-
Web Links Prediction And Category-Wise Recommendation Based On Browser History
Authors:
Ashadullah Shawon,
Syed Tauhid Zuhori,
Firoz Mahmud,
Md. Jamil-Ur Rahman
Abstract:
A web browser should not be only for browsing web pages but also help users to find out their target websites and recommend similar type websites based on their behavior. Throughout this paper, we propose two methods to make a web browser more intelligent about link prediction which works during ty** on address-bar and recommendation of websites according to several categories. Our proposed link…
▽ More
A web browser should not be only for browsing web pages but also help users to find out their target websites and recommend similar type websites based on their behavior. Throughout this paper, we propose two methods to make a web browser more intelligent about link prediction which works during ty** on address-bar and recommendation of websites according to several categories. Our proposed link prediction system is actually frecency prediction which is predicted based on the first visit, last visit and URL counts. But recommend system is the most challenging as it is needed to classify web URLs according to names without visiting web pages. So we use existing model for URL classification. The only existing approach gives unsatisfactory results and low accuracy. So we add hyperparameter optimization with an existing approach that finds the best parameters for existing URL classification model and gives better accuracy. In this paper, we propose a category wise recommendation system using frecency value and the total visit of individual URL category.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Corrigendum to "Is the expertise of evaluation panels congruent with the research interests of the research groups: a quantitative approach based on barycenters" [Journal of Informetrics 9(4) (2015) 704-721]
Authors:
A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman,
Raf Guns,
Ronald Rousseaub,
Tim C. E. Engels
Abstract:
In Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels (2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was based on what we called barycenters in N dimensions. This note corrects this terminology and introduces the more adequate term 'similarity-adapted publication vectors'.
In Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels (2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was based on what we called barycenters in N dimensions. This note corrects this terminology and introduces the more adequate term 'similarity-adapted publication vectors'.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
Measuring the match between evaluators and evaluees: Cognitive distances between panel members and research groups at the journal level
Authors:
A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman,
Raf Guns,
Loet Leydesdorff,
Tim C. E. Engels
Abstract:
When research groups are evaluated by an expert panel, it is an open question how one can determine the match between panel and research groups. In this paper, we outline two quantitative approaches that determine the cognitive distance between evaluators and evaluees, based on the journals they have published in. We use example data from four research evaluations carried out between 2009 and 2014…
▽ More
When research groups are evaluated by an expert panel, it is an open question how one can determine the match between panel and research groups. In this paper, we outline two quantitative approaches that determine the cognitive distance between evaluators and evaluees, based on the journals they have published in. We use example data from four research evaluations carried out between 2009 and 2014 at the University of Antwerp.
While the barycenter approach is based on a journal map, the similarity-adapted publication vector (SAPV) approach is based on the full journal similarity matrix. Both approaches determine an entity's profile based on the journals in which it has published. Subsequently, we determine the Euclidean distance between the barycenter or SAPV profiles of two entities as an indicator of the cognitive distance between them. Using a bootstrap** approach, we determine confidence intervals for these distances. As such, the present article constitutes a refinement of a previous proposal that operates on the level of Web of Science subject categories.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
A note and a correction on measuring cognitive distance in multiple dimensions
Authors:
Ronald Rousseau,
A. I. M. Jakaria Rahman,
Raf Guns,
Tim C. E. Engels
Abstract:
In a previous article (Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels, 2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was based on what we called barycenters in N dimensions. The present note corrects this terminology and introduces the more adequate term 'similarity-adapted publication vectors'. Furthermore, we correct an error in normaliz…
▽ More
In a previous article (Rahman, Guns, Rousseau, and Engels, 2015) we described several approaches to determine the cognitive distance between two units. One of these approaches was based on what we called barycenters in N dimensions. The present note corrects this terminology and introduces the more adequate term 'similarity-adapted publication vectors'. Furthermore, we correct an error in normalization and explain the importance of scale invariance in determining cognitive distance. We also consider weighted cosine similarity as an alternative approach to determine cognitive (dis)similarity. Overall, we find that the three approaches (distance between barycenters, distance between similarity-adapted publication vectors, and weighted cosine similarity) yield very similar results.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2016; v1 submitted 16 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
