Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Rochman, M I

A Comprehensive Analysis of Secondary Coexistence in a Real-World CBRS Deployment

Authors: Armed Tusha, Seda Dogan-Tusha, Hossein Nasiri, Muhammad I. Rochman, Patrick McGuire, Monisha Ghosh

Abstract: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S. has made the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) band (3.55 - 3.7 GHz) available for commercial wireless usage under a shared approach using a three-tier hierarchical architecture, where the federal incumbent is the highest priority Tier 1 user, Priority Access License (PAL) holders, who have paid for licenses, are Tier 2 users and Tier 3… ▽ More The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S. has made the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) band (3.55 - 3.7 GHz) available for commercial wireless usage under a shared approach using a three-tier hierarchical architecture, where the federal incumbent is the highest priority Tier 1 user, Priority Access License (PAL) holders, who have paid for licenses, are Tier 2 users and Tier 3 users operate under General Authorized Access (GAA), without license fees or protection from higher priority users. The Spectrum Access System (SAS) ensures that higher priority users are protected from interference from lower priority users. However, the lowest priority GAA users are not given any protection from each other by the SAS and are expected to not cause any harmful interference to Tier 1 and Tier 2 users. As the deployments of GAA devices grow, the potential for secondary interference between GAA users increases, especially since the SAS architecture does not allow dynamic channel switching when faced with interference. In this paper, we present a first-of-its-kind extensive measurement campaign of a commercial CBRS network deployed in the city of South Bend, IN, that quantifies both co-channel interference (CCI) and adjacent channel interference (ACI) caused by competing GAA devices and C-band 5G, respectively. We (i) identify a particular CCI scenario and improve performance by changing the frequency allocation based on our study of other allocations in the vicinity and (ii) quantify ACI from 5G in C-band (3.7 GHz) on CBRS throughput. We conclude that (i) CCI and ACI for GAA users is not handled well by the SAS, (ii) proper frequency allocation for GAA requires additional analysis of interference from other GAA users followed by dynamical channel selection, and (iii) utilization of immediate adjacent channels by high power 5G deployments limits the performance of CBRS. △ Less

Submitted 15 March, 2024; v1 submitted 7 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

A Comprehensive Real-World Evaluation of 5G Improvements over 4G in Low- and Mid-Bands

Authors: Muhammad Iqbal Rochman, Wei Ye, Zhi-Li Zhang, Monisha Ghosh

Abstract: As discussions around 6G begin, it is important to carefully quantify the spectral efficiency gains actually realized by deployed 5G networks as compared to 4G through various enhancements such as higher modulation, beamforming, and MIMO. This will inform the design of future cellular systems, especially in the mid-bands, which provide a good balance between bandwidth and propagation. Similar to 4… ▽ More As discussions around 6G begin, it is important to carefully quantify the spectral efficiency gains actually realized by deployed 5G networks as compared to 4G through various enhancements such as higher modulation, beamforming, and MIMO. This will inform the design of future cellular systems, especially in the mid-bands, which provide a good balance between bandwidth and propagation. Similar to 4G, 5G also utilizes low-band (<1 GHz) and mid-band spectrum (1 to 6 GHz), and hence comparing the performance of 4G and 5G in these bands will provide insights into how further improvements can be attained. In this work, we address a crucial question: is the performance boost in 5G compared to 4G primarily a result of increased bandwidth, or do the other enhancements play significant roles, and if so, under what circumstances? Hence, we conduct city-wide measurements of 4G and 5G cellular networks deployed in low- and mid-bands in Chicago and Minneapolis, and carefully quantify the contributions of different aspects of 5G advancements to its improved throughput performance. Our analyses show that (i) compared to 4G, the throughput improvement in 5G today is mainly influenced by the wider channel bandwidth, both from single channels and channel aggregation, (ii) in addition to wider channels, improved 5G throughput requires better signal conditions, which can be delivered by denser deployment and/or use of beamforming in mid-bands, (iii) the channel rank in real-world environments rarely supports the full 4 layers of 4x4 MIMO and (iv) advanced features such as MU-MIMO and higher order modulation such as 1024-QAM have yet to be widely deployed. These observations and conclusions lead one to consider designing the next generation of cellular systems to have wider channels, perhaps with improved channel aggregation, dense deployment with more beams. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2024; v1 submitted 1 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

Evaluating The Interference Potential in 6 GHz: An Extensive Measurement Campaign of A Dense Indoor Wi-Fi 6E Network

Authors: Seda Dogan-Tusha, Muhammad Iqbal Rochman, Armed Tusha, Hossein Nasiri, James Helzerman, Monisha Ghosh

Abstract: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has allocated the 6 GHz band (5.925 - 7.125 GHz) for unlicensed, shared use in the US. Incumbents in the band are protected via Low Power Indoor (LPI) rules that do not require the use of an Automatic Frequency Control (AFC) mechanism and Standard Power (SP) rules which do. As the deployment of Wi-Fi 6E APs implementing LPI rules have been increasing, th… ▽ More The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has allocated the 6 GHz band (5.925 - 7.125 GHz) for unlicensed, shared use in the US. Incumbents in the band are protected via Low Power Indoor (LPI) rules that do not require the use of an Automatic Frequency Control (AFC) mechanism and Standard Power (SP) rules which do. As the deployment of Wi-Fi 6E APs implementing LPI rules have been increasing, there is limited research examining the real-world interference potential of dense LPI deployments to fixed links, which remains a concern for incumbents. We have conducted a first-of-its-kind extensive measurement campaign of a dense indoor Wi-Fi 6E network at the University of Michigan, which includes walking, driving, and drone measurements to assess outdoor beacon Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), building entry loss (BEL), channel utilization, and appropriate enabling signal level for a proposed client-to-client (C2C) mode in 6 GHz. Our detailed measurements under various conditions show median outdoor RSSI between -75 dBm and -85 dBm, BEL between 12 dB and 16 dB through double-pane low-emission windows, and only 5% of indoor Basic Service Set Identifiers (BSSIDs) observed outdoors. Our overall conclusion is that the probability of interference to incumbent fixed links is low, but more research is required to determine the appropriate signal level for the C2C enabling signal. △ Less

Submitted 6 August, 2023; v1 submitted 1 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

A Measurement Study of the Impact of Adjacent Channel Interference between C-band and CBRS

Authors: Muhammad Iqbal Rochman, Vanlin Sathya, Bill Payne, Mehmet Yavuz, Monisha Ghosh

Abstract: The 3.7 - 3.98 GHz frequency band (also known as C-band) was recently allocated in the US for the deployment of 5G cellular services. Prior to this, the lower adjacent band, 3.55 - 3.7 GHz, had been allocated to Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS), where the entire 150 MHz can be used for free by Tier 3 General Authorized Access (GAA) users, but access to the spectrum needs to be authorized by… ▽ More The 3.7 - 3.98 GHz frequency band (also known as C-band) was recently allocated in the US for the deployment of 5G cellular services. Prior to this, the lower adjacent band, 3.55 - 3.7 GHz, had been allocated to Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS), where the entire 150 MHz can be used for free by Tier 3 General Authorized Access (GAA) users, but access to the spectrum needs to be authorized by the Spectrum Access System (SAS). GAA users are allowed on a channel only when there are no Tier 1 Incumbents (Navy radars) or Tier 2 Priority Access License (PAL) users in the area. However, since there are no guard bands between GAA and C-band, and both systems employ Time Division Duplexing (TDD) where the uplink/downlink configurations are not synchronized, adjacent channel interference can potentially reduce the performance of both systems. In this paper, we quantify the effect of this mutual interference by performing experiments with a real-world deployment. We observe significant downlink throughput reductions on both systems when two devices are in close proximity to each other, and one is transmitting uplink while the other is transmitting downlink: 60% for 4G CBRS and 43% for 5G C-band. We believe that this is the first paper to demonstrate this in a real deployment. This throughput degradation was reduced when the CBSD changed its channel and operated 20 MHz away from C-band, essentially creating a guard band between the channels. We also demonstrate the improvement in latency under adjacent channel interference by implementing MicroSlicing at the CBSD. Our results indicate that addressing adjacent channel interference due to the lack of guard bands and TDD configuration mismatch is crucial to improving the performance of both CBRS and C-band systems. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2023; v1 submitted 16 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Impact of Device Thermal Performance on 5G mmWave Communication Systems

Authors: Muhammad Iqbal Rochman, Damian Fernandez, Norlen Nunez, Vanlin Sathya, Ahmed S. Ibrahim, Monisha Ghosh, William Payne

Abstract: 5G millimeter wave (mmWave) cellular networks have been reported to deliver 1-2 Gbps downlink throughput, via speed-tests. However, these speed-tests capture only a few seconds of throughput and are not representative of sustained throughput over several minutes. We report the first measurements of sustained throughput in three cities, Miami, Chicago, and San Francisco, where we observe throughput… ▽ More 5G millimeter wave (mmWave) cellular networks have been reported to deliver 1-2 Gbps downlink throughput, via speed-tests. However, these speed-tests capture only a few seconds of throughput and are not representative of sustained throughput over several minutes. We report the first measurements of sustained throughput in three cities, Miami, Chicago, and San Francisco, where we observe throughput throttling due to rising skin temperature of the phone when it is connected to a deployed 5G mmWave base-station (BS). Radio Resource Control (RRC) messaging between the phone and the BS indicates the reduction in the number of aggregated mmWave channels from 4 to 1 followed by a switch to 4G. We corroborate these measurements with infra-red images as the phone heats up. Thus, mmWave throughput will be limited not by network characteristics but by device thermal management. △ Less

Submitted 30 June, 2022; v1 submitted 9 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

A Comparison Study of Cellular Deployments in Chicago and Miami Using Apps on Smartphones

Authors: Muhammad Iqbal Rochman, Vanlin Sathya, Norlen Nunez, Damian Fernandez, Monisha Ghosh, Ahmed S. Ibrahim, William Payne

Abstract: Cellular operators have begun deploying 5G New Radio (NR) in all available bands: low (< 1 GHz), mid (1 - 6 GHz), and high (> 24 GHz) to exploit the different capabilities of each. At the same time, traditional 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) deployments are being enhanced with the addition of bands in the unlicensed 5 GHz (using License Assisted Access, or LAA) and the 3.5 GHz Citizens Broadband Rad… ▽ More Cellular operators have begun deploying 5G New Radio (NR) in all available bands: low (< 1 GHz), mid (1 - 6 GHz), and high (> 24 GHz) to exploit the different capabilities of each. At the same time, traditional 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) deployments are being enhanced with the addition of bands in the unlicensed 5 GHz (using License Assisted Access, or LAA) and the 3.5 GHz Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) resulting in throughput performance comparable to 5G in mid-band. We present a detailed study comparing 4G and 5G deployments, in all bands in Chicago, and focused mmWave measurements and analysis in Miami. Our methodology, based on commercial and custom apps, is scalable for crowdsourcing measurements on a large scale and provides detailed data (throughput, latency, signal strength, etc.) on actual deployments. Our main conclusions based on the measurements are (i) optimized 4G networks in mid-band are comparable in both throughput and latency to current deployments of 5G (both standalone (SA) and non-standalone (NSA)) and (ii) mmWave 5G, even in NSA mode, can deliver multi-Gbps throughput reliably if the installation is dense enough, but performance is still brittle due to the propagation limitations imposed by distance and body loss. Thus, while 5G demonstrates significant early promise, further work needs to be done to ensure that the stated goals of 5G are met. △ Less

Submitted 6 August, 2021; v1 submitted 1 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: Accepted in ACM WiNTECH 2021

Hidden-nodes in coexisting LAA & Wi-Fi: a measurement study of real deployments

Authors: Vanlin Sathya, Muhammad Iqbal Rochman, Monisha Ghosh

Abstract: LTE-Licensed Assisted Access (LAA) networks are beginning to be deployed widely in major metropolitan areas in the US in the unlicensed 5 GHz bands, which have existing dense deployments of Wi-Fi. This provides a real-world opportunity to study the problems due to hidden-node scenarios between LAA and Wi-Fi. The hidden node problem has been well studied in the context of overlap** Wi-Fi APs. How… ▽ More LTE-Licensed Assisted Access (LAA) networks are beginning to be deployed widely in major metropolitan areas in the US in the unlicensed 5 GHz bands, which have existing dense deployments of Wi-Fi. This provides a real-world opportunity to study the problems due to hidden-node scenarios between LAA and Wi-Fi. The hidden node problem has been well studied in the context of overlap** Wi-Fi APs. However, when Wi-Fi coexists with LAA, the hidden node problem is exacerbated since LAA cannot use the well-known Request-to-Send (RTS)/Clear to-Send (CTS) mechanism to resolve contentions, resulting in throughput degradation for Wi-Fi. In this paper, we describe detailed measurements and conclusions from experiments on the campus of the University of Chicago which presents a perfect hidden node scenario where Wi-Fi access points (APs) controlled by us and an LAA base-station (BS) deployed by AT&T are hidden from each other, but the clients are not. We performed careful experiments in three different regions of the coexistence area: (i) clients midway between LAA & Wi-Fi; (ii) clients close to the Wi-Fi AP; and (iii) clients close to the LAA BS. Our results show that in a situation where LAA uses an aggregate of three unlicensed channels (60 MHz bandwidth) which overlap with an 80 MHz Wi-Fi transmission, the Wi-Fi throughput at client devices suffers considerably. Overall, Wi-Fi performance is impacted by the hidden node problem more severely than LAA. In the best outdoor conditions, the throughput of LAA and Wi-Fi is reduced by 35% and 97% respectively when coexisting with each other as compared when the other system is not present. Furthermore, we conclude that when both LAA and Wi-Fi use multiple 20 MHz channels and there are multiple Wi-Fi APs coexisting with LAA on the same set of channels, the choice of Wi-Fi primary channels can have a significant impact on LAA throughput. △ Less

Submitted 31 March, 2021; v1 submitted 29 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Comments: IEEE ICC 2021 Workshop on Spectrum Sharing Technology for Next-Generation Communications

Measurement-based coexistence studies of LAA & Wi-Fi deployments in Chicago

Authors: Vanlin Sathya, Muhammad Iqbal Rochman, Monisha Ghosh

Abstract: LTE-Licensed Assisted Access (LAA) networks are beginning to be deployed widely in major metropolitan areas in the US in the unlicensed 5 GHz bands, which have existing dense deployments of Wi-Fi as well. Various aspects of the coexistence scenarios such deployments give rise to have been considered ina vast body of academic and industry research. However, there is very little data and research on… ▽ More LTE-Licensed Assisted Access (LAA) networks are beginning to be deployed widely in major metropolitan areas in the US in the unlicensed 5 GHz bands, which have existing dense deployments of Wi-Fi as well. Various aspects of the coexistence scenarios such deployments give rise to have been considered ina vast body of academic and industry research. However, there is very little data and research on how these coexisting networks will behave in practice. The question of fair coexistence between Wi-Fi and LAA has moved from a theoretical question to reality. The recent roll-out of LAA deployments provides an opportunity to collect data on the operation of these networks as well as studying coexistence issues on the ground. In this paper we describe the first results of a measurement campaign conducted over many months, using custom apps as well as off-the-shelf tools, in several areas of Chicago where the major carriers have been expanding LAA deployments. The measurements reveal that coexistence between LAA and Wi-Fi in dense, urban environments where both systems aggregate multiple channels, continues to be a challenging problem that requires further research. △ Less

Submitted 28 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: IEEE Wireless Communication Magazine, October 2020

Machine Learning enabled Spectrum Sharing in Dense LTE-U/Wi-Fi Coexistence Scenarios

Authors: Adam Dziedzic, Vanlin Sathya, Muhammad Iqbal Rochman, Monisha Ghosh, Sanjay Krishnan

Abstract: The application of Machine Learning (ML) techniques to complex engineering problems has proved to be an attractive and efficient solution. ML has been successfully applied to several practical tasks like image recognition, automating industrial operations, etc. The promise of ML techniques in solving non-linear problems influenced this work which aims to apply known ML techniques and develop new o… ▽ More The application of Machine Learning (ML) techniques to complex engineering problems has proved to be an attractive and efficient solution. ML has been successfully applied to several practical tasks like image recognition, automating industrial operations, etc. The promise of ML techniques in solving non-linear problems influenced this work which aims to apply known ML techniques and develop new ones for wireless spectrum sharing between Wi-Fi and LTE in the unlicensed spectrum. In this work, we focus on the LTE-Unlicensed (LTE-U) specification developed by the LTE-U Forum, which uses the duty-cycle approach for fair coexistence. The specification suggests reducing the duty cycle at the LTE-U base-station (BS) when the number of co-channel Wi-Fi basic service sets (BSSs) increases from one to two or more. However, without decoding the Wi-Fi packets, detecting the number of Wi-Fi BSSs operating on the channel in real-time is a challenging problem. In this work, we demonstrate a novel ML-based approach which solves this problem by using energy values observed during the LTE-U OFF duration. It is relatively straightforward to observe only the energy values during the LTE-U BS OFF time compared to decoding the entire Wi-Fi packet, which would require a full Wi-Fi receiver at the LTE-U base-station. We implement and validate the proposed ML-based approach by real-time experiments and demonstrate that there exist distinct patterns between the energy distributions between one and many Wi-Fi AP transmissions. The proposed ML-based approach results in a higher accuracy (close to 99\% in all cases) as compared to the existing auto-correlation (AC) and energy detection (ED) approaches. △ Less

Submitted 17 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: Accepted at IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1911.09292