-
Quantum speedups for treewidth
Authors:
Vladislavs Kļevickis,
Krišjānis Prūsis,
Jevgēnijs Vihrovs
Abstract:
In this paper, we study quantum algorithms for computing the exact value of the treewidth of a graph. Our algorithms are based on the classical algorithm by Fomin and Villanger (Combinatorica 32, 2012) that uses $O(2.616^n)$ time and polynomial space. We show three quantum algorithms with the following complexity, using QRAM in both exponential space algorithms: $\bullet$ $O(1.618^n)$ time and pol…
▽ More
In this paper, we study quantum algorithms for computing the exact value of the treewidth of a graph. Our algorithms are based on the classical algorithm by Fomin and Villanger (Combinatorica 32, 2012) that uses $O(2.616^n)$ time and polynomial space. We show three quantum algorithms with the following complexity, using QRAM in both exponential space algorithms: $\bullet$ $O(1.618^n)$ time and polynomial space; $\bullet$ $O(1.554^n)$ time and $O(1.452^n)$ space; $\bullet$ $O(1.538^n)$ time and space. In contrast, the fastest known classical algorithm for treewidth uses $O(1.755^n)$ time and space. The first two speed-ups are obtained in a fairly straightforward way. The first version uses additionally only Grover's search and provides a quadratic speedup. The second speedup is more time-efficient and uses both Grover's search and the quantum exponential dynamic programming by Ambainis et al. (SODA '19). The third version uses the specific properties of the classical algorithm and treewidth, with a modified version of the quantum dynamic programming on the hypercube. Lastly, as a small side result, we also give a new classical time-space tradeoff for computing treewidth in $O^*(2^n)$ time and $O^*(\sqrt{2^n})$ space.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Quantum Lower and Upper Bounds for 2D-Grid and Dyck Language
Authors:
Andris Ambainis,
Kaspars Balodis,
Jānis Iraids,
Kamil Khadiev,
Vladislavs Kļevickis,
Krišjānis Prūsis,
Yixin Shen,
Juris Smotrovs,
Jevgēnijs Vihrovs
Abstract:
We study the quantum query complexity of two problems.
First, we consider the problem of determining if a sequence of parentheses is a properly balanced one (a Dyck word), with a depth of at most $k$. We call this the $Dyck_{k,n}$ problem. We prove a lower bound of $Ω(c^k \sqrt{n})$, showing that the complexity of this problem increases exponentially in $k$. Here $n$ is the length of the word. W…
▽ More
We study the quantum query complexity of two problems.
First, we consider the problem of determining if a sequence of parentheses is a properly balanced one (a Dyck word), with a depth of at most $k$. We call this the $Dyck_{k,n}$ problem. We prove a lower bound of $Ω(c^k \sqrt{n})$, showing that the complexity of this problem increases exponentially in $k$. Here $n$ is the length of the word. When $k$ is a constant, this is interesting as a representative example of star-free languages for which a surprising $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ query quantum algorithm was recently constructed by Aaronson et al. Their proof does not give rise to a general algorithm. When $k$ is not a constant, $Dyck_{k,n}$ is not context-free. We give an algorithm with $O\left(\sqrt{n}(\log{n})^{0.5k}\right)$ quantum queries for $Dyck_{k,n}$ for all $k$. This is better than the trival upper bound $n$ for $k=o\left(\frac{\log(n)}{\log\log n}\right)$.
Second, we consider connectivity problems on grid graphs in 2 dimensions, if some of the edges of the grid may be missing. By embedding the "balanced parentheses" problem into the grid, we show a lower bound of $Ω(n^{1.5-ε})$ for the directed 2D grid and $Ω(n^{2-ε})$ for the undirected 2D grid. The directed problem is interesting as a black-box model for a class of classical dynamic programming strategies including the one that is usually used for the well-known edit distance problem. We also show a generalization of this result to more than 2 dimensions.
△ Less
Submitted 9 July, 2020; v1 submitted 6 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Quantum Lower Bounds for 2D-Grid and Dyck Language
Authors:
Andris Ambainis,
Kaspars Balodis,
Jānis Iraids,
Krišjānis Prūsis,
Juris Smotrovs
Abstract:
We show quantum lower bounds for two problems. First, we consider the problem of determining if a sequence of parentheses is a properly balanced one (a Dyck word), with a depth of at most $k$. It has been known that, for any $k$, $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ queries suffice, with a $\tilde{O}$ term depending on $k$. We prove a lower bound of $Ω(c^k \sqrt{n})$, showing that the complexity of this problem…
▽ More
We show quantum lower bounds for two problems. First, we consider the problem of determining if a sequence of parentheses is a properly balanced one (a Dyck word), with a depth of at most $k$. It has been known that, for any $k$, $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ queries suffice, with a $\tilde{O}$ term depending on $k$. We prove a lower bound of $Ω(c^k \sqrt{n})$, showing that the complexity of this problem increases exponentially in $k$. This is interesting as a representative example of star-free languages for which a surprising $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ query quantum algorithm was recently constructed by Aaronson et al.
Second, we consider connectivity problems on directed/undirected grid in 2 dimensions, if some of the edges of the grid may be missing. By embedding the "balanced parentheses" problem into the grid, we show a lower bound of $Ω(n^{1.5-ε})$ for the directed 2D grid and $Ω(n^{2-ε})$ for the undirected 2D grid. The directed problem is interesting as a black-box model for a class of classical dynamic programming strategies including the one that is usually used for the well-known edit distance problem. We also show a generalization of this result to more than 2 dimensions.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
On Block Sensitivity and Fractional Block Sensitivity
Authors:
Andris Ambainis,
Krišjānis Prūsis,
Jevgēnijs Vihrovs
Abstract:
We investigate the relation between the block sensitivity $\text{bs}(f)$ and fractional block sensitivity $\text{fbs}(f)$ complexity measures of Boolean functions. While it is known that $\text{fbs}(f) = O(\text{bs}(f)^2)$, the best known separation achieves $\text{fbs}(f) = \left(\frac{1}{3\sqrt2} +o(1)\right) \text{bs(f)}^{3/2}$. We improve the constant factor and show a family of functions that…
▽ More
We investigate the relation between the block sensitivity $\text{bs}(f)$ and fractional block sensitivity $\text{fbs}(f)$ complexity measures of Boolean functions. While it is known that $\text{fbs}(f) = O(\text{bs}(f)^2)$, the best known separation achieves $\text{fbs}(f) = \left(\frac{1}{3\sqrt2} +o(1)\right) \text{bs(f)}^{3/2}$. We improve the constant factor and show a family of functions that give $\text{fbs}(f) = \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt6}-o(1)\right) \text{bs}(f)^{3/2}.$
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Quantum Speedups for Exponential-Time Dynamic Programming Algorithms
Authors:
Andris Ambainis,
Kaspars Balodis,
Jānis Iraids,
Martins Kokainis,
Krišjānis Prūsis,
Jevgēnijs Vihrovs
Abstract:
In this paper we study quantum algorithms for NP-complete problems whose best classical algorithm is an exponential time application of dynamic programming. We introduce the path in the hypercube problem that models many of these dynamic programming algorithms. In this problem we are asked whether there is a path from $0^n$ to $1^n$ in a given subgraph of the Boolean hypercube, where the edges are…
▽ More
In this paper we study quantum algorithms for NP-complete problems whose best classical algorithm is an exponential time application of dynamic programming. We introduce the path in the hypercube problem that models many of these dynamic programming algorithms. In this problem we are asked whether there is a path from $0^n$ to $1^n$ in a given subgraph of the Boolean hypercube, where the edges are all directed from smaller to larger Hamming weight. We give a quantum algorithm that solves path in the hypercube in time $O^*(1.817^n)$. The technique combines Grover's search with computing a partial dynamic programming table. We use this approach to solve a variety of vertex ordering problems on graphs in the same time $O^*(1.817^n)$, and graph bandwidth in time $O^*(2.946^n)$. Then we use similar ideas to solve the travelling salesman problem and minimum set cover in time $O^*(1.728^n)$.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
All Classical Adversary Methods are Equivalent for Total Functions
Authors:
Andris Ambainis,
Martins Kokainis,
Krišjānis Prūsis,
Jevgēnijs Vihrovs,
Aleksejs Zajakins
Abstract:
We show that all known classical adversary lower bounds on randomized query complexity are equivalent for total functions, and are equal to the fractional block sensitivity $\text{fbs}(f)$. That includes the Kolmogorov complexity bound of Laplante and Magniez and the earlier relational adversary bound of Aaronson. This equivalence also implies that for total functions, the relational adversary is…
▽ More
We show that all known classical adversary lower bounds on randomized query complexity are equivalent for total functions, and are equal to the fractional block sensitivity $\text{fbs}(f)$. That includes the Kolmogorov complexity bound of Laplante and Magniez and the earlier relational adversary bound of Aaronson. This equivalence also implies that for total functions, the relational adversary is equivalent to a simpler lower bound, which we call rank-1 relational adversary. For partial functions, we show unbounded separations between $\text{fbs}(f)$ and other adversary bounds, as well as between the adversary bounds themselves.
We also show that, for partial functions, fractional block sensitivity cannot give lower bounds larger than $\sqrt{n \cdot \text{bs}(f)}$, where $n$ is the number of variables and $\text{bs}(f)$ is the block sensitivity. Then we exhibit a partial function $f$ that matches this upper bound, $\text{fbs}(f) = Ω(\sqrt{n \cdot \text{bs}(f)})$.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2018; v1 submitted 26 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Zero-Error Affine, Unitary, and Probabilistic OBDDs
Authors:
Rishat Ibrahimov,
Kamil Khadiev,
Krisjanis Prusis,
Jevgenijs Vihrovs,
Abuzer Yakaryilmaz
Abstract:
We introduce the affine OBDD model and show that zero-error affine OBDDs can be exponentially narrower than bounded-error unitary and probabilistic OBDDs on certain problems. Moreover, we show that Las Vegas unitary and probabilistic OBDDs can be quadratically narrower than deterministic OBDDs. We also obtain the same results by considering the automata versions of these models.
We introduce the affine OBDD model and show that zero-error affine OBDDs can be exponentially narrower than bounded-error unitary and probabilistic OBDDs on certain problems. Moreover, we show that Las Vegas unitary and probabilistic OBDDs can be quadratically narrower than deterministic OBDDs. We also obtain the same results by considering the automata versions of these models.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2017; v1 submitted 21 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
-
Exact Affine Counter Automata
Authors:
Masaki Nakanishi,
Kamil Khadiev,
Krišjānis Prūsis,
Jevgēnijs Vihrovs,
Abuzer Yakaryılmaz
Abstract:
We introduce an affine generalization of counter automata, and analyze their ability as well as affine finite automata. Our contributions are as follows. We show that there is a language that can be recognized by exact realtime affine counter automata but by neither 1-way deterministic pushdown automata nor realtime deterministic k-counter automata. We also show that a certain promise problem, whi…
▽ More
We introduce an affine generalization of counter automata, and analyze their ability as well as affine finite automata. Our contributions are as follows. We show that there is a language that can be recognized by exact realtime affine counter automata but by neither 1-way deterministic pushdown automata nor realtime deterministic k-counter automata. We also show that a certain promise problem, which is conjectured not to be solved by two-way quantum finite automata in polynomial time, can be solved by Las Vegas affine finite automata. Lastly, we show that how a counter helps for affine finite automata by showing that the language MANYTWINS, which is conjectured not to be recognized by affine, quantum or classical finite state models in polynomial time, can be recognized by affine counter automata with one-sided bounded-error in realtime.
△ Less
Submitted 21 August, 2017; v1 submitted 13 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
-
Sensitivity versus Certificate Complexity of Boolean Functions
Authors:
Andris Ambainis,
Krišjānis Prūsis,
Jevgēnijs Vihrovs
Abstract:
Sensitivity, block sensitivity and certificate complexity are basic complexity measures of Boolean functions. The famous sensitivity conjecture claims that sensitivity is polynomially related to block sensitivity. However, it has been notoriously hard to obtain even exponential bounds. Since block sensitivity is known to be polynomially related to certificate complexity, an equivalent of proving t…
▽ More
Sensitivity, block sensitivity and certificate complexity are basic complexity measures of Boolean functions. The famous sensitivity conjecture claims that sensitivity is polynomially related to block sensitivity. However, it has been notoriously hard to obtain even exponential bounds. Since block sensitivity is known to be polynomially related to certificate complexity, an equivalent of proving this conjecture would be showing that certificate complexity is polynomially related to sensitivity. Previously, it has been shown that $bs(f) \leq C(f) \leq 2^{s(f)-1} s(f) - (s(f)-1)$. In this work, we give a better upper bound of $bs(f) \leq C(f) \leq \max\left(2^{s(f)-1}\left(s(f)-\frac 1 3\right), s(f)\right)$ using a recent theorem limiting the structure of function graphs. We also examine relations between these measures for functions with small 1-sensitivity $s_1(f)$ and arbitrary 0-sensitivity $s_0(f)$.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2015; v1 submitted 26 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
A Tight Lower Bound on Certificate Complexity in Terms of Block Sensitivity and Sensitivity
Authors:
Andris Ambainis,
Krišjānis Prūsis
Abstract:
Sensitivity, certificate complexity and block sensitivity are widely used Boolean function complexity measures. A longstanding open problem, proposed by Nisan and Szegedy, is whether sensitivity and block sensitivity are polynomially related. Motivated by the constructions of functions which achieve the largest known separations, we study the relation between 1-certificate complexity and 0-sensiti…
▽ More
Sensitivity, certificate complexity and block sensitivity are widely used Boolean function complexity measures. A longstanding open problem, proposed by Nisan and Szegedy, is whether sensitivity and block sensitivity are polynomially related. Motivated by the constructions of functions which achieve the largest known separations, we study the relation between 1-certificate complexity and 0-sensitivity and 0-block sensitivity.
Previously the best known lower bound was $C_1(f)\geq \frac{bs_0(f)}{2 s_0(f)}$, achieved by Kenyon and Kutin. We improve this to $C_1(f)\geq \frac{3 bs_0(f)}{2 s_0(f)}$. While this improvement is only by a constant factor, this is quite important, as it precludes achieving a superquadratic separation between $bs(f)$ and $s(f)$ by iterating functions which reach this bound. In addition, this bound is tight, as it matches the construction of Ambainis and Sun up to an additive constant.
△ Less
Submitted 31 July, 2014; v1 submitted 20 February, 2014;
originally announced February 2014.
