-
Explainable 3D Convolutional Neural Networks by Learning Temporal Transformations
Authors:
Gabriëlle Ras,
Luca Ambrogioni,
Pim Haselager,
Marcel A. J. van Gerven,
Umut Güçlü
Abstract:
In this paper we introduce the temporally factorized 3D convolution (3TConv) as an interpretable alternative to the regular 3D convolution (3DConv). In a 3TConv the 3D convolutional filter is obtained by learning a 2D filter and a set of temporal transformation parameters, resulting in a sparse filter where the 2D slices are sequentially dependent on each other in the temporal dimension. We demons…
▽ More
In this paper we introduce the temporally factorized 3D convolution (3TConv) as an interpretable alternative to the regular 3D convolution (3DConv). In a 3TConv the 3D convolutional filter is obtained by learning a 2D filter and a set of temporal transformation parameters, resulting in a sparse filter where the 2D slices are sequentially dependent on each other in the temporal dimension. We demonstrate that 3TConv learns temporal transformations that afford a direct interpretation. The temporal parameters can be used in combination with various existing 2D visualization methods. We also show that insight about what the model learns can be achieved by analyzing the transformation parameter statistics on a layer and model level. Finally, we implicitly demonstrate that, in popular ConvNets, the 2DConv can be replaced with a 3TConv and that the weights can be transferred to yield pretrained 3TConvs. pretrained 3TConvnets leverage more than a decade of work on traditional 2DConvNets by being able to make use of features that have been proven to deliver excellent results on image classification benchmarks.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Explainable Deep Learning: A Field Guide for the Uninitiated
Authors:
Gabrielle Ras,
Ning Xie,
Marcel van Gerven,
Derek Doran
Abstract:
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become a proven and indispensable machine learning tool. As a black-box model, it remains difficult to diagnose what aspects of the model's input drive the decisions of a DNN. In countless real-world domains, from legislation and law enforcement to healthcare, such diagnosis is essential to ensure that DNN decisions are driven by aspects appropriate in the context…
▽ More
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become a proven and indispensable machine learning tool. As a black-box model, it remains difficult to diagnose what aspects of the model's input drive the decisions of a DNN. In countless real-world domains, from legislation and law enforcement to healthcare, such diagnosis is essential to ensure that DNN decisions are driven by aspects appropriate in the context of its use. The development of methods and studies enabling the explanation of a DNN's decisions has thus blossomed into an active, broad area of research. A practitioner wanting to study explainable deep learning may be intimidated by the plethora of orthogonal directions the field has taken. This complexity is further exacerbated by competing definitions of what it means ``to explain'' the actions of a DNN and to evaluate an approach's ``ability to explain''. This article offers a field guide to explore the space of explainable deep learning aimed at those uninitiated in the field. The field guide: i) Introduces three simple dimensions defining the space of foundational methods that contribute to explainable deep learning, ii) discusses the evaluations for model explanations, iii) places explainability in the context of other related deep learning research areas, and iv) finally elaborates on user-oriented explanation designing and potential future directions on explainable deep learning. We hope the guide is used as an easy-to-digest starting point for those just embarking on research in this field.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2021; v1 submitted 29 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Background Hardly Matters: Understanding Personality Attribution in Deep Residual Networks
Authors:
Gabriëlle Ras,
Ron Dotsch,
Luca Ambrogioni,
Umut Güçlü,
Marcel A. J. van Gerven
Abstract:
Perceived personality traits attributed to an individual do not have to correspond to their actual personality traits and may be determined in part by the context in which one encounters a person. These apparent traits determine, to a large extent, how other people will behave towards them. Deep neural networks are increasingly being used to perform automated personality attribution (e.g., job int…
▽ More
Perceived personality traits attributed to an individual do not have to correspond to their actual personality traits and may be determined in part by the context in which one encounters a person. These apparent traits determine, to a large extent, how other people will behave towards them. Deep neural networks are increasingly being used to perform automated personality attribution (e.g., job interviews). It is important that we understand the driving factors behind the predictions, in humans and in deep neural networks. This paper explicitly studies the effect of the image background on apparent personality prediction while addressing two important confounds present in existing literature; overlap** data splits and including facial information in the background. Surprisingly, we found no evidence that background information improves model predictions for apparent personality traits. In fact, when background is explicitly added to the input, a decrease in performance was measured across all models.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Temporal Factorization of 3D Convolutional Kernels
Authors:
Gabriëlle Ras,
Luca Ambrogioni,
Umut Güçlü,
Marcel A. J. van Gerven
Abstract:
3D convolutional neural networks are difficult to train because they are parameter-expensive and data-hungry. To solve these problems we propose a simple technique for learning 3D convolutional kernels efficiently requiring less training data. We achieve this by factorizing the 3D kernel along the temporal dimension, reducing the number of parameters and making training from data more efficient. A…
▽ More
3D convolutional neural networks are difficult to train because they are parameter-expensive and data-hungry. To solve these problems we propose a simple technique for learning 3D convolutional kernels efficiently requiring less training data. We achieve this by factorizing the 3D kernel along the temporal dimension, reducing the number of parameters and making training from data more efficient. Additionally we introduce a novel dataset called Video-MNIST to demonstrate the performance of our method. Our method significantly outperforms the conventional 3D convolution in the low data regime (1 to 5 videos per class). Finally, our model achieves competitive results in the high data regime (>10 videos per class) using up to 45% fewer parameters.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Explanation Methods in Deep Learning: Users, Values, Concerns and Challenges
Authors:
Gabrielle Ras,
Marcel van Gerven,
Pim Haselager
Abstract:
Issues regarding explainable AI involve four components: users, laws & regulations, explanations and algorithms. Together these components provide a context in which explanation methods can be evaluated regarding their adequacy. The goal of this chapter is to bridge the gap between expert users and lay users. Different kinds of users are identified and their concerns revealed, relevant statements…
▽ More
Issues regarding explainable AI involve four components: users, laws & regulations, explanations and algorithms. Together these components provide a context in which explanation methods can be evaluated regarding their adequacy. The goal of this chapter is to bridge the gap between expert users and lay users. Different kinds of users are identified and their concerns revealed, relevant statements from the General Data Protection Regulation are analyzed in the context of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), a taxonomy for the classification of existing explanation methods is introduced, and finally, the various classes of explanation methods are analyzed to verify if user concerns are justified. Overall, it is clear that (visual) explanations can be given about various aspects of the influence of the input on the output. However, it is noted that explanation methods or interfaces for lay users are missing and we speculate which criteria these methods / interfaces should satisfy. Finally it is noted that two important concerns are difficult to address with explanation methods: the concern about bias in datasets that leads to biased DNNs, as well as the suspicion about unfair outcomes.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2018; v1 submitted 20 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
