On the Effectiveness of Image Manipulation Detection in the Age of Social Media
Authors:
Rosaura G. VidalMata,
Priscila Saboia,
Daniel Moreira,
Grant Jensen,
Jason Schlessman,
Walter J. Scheirer
Abstract:
Image manipulation detection algorithms designed to identify local anomalies often rely on the manipulated regions being ``sufficiently'' different from the rest of the non-tampered regions in the image. However, such anomalies might not be easily identifiable in high-quality manipulations, and their use is often based on the assumption that certain image phenomena are associated with the use of s…
▽ More
Image manipulation detection algorithms designed to identify local anomalies often rely on the manipulated regions being ``sufficiently'' different from the rest of the non-tampered regions in the image. However, such anomalies might not be easily identifiable in high-quality manipulations, and their use is often based on the assumption that certain image phenomena are associated with the use of specific editing tools. This makes the task of manipulation detection hard in and of itself, with state-of-the-art detectors only being able to detect a limited number of manipulation types. More importantly, in cases where the anomaly assumption does not hold, the detection of false positives in otherwise non-manipulated images becomes a serious problem.
To understand the current state of manipulation detection, we present an in-depth analysis of deep learning-based and learning-free methods, assessing their performance on different benchmark datasets containing tampered and non-tampered samples. We provide a comprehensive study of their suitability for detecting different manipulations as well as their robustness when presented with non-tampered data. Furthermore, we propose a novel deep learning-based pre-processing technique that accentuates the anomalies present in manipulated regions to make them more identifiable by a variety of manipulation detection methods. To this end, we introduce an anomaly enhancement loss that, when used with a residual architecture, improves the performance of different detection algorithms with a minimal introduction of false positives on the non-manipulated data.
Lastly, we introduce an open-source manipulation detection toolkit comprising a number of standard detection algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
Non-Generative Energy Based Models
Authors:
Jacob Piland,
Christopher Sweet,
Priscila Saboia,
Charles Vardeman II,
Adam Czajka
Abstract:
Energy-based models (EBM) have become increasingly popular within computer vision. EBMs bring a probabilistic approach to training deep neural networks (DNN) and have been shown to enhance performance in areas such as calibration, out-of-distribution detection, and adversarial resistance. However, these advantages come at the cost of estimating input data probabilities, usually using a Langevin ba…
▽ More
Energy-based models (EBM) have become increasingly popular within computer vision. EBMs bring a probabilistic approach to training deep neural networks (DNN) and have been shown to enhance performance in areas such as calibration, out-of-distribution detection, and adversarial resistance. However, these advantages come at the cost of estimating input data probabilities, usually using a Langevin based method such as Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD), which bring additional computational costs, require parameterization, caching methods for efficiency, and can run into stability and scaling issues. EBMs use dynamical methods to draw samples from the probability density function (PDF) defined by the current state of the network and compare them to the training data using a maximum log likelihood approach to learn the correct PDF.
We propose a non-generative training approach, Non-Generative EBM (NG-EBM), that utilizes the {\it{Approximate Mass}}, identified by Grathwohl et al., as a loss term to direct the training. We show that our NG-EBM training strategy retains many of the benefits of EBM in calibration, out-of-distribution detection, and adversarial resistance, but without the computational complexity and overhead of the traditional approaches. In particular, the NG-EBM approach improves the Expected Calibration Error by a factor of 2.5 for CIFAR10 and 7.5 times for CIFAR100, when compared to traditionally trained models.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
