-
Explaining machine learning models for age classification in human gait analysis
Authors:
Djordje Slijepcevic,
Fabian Horst,
Marvin Simak,
Sebastian Lapuschkin,
Anna-Maria Raberger,
Wojciech Samek,
Christian Breiteneder,
Wolfgang I. Schöllhorn,
Matthias Zeppelzauer,
Brian Horsak
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) models have proven effective in classifying gait analysis data, e.g., binary classification of young vs. older adults. ML models, however, lack in providing human understandable explanations for their predictions. This "black-box" behavior impedes the understanding of which input features the model predictions are based on. We investigated an Explainable Artificial Intelligen…
▽ More
Machine learning (ML) models have proven effective in classifying gait analysis data, e.g., binary classification of young vs. older adults. ML models, however, lack in providing human understandable explanations for their predictions. This "black-box" behavior impedes the understanding of which input features the model predictions are based on. We investigated an Explainable Artificial Intelligence method, i.e., Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), for gait analysis data. The research question was: Which input features are used by ML models to classify age-related differences in walking patterns? We utilized a subset of the AIST Gait Database 2019 containing five bilateral ground reaction force (GRF) recordings per person during barefoot walking of healthy participants. Each input signal was min-max normalized before concatenation and fed into a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Participants were divided into three age groups: young (20-39 years), middle-aged (40-64 years), and older (65-79 years) adults. The classification accuracy and relevance scores (derived using LRP) were averaged over a stratified ten-fold cross-validation. The mean classification accuracy of 60.1% was clearly higher than the zero-rule baseline of 37.3%. The confusion matrix shows that the CNN distinguished younger and older adults well, but had difficulty modeling the middle-aged adults.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Explaining automated gender classification of human gait
Authors:
Fabian Horst,
Djordje Slijepcevic,
Matthias Zeppelzauer,
Anna-Maria Raberger,
Sebastian Lapuschkin,
Wojciech Samek,
Wolfgang I. Schöllhorn,
Christian Breiteneder,
Brian Horsak
Abstract:
State-of-the-art machine learning (ML) models are highly effective in classifying gait analysis data, however, they lack in providing explanations for their predictions. This "black-box" characteristic makes it impossible to understand on which input patterns, ML models base their predictions. The present study investigates whether Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods, i.e., Layer-wise Rele…
▽ More
State-of-the-art machine learning (ML) models are highly effective in classifying gait analysis data, however, they lack in providing explanations for their predictions. This "black-box" characteristic makes it impossible to understand on which input patterns, ML models base their predictions. The present study investigates whether Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods, i.e., Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), can be useful to enhance the explainability of ML predictions in gait classification. The research question was: Which input patterns are most relevant for an automated gender classification model and do they correspond to characteristics identified in the literature? We utilized a subset of the GAITREC dataset containing five bilateral ground reaction force (GRF) recordings per person during barefoot walking of 62 healthy participants: 34 females and 28 males. Each input signal (right and left side) was min-max normalized before concatenation and fed into a multi-layer Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The classification accuracy was obtained over a stratified ten-fold cross-validation. To identify gender-specific patterns, the input relevance scores were derived using LRP. The mean classification accuracy of the CNN with 83.3% showed a clear superiority over the zero-rule baseline of 54.8%.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
On the Explanation of Machine Learning Predictions in Clinical Gait Analysis
Authors:
Djordje Slijepcevic,
Fabian Horst,
Sebastian Lapuschkin,
Anna-Maria Raberger,
Matthias Zeppelzauer,
Wojciech Samek,
Christian Breiteneder,
Wolfgang I. Schöllhorn,
Brian Horsak
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used to support decision-making in the healthcare sector. While ML approaches provide promising results with regard to their classification performance, most share a central limitation, namely their black-box character. Motivated by the interest to understand the functioning of ML models, methods from the field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) have…
▽ More
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly used to support decision-making in the healthcare sector. While ML approaches provide promising results with regard to their classification performance, most share a central limitation, namely their black-box character. Motivated by the interest to understand the functioning of ML models, methods from the field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) have recently become important. This article investigates the usefulness of XAI methods in clinical gait classification. For this purpose, predictions of state-of-the-art classification methods are explained with an established XAI method, i.e., Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP). We propose to evaluate the obtained explanations with two complementary approaches: a statistical analysis of the underlying data using Statistical Parametric Map** and a qualitative evaluation by a clinical expert. A gait dataset comprising ground reaction force measurements from 132 patients with different lower-body gait disorders and 62 healthy controls is utilized. We investigate several gait classification tasks, employ multiple classification methods, and analyze the impact of data normalization and different signal components for classification performance and explanation quality. Our experiments show that explanations obtained by LRP exhibit promising statistical properties concerning inter-class discriminativity and are also in line with clinically relevant biomechanical gait characteristics.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2020; v1 submitted 16 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
