Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Poudat, C

Message du troisi{è}me type : irruption d'un tiers dans un dialogue en ligne

Authors: Ludovic Tanguy, Céline Poudat, Lydia-Mai Ho-Dac

Abstract: Our study focuses on Wikipedia talk pages, from a global perspective analyzing contributors' behaviors in online interactions. Using a corpus comprising all Wikipedia talk pages in French, totaling more than 300,000 discussion threads, we examine how discussions with more than two participants (multiparty conversation) unfold and we specifically investigate the role of a third participant's interv… ▽ More Our study focuses on Wikipedia talk pages, from a global perspective analyzing contributors' behaviors in online interactions. Using a corpus comprising all Wikipedia talk pages in French, totaling more than 300,000 discussion threads, we examine how discussions with more than two participants (multiparty conversation) unfold and we specifically investigate the role of a third participant's intervention when two Wikipedians have already initiated an exchange. In this regard, we concentrate on the sequential structure of these interactions in terms of articulation among different participants and aim to specify this third message by exploring its lexical particularities, while also proposing an initial typology of the third participant's message role and how it aligns with preceding messages. △ Less

Submitted 28 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: in French language. JADT 2024 - 17es Journ{é}es internationales d'Analyse statistique des Donn{é}es Textuelles, SeSLa (S{é}minaire des Sciences du Langage de l'UCLouvain -- Site Saint-Louis); LASLA (Laboratoire d'Analyse statistique des Langues anciennes de l'Universit{é} de Li{è}ge), 2024, Bruxelles, Belgique

Managing conflicts between users in Wikipedia

Authors: Bernard Jacquemin, Aurélien Lauf, Céline Poudat, Martine Hurault-Plantet, Nicolas Auray

Abstract: Wikipedia is nowadays a widely used encyclopedia, and one of the most visible sites on the Internet. Its strong principle of collaborative work and free editing sometimes generates disputes due to disagreements between users. In this article we study how the wikipedian community resolves the conflicts and which roles do wikipedian choose in this process. We observed the users behavior both in th… ▽ More Wikipedia is nowadays a widely used encyclopedia, and one of the most visible sites on the Internet. Its strong principle of collaborative work and free editing sometimes generates disputes due to disagreements between users. In this article we study how the wikipedian community resolves the conflicts and which roles do wikipedian choose in this process. We observed the users behavior both in the article talk pages, and in the Arbitration Committee pages specifically dedicated to serious disputes. We first set up a users typology according to their involvement in conflicts and their publishing and management activity in the encyclopedia. We then used those user types to describe users behavior in contributing to articles that are tagged by the wikipedian community as being in conflict with the official guidelines of Wikipedia, or conversely as being well featured. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2008; originally announced May 2008.

Comments: 12 pp

Journal ref: Dans BIS 2008 Workshop proceedings - 11th Conference on Business Information Systems (BIS 2008), Social Aspects of the Web Workshop (SAW 2008), Innsbruck : Autriche (2008)

La fiabilité des informations sur le web

Authors: Bernard Jacquemin, Aurélien Lauf, Céline Poudat, Martine Hurault-Plantet, Nicolas Auray

Abstract: Online IR tools have to take into account new phenomena linked to the appearance of blogs, wiki and other collaborative publications. Among these collaborative sites, Wikipedia represents a crucial source of information. However, the quality of this information has been recently questionned. A better knowledge of the contributors' behaviors should help users navigate through information whose qu… ▽ More Online IR tools have to take into account new phenomena linked to the appearance of blogs, wiki and other collaborative publications. Among these collaborative sites, Wikipedia represents a crucial source of information. However, the quality of this information has been recently questionned. A better knowledge of the contributors' behaviors should help users navigate through information whose quality may vary from one source to another. In order to explore this idea, we present an analysis of the role of different types of contributors in the control of the publication of conflictual articles. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2008; originally announced May 2008.

Comments: 8 pp

Journal ref: Dans Actes de la Conférence en Recherche d'Information et Applications CORIA 2008 - Conférence en Recherche d'Information et Applications 2008, Trégastel : France (2008)