-
Breaking the Metric Voting Distortion Barrier
Authors:
Moses Charikar,
Prasanna Ramakrishnan,
Kangning Wang,
Hongxun Wu
Abstract:
We consider the following well studied problem of metric distortion in social choice. Suppose we have an election with $n$ voters and $m$ candidates who lie in a shared metric space. We would like to design a voting rule that chooses a candidate whose average distance to the voters is small. However, instead of having direct access to the distances in the metric space, each voter gives us a ranked…
▽ More
We consider the following well studied problem of metric distortion in social choice. Suppose we have an election with $n$ voters and $m$ candidates who lie in a shared metric space. We would like to design a voting rule that chooses a candidate whose average distance to the voters is small. However, instead of having direct access to the distances in the metric space, each voter gives us a ranked list of the candidates in order of distance. Can we design a rule that regardless of the election instance and underlying metric space, chooses a candidate whose cost differs from the true optimum by only a small factor (known as the distortion)?
A long line of work culminated in finding deterministic voting rules with metric distortion $3$, which is the best possible for deterministic rules and many other classes of voting rules. However, without any restrictions, there is still a significant gap in our understanding: Even though the best lower bound is substantially lower at $2.112$, the best upper bound is still $3$, which is attained even by simple rules such as Random Dictatorship. Finding a rule that guarantees distortion $3 - \varepsilon$ for some constant $\varepsilon $ has been a major challenge in computational social choice.
In this work, we give a rule that guarantees distortion less than $2.753$. To do so we study a handful of voting rules that are new to the problem. One is Maximal Lotteries, a rule based on the Nash equilibrium of a natural zero-sum game which dates back to the 60's. The others are novel rules that can be thought of as hybrids of Random Dictatorship and the Copeland rule. Though none of these rules can beat distortion $3$ alone, a careful randomization between Maximal Lotteries and any of the novel rules can.
△ Less
Submitted 30 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Distortion in metric matching with ordinal preferences
Authors:
Nima Anari,
Moses Charikar,
Prasanna Ramakrishnan
Abstract:
Suppose that we have $n$ agents and $n$ items which lie in a shared metric space. We would like to match the agents to items such that the total distance from agents to their matched items is as small as possible. However, instead of having direct access to distances in the metric, we only have each agent's ranking of the items in order of distance. Given this limited information, what is the mini…
▽ More
Suppose that we have $n$ agents and $n$ items which lie in a shared metric space. We would like to match the agents to items such that the total distance from agents to their matched items is as small as possible. However, instead of having direct access to distances in the metric, we only have each agent's ranking of the items in order of distance. Given this limited information, what is the minimum possible worst-case approximation ratio (known as the distortion) that a matching mechanism can guarantee?
Previous work by Caragiannis et al. proved that the (deterministic) Serial Dictatorship mechanism has distortion at most $2^n - 1$. We improve this by providing a simple deterministic mechanism that has distortion $O(n^2)$. We also provide the first nontrivial lower bound on this problem, showing that any matching mechanism (deterministic or randomized) must have worst-case distortion $Ω(\log n)$.
In addition to these new bounds, we show that a large class of truthful mechanisms derived from Deferred Acceptance all have worst-case distortion at least $2^n - 1$, and we find an intriguing connection between thin matchings (analogous to the well-known thin trees conjecture) and the distortion gap between deterministic and randomized mechanisms.
△ Less
Submitted 20 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Building Flexible, Low-Cost Wireless Access Networks With Magma
Authors:
Shaddi Hasan,
Amar Padmanabhan,
Bruce Davie,
Jennifer Rexford,
Ulas Kozat,
Hunter Gatewood,
Shruti Sanadhya,
Nick Yurchenko,
Tariq Al-Khasib,
Oriol Batalla,
Marie Bremner,
Andrei Lee,
Evgeniy Makeev,
Scott Moeller,
Alex Rodriguez,
Pravin Shelar,
Karthik Subraveti,
Sudarshan Kandi,
Alejandro Xoconostle,
Praveen Kumar Ramakrishnan,
Xiaochen Tian,
Anoop Tomar
Abstract:
Billions of people remain without Internet access due to availability or affordability of service. In this paper, we present Magma, an open and flexible system for building low-cost wireless access networks. Magma aims to connect users where operator economics are difficult due to issues such as low population density or income levels, while preserving features expected in cellular networks such a…
▽ More
Billions of people remain without Internet access due to availability or affordability of service. In this paper, we present Magma, an open and flexible system for building low-cost wireless access networks. Magma aims to connect users where operator economics are difficult due to issues such as low population density or income levels, while preserving features expected in cellular networks such as authentication and billing policies. To achieve this, and in contrast to traditional cellular networks, Magma adopts an approach that extensively leverages Internet design patterns, terminating access network-specific protocols at the edge and abstracting the access network from the core architecture. This decision allows Magma to refactor the wireless core using SDN (software-defined networking) principles and leverage other techniques from modern distributed systems. In doing so, Magma lowers cost and operational complexity for network operators while achieving resilience, scalability, and rich policy support.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
The composition complexity of majority
Authors:
Victor Lecomte,
Prasanna Ramakrishnan,
Li-Yang Tan
Abstract:
We study the complexity of computing majority as a composition of local functions: \[ \text{Maj}_n = h(g_1,\ldots,g_m), \] where each $g_j :\{0,1\}^{n} \to \{0,1\}$ is an arbitrary function that queries only $k \ll n$ variables and $h : \{0,1\}^m \to \{0,1\}$ is an arbitrary combining function. We prove an optimal lower bound of \[ m \ge Ω\left( \frac{n}{k} \log k \right) \] on the number of funct…
▽ More
We study the complexity of computing majority as a composition of local functions: \[ \text{Maj}_n = h(g_1,\ldots,g_m), \] where each $g_j :\{0,1\}^{n} \to \{0,1\}$ is an arbitrary function that queries only $k \ll n$ variables and $h : \{0,1\}^m \to \{0,1\}$ is an arbitrary combining function. We prove an optimal lower bound of \[ m \ge Ω\left( \frac{n}{k} \log k \right) \] on the number of functions needed, which is a factor $Ω(\log k)$ larger than the ideal $m = n/k$. We call this factor the composition overhead; previously, no superconstant lower bounds on it were known for majority.
Our lower bound recovers, as a corollary and via an entirely different proof, the best known lower bound for bounded-width branching programs for majority (Alon and Maass '86, Babai et al. '90). It is also the first step in a plan that we propose for breaking a longstanding barrier in lower bounds for small-depth boolean circuits.
Novel aspects of our proof include sharp bounds on the information lost as computation flows through the inner functions $g_j$, and the bootstrap** of lower bounds for a multi-output function (Hamming weight) into lower bounds for a single-output one (majority).
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2022; v1 submitted 4 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Tradeoffs for small-depth Frege proofs
Authors:
Toniann Pitassi,
Prasanna Ramakrishnan,
Li-Yang Tan
Abstract:
We study the complexity of small-depth Frege proofs and give the first tradeoffs between the size of each line and the number of lines. Existing lower bounds apply to the overall proof size -- the sum of sizes of all lines -- and do not distinguish between these notions of complexity.
For depth-$d$ Frege proofs of the Tseitin principle on the $n \times n$ grid where each line is a size-$s$ formu…
▽ More
We study the complexity of small-depth Frege proofs and give the first tradeoffs between the size of each line and the number of lines. Existing lower bounds apply to the overall proof size -- the sum of sizes of all lines -- and do not distinguish between these notions of complexity.
For depth-$d$ Frege proofs of the Tseitin principle on the $n \times n$ grid where each line is a size-$s$ formula, we prove that $\exp(n/2^{Ω(d\sqrt{\log s})})$ many lines are necessary. This yields new lower bounds on line complexity that are not implied by Håstad's recent $\exp(n^{Ω(1/d)})$ lower bound on the overall proof size. For $s = \mathrm{poly}(n)$, for example, our lower bound remains $\exp(n^{1-o(1)})$ for all $d = o(\sqrt{\log n})$, whereas Håstad's lower bound is $\exp(n^{o(1)})$ once $d = ω_n(1)$.
Our main conceptual contribution is the simple observation that techniques for establishing correlation bounds in circuit complexity can be leveraged to establish such tradeoffs in proof complexity.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2022; v1 submitted 14 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Metric Distortion Bounds for Randomized Social Choice
Authors:
Moses Charikar,
Prasanna Ramakrishnan
Abstract:
Consider the following social choice problem. Suppose we have a set of $n$ voters and $m$ candidates that lie in a metric space. The goal is to design a mechanism to choose a candidate whose average distance to the voters is as small as possible. However, the mechanism does not get direct access to the metric space. Instead, it gets each voter's ordinal ranking of the candidates by distance. Given…
▽ More
Consider the following social choice problem. Suppose we have a set of $n$ voters and $m$ candidates that lie in a metric space. The goal is to design a mechanism to choose a candidate whose average distance to the voters is as small as possible. However, the mechanism does not get direct access to the metric space. Instead, it gets each voter's ordinal ranking of the candidates by distance. Given only this partial information, what is the smallest worst-case approximation ratio (known as the distortion) that a mechanism can guarantee?
A simple example shows that no deterministic mechanism can guarantee distortion better than $3$, and no randomized mechanism can guarantee distortion better than $2$. It has been conjectured that both of these lower bounds are optimal, and recently, Gkatzelis, Halpern, and Shah proved this conjecture for deterministic mechanisms. We disprove the conjecture for randomized mechanisms for $m \geq 3$ by constructing elections for which no randomized mechanism can guarantee distortion better than $2.0261$ for $m = 3$, $2.0496$ for $m = 4$, up to $2.1126$ as $m \to \infty$. We obtain our lower bounds by identifying a class of simple metrics that appear to capture much of the hardness of the problem, and we show that any randomized mechanism must have high distortion on one of these metrics. We provide a nearly matching upper bound for this restricted class of metrics as well. Finally, we conjecture that these bounds give the optimal distortion for every $m$, and provide a proof for $m = 3$, thereby resolving that case.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
On taking advantage of multiple requests in error correcting codes
Authors:
Prasanna Ramakrishnan,
Mary Wootters
Abstract:
In most notions of locality in error correcting codes -- notably locally recoverable codes (LRCs) and locally decodable codes (LDCs) -- a decoder seeks to learn a single symbol of a message while looking at only a few symbols of the corresponding codeword. However, suppose that one wants to recover r > 1 symbols of the message. The two extremes are repeating the single-query algorithm r times (thi…
▽ More
In most notions of locality in error correcting codes -- notably locally recoverable codes (LRCs) and locally decodable codes (LDCs) -- a decoder seeks to learn a single symbol of a message while looking at only a few symbols of the corresponding codeword. However, suppose that one wants to recover r > 1 symbols of the message. The two extremes are repeating the single-query algorithm r times (this is the intuition behind LRCs with availability, primitive multiset batch codes, and PIR codes) or simply running a global decoding algorithm to recover the whole thing. In this paper, we investigate what can happen in between these two extremes: at what value of r does repetition stop being a good idea? In order to begin to study this question we introduce robust batch codes, which seek to find r symbols of the message using m queries to the codeword, in the presence of erasures. We focus on the case where r = m, which can be seen as a generalization of the MDS property. Surprisingly, we show that for this notion of locality, repetition is optimal even up to very large values of $r = Ω(k)$.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
