern as batteries are often required due to devices being located where electricity is not readily available. In this paper, a comparison is performed between three wireless technologies: IEEE 802.15.4 (Zigbee), Long Range Wireless Area Network (LoRaWAN), and IEEE 802.11g (WiFi 2.4~GHz) for agricultural monitoring with energy harvesting capabilities. According to experimental results, LoRaWAN is the optimal technology to use in an agricultural monitoring system where power consumption and network lifetime are a priority. The experimental results can be used for the selection of wireless technology for agricultural monitoring following application requirements.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
Memoryless Techniques and Wireless Technologies for Indoor Localization with the Internet of Things
Authors:
Sebastian Sadowski,
Petros Spachos,
Konstantinos Plataniotis
Abstract:
In recent years, the Internet of Things (IoT) has grown to include the tracking of devices through the use of Indoor Positioning Systems (IPS) and Location Based Services (LBS). When designing an IPS, a popular approach involves using wireless networks to calculate the approximate location of the target from devices with predetermined positions. In many smart building applications, LBS are necessa…
▽ More
In recent years, the Internet of Things (IoT) has grown to include the tracking of devices through the use of Indoor Positioning Systems (IPS) and Location Based Services (LBS). When designing an IPS, a popular approach involves using wireless networks to calculate the approximate location of the target from devices with predetermined positions. In many smart building applications, LBS are necessary for efficient workspaces to be developed. In this paper, we examine two memoryless positioning techniques, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Naive Bayes, and compare them with simple trilateration, in terms of accuracy, precision, and complexity. We present a comprehensive analysis between the techniques through the use of three popular IoT wireless technologies: Zigbee, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), and WiFi (2.4 GHz band), along with three experimental scenarios to verify results across multiple environments. According to experimental results, KNN is the most accurate localization technique as well as the most precise. The RSSI dataset of all the experiments is available online.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2020; v1 submitted 4 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
