-
Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generation
Authors:
Jessica Quaye,
Alicia Parrish,
Oana Inel,
Charvi Rastogi,
Hannah Rose Kirk,
Minsuk Kahng,
Erin van Liemt,
Max Bartolo,
Jess Tsang,
Justin White,
Nathan Clement,
Rafael Mosquera,
Juan Ciro,
Vijay Janapa Reddi,
Lora Aroyo
Abstract:
With the rise of text-to-image (T2I) generative AI models reaching wide audiences, it is critical to evaluate model robustness against non-obvious attacks to mitigate the generation of offensive images. By focusing on ``implicitly adversarial'' prompts (those that trigger T2I models to generate unsafe images for non-obvious reasons), we isolate a set of difficult safety issues that human creativit…
▽ More
With the rise of text-to-image (T2I) generative AI models reaching wide audiences, it is critical to evaluate model robustness against non-obvious attacks to mitigate the generation of offensive images. By focusing on ``implicitly adversarial'' prompts (those that trigger T2I models to generate unsafe images for non-obvious reasons), we isolate a set of difficult safety issues that human creativity is well-suited to uncover. To this end, we built the Adversarial Nibbler Challenge, a red-teaming methodology for crowdsourcing a diverse set of implicitly adversarial prompts. We have assembled a suite of state-of-the-art T2I models, employed a simple user interface to identify and annotate harms, and engaged diverse populations to capture long-tail safety issues that may be overlooked in standard testing. The challenge is run in consecutive rounds to enable a sustained discovery and analysis of safety pitfalls in T2I models.
In this paper, we present an in-depth account of our methodology, a systematic study of novel attack strategies and discussion of safety failures revealed by challenge participants. We also release a companion visualization tool for easy exploration and derivation of insights from the dataset. The first challenge round resulted in over 10k prompt-image pairs with machine annotations for safety. A subset of 1.5k samples contains rich human annotations of harm types and attack styles. We find that 14% of images that humans consider harmful are mislabeled as ``safe'' by machines. We have identified new attack strategies that highlight the complexity of ensuring T2I model robustness. Our findings emphasize the necessity of continual auditing and adaptation as new vulnerabilities emerge. We are confident that this work will enable proactive, iterative safety assessments and promote responsible development of T2I models.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2024; v1 submitted 14 February, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial on Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in Peer Review Discussions
Authors:
Charvi Rastogi,
Xiangchen Song,
Zhi**g **,
Ivan Stelmakh,
Hal Daumé III,
Kun Zhang,
Nihar B. Shah
Abstract:
Peer review often involves reviewers submitting their independent reviews, followed by a discussion among reviewers of each paper. A question among policymakers is whether the reviewers of a paper should be anonymous to each other during the discussion. We shed light on this by conducting a randomized controlled trial at the UAI 2022 conference. We randomly split the reviewers and papers into two…
▽ More
Peer review often involves reviewers submitting their independent reviews, followed by a discussion among reviewers of each paper. A question among policymakers is whether the reviewers of a paper should be anonymous to each other during the discussion. We shed light on this by conducting a randomized controlled trial at the UAI 2022 conference. We randomly split the reviewers and papers into two conditions--one with anonymous discussions and the other with non-anonymous discussions, and conduct an anonymous survey of all reviewers, to address the following questions: 1. Do reviewers discuss more in one of the conditions? Marginally more in anonymous (n = 2281, p = 0.051). 2. Does seniority have more influence on final decisions when non-anonymous? Yes, the decisions are closer to senior reviewers' scores in the non-anonymous condition than in anonymous (n = 484, p = 0.04). 3. Are reviewers more polite in one of the conditions? No significant difference in politeness of reviewers' text-based responses (n = 1125, p = 0.72). 4. Do reviewers' self-reported experiences differ across the two conditions? No significant difference for each of the five questions asked (n = 132 and p > 0.3). 5. Do reviewers prefer one condition over the other? Yes, there is a weak preference for anonymous discussions (n = 159 and Cohen's d= 0.25). 6. What do reviewers consider important to make policy on anonymity among reviewers? Reviewers' feeling of safety in expressing their opinions was rated most important, while polite communication among reviewers was rated least important (n = 159). 7. Have reviewers experienced dishonest behavior due to non-anonymity in discussions? Yes, roughly 7% of respondents answered affirmatively (n = 167). Overall, this experiment reveals evidence supporting an anonymous discussion setup in the peer-review process, in terms of the evaluation criteria considered.
△ Less
Submitted 1 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Exploring Graph Based Approaches for Author Name Disambiguation
Authors:
Chetanya Rastogi,
Prabhat Agarwal,
Shreya Singh
Abstract:
In many applications, such as scientific literature management, researcher search, social network analysis and etc, Name Disambiguation (aiming at disambiguating WhoIsWho) has been a challenging problem. In addition, the growth of scientific literature makes the problem more difficult and urgent. Although name disambiguation has been extensively studied in academia and industry, the problem has no…
▽ More
In many applications, such as scientific literature management, researcher search, social network analysis and etc, Name Disambiguation (aiming at disambiguating WhoIsWho) has been a challenging problem. In addition, the growth of scientific literature makes the problem more difficult and urgent. Although name disambiguation has been extensively studied in academia and industry, the problem has not been solved well due to the clutter of data and the complexity of the same name scenario. In this work, we aim to explore models that can perform the task of name disambiguation using the network structure that is intrinsic to the problem and present an analysis of the models.
△ Less
Submitted 12 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
A Self-Supervised Miniature One-Shot Texture Segmentation (MOSTS) Model for Real-Time Robot Navigation and Embedded Applications
Authors:
Yu Chen,
Chirag Rastogi,
Zheyu Zhou,
William R. Norris
Abstract:
Determining the drivable area, or free space segmentation, is critical for mobile robots to navigate indoor environments safely. However, the lack of coherent markings and structures (e.g., lanes, curbs, etc.) in indoor spaces places the burden of traversability estimation heavily on the mobile robot. This paper explores the use of a self-supervised one-shot texture segmentation framework and an R…
▽ More
Determining the drivable area, or free space segmentation, is critical for mobile robots to navigate indoor environments safely. However, the lack of coherent markings and structures (e.g., lanes, curbs, etc.) in indoor spaces places the burden of traversability estimation heavily on the mobile robot. This paper explores the use of a self-supervised one-shot texture segmentation framework and an RGB-D camera to achieve robust drivable area segmentation. With a fast inference speed and compact size, the developed model, MOSTS is ideal for real-time robot navigation and various embedded applications. A benchmark study was conducted to compare MOSTS's performance with existing one-shot texture segmentation models to evaluate its performance. Additionally, a validation dataset was built to assess MOSTS's ability to perform texture segmentation in the wild, where it effectively identified small low-lying objects that were previously undetectable by depth measurements. Further, the study also compared MOSTS's performance with two State-Of-The-Art (SOTA) indoor semantic segmentation models, both quantitatively and qualitatively. The results showed that MOSTS offers comparable accuracy with up to eight times faster inference speed in indoor drivable area segmentation.
△ Less
Submitted 14 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Adversarial Nibbler: A Data-Centric Challenge for Improving the Safety of Text-to-Image Models
Authors:
Alicia Parrish,
Hannah Rose Kirk,
Jessica Quaye,
Charvi Rastogi,
Max Bartolo,
Oana Inel,
Juan Ciro,
Rafael Mosquera,
Addison Howard,
Will Cukierski,
D. Sculley,
Vijay Janapa Reddi,
Lora Aroyo
Abstract:
The generative AI revolution in recent years has been spurred by an expansion in compute power and data quantity, which together enable extensive pre-training of powerful text-to-image (T2I) models. With their greater capabilities to generate realistic and creative content, these T2I models like DALL-E, MidJourney, Imagen or Stable Diffusion are reaching ever wider audiences. Any unsafe behaviors…
▽ More
The generative AI revolution in recent years has been spurred by an expansion in compute power and data quantity, which together enable extensive pre-training of powerful text-to-image (T2I) models. With their greater capabilities to generate realistic and creative content, these T2I models like DALL-E, MidJourney, Imagen or Stable Diffusion are reaching ever wider audiences. Any unsafe behaviors inherited from pretraining on uncurated internet-scraped datasets thus have the potential to cause wide-reaching harm, for example, through generated images which are violent, sexually explicit, or contain biased and derogatory stereotypes. Despite this risk of harm, we lack systematic and structured evaluation datasets to scrutinize model behavior, especially adversarial attacks that bypass existing safety filters. A typical bottleneck in safety evaluation is achieving a wide coverage of different types of challenging examples in the evaluation set, i.e., identifying 'unknown unknowns' or long-tail problems. To address this need, we introduce the Adversarial Nibbler challenge. The goal of this challenge is to crowdsource a diverse set of failure modes and reward challenge participants for successfully finding safety vulnerabilities in current state-of-the-art T2I models. Ultimately, we aim to provide greater awareness of these issues and assist developers in improving the future safety and reliability of generative AI models. Adversarial Nibbler is a data-centric challenge, part of the DataPerf challenge suite, organized and supported by Kaggle and MLCommons.
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Supporting Human-AI Collaboration in Auditing LLMs with LLMs
Authors:
Charvi Rastogi,
Marco Tulio Ribeiro,
Nicholas King,
Harsha Nori,
Saleema Amershi
Abstract:
Large language models are becoming increasingly pervasive and ubiquitous in society via deployment in sociotechnical systems. Yet these language models, be it for classification or generation, have been shown to be biased and behave irresponsibly, causing harm to people at scale. It is crucial to audit these language models rigorously. Existing auditing tools leverage either or both humans and AI…
▽ More
Large language models are becoming increasingly pervasive and ubiquitous in society via deployment in sociotechnical systems. Yet these language models, be it for classification or generation, have been shown to be biased and behave irresponsibly, causing harm to people at scale. It is crucial to audit these language models rigorously. Existing auditing tools leverage either or both humans and AI to find failures. In this work, we draw upon literature in human-AI collaboration and sensemaking, and conduct interviews with research experts in safe and fair AI, to build upon the auditing tool: AdaTest (Ribeiro and Lundberg, 2022), which is powered by a generative large language model (LLM). Through the design process we highlight the importance of sensemaking and human-AI communication to leverage complementary strengths of humans and generative models in collaborative auditing. To evaluate the effectiveness of the augmented tool, AdaTest++, we conduct user studies with participants auditing two commercial language models: OpenAI's GPT-3 and Azure's sentiment analysis model. Qualitative analysis shows that AdaTest++ effectively leverages human strengths such as schematization, hypothesis formation and testing. Further, with our tool, participants identified a variety of failures modes, covering 26 different topics over 2 tasks, that have been shown before in formal audits and also those previously under-reported.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2023; v1 submitted 19 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
How do Authors' Perceptions of their Papers Compare with Co-authors' Perceptions and Peer-review Decisions?
Authors:
Charvi Rastogi,
Ivan Stelmakh,
Alina Beygelzimer,
Yann N. Dauphin,
Percy Liang,
Jennifer Wortman Vaughan,
Zhenyu Xue,
Hal Daumé III,
Emma Pierson,
Nihar B. Shah
Abstract:
How do author perceptions match up to the outcomes of the peer-review process and perceptions of others? In a top-tier computer science conference (NeurIPS 2021) with more than 23,000 submitting authors and 9,000 submitted papers, we survey the authors on three questions: (i) their predicted probability of acceptance for each of their papers, (ii) their perceived ranking of their own papers based…
▽ More
How do author perceptions match up to the outcomes of the peer-review process and perceptions of others? In a top-tier computer science conference (NeurIPS 2021) with more than 23,000 submitting authors and 9,000 submitted papers, we survey the authors on three questions: (i) their predicted probability of acceptance for each of their papers, (ii) their perceived ranking of their own papers based on scientific contribution, and (iii) the change in their perception about their own papers after seeing the reviews. The salient results are: (1) Authors have roughly a three-fold overestimate of the acceptance probability of their papers: The median prediction is 70% for an approximately 25% acceptance rate. (2) Female authors exhibit a marginally higher (statistically significant) miscalibration than male authors; predictions of authors invited to serve as meta-reviewers or reviewers are similarly calibrated, but better than authors who were not invited to review. (3) Authors' relative ranking of scientific contribution of two submissions they made generally agree (93%) with their predicted acceptance probabilities, but there is a notable 7% responses where authors think their better paper will face a worse outcome. (4) The author-provided rankings disagreed with the peer-review decisions about a third of the time; when co-authors ranked their jointly authored papers, co-authors disagreed at a similar rate -- about a third of the time. (5) At least 30% of respondents of both accepted and rejected papers said that their perception of their own paper improved after the review process. The stakeholders in peer review should take these findings into account in setting their expectations from peer review.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Neural Generation Meets Real People: Building a Social, Informative Open-Domain Dialogue Agent
Authors:
Ethan A. Chi,
Ashwin Paranjape,
Abigail See,
Caleb Chiam,
Trenton Chang,
Kathleen Kenealy,
Swee Kiat Lim,
Amelia Hardy,
Chetanya Rastogi,
Haojun Li,
Alexander Iyabor,
Yutong He,
Hari Sowrirajan,
Peng Qi,
Kaushik Ram Sadagopan,
Nguyet Minh Phu,
Dilara Soylu,
Jillian Tang,
Avanika Narayan,
Giovanni Campagna,
Christopher D. Manning
Abstract:
We present Chirpy Cardinal, an open-domain social chatbot. Aiming to be both informative and conversational, our bot chats with users in an authentic, emotionally intelligent way. By integrating controlled neural generation with scaffolded, hand-written dialogue, we let both the user and bot take turns driving the conversation, producing an engaging and socially fluent experience. Deployed in the…
▽ More
We present Chirpy Cardinal, an open-domain social chatbot. Aiming to be both informative and conversational, our bot chats with users in an authentic, emotionally intelligent way. By integrating controlled neural generation with scaffolded, hand-written dialogue, we let both the user and bot take turns driving the conversation, producing an engaging and socially fluent experience. Deployed in the fourth iteration of the Alexa Prize Socialbot Grand Challenge, Chirpy Cardinal handled thousands of conversations per day, placing second out of nine bots with an average user rating of 3.58/5.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2023; v1 submitted 25 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
DataPerf: Benchmarks for Data-Centric AI Development
Authors:
Mark Mazumder,
Colby Banbury,
Xiaozhe Yao,
Bojan Karlaš,
William Gaviria Rojas,
Sudnya Diamos,
Greg Diamos,
Lynn He,
Alicia Parrish,
Hannah Rose Kirk,
Jessica Quaye,
Charvi Rastogi,
Douwe Kiela,
David Jurado,
David Kanter,
Rafael Mosquera,
Juan Ciro,
Lora Aroyo,
Bilge Acun,
Lingjiao Chen,
Mehul Smriti Raje,
Max Bartolo,
Sabri Eyuboglu,
Amirata Ghorbani,
Emmett Goodman
, et al. (20 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Machine learning research has long focused on models rather than datasets, and prominent datasets are used for common ML tasks without regard to the breadth, difficulty, and faithfulness of the underlying problems. Neglecting the fundamental importance of data has given rise to inaccuracy, bias, and fragility in real-world applications, and research is hindered by saturation across existing datase…
▽ More
Machine learning research has long focused on models rather than datasets, and prominent datasets are used for common ML tasks without regard to the breadth, difficulty, and faithfulness of the underlying problems. Neglecting the fundamental importance of data has given rise to inaccuracy, bias, and fragility in real-world applications, and research is hindered by saturation across existing dataset benchmarks. In response, we present DataPerf, a community-led benchmark suite for evaluating ML datasets and data-centric algorithms. We aim to foster innovation in data-centric AI through competition, comparability, and reproducibility. We enable the ML community to iterate on datasets, instead of just architectures, and we provide an open, online platform with multiple rounds of challenges to support this iterative development. The first iteration of DataPerf contains five benchmarks covering a wide spectrum of data-centric techniques, tasks, and modalities in vision, speech, acquisition, debugging, and diffusion prompting, and we support hosting new contributed benchmarks from the community. The benchmarks, online evaluation platform, and baseline implementations are open source, and the MLCommons Association will maintain DataPerf to ensure long-term benefits to academia and industry.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2023; v1 submitted 20 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
A Taxonomy of Human and ML Strengths in Decision-Making to Investigate Human-ML Complementarity
Authors:
Charvi Rastogi,
Liu Leqi,
Kenneth Holstein,
Hoda Heidari
Abstract:
Hybrid human-ML systems increasingly make consequential decisions in a wide range of domains. These systems are often introduced with the expectation that the combined human-ML system will achieve complementary performance, that is, the combined decision-making system will be an improvement compared with either decision-making agent in isolation. However, empirical results have been mixed, and exi…
▽ More
Hybrid human-ML systems increasingly make consequential decisions in a wide range of domains. These systems are often introduced with the expectation that the combined human-ML system will achieve complementary performance, that is, the combined decision-making system will be an improvement compared with either decision-making agent in isolation. However, empirical results have been mixed, and existing research rarely articulates the sources and mechanisms by which complementary performance is expected to arise. Our goal in this work is to provide conceptual tools to advance the way researchers reason and communicate about human-ML complementarity. Drawing upon prior literature in human psychology, machine learning, and human-computer interaction, we propose a taxonomy characterizing distinct ways in which human and ML-based decision-making can differ. In doing so, we conceptually map potential mechanisms by which combining human and ML decision-making may yield complementary performance, develo** a language for the research community to reason about design of hybrid systems in any decision-making domain. To illustrate how our taxonomy can be used to investigate complementarity, we provide a mathematical aggregation framework to examine enabling conditions for complementarity. Through synthetic simulations, we demonstrate how this framework can be used to explore specific aspects of our taxonomy and shed light on the optimal mechanisms for combining human-ML judgments
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2023; v1 submitted 22 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
To ArXiv or not to ArXiv: A Study Quantifying Pros and Cons of Posting Preprints Online
Authors:
Charvi Rastogi,
Ivan Stelmakh,
Xinwei Shen,
Marina Meila,
Federico Echenique,
Shuchi Chawla,
Nihar B. Shah
Abstract:
Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allow authors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the review process. Independently, some authors of research papers face the dilemma of whether to put their papers on arXiv due to its pros and cons. We conduct a study to substantiate this debate and dilemma via quantitative measurements. Specifically, we conduct…
▽ More
Double-blind conferences have engaged in debates over whether to allow authors to post their papers online on arXiv or elsewhere during the review process. Independently, some authors of research papers face the dilemma of whether to put their papers on arXiv due to its pros and cons. We conduct a study to substantiate this debate and dilemma via quantitative measurements. Specifically, we conducted surveys of reviewers in two top-tier double-blind computer science conferences -- ICML 2021 (5361 submissions and 4699 reviewers) and EC 2021 (498 submissions and 190 reviewers). Our two main findings are as follows. First, more than a third of the reviewers self-report searching online for a paper they are assigned to review. Second, outside the review process, we find that preprints from better-ranked affiliations see a weakly higher visibility, with a correlation of 0.06 in ICML and 0.05 in EC. In particular, papers associated with the top-10-ranked affiliations had a visibility of approximately 11% in ICML and 22% in EC, whereas the remaining papers had a visibility of 7% and 18% respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2022; v1 submitted 31 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Cite-seeing and Reviewing: A Study on Citation Bias in Peer Review
Authors:
Ivan Stelmakh,
Charvi Rastogi,
Ryan Liu,
Shuchi Chawla,
Federico Echenique,
Nihar B. Shah
Abstract:
Citations play an important role in researchers' careers as a key factor in evaluation of scientific impact. Many anecdotes advice authors to exploit this fact and cite prospective reviewers to try obtaining a more positive evaluation for their submission. In this work, we investigate if such a citation bias actually exists: Does the citation of a reviewer's own work in a submission cause them to…
▽ More
Citations play an important role in researchers' careers as a key factor in evaluation of scientific impact. Many anecdotes advice authors to exploit this fact and cite prospective reviewers to try obtaining a more positive evaluation for their submission. In this work, we investigate if such a citation bias actually exists: Does the citation of a reviewer's own work in a submission cause them to be positively biased towards the submission? In conjunction with the review process of two flagship conferences in machine learning and algorithmic economics, we execute an observational study to test for citation bias in peer review. In our analysis, we carefully account for various confounding factors such as paper quality and reviewer expertise, and apply different modeling techniques to alleviate concerns regarding the model mismatch. Overall, our analysis involves 1,314 papers and 1,717 reviewers and detects citation bias in both venues we consider. In terms of the effect size, by citing a reviewer's work, a submission has a non-trivial chance of getting a higher score from the reviewer: an expected increase in the score is approximately 0.23 on a 5-point Likert item. For reference, a one-point increase of a score by a single reviewer improves the position of a submission by 11% on average.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Comparison of Dynamic and Kinematic Model Driven Extended Kalman Filters (EKF) for the Localization of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
Authors:
Sharan Balasubramanian,
Ayush Rajput,
Rodra W. Hascaryo,
Chirag Rastogi,
William R. Norris
Abstract:
Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) and Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) are used for a wide variety of missions related to exploration and scientific research. Successful navigation by these systems requires a good localization system. Kalman filter based localization techniques have been prevalent since the early 1960s and extensive research has been carried out using them, both in developmen…
▽ More
Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) and Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) are used for a wide variety of missions related to exploration and scientific research. Successful navigation by these systems requires a good localization system. Kalman filter based localization techniques have been prevalent since the early 1960s and extensive research has been carried out using them, both in development and in design. It has been found that the use of a dynamic model (instead of a kinematic model) in the Kalman filter can lead to more accurate predictions, as the dynamic model takes the forces acting on the AUV into account. Presented in this paper is a motion-predictive extended Kalman filter (EKF) for AUVs using a simplified dynamic model. The dynamic model is derived first and then it was simplified for a RexROV, a type of submarine vehicle used in simple underwater exploration, inspection of subsea structures, pipelines and shipwrecks. The filter was implemented with a simulated vehicle in an open-source marine vehicle simulator called UUV Simulator and the results were compared with the ground truth. The results show good prediction accuracy for the dynamic filter, though improvements are needed before the EKF can be used on real-time. Some perspective and discussion on practical implementation is presented to show the next steps needed for this concept.
△ Less
Submitted 25 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Routing algorithms as tools for integrating social distancing with emergency evacuation
Authors:
Yi-Lin Tsai,
Chetanya Rastogi,
Peter K. Kitanidis,
Christopher B. Field
Abstract:
One of the lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic is the importance of social distancing, even in challenging circumstances such as pre-hurricane evacuation. To explore the implications of integrating social distancing with evacuation operations, we describe this evacuation process as a Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) and solve it using a DNN (Deep Neural Network)-based solution (Deep Reinf…
▽ More
One of the lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic is the importance of social distancing, even in challenging circumstances such as pre-hurricane evacuation. To explore the implications of integrating social distancing with evacuation operations, we describe this evacuation process as a Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP) and solve it using a DNN (Deep Neural Network)-based solution (Deep Reinforcement Learning) and a non-DNN solution (Sweep Algorithm). A central question is whether Deep Reinforcement Learning provides sufficient extra routing efficiency to accommodate increased social distancing in a time-constrained evacuation operation. We found that, in comparison to the Sweep Algorithm, Deep Reinforcement Learning can provide decision-makers with more efficient routing. However, the evacuation time saved by Deep Reinforcement Learning does not come close to compensating for the extra time required for social distancing, and its advantage disappears as the emergency vehicle capacity approaches the number of people per household.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2021; v1 submitted 4 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
A Large Scale Randomized Controlled Trial on Herding in Peer-Review Discussions
Authors:
Ivan Stelmakh,
Charvi Rastogi,
Nihar B. Shah,
Aarti Singh,
Hal Daumé III
Abstract:
Peer review is the backbone of academia and humans constitute a cornerstone of this process, being responsible for reviewing papers and making the final acceptance/rejection decisions. Given that human decision making is known to be susceptible to various cognitive biases, it is important to understand which (if any) biases are present in the peer-review process and design the pipeline such that t…
▽ More
Peer review is the backbone of academia and humans constitute a cornerstone of this process, being responsible for reviewing papers and making the final acceptance/rejection decisions. Given that human decision making is known to be susceptible to various cognitive biases, it is important to understand which (if any) biases are present in the peer-review process and design the pipeline such that the impact of these biases is minimized. In this work, we focus on the dynamics of between-reviewers discussions and investigate the presence of herding behaviour therein. In that, we aim to understand whether reviewers and more senior decision makers get disproportionately influenced by the first argument presented in the discussion when (in case of reviewers) they form an independent opinion about the paper before discussing it with others. Specifically, in conjunction with the review process of ICML 2020 -- a large, top tier machine learning conference -- we design and execute a randomized controlled trial with the goal of testing for the conditional causal effect of the discussion initiator's opinion on the outcome of a paper.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Deciding Fast and Slow: The Role of Cognitive Biases in AI-assisted Decision-making
Authors:
Charvi Rastogi,
Yunfeng Zhang,
Dennis Wei,
Kush R. Varshney,
Amit Dhurandhar,
Richard Tomsett
Abstract:
Several strands of research have aimed to bridge the gap between artificial intelligence (AI) and human decision-makers in AI-assisted decision-making, where humans are the consumers of AI model predictions and the ultimate decision-makers in high-stakes applications. However, people's perception and understanding are often distorted by their cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, anchoring…
▽ More
Several strands of research have aimed to bridge the gap between artificial intelligence (AI) and human decision-makers in AI-assisted decision-making, where humans are the consumers of AI model predictions and the ultimate decision-makers in high-stakes applications. However, people's perception and understanding are often distorted by their cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias, anchoring bias, availability bias, to name a few. In this work, we use knowledge from the field of cognitive science to account for cognitive biases in the human-AI collaborative decision-making setting, and mitigate their negative effects on collaborative performance. To this end, we mathematically model cognitive biases and provide a general framework through which researchers and practitioners can understand the interplay between cognitive biases and human-AI accuracy. We then focus specifically on anchoring bias, a bias commonly encountered in human-AI collaboration. We implement a time-based de-anchoring strategy and conduct our first user experiment that validates its effectiveness in human-AI collaborative decision-making. With this result, we design a time allocation strategy for a resource-constrained setting that achieves optimal human-AI collaboration under some assumptions. We, then, conduct a second user experiment which shows that our time allocation strategy with explanation can effectively de-anchor the human and improve collaborative performance when the AI model has low confidence and is incorrect.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2022; v1 submitted 15 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Can We Achieve More with Less? Exploring Data Augmentation for Toxic Comment Classification
Authors:
Chetanya Rastogi,
Nikka Mofid,
Fang-I Hsiao
Abstract:
This paper tackles one of the greatest limitations in Machine Learning: Data Scarcity. Specifically, we explore whether high accuracy classifiers can be built from small datasets, utilizing a combination of data augmentation techniques and machine learning algorithms. In this paper, we experiment with Easy Data Augmentation (EDA) and Backtranslation, as well as with three popular learning algorith…
▽ More
This paper tackles one of the greatest limitations in Machine Learning: Data Scarcity. Specifically, we explore whether high accuracy classifiers can be built from small datasets, utilizing a combination of data augmentation techniques and machine learning algorithms. In this paper, we experiment with Easy Data Augmentation (EDA) and Backtranslation, as well as with three popular learning algorithms, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Network (Bi-LSTM). For our experimentation, we utilize the Wikipedia Toxic Comments dataset so that in the process of exploring the benefits of data augmentation, we can develop a model to detect and classify toxic speech in comments to help fight back against cyberbullying and online harassment. Ultimately, we found that data augmentation techniques can be used to significantly boost the performance of classifiers and are an excellent strategy to combat lack of data in NLP problems.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Two-Sample Testing on Ranked Preference Data and the Role of Modeling Assumptions
Authors:
Charvi Rastogi,
Sivaraman Balakrishnan,
Nihar B. Shah,
Aarti Singh
Abstract:
A number of applications require two-sample testing on ranked preference data. For instance, in crowdsourcing, there is a long-standing question of whether pairwise comparison data provided by people is distributed similar to ratings-converted-to-comparisons. Other examples include sports data analysis and peer grading. In this paper, we design two-sample tests for pairwise comparison data and ran…
▽ More
A number of applications require two-sample testing on ranked preference data. For instance, in crowdsourcing, there is a long-standing question of whether pairwise comparison data provided by people is distributed similar to ratings-converted-to-comparisons. Other examples include sports data analysis and peer grading. In this paper, we design two-sample tests for pairwise comparison data and ranking data. For our two-sample test for pairwise comparison data, we establish an upper bound on the sample complexity required to correctly distinguish between the distributions of the two sets of samples. Our test requires essentially no assumptions on the distributions. We then prove complementary lower bounds showing that our results are tight (in the minimax sense) up to constant factors. We investigate the role of modeling assumptions by proving lower bounds for a range of pairwise comparison models (WST, MST,SST, parameter-based such as BTL and Thurstone). We also provide testing algorithms and associated sample complexity bounds for the problem of two-sample testing with partial (or total) ranking data.Furthermore, we empirically evaluate our results via extensive simulations as well as two real-world datasets consisting of pairwise comparisons. By applying our two-sample test on real-world pairwise comparison data, we conclude that ratings and rankings provided by people are indeed distributed differently. On the other hand, our test recognizes no significant difference in the relative performance of European football teams across two seasons. Finally, we apply our two-sample test on a real-world partial and total ranking dataset and find a statistically significant difference in Sushi preferences across demographic divisions based on gender, age and region of residence.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2020; v1 submitted 21 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
A Spectral Approach for the Design of Experiments: Design, Analysis and Algorithms
Authors:
Bhavya Kailkhura,
Jayaraman J. Thiagarajan,
Charvi Rastogi,
Pramod K. Varshney,
Peer-Timo Bremer
Abstract:
This paper proposes a new approach to construct high quality space-filling sample designs. First, we propose a novel technique to quantify the space-filling property and optimally trade-off uniformity and randomness in sample designs in arbitrary dimensions. Second, we connect the proposed metric (defined in the spatial domain) to the objective measure of the design performance (defined in the spe…
▽ More
This paper proposes a new approach to construct high quality space-filling sample designs. First, we propose a novel technique to quantify the space-filling property and optimally trade-off uniformity and randomness in sample designs in arbitrary dimensions. Second, we connect the proposed metric (defined in the spatial domain) to the objective measure of the design performance (defined in the spectral domain). This connection serves as an analytic framework for evaluating the qualitative properties of space-filling designs in general. Using the theoretical insights provided by this spatial-spectral analysis, we derive the notion of optimal space-filling designs, which we refer to as space-filling spectral designs. Third, we propose an efficient estimator to evaluate the space-filling properties of sample designs in arbitrary dimensions and use it to develop an optimization framework to generate high quality space-filling designs. Finally, we carry out a detailed performance comparison on two different applications in 2 to 6 dimensions: a) image reconstruction and b) surrogate modeling on several benchmark optimization functions and an inertial confinement fusion (ICF) simulation code. We demonstrate that the propose spectral designs significantly outperform existing approaches especially in high dimensions.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
-
Mobile Sensing of Two-Dimensional Bandlimited Fields on Random Paths
Authors:
Charvi Rastogi,
Animesh Kumar
Abstract:
Mobile sensing has been recently proposed for sampling spatial fields, where mobile sensors record the field along various paths for reconstruction. Classical and contemporary sampling typically assumes that the sampling locations are approximately known. This work explores multiple sampling strategies along random paths to sample and reconstruct a two dimensional bandlimited field. Extensive simu…
▽ More
Mobile sensing has been recently proposed for sampling spatial fields, where mobile sensors record the field along various paths for reconstruction. Classical and contemporary sampling typically assumes that the sampling locations are approximately known. This work explores multiple sampling strategies along random paths to sample and reconstruct a two dimensional bandlimited field. Extensive simulations are carried out, with insights from sensing matrices and their properties, to evaluate the sampling strategies. Their performance is measured by evaluating the stability of field reconstruction from field samples. The effect of location unawareness on some sampling strategies is also evaluated by simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
