Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? Machine Learning (ML) In and For Agent-Based Modelling (ABM)
Authors:
Johannes Dahlke,
Kristina Bogner,
Matthias Mueller,
Thomas Berger,
Andreas Pyka,
Bernd Ebersberger
Abstract:
In recent years, many scholars praised the seemingly endless possibilities of using machine learning (ML) techniques in and for agent-based simulation models (ABM). To get a more comprehensive understanding of these possibilities, we conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) and classify the literature on the application of ML in and for ABM according to a theoretically derived classification s…
▽ More
In recent years, many scholars praised the seemingly endless possibilities of using machine learning (ML) techniques in and for agent-based simulation models (ABM). To get a more comprehensive understanding of these possibilities, we conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) and classify the literature on the application of ML in and for ABM according to a theoretically derived classification scheme. We do so to investigate how exactly machine learning has been utilized in and for agent-based models so far and to critically discuss the combination of these two promising methods. We find that, indeed, there is a broad range of possible applications of ML to support and complement ABMs in many different ways, already applied in many different disciplines. We see that, so far, ML is mainly used in ABM for two broad cases: First, the modelling of adaptive agents equipped with experience learning and, second, the analysis of outcomes produced by a given ABM. While these are the most frequent, there also exist a variety of many more interesting applications. This being the case, researchers should dive deeper into the analysis of when and how which kinds of ML techniques can support ABM, e.g. by conducting a more in-depth analysis and comparison of different use cases. Nonetheless, as the application of ML in and for ABM comes at certain costs, researchers should not use ML for ABMs just for the sake of doing it.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
