A Feature-Driven Active Framework for Ultrasound-Based Brain Shift Compensation
Authors:
Jie Luo,
Matt Toews,
Ines Machado,
Sarah Frisken,
Miaomiao Zhang,
Frank Preiswerk,
Alireza Sedghi,
Hongyi Ding,
Steve Pieper,
Polina Golland,
Alexandra Golby,
Masashi Sugiyama,
William M. Wells III
Abstract:
A reliable Ultrasound (US)-to-US registration method to compensate for brain shift would substantially improve Image-Guided Neurological Surgery. Develo** such a registration method is very challenging, due to factors such as missing correspondence in images, the complexity of brain pathology and the demand for fast computation. We propose a novel feature-driven active framework. Here, landmarks…
▽ More
A reliable Ultrasound (US)-to-US registration method to compensate for brain shift would substantially improve Image-Guided Neurological Surgery. Develo** such a registration method is very challenging, due to factors such as missing correspondence in images, the complexity of brain pathology and the demand for fast computation. We propose a novel feature-driven active framework. Here, landmarks and their displacement are first estimated from a pair of US images using corresponding local image features. Subsequently, a Gaussian Process (GP) model is used to interpolate a dense deformation field from the sparse landmarks. Kernels of the GP are estimated by using variograms and a discrete grid search method. If necessary, the user can actively add new landmarks based on the image context and visualization of the uncertainty measure provided by the GP to further improve the result. We retrospectively demonstrate our registration framework as a robust and accurate brain shift compensation solution on clinical data acquired during neurosurgery.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
On the Applicability of Registration Uncertainty
Authors:
Jie Luo,
Alireza Sedghi,
Karteek Popuri,
Dana Cobzas,
Miaomiao Zhang,
Frank Preiswerk,
Matthew Toews,
Alexandra Golby,
Masashi Sugiyama,
William M. Wells III,
Sarah Frisken
Abstract:
Estimating the uncertainty in (probabilistic) image registration enables, e.g., surgeons to assess the operative risk based on the trustworthiness of the registered image data. If surgeons receive inaccurately calculated registration uncertainty and misplace unwarranted confidence in the alignment solutions, severe consequences may result. For probabilistic image registration (PIR), the predominan…
▽ More
Estimating the uncertainty in (probabilistic) image registration enables, e.g., surgeons to assess the operative risk based on the trustworthiness of the registered image data. If surgeons receive inaccurately calculated registration uncertainty and misplace unwarranted confidence in the alignment solutions, severe consequences may result. For probabilistic image registration (PIR), the predominant way to quantify the registration uncertainty is using summary statistics of the distribution of transformation parameters. The majority of existing research focuses on trying out different summary statistics as well as a means to exploit them. Distinctively, in this paper, we study two rarely examined topics: (1) whether those summary statistics of the transformation distribution most informatively represent the registration uncertainty; (2) Does utilizing the registration uncertainty always be beneficial. We show that there are two types of uncertainties: the transformation uncertainty, Ut, and label uncertainty Ul. The conventional way of using Ut to quantify Ul is inappropriate and can be misleading. By a real data experiment, we also share a potentially critical finding that making use of the registration uncertainty may not always be an improvement.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2020; v1 submitted 14 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
