Showing 1–20 of 20 results for author: Rajagopal, D

Confidence Calibration and Rationalization for LLMs via Multi-Agent Deliberation

Authors: Ruixin Yang, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Bin Hu, Dongyeop Kang

Abstract: Uncertainty estimation is a significant issue for current large language models (LLMs) that are generally poorly calibrated and over-confident, especially with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Unlike humans, whose decisions and confidences not only stem from intrinsic beliefs but can also be adjusted through daily observations, existing calibration methods for LLMs focus on estim… ▽ More Uncertainty estimation is a significant issue for current large language models (LLMs) that are generally poorly calibrated and over-confident, especially with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Unlike humans, whose decisions and confidences not only stem from intrinsic beliefs but can also be adjusted through daily observations, existing calibration methods for LLMs focus on estimating or eliciting individual confidence without taking full advantage of the "Collective Wisdom": the interaction among multiple LLMs that can collectively improve both accuracy and calibration. In this work, we propose Collaborative Calibration, a post-hoc training-free calibration strategy that leverages the collaborative and expressive capabilities of multiple tool-augmented LLM agents in a simulated group deliberation process. We demonstrate the effectiveness of Collaborative Calibration on generative QA tasks across various domains, showing its potential in harnessing the rationalization of collectively calibrated confidence assessments and improving the reliability of model predictions. △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2024; v1 submitted 13 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: Accepted at ICLR 2024 Workshop on Reliable and Responsible Foundation Models

How Far Can We Extract Diverse Perspectives from Large Language Models?

Authors: Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Minhwa Lee, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Dongyeop Kang

Abstract: Collecting diverse human opinions is costly and challenging. This leads to a recent trend in collaborative efforts between humans and Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating diverse data, offering potential scalable and efficient solutions. However, the extent of LLMs' capability to generate diverse perspectives on subjective topics remains an unexplored question. In this study, we investigate… ▽ More Collecting diverse human opinions is costly and challenging. This leads to a recent trend in collaborative efforts between humans and Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating diverse data, offering potential scalable and efficient solutions. However, the extent of LLMs' capability to generate diverse perspectives on subjective topics remains an unexplored question. In this study, we investigate LLMs' capacity for generating diverse perspectives and rationales on subjective topics, such as social norms and argumentative texts. We formulate a new problem of maximum diversity extraction from LLMs. Motivated by how humans develop their opinions through their values, we propose a criteria-based prompting technique to ground diverse opinions. To see how far we can extract diverse perspectives from LLMs, or called diversity coverage, we employ a step-by-step recall prompting for generating more outputs from the model in an iterative manner. As we apply our methods to various tasks, indeed we find that LLMs can generate diverse opinions according to the degree of task subjectivity △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2024; v1 submitted 16 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language Models

Authors: Pranjal Aggarwal, Aman Madaan, Ankit Anand, Srividya Pranavi Potharaju, Swaroop Mishra, Pei Zhou, Aditya Gupta, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Karthik Kappaganthu, Yiming Yang, Shyam Upadhyay, Manaal Faruqui, Mausam

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are now available from cloud API providers in various sizes and configurations. While this diversity offers a broad spectrum of choices, effectively leveraging the options to optimize computational cost and performance remains challenging. In this work, we present Automix, an approach that strategically routes queries to larger LMs, based on the approximate correctness… ▽ More Large language models (LLMs) are now available from cloud API providers in various sizes and configurations. While this diversity offers a broad spectrum of choices, effectively leveraging the options to optimize computational cost and performance remains challenging. In this work, we present Automix, an approach that strategically routes queries to larger LMs, based on the approximate correctness of outputs from a smaller LM. Central to Automix are two key technical contributions. First, it has a few-shot self-verification mechanism, which estimates the reliability of its own outputs without requiring extensive training. Second, given that self-verification can be noisy, it employs a POMDP based router that can effectively select an appropriately sized model, based on answer confidence. Experiments across five language models and five challenging datasets show that Automix consistently surpasses strong baselines, reducing computational cost by over 50% for comparable performance. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2024; v1 submitted 19 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: The first two authors contributed equally. Work started and partly done during Aman's internship at Google. This version adds results on additional models and datasets

StyLEx: Explaining Style Using Human Lexical Annotations

Authors: Shirley Anugrah Hayati, Kyumin Park, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Lyle Ungar, Dongyeop Kang

Abstract: Large pre-trained language models have achieved impressive results on various style classification tasks, but they often learn spurious domain-specific words to make predictions (Hayati et al., 2021). While human explanation highlights stylistic tokens as important features for this task, we observe that model explanations often do not align with them. To tackle this issue, we introduce StyLEx, a… ▽ More Large pre-trained language models have achieved impressive results on various style classification tasks, but they often learn spurious domain-specific words to make predictions (Hayati et al., 2021). While human explanation highlights stylistic tokens as important features for this task, we observe that model explanations often do not align with them. To tackle this issue, we introduce StyLEx, a model that learns from human-annotated explanations of stylistic features and jointly learns to perform the task and predict these features as model explanations. Our experiments show that StyLEx can provide human-like stylistic lexical explanations without sacrificing the performance of sentence-level style prediction on both in-domain and out-of-domain datasets. Explanations from StyLEx show significant improvements in explanation metrics (sufficiency, plausibility) and when evaluated with human annotations. They are also more understandable by human judges compared to the widely-used saliency-based explanation baseline. △ Less

Submitted 14 April, 2023; v1 submitted 13 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

Comments: EACL 2023

Conditional set generation using Seq2seq models

Authors: Aman Madaan, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Niket Tandon, Yiming Yang, Antoine Bosselut

Abstract: Conditional set generation learns a map** from an input sequence of tokens to a set. Several NLP tasks, such as entity ty** and dialogue emotion tagging, are instances of set generation. Seq2Seq models, a popular choice for set generation, treat a set as a sequence and do not fully leverage its key properties, namely order-invariance and cardinality. We propose a novel algorithm for effectivel… ▽ More Conditional set generation learns a map** from an input sequence of tokens to a set. Several NLP tasks, such as entity ty** and dialogue emotion tagging, are instances of set generation. Seq2Seq models, a popular choice for set generation, treat a set as a sequence and do not fully leverage its key properties, namely order-invariance and cardinality. We propose a novel algorithm for effectively sampling informative orders over the combinatorial space of label orders. We jointly model the set cardinality and output by prepending the set size and taking advantage of the autoregressive factorization used by Seq2Seq models. Our method is a model-independent data augmentation approach that endows any Seq2Seq model with the signals of order-invariance and cardinality. Training a Seq2Seq model on this augmented data (without any additional annotations) gets an average relative improvement of 20% on four benchmark datasets across various models: BART, T5, and GPT-3. Code to use SETAUG available at: https://setgen.structgen.com. △ Less

Submitted 24 October, 2022; v1 submitted 25 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: EMNLP 2022

Counterfactual Data Augmentation improves Factuality of Abstractive Summarization

Authors: Dheeraj Rajagopal, Siamak Shakeri, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Eduard Hovy, Chung-Ching Chang

Abstract: Abstractive summarization systems based on pretrained language models often generate coherent but factually inconsistent sentences. In this paper, we present a counterfactual data augmentation approach where we augment data with perturbed summaries that increase the training data diversity. Specifically, we present three augmentation approaches based on replacing (i) entities from other and the sa… ▽ More Abstractive summarization systems based on pretrained language models often generate coherent but factually inconsistent sentences. In this paper, we present a counterfactual data augmentation approach where we augment data with perturbed summaries that increase the training data diversity. Specifically, we present three augmentation approaches based on replacing (i) entities from other and the same category and (ii) nouns with their corresponding WordNet hypernyms. We show that augmenting the training data with our approach improves the factual correctness of summaries without significantly affecting the ROUGE score. We show that in two commonly used summarization datasets (CNN/Dailymail and XSum), we improve the factual correctness by about 2.5 points on average △ Less

Submitted 24 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Template Filling for Controllable Commonsense Reasoning

Authors: Dheeraj Rajagopal, Vivek Khetan, Bogdan Sacaleanu, Anatole Gershman, Andrew Fano, Eduard Hovy

Abstract: Large-scale sequence-to-sequence models have shown to be adept at both multiple-choice and open-domain commonsense reasoning tasks. However, the current systems do not provide the ability to control the various attributes of the reasoning chain. To enable better controllability, we propose to study the commonsense reasoning as a template filling task (TemplateCSR) -- where the language models fill… ▽ More Large-scale sequence-to-sequence models have shown to be adept at both multiple-choice and open-domain commonsense reasoning tasks. However, the current systems do not provide the ability to control the various attributes of the reasoning chain. To enable better controllability, we propose to study the commonsense reasoning as a template filling task (TemplateCSR) -- where the language models fills reasoning templates with the given constraints as control factors. As an approach to TemplateCSR, we (i) propose a dataset of commonsense reasoning template-expansion pairs and (ii) introduce POTTER, a pretrained sequence-to-sequence model using prompts to perform commonsense reasoning across concepts. Our experiments show that our approach outperforms baselines both in generation metrics and factuality metrics. We also present a detailed error analysis on our approach's ability to reliably perform commonsense reasoning. △ Less

Submitted 13 October, 2022; v1 submitted 31 October, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Think about it! Improving defeasible reasoning by first modeling the question scenario

Authors: Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Peter Clark, Yiming Yang, Eduard Hovy

Abstract: Defeasible reasoning is the mode of reasoning where conclusions can be overturned by taking into account new evidence. Existing cognitive science literature on defeasible reasoning suggests that a person forms a mental model of the problem scenario before answering questions. Our research goal asks whether neural models can similarly benefit from envisioning the question scenario before answering… ▽ More Defeasible reasoning is the mode of reasoning where conclusions can be overturned by taking into account new evidence. Existing cognitive science literature on defeasible reasoning suggests that a person forms a mental model of the problem scenario before answering questions. Our research goal asks whether neural models can similarly benefit from envisioning the question scenario before answering a defeasible query. Our approach is, given a question, to have a model first create a graph of relevant influences, and then leverage that graph as an additional input when answering the question. Our system, CURIOUS, achieves a new state-of-the-art on three different defeasible reasoning datasets. This result is significant as it illustrates that performance can be improved by guiding a system to "think about" a question and explicitly model the scenario, rather than answering reflexively. Code, data, and pre-trained models are located at https://github.com/madaan/thinkaboutit. △ Less

Submitted 24 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: EMNLP 2021

First-Generation Inference Accelerator Deployment at Facebook

Authors: Michael Anderson, Benny Chen, Stephen Chen, Summer Deng, Jordan Fix, Michael Gschwind, Aravind Kalaiah, Changkyu Kim, Jaewon Lee, Jason Liang, Haixin Liu, Yinghai Lu, Jack Montgomery, Arun Moorthy, Satish Nadathur, Sam Naghshineh, Avinash Nayak, Jongsoo Park, Chris Petersen, Martin Schatz, Narayanan Sundaram, Bangsheng Tang, Peter Tang, Amy Yang, Jiecao Yu , et al. (90 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: In this paper, we provide a deep dive into the deployment of inference accelerators at Facebook. Many of our ML workloads have unique characteristics, such as sparse memory accesses, large model sizes, as well as high compute, memory and network bandwidth requirements. We co-designed a high-performance, energy-efficient inference accelerator platform based on these requirements. We describe the in… ▽ More In this paper, we provide a deep dive into the deployment of inference accelerators at Facebook. Many of our ML workloads have unique characteristics, such as sparse memory accesses, large model sizes, as well as high compute, memory and network bandwidth requirements. We co-designed a high-performance, energy-efficient inference accelerator platform based on these requirements. We describe the inference accelerator platform ecosystem we developed and deployed at Facebook: both hardware, through Open Compute Platform (OCP), and software framework and tooling, through Pytorch/Caffe2/Glow. A characteristic of this ecosystem from the start is its openness to enable a variety of AI accelerators from different vendors. This platform, with six low-power accelerator cards alongside a single-socket host CPU, allows us to serve models of high complexity that cannot be easily or efficiently run on CPUs. We describe various performance optimizations, at both platform and accelerator level, which enables this platform to serve production traffic at Facebook. We also share deployment challenges, lessons learned during performance optimization, as well as provide guidance for future inference hardware co-design. △ Less

Submitted 4 August, 2021; v1 submitted 8 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Could you give me a hint? Generating inference graphs for defeasible reasoning

Authors: Aman Madaan, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Niket Tandon, Yiming Yang, Eduard Hovy

Abstract: Defeasible reasoning is the mode of reasoning where conclusions can be overturned by taking into account new evidence. A commonly used method in cognitive science and logic literature is to handcraft argumentation supporting inference graphs. While humans find inference graphs very useful for reasoning, constructing them at scale is difficult. In this paper, we automatically generate such inferenc… ▽ More Defeasible reasoning is the mode of reasoning where conclusions can be overturned by taking into account new evidence. A commonly used method in cognitive science and logic literature is to handcraft argumentation supporting inference graphs. While humans find inference graphs very useful for reasoning, constructing them at scale is difficult. In this paper, we automatically generate such inference graphs through transfer learning from another NLP task that shares the kind of reasoning that inference graphs support. Through automated metrics and human evaluation, we find that our method generates meaningful graphs for the defeasible inference task. Human accuracy on this task improves by 20% by consulting the generated graphs. Our findings open up exciting new research avenues for cases where machine reasoning can help human reasoning. (A dataset of 230,000 influence graphs for each defeasible query is located at: https://tinyurl.com/defeasiblegraphs.) △ Less

Submitted 28 May, 2021; v1 submitted 12 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2021

Improving Neural Model Performance through Natural Language Feedback on Their Explanations

Authors: Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Yiming Yang, Peter Clark, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Ed Hovy

Abstract: A class of explainable NLP models for reasoning tasks support their decisions by generating free-form or structured explanations, but what happens when these supporting structures contain errors? Our goal is to allow users to interactively correct explanation structures through natural language feedback. We introduce MERCURIE - an interactive system that refines its explanations for a given reason… ▽ More A class of explainable NLP models for reasoning tasks support their decisions by generating free-form or structured explanations, but what happens when these supporting structures contain errors? Our goal is to allow users to interactively correct explanation structures through natural language feedback. We introduce MERCURIE - an interactive system that refines its explanations for a given reasoning task by getting human feedback in natural language. Our approach generates graphs that have 40% fewer inconsistencies as compared with the off-the-shelf system. Further, simply appending the corrected explanation structures to the output leads to a gain of 1.2 points on accuracy on defeasible reasoning across all three domains. We release a dataset of over 450k graphs for defeasible reasoning generated by our system at https://tinyurl.com/mercurie . △ Less

Submitted 18 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

CURIE: An Iterative Querying Approach for Reasoning About Situations

Authors: Dheeraj Rajagopal, Aman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Yiming Yang, Shrimai Prabhumoye, Abhilasha Ravichander, Peter Clark, Eduard Hovy

Abstract: Recently, models have been shown to predict the effects of unexpected situations, e.g., would cloudy skies help or hinder plant growth? Given a context, the goal of such situational reasoning is to elicit the consequences of a new situation (st) that arises in that context. We propose a method to iteratively build a graph of relevant consequences explicitly in a structured situational graph (st-gr… ▽ More Recently, models have been shown to predict the effects of unexpected situations, e.g., would cloudy skies help or hinder plant growth? Given a context, the goal of such situational reasoning is to elicit the consequences of a new situation (st) that arises in that context. We propose a method to iteratively build a graph of relevant consequences explicitly in a structured situational graph (st-graph) using natural language queries over a finetuned language model (M). Across multiple domains, CURIE generates st-graphs that humans find relevant and meaningful in eliciting the consequences of a new situation. We show that st-graphs generated by CURIE improve a situational reasoning end task (WIQA-QA) by 3 points on accuracy by simply augmenting their input with our generated situational graphs, especially for a hard subset that requires background knowledge and multi-hop reasoning. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2021; v1 submitted 1 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

Comments: This paper builds upon EIGEN (arXiv:2010.11764) and proposes a general framework for situational reasoning

SelfExplain: A Self-Explaining Architecture for Neural Text Classifiers

Authors: Dheeraj Rajagopal, Vidhisha Balachandran, Eduard Hovy, Yulia Tsvetkov

Abstract: We introduce SelfExplain, a novel self-explaining model that explains a text classifier's predictions using phrase-based concepts. SelfExplain augments existing neural classifiers by adding (1) a globally interpretable layer that identifies the most influential concepts in the training set for a given sample and (2) a locally interpretable layer that quantifies the contribution of each local input… ▽ More We introduce SelfExplain, a novel self-explaining model that explains a text classifier's predictions using phrase-based concepts. SelfExplain augments existing neural classifiers by adding (1) a globally interpretable layer that identifies the most influential concepts in the training set for a given sample and (2) a locally interpretable layer that quantifies the contribution of each local input concept by computing a relevance score relative to the predicted label. Experiments across five text-classification datasets show that SelfExplain facilitates interpretability without sacrificing performance. Most importantly, explanations from SelfExplain show sufficiency for model predictions and are perceived as adequate, trustworthy and understandable by human judges compared to existing widely-used baselines. △ Less

Submitted 7 September, 2021; v1 submitted 22 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

A Dataset for Tracking Entities in Open Domain Procedural Text

Authors: Niket Tandon, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Peter Clark, Michal Guerquin, Kyle Richardson, Eduard Hovy

Abstract: We present the first dataset for tracking state changes in procedural text from arbitrary domains by using an unrestricted (open) vocabulary. For example, in a text describing fog removal using potatoes, a car window may transition between being foggy, sticky,opaque, and clear. Previous formulations of this task provide the text and entities involved,and ask how those entities change for just a sm… ▽ More We present the first dataset for tracking state changes in procedural text from arbitrary domains by using an unrestricted (open) vocabulary. For example, in a text describing fog removal using potatoes, a car window may transition between being foggy, sticky,opaque, and clear. Previous formulations of this task provide the text and entities involved,and ask how those entities change for just a small, pre-defined set of attributes (e.g., location), limiting their fidelity. Our solution is a new task formulation where given just a procedural text as input, the task is to generate a set of state change tuples(entity, at-tribute, before-state, after-state)for each step,where the entity, attribute, and state values must be predicted from an open vocabulary. Using crowdsourcing, we create OPENPI1, a high-quality (91.5% coverage as judged by humans and completely vetted), and large-scale dataset comprising 29,928 state changes over 4,050 sentences from 810 procedural real-world paragraphs from WikiHow.com. A current state-of-the-art generation model on this task achieves 16.1% F1 based on BLEU metric, leaving enough room for novel model architectures. △ Less

Submitted 30 October, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: To appear in EMNLP 2020

EIGEN: Event Influence GENeration using Pre-trained Language Models

Authors: Aman Madaan, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Yiming Yang, Abhilasha Ravichander, Eduard Hovy, Shrimai Prabhumoye

Abstract: Reasoning about events and tracking their influences is fundamental to understanding processes. In this paper, we present EIGEN - a method to leverage pre-trained language models to generate event influences conditioned on a context, nature of their influence, and the distance in a reasoning chain. We also derive a new dataset for research and evaluation of methods for event influence generation.… ▽ More Reasoning about events and tracking their influences is fundamental to understanding processes. In this paper, we present EIGEN - a method to leverage pre-trained language models to generate event influences conditioned on a context, nature of their influence, and the distance in a reasoning chain. We also derive a new dataset for research and evaluation of methods for event influence generation. EIGEN outperforms strong baselines both in terms of automated evaluation metrics (by 10 ROUGE points) and human judgments on closeness to reference and relevance of generations. Furthermore, we show that the event influences generated by EIGEN improve the performance on a "what-if" Question Answering (WIQA) benchmark (over 3% F1), especially for questions that require background knowledge and multi-hop reasoning. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

What-if I ask you to explain: Explaining the effects of perturbations in procedural text

Authors: Dheeraj Rajagopal, Niket Tandon, Bhavana Dalvi, Peter Clark, Eduard Hovy

Abstract: We address the task of explaining the effects of perturbations in procedural text, an important test of process comprehension. Consider a passage describing a rabbit's life-cycle: humans can easily explain the effect on the rabbit population if a female rabbit becomes ill -- i.e., the female rabbit would not become pregnant, and as a result not have babies leading to a decrease in rabbit populatio… ▽ More We address the task of explaining the effects of perturbations in procedural text, an important test of process comprehension. Consider a passage describing a rabbit's life-cycle: humans can easily explain the effect on the rabbit population if a female rabbit becomes ill -- i.e., the female rabbit would not become pregnant, and as a result not have babies leading to a decrease in rabbit population. We present QUARTET, a system that constructs such explanations from paragraphs, by modeling the explanation task as a multitask learning problem. QUARTET provides better explanations (based on the sentences in the procedural text) compared to several strong baselines on a recent process comprehension benchmark. We also present a surprising secondary effect: our model also achieves a new SOTA with a 7% absolute F1 improvement on a downstream QA task. This illustrates that good explanations do not have to come at the expense of end task performance. △ Less

Submitted 7 October, 2020; v1 submitted 4 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

StructSum: Summarization via Structured Representations

Authors: Vidhisha Balachandran, Artidoro Pagnoni, Jay Yoon Lee, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Jaime Carbonell, Yulia Tsvetkov

Abstract: Abstractive text summarization aims at compressing the information of a long source document into a rephrased, condensed summary. Despite advances in modeling techniques, abstractive summarization models still suffer from several key challenges: (i) layout bias: they overfit to the style of training corpora; (ii) limited abstractiveness: they are optimized to copying n-grams from the source rather… ▽ More Abstractive text summarization aims at compressing the information of a long source document into a rephrased, condensed summary. Despite advances in modeling techniques, abstractive summarization models still suffer from several key challenges: (i) layout bias: they overfit to the style of training corpora; (ii) limited abstractiveness: they are optimized to copying n-grams from the source rather than generating novel abstractive summaries; (iii) lack of transparency: they are not interpretable. In this work, we propose a framework based on document-level structure induction for summarization to address these challenges. To this end, we propose incorporating latent and explicit dependencies across sentences in the source document into end-to-end single-document summarization models. Our framework complements standard encoder-decoder summarization models by augmenting them with rich structure-aware document representations based on implicitly learned (latent) structures and externally-derived linguistic (explicit) structures. We show that our summarization framework, trained on the CNN/DM dataset, improves the coverage of content in the source documents, generates more abstractive summaries by generating more novel n-grams, and incorporates interpretable sentence-level structures, while performing on par with standard baselines. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2021; v1 submitted 1 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Simple and Effective Semi-Supervised Question Answering

Authors: Bhuwan Dhingra, Danish Pruthi, Dheeraj Rajagopal

Abstract: Recent success of deep learning models for the task of extractive Question Answering (QA) is hinged on the availability of large annotated corpora. However, large domain specific annotated corpora are limited and expensive to construct. In this work, we envision a system where the end user specifies a set of base documents and only a few labelled examples. Our system exploits the document structur… ▽ More Recent success of deep learning models for the task of extractive Question Answering (QA) is hinged on the availability of large annotated corpora. However, large domain specific annotated corpora are limited and expensive to construct. In this work, we envision a system where the end user specifies a set of base documents and only a few labelled examples. Our system exploits the document structure to create cloze-style questions from these base documents; pre-trains a powerful neural network on the cloze style questions; and further fine-tunes the model on the labeled examples. We evaluate our proposed system across three diverse datasets from different domains, and find it to be highly effective with very little labeled data. We attain more than 50% F1 score on SQuAD and TriviaQA with less than a thousand labelled examples. We are also releasing a set of 3.2M cloze-style questions for practitioners to use while building QA systems. △ Less

Submitted 2 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: Short paper, NAACL 2018

Gated-Attention Architectures for Task-Oriented Language Grounding

Authors: Devendra Singh Chaplot, Kanthashree Mysore Sathyendra, Rama Kumar Pasumarthi, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Ruslan Salakhutdinov

Abstract: To perform tasks specified by natural language instructions, autonomous agents need to extract semantically meaningful representations of language and map it to visual elements and actions in the environment. This problem is called task-oriented language grounding. We propose an end-to-end trainable neural architecture for task-oriented language grounding in 3D environments which assumes no prior… ▽ More To perform tasks specified by natural language instructions, autonomous agents need to extract semantically meaningful representations of language and map it to visual elements and actions in the environment. This problem is called task-oriented language grounding. We propose an end-to-end trainable neural architecture for task-oriented language grounding in 3D environments which assumes no prior linguistic or perceptual knowledge and requires only raw pixels from the environment and the natural language instruction as input. The proposed model combines the image and text representations using a Gated-Attention mechanism and learns a policy to execute the natural language instruction using standard reinforcement and imitation learning methods. We show the effectiveness of the proposed model on unseen instructions as well as unseen maps, both quantitatively and qualitatively. We also introduce a novel environment based on a 3D game engine to simulate the challenges of task-oriented language grounding over a rich set of instructions and environment states. △ Less

Submitted 8 January, 2018; v1 submitted 22 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Comments: To appear in AAAI-18

Customer Data Clustering using Data Mining Technique

Authors: Dr. Sankar Rajagopal

Abstract: Classification and patterns extraction from customer data is very important for business support and decision making. Timely identification of newly emerging trends is very important in business process. Large companies are having huge volume of data but starving for knowledge. To overcome the organization current issue, the new breed of technique is required that has intelligence and capability t… ▽ More Classification and patterns extraction from customer data is very important for business support and decision making. Timely identification of newly emerging trends is very important in business process. Large companies are having huge volume of data but starving for knowledge. To overcome the organization current issue, the new breed of technique is required that has intelligence and capability to solve the knowledge scarcity and the technique is called Data mining. The objectives of this paper are to identify the high-profit, high-value and low-risk customers by one of the data mining technique - customer clustering. In the first phase, cleansing the data and developed the patterns via demographic clustering algorithm using IBM I-Miner. In the second phase, profiling the data, develop the clusters and identify the high-value low-risk customers. This cluster typically represents the 10-20 percent of customers which yields 80% of the revenue. △ Less

Submitted 9 December, 2011; originally announced December 2011.

Comments: 11 pages, 2 figures and 1 table

Journal ref: International Journal of Database Management Systems ( IJDMS ) Vol.3, No.4, November 2011