-
Evolutionary Diversity Optimisation in Constructing Satisfying Assignments
Authors:
Adel Nikfarjam,
Ralf Rothenberger,
Frank Neumann,
Tobias Friedrich
Abstract:
Computing diverse solutions for a given problem, in particular evolutionary diversity optimisation (EDO), is a hot research topic in the evolutionary computation community. This paper studies the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) in the context of EDO. SAT is of great importance in computer science and differs from the other problems studied in EDO literature, such as KP and TSP. SAT is heavily…
▽ More
Computing diverse solutions for a given problem, in particular evolutionary diversity optimisation (EDO), is a hot research topic in the evolutionary computation community. This paper studies the Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) in the context of EDO. SAT is of great importance in computer science and differs from the other problems studied in EDO literature, such as KP and TSP. SAT is heavily constrained, and the conventional evolutionary operators are inefficient in generating SAT solutions. Our approach avails of the following characteristics of SAT: 1) the possibility of adding more constraints (clauses) to the problem to forbid solutions or to fix variables, and 2) powerful solvers in the literature, such as minisat. We utilise such a solver to construct a diverse set of solutions. Moreover, maximising diversity provides us with invaluable information about the solution space of a given SAT problem, such as how large the feasible region is. In this study, we introduce evolutionary algorithms (EAs) employing a well-known SAT solver to maximise diversity among a set of SAT solutions explicitly. The experimental investigations indicate the introduced algorithms' capability to maximise diversity among the SAT solutions.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
The Impact of Heterogeneity and Geometry on the Proof Complexity of Random Satisfiability
Authors:
Thomas Bläsius,
Tobias Friedrich,
Andreas Göbel,
Jordi Levy,
Ralf Rothenberger
Abstract:
Satisfiability is considered the canonical NP-complete problem and is used as a starting point for hardness reductions in theory, while in practice heuristic SAT solving algorithms can solve large-scale industrial SAT instances very efficiently. This disparity between theory and practice is believed to be a result of inherent properties of industrial SAT instances that make them tractable. Two cha…
▽ More
Satisfiability is considered the canonical NP-complete problem and is used as a starting point for hardness reductions in theory, while in practice heuristic SAT solving algorithms can solve large-scale industrial SAT instances very efficiently. This disparity between theory and practice is believed to be a result of inherent properties of industrial SAT instances that make them tractable. Two characteristic properties seem to be prevalent in the majority of real-world SAT instances, heterogeneous degree distribution and locality. To understand the impact of these two properties on SAT, we study the proof complexity of random k-SAT models that allow to control heterogeneity and locality. Our findings show that heterogeneity alone does not make SAT easy as heterogeneous random k-SAT instances have superpolynomial resolution size. This implies intractability of these instances for modern SAT-solvers. On the other hand, modeling locality with an underlying geometry leads to small unsatisfiable subformulas, which can be found within polynomial time.
A key ingredient for the result on geometric random k-SAT can be found in the complexity of higher-order Voronoi diagrams. As an additional technical contribution, we show a linear upper bound on the number of non-empty Voronoi regions, that holds for points with random positions in a very general setting. In particular, it covers arbitrary p-norms, higher dimensions, and weights affecting the area of influence of each point multiplicatively. This is in stark contrast to quadratic lower bounds for the worst case.
△ Less
Submitted 23 November, 2021; v1 submitted 15 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
The Satisfiability Threshold for Non-Uniform Random 2-SAT
Authors:
Tobias Friedrich,
Ralf Rothenberger
Abstract:
Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is one of the most fundamental problems in computer science. Its worst-case hardness lies at the core of computational complexity theory, for example in the form of NP-hardness and the (Strong) Exponential Time Hypothesis. In practice however, SAT instances can often be solved efficiently. This contradicting behavior has spawned interest in the average-case analy…
▽ More
Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is one of the most fundamental problems in computer science. Its worst-case hardness lies at the core of computational complexity theory, for example in the form of NP-hardness and the (Strong) Exponential Time Hypothesis. In practice however, SAT instances can often be solved efficiently. This contradicting behavior has spawned interest in the average-case analysis of SAT and has triggered the development of sophisticated rigorous and non-rigorous techniques for analyzing random structures.
Despite a long line of research and substantial progress, most theoretical work on random SAT assumes a uniform distribution on the variables. In contrast, real-world instances often exhibit large fluctuations in variable occurrence. This can be modeled by a non-uniform distribution of the variables, which can result in distributions closer to industrial SAT instances.
We study satisfiability thresholds of non-uniform random $2$-SAT with $n$ variables and $m$ clauses and with an arbitrary probability distribution $(p_i)_{i\in[n]}$ with $p_1 \ge p_2 \ge \ldots \ge p_n > 0$ over the n variables. We show for $p_1^2=Θ(\sum_{i=1}^n p_i^2)$ that the asymptotic satisfiability threshold is at $m=Θ( (1-\sum_{i=1}^n p_i^2)/(p_1\cdot(\sum_{i=2}^n p_i^2)^{1/2}) )$ and that it is coarse. For $p_1^2=o(\sum_{i=1}^n p_i^2)$ we show that there is a sharp satisfiability threshold at $m=(\sum_{i=1}^n p_i^2)^{-1}$. This result generalizes the seminal works by Chvatal and Reed [FOCS 1992] and by Goerdt [JCSS 1996].
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2022; v1 submitted 3 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Greedy Maximization of Functions with Bounded Curvature under Partition Matroid Constraints
Authors:
Tobias Friedrich,
Andreas Göbel,
Frank Neumann,
Francesco Quinzan,
Ralf Rothenberger
Abstract:
We investigate the performance of a deterministic GREEDY algorithm for the problem of maximizing functions under a partition matroid constraint. We consider non-monotone submodular functions and monotone subadditive functions. Even though constrained maximization problems of monotone submodular functions have been extensively studied, little is known about greedy maximization of non-monotone submo…
▽ More
We investigate the performance of a deterministic GREEDY algorithm for the problem of maximizing functions under a partition matroid constraint. We consider non-monotone submodular functions and monotone subadditive functions. Even though constrained maximization problems of monotone submodular functions have been extensively studied, little is known about greedy maximization of non-monotone submodular functions or monotone subadditive functions.
We give approximation guarantees for GREEDY on these problems, in terms of the curvature. We find that this simple heuristic yields a strong approximation guarantee on a broad class of functions.
We discuss the applicability of our results to three real-world problems: Maximizing the determinant function of a positive semidefinite matrix, and related problems such as the maximum entropy sampling problem, the constrained maximum cut problem on directed graphs, and combinatorial auction games.
We conclude that GREEDY is well-suited to approach these problems. Overall, we present evidence to support the idea that, when dealing with constrained maximization problems with bounded curvature, one needs not search for approximate) monotonicity to get good approximate solutions.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2019; v1 submitted 13 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
Bounds on the Satisfiability Threshold for Power Law Distributed Random SAT
Authors:
Tobias Friedrich,
Anton Krohmer,
Ralf Rothenberger,
Thomas Sauerwald,
Andrew M. Sutton
Abstract:
Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is one of the most fundamental problems in computer science. The worst-case hardness of SAT lies at the core of computational complexity theory. The average-case analysis of SAT has triggered the development of sophisticated rigorous and non-rigorous techniques for analyzing random structures.
Despite a long line of research and substantial progress, nearly all…
▽ More
Propositional satisfiability (SAT) is one of the most fundamental problems in computer science. The worst-case hardness of SAT lies at the core of computational complexity theory. The average-case analysis of SAT has triggered the development of sophisticated rigorous and non-rigorous techniques for analyzing random structures.
Despite a long line of research and substantial progress, nearly all theoretical work on random SAT assumes a uniform distribution on the variables. In contrast, real-world instances often exhibit large fluctuations in variable occurrence. This can be modeled by a scale-free distribution of the variables, which results in distributions closer to industrial SAT instances.
We study random k-SAT on n variables, $m=Θ(n)$ clauses, and a power law distribution on the variable occurrences with exponent $β$. We observe a satisfiability threshold at $β=(2k-1)/(k-1)$. This threshold is tight in the sense that instances with $β\le(2k-1)/(k-1)-\varepsilon$ for any constant $\varepsilon>0$ are unsatisfiable with high probability (w.h.p.). For $β\geq(2k-1)/(k-1)+\varepsilon$, the picture is reminiscent of the uniform case: instances are satisfiable w.h.p. for sufficiently small constant clause-variable ratios $m/n$; they are unsatisfiable above a ratio $m/n$ that depends on $β$.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
Greed is Good for Deterministic Scale-Free Networks
Authors:
Ankit Chauhan,
Tobias Friedrich,
Ralf Rothenberger
Abstract:
Large real-world networks typically follow a power-law degree distribution. To study such networks, numerous random graph models have been proposed. However, real-world networks are not drawn at random. Therefore, Brach, Cygan, Łacki, and Sankowski [SODA 2016] introduced two natural deterministic conditions: (1) a power-law upper bound on the degree distribution (PLB-U) and (2) power-law neighborh…
▽ More
Large real-world networks typically follow a power-law degree distribution. To study such networks, numerous random graph models have been proposed. However, real-world networks are not drawn at random. Therefore, Brach, Cygan, Łacki, and Sankowski [SODA 2016] introduced two natural deterministic conditions: (1) a power-law upper bound on the degree distribution (PLB-U) and (2) power-law neighborhoods, that is, the degree distribution of neighbors of each vertex is also upper bounded by a power law (PLB-N). They showed that many real-world networks satisfy both deterministic properties and exploit them to design faster algorithms for a number of classical graph problems.
We complement the work of Brach et al. by showing that some well-studied random graph models exhibit both the mentioned PLB properties and additionally also a power-law lower bound on the degree distribution (PLB-L). All three properties hold with high probability for Chung-Lu Random Graphs and Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs and almost surely for Hyperbolic Random Graphs. As a consequence, all results of Brach et al. also hold with high probability or almost surely for those random graph classes.
In the second part of this work we study three classical NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems on PLB networks. It is known that on general graphs with maximum degree Δ, a greedy algorithm, which chooses nodes in the order of their degree, only achieves an Ω(ln Δ)-approximation for Minimum Vertex Cover and Minimum Dominating Set, and an Ω(Δ)-approximation for Maximum Independent Set. We prove that the PLB-U property suffices for the greedy approach to achieve a constant-factor approximation for all three problems. We also show that all three combinatorial optimization problems are APX-complete, even if all PLB-properties hold.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
