-
Pixels and Predictions: Potential of GPT-4V in Meteorological Imagery Analysis and Forecast Communication
Authors:
John R. Lawson,
Montgomery L. Flora,
Kevin H. Goebbert,
Seth N. Lyman,
Corey K. Potvin,
David M. Schultz,
Adam J. Stepanek,
Joseph E. Trujillo-Falcón
Abstract:
Generative AI, such as OpenAI's GPT-4V large-language model, has rapidly entered mainstream discourse. Novel capabilities in image processing and natural-language communication may augment existing forecasting methods. Large language models further display potential to better communicate weather hazards in a style honed for diverse communities and different languages. This study evaluates GPT-4V's…
▽ More
Generative AI, such as OpenAI's GPT-4V large-language model, has rapidly entered mainstream discourse. Novel capabilities in image processing and natural-language communication may augment existing forecasting methods. Large language models further display potential to better communicate weather hazards in a style honed for diverse communities and different languages. This study evaluates GPT-4V's ability to interpret meteorological charts and communicate weather hazards appropriately to the user, despite challenges of hallucinations, where generative AI delivers coherent, confident, but incorrect responses. We assess GPT-4V's competence via its web interface ChatGPT in two tasks: (1) generating a severe-weather outlook from weather-chart analysis and conducting self-evaluation, revealing an outlook that corresponds well with a Storm Prediction Center human-issued forecast; and (2) producing hazard summaries in Spanish and English from weather charts. Responses in Spanish, however, resemble direct (not idiomatic) translations from English to Spanish, yielding poorly translated summaries that lose critical idiomatic precision required for optimal communication. Our findings advocate for cautious integration of tools like GPT-4V in meteorology, underscoring the necessity of human oversight and development of trustworthy, explainable AI.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Hypergraph Topological Features for Autoencoder-Based Intrusion Detection for Cybersecurity Data
Authors:
Bill Kay,
Sinan G. Aksoy,
Molly Baird,
Daniel M. Best,
Helen Jenne,
Cliff Joslyn,
Christopher Potvin,
Gregory Henselman-Petrusek,
Garret Seppala,
Stephen J. Young,
Emilie Purvine
Abstract:
In this position paper, we argue that when hypergraphs are used to capture multi-way local relations of data, their resulting topological features describe global behaviour. Consequently, these features capture complex correlations that can then serve as high fidelity inputs to autoencoder-driven anomaly detection pipelines. We propose two such potential pipelines for cybersecurity data, one that…
▽ More
In this position paper, we argue that when hypergraphs are used to capture multi-way local relations of data, their resulting topological features describe global behaviour. Consequently, these features capture complex correlations that can then serve as high fidelity inputs to autoencoder-driven anomaly detection pipelines. We propose two such potential pipelines for cybersecurity data, one that uses an autoencoder directly to determine network intrusions, and one that de-noises input data for a persistent homology system, PHANTOM. We provide heuristic justification for the use of the methods described therein for an intrusion detection pipeline for cyber data. We conclude by showing a small example over synthetic cyber attack data.
△ Less
Submitted 9 November, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Machine Learning Estimation of Maximum Vertical Velocity from Radar
Authors:
Randy J. Chase,
Amy McGovern,
Cameron Homeyer,
Peter Marinescu,
Corey Potvin
Abstract:
The quantification of storm updrafts remains unavailable for operational forecasting despite their inherent importance to convection and its associated severe weather hazards. Updraft proxies, like overshooting top area from satellite images, have been linked to severe weather hazards but only relate to a limited portion of the total storm updraft. This study investigates if a machine learning mod…
▽ More
The quantification of storm updrafts remains unavailable for operational forecasting despite their inherent importance to convection and its associated severe weather hazards. Updraft proxies, like overshooting top area from satellite images, have been linked to severe weather hazards but only relate to a limited portion of the total storm updraft. This study investigates if a machine learning model, namely U-Nets, can skillfully retrieve maximum vertical velocity and its areal extent from 3-dimensional gridded radar reflectivity alone. The machine learning model is trained using simulated radar reflectivity and vertical velocity from the National Severe Storm Laboratory's convection permitting Warn on Forecast System (WoFS). A parametric regression technique using the sinh-arcsinh-normal distribution is adapted to run with U-Nets, allowing for both deterministic and probabilistic predictions of maximum vertical velocity. The best models after hyperparameter search provided less than 50% root mean squared error, a coefficient of determination greater than 0.65 and an intersection over union (IoU) of more than 0.45 on the independent test set composed of WoFS data. Beyond the WoFS analysis, a case study was conducted using real radar data and corresponding dual-Doppler analyses of vertical velocity within a supercell. The U-Net consistently underestimates the dual-Doppler updraft speed estimates by 50$\%$. Meanwhile, the area of the 5 and 10 m s^-1 updraft cores show an IoU of 0.25. While the above statistics are not exceptional, the machine learning model enables quick distillation of 3D radar data that is related to the maximum vertical velocity which could be useful in assessing a storm's severe potential.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2024; v1 submitted 13 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Comparing Explanation Methods for Traditional Machine Learning Models Part 2: Quantifying Model Explainability Faithfulness and Improvements with Dimensionality Reduction
Authors:
Montgomery Flora,
Corey Potvin,
Amy McGovern,
Shawn Handler
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) models are becoming increasingly common in the atmospheric science community with a wide range of applications. To enable users to understand what an ML model has learned, ML explainability has become a field of active research. In Part I of this two-part study, we described several explainability methods and demonstrated that feature rankings from different methods can subst…
▽ More
Machine learning (ML) models are becoming increasingly common in the atmospheric science community with a wide range of applications. To enable users to understand what an ML model has learned, ML explainability has become a field of active research. In Part I of this two-part study, we described several explainability methods and demonstrated that feature rankings from different methods can substantially disagree with each other. It is unclear, though, whether the disagreement is overinflated due to some methods being less faithful in assigning importance. Herein, "faithfulness" or "fidelity" refer to the correspondence between the assigned feature importance and the contribution of the feature to model performance. In the present study, we evaluate the faithfulness of feature ranking methods using multiple methods. Given the sensitivity of explanation methods to feature correlations, we also quantify how much explainability faithfulness improves after correlated features are limited. Before dimensionality reduction, the feature relevance methods [e.g., SHAP, LIME, ALE variance, and logistic regression (LR) coefficients] were generally more faithful than the permutation importance methods due to the negative impact of correlated features. Once correlated features were reduced, traditional permutation importance became the most faithful method. In addition, the ranking uncertainty (i.e., the spread in rank assigned to a feature by the different ranking methods) was reduced by a factor of 2-10, and excluding less faithful feature ranking methods reduces it further. This study is one of the first to quantify the improvement in explainability from limiting correlated features and knowing the relative fidelity of different explainability methods.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Comparing Explanation Methods for Traditional Machine Learning Models Part 1: An Overview of Current Methods and Quantifying Their Disagreement
Authors:
Montgomery Flora,
Corey Potvin,
Amy McGovern,
Shawn Handler
Abstract:
With increasing interest in explaining machine learning (ML) models, the first part of this two-part study synthesizes recent research on methods for explaining global and local aspects of ML models. This study distinguishes explainability from interpretability, local from global explainability, and feature importance versus feature relevance. We demonstrate and visualize different explanation met…
▽ More
With increasing interest in explaining machine learning (ML) models, the first part of this two-part study synthesizes recent research on methods for explaining global and local aspects of ML models. This study distinguishes explainability from interpretability, local from global explainability, and feature importance versus feature relevance. We demonstrate and visualize different explanation methods, how to interpret them, and provide a complete Python package (scikit-explain) to allow future researchers to explore these products. We also highlight the frequent disagreement between explanation methods for feature rankings and feature effects and provide practical advice for dealing with these disagreements. We used ML models developed for severe weather prediction and sub-freezing road surface temperature prediction to generalize the behavior of the different explanation methods. For feature rankings, there is substantially more agreement on the set of top features (e.g., on average, two methods agree on 6 of the top 10 features) than on specific rankings (on average, two methods only agree on the ranks of 2-3 features in the set of top 10 features). On the other hand, two feature effect curves from different methods are in high agreement as long as the phase space is well sampled. Finally, a lesser-known method, tree interpreter, was found comparable to SHAP for feature effects, and with the widespread use of random forests in geosciences and computational ease of tree interpreter, we recommend it be explored in future research.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Using Machine Learning to Calibrate Storm-Scale Probabilistic Guidance of Severe Weather Hazards in the Warn-on-Forecast System
Authors:
Montgomery Flora,
Corey K. Potvin,
Patrick S. Skinner,
Shawn Handler,
Amy McGovern
Abstract:
A primary goal of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Warn-on-Forecast (WoF) project is to provide rapidly updating probabilistic guidance to human forecasters for short-term (e.g., 0-3 h) severe weather forecasts. Maximizing the usefulness of probabilistic severe weather guidance from an ensemble of convection-allowing model forecasts requires calibration. In this study, we…
▽ More
A primary goal of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Warn-on-Forecast (WoF) project is to provide rapidly updating probabilistic guidance to human forecasters for short-term (e.g., 0-3 h) severe weather forecasts. Maximizing the usefulness of probabilistic severe weather guidance from an ensemble of convection-allowing model forecasts requires calibration. In this study, we compare the skill of a simple method using updraft helicity against a series of machine learning (ML) algorithms for calibrating WoFS severe weather guidance. ML models are often used to calibrate severe weather guidance since they leverage multiple variables and discover useful patterns in complex datasets. \indent Our dataset includes WoF System (WoFS) ensemble forecasts available every 5 minutes out to 150 min of lead time from the 2017-2019 NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiments (81 dates). Using a novel ensemble storm track identification method, we extracted three sets of predictors from the WoFS forecasts: intra-storm state variables, near-storm environment variables, and morphological attributes of the ensemble storm tracks. We then trained random forests, gradient-boosted trees, and logistic regression algorithms to predict which WoFS 30-min ensemble storm tracks will correspond to a tornado, severe hail, and/or severe wind report. For the simple method, we extracted the ensemble probability of 2-5 km updraft helicity (UH) exceeding a threshold (tuned per severe weather hazard) from each ensemble storm track. The three ML algorithms discriminated well for all three hazards and produced more reliable probabilities than the UH-based predictions. Overall, the results suggest that ML-based calibrations of dynamical ensemble output can improve short term, storm-scale severe weather probabilistic guidance
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
