-
On the Complexity of Simultaneous Geometric Embedding for Edge-Disjoint Graphs
Authors:
Benedikt Künzel,
Jonathan Rollin
Abstract:
Simultaneous Geometric Embedding (SGE) asks whether, for a given collection of graphs on the same vertex set V, there is an embedding of V in the plane that admits a crossing-free drawing with straightline edges for each of the given graphs. It is known that SGE is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete, that is, the problem is polynomially equivalent to deciding whether a system of polynomial equations and…
▽ More
Simultaneous Geometric Embedding (SGE) asks whether, for a given collection of graphs on the same vertex set V, there is an embedding of V in the plane that admits a crossing-free drawing with straightline edges for each of the given graphs. It is known that SGE is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete, that is, the problem is polynomially equivalent to deciding whether a system of polynomial equations and inequalities with integer coefficients has a real solution. We prove that SGE remains $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete for edge-disjoint input graphs, that is, for collections of graphs without so-called public edges.
As an intermediate result, we prove that it is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete to decide whether a directional walk without repeating edges is realizable. Here, a directional walk consists of a sequence of not-necessarily distinct vertices (a walk) and a function prescribing for each inner position whether the walk shall turn left or shall turn right. A directional walk is realizable, if there is an embedding of its vertices in the plane such that the embedded walk turns according to the given directions. Previously it was known that realization is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete to decide for directional walks repeating each edge at most 336 times.
This answers two questions posed by Schaefer ["On the Complexity of Some Geometric Problems With Fixed Parameters", JGAA 2021].
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
On the geometric thickness of 2-degenerate graphs
Authors:
Rahul Jain,
Marco Ricci,
Jonathan Rollin,
André Schulz
Abstract:
A graph is 2-degenerate if every subgraph contains a vertex of degree at most 2. We show that every 2-degenerate graph can be drawn with straight lines such that the drawing decomposes into 4 plane forests. Therefore, the geometric arboricity, and hence the geometric thickness, of 2-degenerate graphs is at most 4. On the other hand, we show that there are 2-degenerate graphs that do not admit any…
▽ More
A graph is 2-degenerate if every subgraph contains a vertex of degree at most 2. We show that every 2-degenerate graph can be drawn with straight lines such that the drawing decomposes into 4 plane forests. Therefore, the geometric arboricity, and hence the geometric thickness, of 2-degenerate graphs is at most 4. On the other hand, we show that there are 2-degenerate graphs that do not admit any straight-line drawing with a decomposition of the edge set into 2 plane graphs. That is, there are 2-degenerate graphs with geometric thickness, and hence geometric arboricity, at least 3. This answers two questions posed by Eppstein [Separating thickness from geometric thickness. In Towards a Theory of Geometric Graphs, vol. 342 of Contemp. Math., AMS, 2004].
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Edge-Minimum Saturated k-Planar Drawings
Authors:
Steven Chaplick,
Fabian Klute,
Irene Parada,
Jonathan Rollin,
Torsten Ueckerdt
Abstract:
For a class $\mathcal{D}$ of drawings of loopless (multi-)graphs in the plane, a drawing $D \in \mathcal{D}$ is \emph{saturated} when the addition of any edge to $D$ results in $D' \notin \mathcal{D}$ - this is analogous to saturated graphs in a graph class as introduced by Turán (1941) and Erdős, Hajnal, and Moon (1964). We focus on $k$-planar drawings, that is, graphs drawn in the plane where ea…
▽ More
For a class $\mathcal{D}$ of drawings of loopless (multi-)graphs in the plane, a drawing $D \in \mathcal{D}$ is \emph{saturated} when the addition of any edge to $D$ results in $D' \notin \mathcal{D}$ - this is analogous to saturated graphs in a graph class as introduced by Turán (1941) and Erdős, Hajnal, and Moon (1964). We focus on $k$-planar drawings, that is, graphs drawn in the plane where each edge is crossed at most $k$ times, and the classes $\mathcal{D}$ of all $k$-planar drawings obeying a number of restrictions, such as having no crossing incident edges, no pair of edges crossing more than once, or no edge crossing itself. While saturated $k$-planar drawings are the focus of several prior works, tight bounds on how sparse these can be are not well understood. We establish a generic framework to determine the minimum number of edges among all $n$-vertex saturated $k$-planar drawings in many natural classes. For example, when incident crossings, multicrossings and selfcrossings are all allowed, the sparsest $n$-vertex saturated $k$-planar drawings have $\frac{2}{k - (k \bmod 2)} (n-1)$ edges for any $k \geq 4$, while if all that is forbidden, the sparsest such drawings have $\frac{2(k+1)}{k(k-1)}(n-1)$ edges for any $k \geq 6$.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2021; v1 submitted 15 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Augmenting Geometric Graphs with Matchings
Authors:
Alexander Pilz,
Jonathan Rollin,
Lena Schlipf,
André Schulz
Abstract:
We study noncrossing geometric graphs and their disjoint compatible geometric matchings. Given a cycle (a polygon) P we want to draw a set of pairwise disjoint straight-line edges with endpoints on the vertices of P such that these new edges neither cross nor contain any edge of the polygon. We prove NP-completeness of deciding whether there is such a perfect matching. For any n-vertex polygon, wi…
▽ More
We study noncrossing geometric graphs and their disjoint compatible geometric matchings. Given a cycle (a polygon) P we want to draw a set of pairwise disjoint straight-line edges with endpoints on the vertices of P such that these new edges neither cross nor contain any edge of the polygon. We prove NP-completeness of deciding whether there is such a perfect matching. For any n-vertex polygon, with n > 3, we show that such a matching with less than n/7 edges is not maximal, that is, it can be extended by another compatible matching edge. We also construct polygons with maximal compatible matchings with n/7 edges, demonstrating the tightness of this bound. Tight bounds on the size of a minimal maximal compatible matching are also obtained for the families of d-regular geometric graphs for each d in {0,1,2}. Finally we consider a related problem. We prove that it is NP-complete to decide whether a noncrossing geometric graph G admits a set of compatible noncrossing edges such that G together with these edges has minimum degree five.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
The interval number of a planar graph is at most three
Authors:
Guillaume Guégan,
Kolja Knauer,
Jonathan Rollin,
Torsten Ueckerdt
Abstract:
The interval number of a graph $G$ is the minimum $k$ such that one can assign to each vertex of $G$ a union of $k$ intervals on the real line, such that $G$ is the intersection graph of these sets, i.e., two vertices are adjacent in $G$ if and only if the corresponding sets of intervals have non-empty intersection. In 1983 Scheinerman and West [The interval number of a planar graph: Three interva…
▽ More
The interval number of a graph $G$ is the minimum $k$ such that one can assign to each vertex of $G$ a union of $k$ intervals on the real line, such that $G$ is the intersection graph of these sets, i.e., two vertices are adjacent in $G$ if and only if the corresponding sets of intervals have non-empty intersection. In 1983 Scheinerman and West [The interval number of a planar graph: Three intervals suffice. \textit{J.~Comb.~Theory, Ser.~B}, 35:224--239, 1983] proved that the interval number of any planar graph is at most $3$. However the original proof has a flaw. We give a different and shorter proof of this result.
△ Less
Submitted 25 July, 2019; v1 submitted 8 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Induced and Weak Induced Arboricities
Authors:
Maria Axenovich,
Philip Dörr,
Jonathan Rollin,
Torsten Ueckerdt
Abstract:
We define the induced arboricity of a graph $G$, denoted by ${\rm ia}(G)$, as the smallest $k$ such that the edges of $G$ can be covered with $k$ induced forests in $G$. This notion generalizes the classical notions of the arboricity and strong chromatic index.
For a class $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs and a graph parameter $p$, let $p(\mathcal{F}) = \sup\{p(G) \mid G\in \mathcal{F}\}$. We show that…
▽ More
We define the induced arboricity of a graph $G$, denoted by ${\rm ia}(G)$, as the smallest $k$ such that the edges of $G$ can be covered with $k$ induced forests in $G$. This notion generalizes the classical notions of the arboricity and strong chromatic index.
For a class $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs and a graph parameter $p$, let $p(\mathcal{F}) = \sup\{p(G) \mid G\in \mathcal{F}\}$. We show that ${\rm ia}(\mathcal{F})$ is bounded from above by an absolute constant depending only on $\mathcal{F}$, that is ${\rm ia}(\mathcal{F})\neq\infty$ if and only if $χ(\mathcal{F} \nabla \frac{1}{2}) \neq\infty$, where $\mathcal{F} \nabla \frac{1}{2}$ is the class of $\frac{1}{2}$-shallow minors of graphs from $\mathcal{F}$ and $χ$ is the chromatic number.
Further, we give bounds on ${\rm ia}(\mathcal{F})$ when $\mathcal{F}$ is the class of planar graphs, the class of $d$-degenerate graphs, or the class of graphs having tree-width at most $d$. Specifically, we show that if $\mathcal{F}$ is the class of planar graphs, then $8 \leq {\rm ia}(\mathcal{F}) \leq 10$.
In addition, we establish similar results for so-called weak induced arboricities and star arboricities of classes of graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Minimal Ordered Ramsey Graphs
Authors:
Jonathan Rollin
Abstract:
An ordered graph is a graph equipped with a linear ordering of its vertex set. A pair of ordered graphs is Ramsey finite if it has only finitely many minimal ordered Ramsey graphs and Ramsey infinite otherwise. Here an ordered graph F is an ordered Ramsey graph of a pair (H,H') of ordered graphs if for any coloring of the edges of F in colors red and blue there is either a copy of H with all edges…
▽ More
An ordered graph is a graph equipped with a linear ordering of its vertex set. A pair of ordered graphs is Ramsey finite if it has only finitely many minimal ordered Ramsey graphs and Ramsey infinite otherwise. Here an ordered graph F is an ordered Ramsey graph of a pair (H,H') of ordered graphs if for any coloring of the edges of F in colors red and blue there is either a copy of H with all edges colored red or a copy of H' with all edges colored blue. Such an ordered Ramsey graph is minimal if neither of its proper subgraphs is an ordered Ramsey graph of (H,H'). If H=H' then H itself is called Ramsey finite.
We show that a connected ordered graph is Ramsey finite if and only if it is a star with center being the first or the last vertex in the linear order. In general we prove that each Ramsey finite (not necessarily connected) ordered graph H has a pseudoforest as a Ramsey graph and therefore is a star forest with strong restrictions on the positions of the centers of the stars. In the asymmetric case we show that (H,H') is Ramsey finite whenever H is a so-called monotone matching. Among several further results we show that there are Ramsey finite pairs of ordered stars and ordered caterpillars of arbitrary size and diameter. This is in contrast to the unordered setting where for any Ramsey finite pair (H,H') of forests either one of H or H' is a matching or both are star forests (with additional constraints).
Several of our results give a relation between Ramsey finiteness and the existence of sparse ordered Ramsey graphs. Motivated by these relations we characterize all pairs of ordered graphs that have a forest as an ordered Ramsey graph and all pairs of connected ordered graphs that have a pseudoforest as a Ramsey graph.
△ Less
Submitted 25 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
The Chromatic Number of Ordered Graphs With Constrained Conflict Graphs
Authors:
Maria Axenovich,
Jonathan Rollin,
Torsten Ueckerdt
Abstract:
An ordered graph $G$ is a graph whose vertex set is a subset of integers. The edges are interpreted as tuples $(u,v)$ with $u < v$. For a positive integer $s$, a matrix $M \in \mathbb{Z}^{s \times 4}$, and a vector $\mathbf{p} = (p,\ldots,p) \in \mathbb{Z}^s$ we build a conflict graph by saying that edges $(u,v)$ and $(x,y)$ are conflicting if $M(u,v,x,y)^\top \geq \mathbf{p}$ or…
▽ More
An ordered graph $G$ is a graph whose vertex set is a subset of integers. The edges are interpreted as tuples $(u,v)$ with $u < v$. For a positive integer $s$, a matrix $M \in \mathbb{Z}^{s \times 4}$, and a vector $\mathbf{p} = (p,\ldots,p) \in \mathbb{Z}^s$ we build a conflict graph by saying that edges $(u,v)$ and $(x,y)$ are conflicting if $M(u,v,x,y)^\top \geq \mathbf{p}$ or $M(x,y,u,v)^\top \geq \mathbf{p}$, where the comparison is componentwise. This new framework generalizes many natural concepts of ordered and unordered graphs, such as the page-number, queue-number, band-width, interval chromatic number and forbidden ordered matchings.
For fixed $M$ and $p$, we investigate how the chromatic number of $G$ depends on the structure of its conflict graph. Specifically, we study the maximum chromatic number $X_\text{cli}(M,p,w)$ of ordered graphs $G$ with no $w$ pairwise conflicting edges and the maximum chromatic number $X_\text{ind}(M,p,a)$ of ordered graphs $G$ with no $a$ pairwise non-conflicting edges. We determine $X_\text{cli}(M,p,w)$ and $X_\text{ind}(M,p,a)$ exactly whenever $M$ consists of one row with entries in $\{-1,0,+1\}$ and moreover consider several cases in which $M$ consists of two rows or has arbitrary entries from $\mathbb{Z}$.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
The $k$-strong induced arboricity of a graph
Authors:
Maria Axenovich,
Daniel Goncalves,
Jonathan Rollin,
Torsten Ueckerdt
Abstract:
The induced arboricity of a graph $G$ is the smallest number of induced forests covering the edges of $G$. This is a well-defined parameter bounded from above by the number of edges of $G$ when each forest in a cover consists of exactly one edge. Not all edges of a graph necessarily belong to induced forests with larger components. For $k\geq 1$, we call an edge $k$-valid if it is contained in an…
▽ More
The induced arboricity of a graph $G$ is the smallest number of induced forests covering the edges of $G$. This is a well-defined parameter bounded from above by the number of edges of $G$ when each forest in a cover consists of exactly one edge. Not all edges of a graph necessarily belong to induced forests with larger components. For $k\geq 1$, we call an edge $k$-valid if it is contained in an induced tree on $k$ edges. The $k$-strong induced arboricity of $G$, denoted by $f_k(G)$, is the smallest number of induced forests with components of sizes at least $k$ that cover all $k$-valid edges in $G$. This parameter is highly non-monotone.
However, we prove that for any proper minor-closed graph class $\mathcal{C}$, and more generally for any class of bounded expansion, and any $k \geq 1$, the maximum value of $f_k(G)$ for $G \in \mathcal{C}$ is bounded from above by a constant depending only on $\mathcal{C}$ and $k$. This implies that the adjacent closed vertex-distinguishing number of graphs from a class of bounded expansion is bounded by a constant depending only on the class. We further prove that $f_2(G) \leq 3\binom{t+1}{3}$ for any graph $G$ of tree-width~$t$ and that $f_k(G) \leq (2k)^d$ for any graph of tree-depth $d$. In addition, we prove that $f_2(G) \leq 310$ when $G$ is planar.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2017; v1 submitted 25 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
-
Chromatic number of ordered graphs with forbidden ordered subgraphs
Authors:
Maria Axenovich,
Jonathan Rollin,
Torsten Ueckerdt
Abstract:
It is well-known that the graphs not containing a given graph H as a subgraph have bounded chromatic number if and only if H is acyclic. Here we consider ordered graphs, i.e., graphs with a linear ordering on their vertex set, and the function f(H) = sup{chi(G) | G in Forb(H)} where Forb(H) denotes the set of all ordered graphs that do not contain a copy of H. If H contains a cycle, then as in the…
▽ More
It is well-known that the graphs not containing a given graph H as a subgraph have bounded chromatic number if and only if H is acyclic. Here we consider ordered graphs, i.e., graphs with a linear ordering on their vertex set, and the function f(H) = sup{chi(G) | G in Forb(H)} where Forb(H) denotes the set of all ordered graphs that do not contain a copy of H. If H contains a cycle, then as in the case of unordered graphs, f(H) is infinity. However, in contrast to the unordered graphs, we describe an infinite family of ordered forests H with infinite f(H). An ordered graph is crossing if there are two edges uv and u'v' with u < u' < v < v'. For connected crossing ordered graphs H we reduce the problem of determining whether f(H) is finite to a family of so-called monotonically alternating trees. For non-crossing H we prove that f(H) is finite if and only if H is acyclic and does not contain a copy of any of the five special ordered forests on four or five vertices, which we call bonnets. For such forests H, we show that f(H) <= 2^|V(H)| and that f(H) <= 2|V(H)|-3 if H is connected.
△ Less
Submitted 1 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Playing weighted Tron on Trees
Authors:
Daniel Hoske,
Jonathan Rollin,
Torsten Ueckerdt,
Stefan Walzer
Abstract:
We consider the weighted version of the Tron game on graphs where two players, Alice and Bob, each build their own path by claiming one vertex at a time, starting with Alice. The vertices carry non-negative weights that sum up to 1 and either player tries to claim a path with larger total weight than the opponent. We show that if the graph is a tree then Alice can always ensure to get at most 1/5…
▽ More
We consider the weighted version of the Tron game on graphs where two players, Alice and Bob, each build their own path by claiming one vertex at a time, starting with Alice. The vertices carry non-negative weights that sum up to 1 and either player tries to claim a path with larger total weight than the opponent. We show that if the graph is a tree then Alice can always ensure to get at most 1/5 less than Bob, and that there exist trees where Bob can ensure to get at least 1/5 more than Alice.
△ Less
Submitted 12 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
Cubic Augmentation of Planar Graphs
Authors:
Tanja Hartmann,
Jonathan Rollin,
Ignaz Rutter
Abstract:
In this paper we study the problem of augmenting a planar graph such that it becomes 3-regular and remains planar. We show that it is NP-hard to decide whether such an augmentation exists. On the other hand, we give an efficient algorithm for the variant of the problem where the input graph has a fixed planar (topological) embedding that has to be preserved by the augmentation. We further generali…
▽ More
In this paper we study the problem of augmenting a planar graph such that it becomes 3-regular and remains planar. We show that it is NP-hard to decide whether such an augmentation exists. On the other hand, we give an efficient algorithm for the variant of the problem where the input graph has a fixed planar (topological) embedding that has to be preserved by the augmentation. We further generalize this algorithm to test efficiently whether a 3-regular planar augmentation exists that additionally makes the input graph connected or biconnected. If the input graph should become even triconnected, we show that the existence of a 3-regular planar augmentation is again NP-hard to decide.
△ Less
Submitted 18 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
