Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Regenwetter, L

BIKED++: A Multimodal Dataset of 1.4 Million Bicycle Image and Parametric CAD Designs

Authors: Lyle Regenwetter, Yazan Abu Obaideh, Amin Heyrani Nobari, Faez Ahmed

Abstract: This paper introduces a public dataset of 1.4 million procedurally-generated bicycle designs represented parametrically, as JSON files, and as rasterized images. The dataset is created through the use of a rendering engine which harnesses the BikeCAD software to generate vector graphics from parametric designs. This rendering engine is discussed in the paper and also released publicly alongside th… ▽ More This paper introduces a public dataset of 1.4 million procedurally-generated bicycle designs represented parametrically, as JSON files, and as rasterized images. The dataset is created through the use of a rendering engine which harnesses the BikeCAD software to generate vector graphics from parametric designs. This rendering engine is discussed in the paper and also released publicly alongside the dataset. Though this dataset has numerous applications, a principal motivation is the need to train cross-modal predictive models between parametric and image-based design representations. For example, we demonstrate that a predictive model can be trained to accurately estimate Contrastive Language-Image Pretraining (CLIP) embeddings from a parametric representation directly. This allows similarity relations to be established between parametric bicycle designs and text strings or reference images. Trained predictive models are also made public. The dataset joins the BIKED dataset family which includes thousands of mixed-representation human-designed bicycle models and several datasets quantifying design performance. The code and dataset can be found at: https://github.com/Lyleregenwetter/BIKED_multimodal/tree/main △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2024; v1 submitted 7 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

NITO: Neural Implicit Fields for Resolution-free Topology Optimization

Authors: Amin Heyrani Nobari, Giorgio Giannone, Lyle Regenwetter, Faez Ahmed

Abstract: Topology optimization is a critical task in engineering design, where the goal is to optimally distribute material in a given space for maximum performance. We introduce Neural Implicit Topology Optimization (NITO), a novel approach to accelerate topology optimization problems using deep learning. NITO stands out as one of the first frameworks to offer a resolution-free and domain-agnostic solutio… ▽ More Topology optimization is a critical task in engineering design, where the goal is to optimally distribute material in a given space for maximum performance. We introduce Neural Implicit Topology Optimization (NITO), a novel approach to accelerate topology optimization problems using deep learning. NITO stands out as one of the first frameworks to offer a resolution-free and domain-agnostic solution in deep learning-based topology optimization. NITO synthesizes structures with up to seven times better structural efficiency compared to SOTA diffusion models and does so in a tenth of the time. In the NITO framework, we introduce a novel method, the Boundary Point Order-Invariant MLP (BPOM), to represent boundary conditions in a sparse and domain-agnostic manner, moving away from expensive simulation-based approaches. Crucially, NITO circumvents the domain and resolution limitations that restrict Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models to a structured domain of fixed size -- limitations that hinder the widespread adoption of CNNs in engineering applications. This generalizability allows a single NITO model to train and generate solutions in countless domains, eliminating the need for numerous domain-specific CNNs and their extensive datasets. Despite its generalizability, NITO outperforms SOTA models even in specialized tasks, is an order of magnitude smaller, and is practically trainable at high resolutions that would be restrictive for CNNs. This combination of versatility, efficiency, and performance underlines NITO's potential to transform the landscape of engineering design optimization problems through implicit fields. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Learning from Invalid Data: On Constraint Satisfaction in Generative Models

Authors: Giorgio Giannone, Lyle Regenwetter, Akash Srivastava, Dan Gutfreund, Faez Ahmed

Abstract: Generative models have demonstrated impressive results in vision, language, and speech. However, even with massive datasets, they struggle with precision, generating physically invalid or factually incorrect data. This is particularly problematic when the generated data must satisfy constraints, for example, to meet product specifications in engineering design or to adhere to the laws of physics i… ▽ More Generative models have demonstrated impressive results in vision, language, and speech. However, even with massive datasets, they struggle with precision, generating physically invalid or factually incorrect data. This is particularly problematic when the generated data must satisfy constraints, for example, to meet product specifications in engineering design or to adhere to the laws of physics in a natural scene. To improve precision while preserving diversity and fidelity, we propose a novel training mechanism that leverages datasets of constraint-violating data points, which we consider invalid. Our approach minimizes the divergence between the generative distribution and the valid prior while maximizing the divergence with the invalid distribution. We demonstrate how generative models like GANs and DDPMs that we augment to train with invalid data vastly outperform their standard counterparts which solely train on valid data points. For example, our training procedure generates up to 98 % fewer invalid samples on 2D densities, improves connectivity and stability four-fold on a stacking block problem, and improves constraint satisfaction by 15 % on a structural topology optimization benchmark in engineering design. We also analyze how the quality of the invalid data affects the learning procedure and the generalization properties of models. Finally, we demonstrate significant improvements in sample efficiency, showing that a tenfold increase in valid samples leads to a negligible difference in constraint satisfaction, while less than 10 % invalid samples lead to a tenfold improvement. Our proposed mechanism offers a promising solution for improving precision in generative models while preserving diversity and fidelity, particularly in domains where constraint satisfaction is critical and data is limited, such as engineering design, robotics, and medicine. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

MCD: A Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Search Method For Multi-modal Design Modifications

Authors: Lyle Regenwetter, Yazan Abu Obaideh, Faez Ahmed

Abstract: Designers may often ask themselves how to adjust their design concepts to achieve demanding functional goals. To answer such questions, designers must often consider counterfactuals, weighing design alternatives and their projected performance. This paper introduces Multi-objective Counterfactuals for Design (MCD), a computational tool that automates and streamlines the counterfactual search proce… ▽ More Designers may often ask themselves how to adjust their design concepts to achieve demanding functional goals. To answer such questions, designers must often consider counterfactuals, weighing design alternatives and their projected performance. This paper introduces Multi-objective Counterfactuals for Design (MCD), a computational tool that automates and streamlines the counterfactual search process and recommends targeted design modifications that meet designers' unique requirements. MCD improves upon existing counterfactual search methods by supporting multi-objective requirements, which are crucial in design problems, and by decoupling the counterfactual search and sampling processes, thus enhancing efficiency and facilitating objective trade-off visualization. The paper showcases MCD's capabilities in complex engineering tasks using three demonstrative bicycle design challenges. In the first, MCD effectively identifies design modifications that quantifiably enhance functional performance, strengthening the bike frame and saving weight. In the second, MCD modifies parametric bike models in a cross-modal fashion to resemble subjective text prompts or reference images. In a final multidisciplinary case study, MCD tackles all the quantitative and subjective design requirements introduced in the first two problems, while simultaneously customizing a bike design to an individual rider's biomechanical attributes. By exploring hypothetical design alterations and their impact on multiple design objectives, MCD recommends effective design modifications for practitioners seeking to make targeted enhancements to their designs. The code, test problems, and datasets used in the paper are available to the public at decode.mit.edu/projects/counterfactuals/. △ Less

Submitted 31 May, 2024; v1 submitted 18 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Beyond Statistical Similarity: Rethinking Metrics for Deep Generative Models in Engineering Design

Authors: Lyle Regenwetter, Akash Srivastava, Dan Gutfreund, Faez Ahmed

Abstract: Deep generative models such as Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Diffusion Models, and Transformers, have shown great promise in a variety of applications, including image and speech synthesis, natural language processing, and drug discovery. However, when applied to engineering design problems, evaluating the performance of these models can be challenging, a… ▽ More Deep generative models such as Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Diffusion Models, and Transformers, have shown great promise in a variety of applications, including image and speech synthesis, natural language processing, and drug discovery. However, when applied to engineering design problems, evaluating the performance of these models can be challenging, as traditional statistical metrics based on likelihood may not fully capture the requirements of engineering applications. This paper doubles as a review and practical guide to evaluation metrics for deep generative models (DGMs) in engineering design. We first summarize the well-accepted `classic' evaluation metrics for deep generative models grounded in machine learning theory. Using case studies, we then highlight why these metrics seldom translate well to design problems but see frequent use due to the lack of established alternatives. Next, we curate a set of design-specific metrics which have been proposed across different research communities and can be used for evaluating deep generative models. These metrics focus on unique requirements in design and engineering, such as constraint satisfaction, functional performance, novelty, and conditioning. Throughout our discussion, we apply the metrics to models trained on simple-to-visualize 2-dimensional example problems. Finally, we evaluate four deep generative models on a bicycle frame design problem and structural topology generation problem. In particular, we showcase the use of proposed metrics to quantify performance target achievement, design novelty, and geometric constraints. We publicly release the code for the datasets, models, and metrics used throughout the paper at https://decode.mit.edu/projects/metrics/. △ Less

Submitted 14 October, 2023; v1 submitted 6 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Towards Goal, Feasibility, and Diversity-Oriented Deep Generative Models in Design

Authors: Lyle Regenwetter, Faez Ahmed

Abstract: Deep Generative Machine Learning Models (DGMs) have been growing in popularity across the design community thanks to their ability to learn and mimic complex data distributions. DGMs are conventionally trained to minimize statistical divergence between the distribution over generated data and distribution over the dataset on which they are trained. While sufficient for the task of generating "real… ▽ More Deep Generative Machine Learning Models (DGMs) have been growing in popularity across the design community thanks to their ability to learn and mimic complex data distributions. DGMs are conventionally trained to minimize statistical divergence between the distribution over generated data and distribution over the dataset on which they are trained. While sufficient for the task of generating "realistic" fake data, this objective is typically insufficient for design synthesis tasks. Instead, design problems typically call for adherence to design requirements, such as performance targets and constraints. Advancing DGMs in engineering design requires new training objectives which promote engineering design objectives. In this paper, we present the first Deep Generative Model that simultaneously optimizes for performance, feasibility, diversity, and target achievement. We benchmark performance of the proposed method against several Deep Generative Models over eight evaluation metrics that focus on feasibility, diversity, and satisfaction of design performance targets. Methods are tested on a challenging multi-objective bicycle frame design problem with skewed, multimodal data of different datatypes. The proposed framework was found to outperform all Deep Generative Models in six of eight metrics. △ Less

Submitted 14 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2205.03005

Design Target Achievement Index: A Differentiable Metric to Enhance Deep Generative Models in Multi-Objective Inverse Design

Authors: Lyle Regenwetter, Faez Ahmed

Abstract: Deep Generative Machine Learning Models have been growing in popularity across the design community thanks to their ability to learn and mimic complex data distributions. While early works are promising, further advancement will depend on addressing several critical considerations such as design quality, feasibility, novelty, and targeted inverse design. We propose the Design Target Achievement In… ▽ More Deep Generative Machine Learning Models have been growing in popularity across the design community thanks to their ability to learn and mimic complex data distributions. While early works are promising, further advancement will depend on addressing several critical considerations such as design quality, feasibility, novelty, and targeted inverse design. We propose the Design Target Achievement Index (DTAI), a differentiable, tunable metric that scores a design's ability to achieve designer-specified minimum performance targets. We demonstrate that DTAI can drastically improve the performance of generated designs when directly used as a training loss in Deep Generative Models. We apply the DTAI loss to a Performance-Augmented Diverse GAN (PaDGAN) and demonstrate superior generative performance compared to a set of baseline Deep Generative Models including a Multi-Objective PaDGAN and specialized tabular generation algorithms like the Conditional Tabular GAN (CTGAN). We further enhance PaDGAN with an auxiliary feasibility classifier to encourage feasible designs. To evaluate methods, we propose a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics for generative methods that focus on feasibility, diversity, and satisfaction of design performance targets. Methods are tested on a challenging benchmarking problem: the FRAMED bicycle frame design dataset featuring mixed-datatype parametric data, heavily skewed and multimodal distributions, and ten competing performance objectives. △ Less

Submitted 6 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

FRAMED: An AutoML Approach for Structural Performance Prediction of Bicycle Frames

Authors: Lyle Regenwetter, Colin Weaver, Faez Ahmed

Abstract: This paper demonstrates how Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) methods can be used as effective surrogate models in engineering design problems. To do so, we consider the challenging problem of structurally-performant bicycle frame design and demonstrate across-the-board dominance by AutoML in regression and classification surrogate modeling tasks. We also introduce FRAMED -- a parametric dataset… ▽ More This paper demonstrates how Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) methods can be used as effective surrogate models in engineering design problems. To do so, we consider the challenging problem of structurally-performant bicycle frame design and demonstrate across-the-board dominance by AutoML in regression and classification surrogate modeling tasks. We also introduce FRAMED -- a parametric dataset of 4500 bicycle frames based on bicycles designed by practitioners and enthusiasts worldwide. Accompanying these frame designs, we provide ten structural performance values such as weight, displacements under load, and safety factors computed using finite element simulations for all the bicycle frame designs. We formulate two challenging test problems: a performance-prediction regression problem and a feasibility-prediction classification problem. We then systematically search for optimal surrogate models using Bayesian hyperparameter tuning and neural architecture search. Finally, we show how a state-of-the-art AutoML method can be effective for both regression and classification problems. We demonstrate that the proposed AutoML models outperform the strongest gradient boosting and neural network surrogates identified through Bayesian optimization by an improved F1 score of 24\% for classification and reduced mean absolute error by 12.5\% for regression. Our work introduces a dataset for bicycle design practitioners, provides two benchmark problems for surrogate modeling researchers, and demonstrates the advantages of AutoML in machine learning tasks. The dataset and code are provided at \url{http://decode.mit.edu/projects/framed/}. △ Less

Submitted 3 December, 2022; v1 submitted 25 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Deep Generative Models in Engineering Design: A Review

Authors: Lyle Regenwetter, Amin Heyrani Nobari, Faez Ahmed

Abstract: Automated design synthesis has the potential to revolutionize the modern engineering design process and improve access to highly optimized and customized products across countless industries. Successfully adapting generative Machine Learning to design engineering may enable such automated design synthesis and is a research subject of great importance. We present a review and analysis of Deep Gener… ▽ More Automated design synthesis has the potential to revolutionize the modern engineering design process and improve access to highly optimized and customized products across countless industries. Successfully adapting generative Machine Learning to design engineering may enable such automated design synthesis and is a research subject of great importance. We present a review and analysis of Deep Generative Machine Learning models in engineering design. Deep Generative Models (DGMs) typically leverage deep networks to learn from an input dataset and synthesize new designs. Recently, DGMs such as feedforward Neural Networks (NNs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), and certain Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) frameworks have shown promising results in design applications like structural optimization, materials design, and shape synthesis. The prevalence of DGMs in engineering design has skyrocketed since 2016. Anticipating continued growth, we conduct a review of recent advances to benefit researchers interested in DGMs for design. We structure our review as an exposition of the algorithms, datasets, representation methods, and applications commonly used in the current literature. In particular, we discuss key works that have introduced new techniques and methods in DGMs, successfully applied DGMs to a design-related domain, or directly supported the development of DGMs through datasets or auxiliary methods. We further identify key challenges and limitations currently seen in DGMs across design fields, such as design creativity, handling constraints and objectives, and modeling both form and functional performance simultaneously. In our discussion, we identify possible solution pathways as key areas on which to target future work. △ Less

Submitted 16 March, 2022; v1 submitted 20 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

BIKED: A Dataset for Computational Bicycle Design with Machine Learning Benchmarks

Authors: Lyle Regenwetter, Brent Curry, Faez Ahmed

Abstract: In this paper, we present "BIKED," a dataset comprised of 4500 individually designed bicycle models sourced from hundreds of designers. We expect BIKED to enable a variety of data-driven design applications for bicycles and support the development of data-driven design methods. The dataset is comprised of a variety of design information including assembly images, component images, numerical design… ▽ More In this paper, we present "BIKED," a dataset comprised of 4500 individually designed bicycle models sourced from hundreds of designers. We expect BIKED to enable a variety of data-driven design applications for bicycles and support the development of data-driven design methods. The dataset is comprised of a variety of design information including assembly images, component images, numerical design parameters, and class labels. In this paper, we first discuss the processing of the dataset, then highlight some prominent research questions that BIKED can help address. Of these questions, we further explore the following in detail: 1) Are there prominent gaps in the current bicycle market and design space? We explore the design space using unsupervised dimensionality reduction methods. 2) How does one identify the class of a bicycle and what factors play a key role in defining it? We address the bicycle classification task by training a multitude of classifiers using different forms of design data and identifying parameters of particular significance through permutation-based interpretability analysis. 3) How does one synthesize new bicycles using different representation methods? We consider numerous machine learning methods to generate new bicycle models as well as interpolate between and extrapolate from existing models using Variational Autoencoders. The dataset and code are available at http://decode.mit.edu/projects/biked/. △ Less

Submitted 17 August, 2021; v1 submitted 9 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.