-
An Interface Preserving Moving Mesh in Multiple Space Dimensions
Authors:
Maria Alkämper,
Jim Magiera,
Christian Rohde
Abstract:
An interface preserving moving mesh algorithm in two or higher dimensions is presented. It resolves a moving $(d-1)$-dimensional manifold directly within the $d$-dimensional mesh, which means that the interface is represented by a subset of moving mesh cell-surfaces. The underlying mesh is a conforming simplicial partition that fulfills the Delaunay property. The local remeshing algorithms allow f…
▽ More
An interface preserving moving mesh algorithm in two or higher dimensions is presented. It resolves a moving $(d-1)$-dimensional manifold directly within the $d$-dimensional mesh, which means that the interface is represented by a subset of moving mesh cell-surfaces. The underlying mesh is a conforming simplicial partition that fulfills the Delaunay property. The local remeshing algorithms allow for strong interface deformations. We give a proof that the given algorithms preserve the interface after interface deformation and remeshing steps. Originating from various numerical methods, data is attached cell-wise to the mesh. After each remeshing operation the interface preserving moving mesh retains valid data by projecting the data to the new mesh cells.\newline An open source implementation of the moving mesh algorithm is available at [1].
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Comparison of data-driven uncertainty quantification methods for a carbon dioxide storage benchmark scenario
Authors:
Markus Köppel,
Fabian Franzelin,
Ilja Kröker,
Sergey Oladyshkin,
Gabriele Santin,
Dominik Wittwar,
Andrea Barth,
Bernard Haasdonk,
Wolfgang Nowak,
Dirk Pflüger,
Christian Rohde
Abstract:
A variety of methods is available to quantify uncertainties arising with\-in the modeling of flow and transport in carbon dioxide storage, but there is a lack of thorough comparisons. Usually, raw data from such storage sites can hardly be described by theoretical statistical distributions since only very limited data is available. Hence, exact information on distribution shapes for all uncertain…
▽ More
A variety of methods is available to quantify uncertainties arising with\-in the modeling of flow and transport in carbon dioxide storage, but there is a lack of thorough comparisons. Usually, raw data from such storage sites can hardly be described by theoretical statistical distributions since only very limited data is available. Hence, exact information on distribution shapes for all uncertain parameters is very rare in realistic applications. We discuss and compare four different methods tested for data-driven uncertainty quantification based on a benchmark scenario of carbon dioxide storage. In the benchmark, for which we provide data and code, carbon dioxide is injected into a saline aquifer modeled by the nonlinear capillarity-free fractional flow formulation for two incompressible fluid phases, namely carbon dioxide and brine. To cover different aspects of uncertainty quantification, we incorporate various sources of uncertainty such as uncertainty of boundary conditions, of conceptual model definitions and of material properties. We consider recent versions of the following non-intrusive and intrusive uncertainty quantification methods: arbitary polynomial chaos, spatially adaptive sparse grids, kernel-based greedy interpolation and hybrid stochastic Galerkin. The performance of each approach is demonstrated assessing expectation value and standard deviation of the carbon dioxide saturation against a reference statistic based on Monte Carlo sampling. We compare the convergence of all methods reporting on accuracy with respect to the number of model runs and resolution. Finally we offer suggestions about the methods' advantages and disadvantages that can guide the modeler for uncertainty quantification in carbon dioxide storage and beyond.
△ Less
Submitted 8 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Energy-Efficient 5G Outdoor-to-Indoor Communication: SUDAS Over Licensed and Unlicensed Spectrum
Authors:
Derrick Wing Kwan Ng,
Marco Breiling,
Christian Rohde,
Frank Burkhardt,
Robert Schober
Abstract:
In this paper, we study the joint resource allocation algorithm design for downlink and uplink multicarrier transmission assisted by a shared user equipment (UE)-side distributed antenna system (SUDAS). The proposed SUDAS simultaneously utilizes licensed frequency bands and unlicensed frequency bands, (e.g. millimeter wave bands), to enable a spatial multiplexing gain for single-antenna UEs to imp…
▽ More
In this paper, we study the joint resource allocation algorithm design for downlink and uplink multicarrier transmission assisted by a shared user equipment (UE)-side distributed antenna system (SUDAS). The proposed SUDAS simultaneously utilizes licensed frequency bands and unlicensed frequency bands, (e.g. millimeter wave bands), to enable a spatial multiplexing gain for single-antenna UEs to improve energy efficiency and system throughput of $5$-th generation (5G) outdoor-to-indoor communication. The design of the UE selection, the time allocation to uplink and downlink, and the transceiver processing matrix is formulated as a non-convex optimization problem for the maximization of the end-to-end system energy efficiency (bits/Joule). The proposed problem formulation takes into account minimum data rate requirements for delay sensitive UEs and the circuit power consumption of all transceivers. In order to design a tractable resource allocation algorithm, we first show that the optimal transmitter precoding and receiver post-processing matrices jointly diagonalize the end-to-end communication channel for both downlink and uplink communication via SUDAS. Subsequently, the matrix optimization problem is converted to an equivalent scalar optimization problem for multiple parallel channels, which is solved by an asymptotically globally optimal iterative algorithm. Besides, we propose a suboptimal algorithm which finds a locally optimal solution of the non-convex optimization problem. Simulation results illustrate that the proposed resource allocation algorithms for SUDAS achieve a significant performance gain in terms of system energy efficiency and spectral efficiency compared to conventional baseline systems by offering multiple parallel data streams for single-antenna UEs.
△ Less
Submitted 24 June, 2015;
originally announced June 2015.
-
Resource Allocation for Outdoor-to-Indoor Multicarrier Transmission with Shared UE-side Distributed Antenna Systems
Authors:
Marco Breiling,
Derrick Wing Kwan Ng,
Christian Rohde,
Frank Burkhardt,
Robert Schober
Abstract:
In this paper, we study the resource allocation algorithm design for downlink multicarrier transmission with a shared user equipment (UE)-side distributed antenna system (SUDAS) which utilizes both licensed and unlicensed frequency bands for improving the system throughput. The joint UE selection and transceiver processing matrix design is formulated as a non-convex optimization problem for the ma…
▽ More
In this paper, we study the resource allocation algorithm design for downlink multicarrier transmission with a shared user equipment (UE)-side distributed antenna system (SUDAS) which utilizes both licensed and unlicensed frequency bands for improving the system throughput. The joint UE selection and transceiver processing matrix design is formulated as a non-convex optimization problem for the maximization of the end-to-end system throughput (bits/s). In order to obtain a tractable resource allocation algorithm, we first show that the optimal transmitter precoding and receiver post-processing matrices jointly diagonalize the end-to-end communication channel. Subsequently, the optimization problem is converted to a scalar optimization problem for multiple parallel channels, which is solved by using an asymptotically optimal iterative algorithm. Simulation results illustrate that the proposed resource allocation algorithm for the SUDAS achieves an excellent system performance and provides a spatial multiplexing gain for single-antenna UEs.
△ Less
Submitted 9 January, 2015; v1 submitted 30 August, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
