Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Posocco, N

SANGEA: Scalable and Attributed Network Generation

Authors: Valentin Lemaire, Youssef Achenchabe, Lucas Ody, Houssem Eddine Souid, Gianmarco Aversano, Nicolas Posocco, Sabri Skhiri

Abstract: The topic of synthetic graph generators (SGGs) has recently received much attention due to the wave of the latest breakthroughs in generative modelling. However, many state-of-the-art SGGs do not scale well with the graph size. Indeed, in the generation process, all the possible edges for a fixed number of nodes must often be considered, which scales in $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$, with $N$ being the numbe… ▽ More The topic of synthetic graph generators (SGGs) has recently received much attention due to the wave of the latest breakthroughs in generative modelling. However, many state-of-the-art SGGs do not scale well with the graph size. Indeed, in the generation process, all the possible edges for a fixed number of nodes must often be considered, which scales in $\mathcal{O}(N^2)$, with $N$ being the number of nodes in the graph. For this reason, many state-of-the-art SGGs are not applicable to large graphs. In this paper, we present SANGEA, a sizeable synthetic graph generation framework which extends the applicability of any SGG to large graphs. By first splitting the large graph into communities, SANGEA trains one SGG per community, then links the community graphs back together to create a synthetic large graph. Our experiments show that the graphs generated by SANGEA have high similarity to the original graph, in terms of both topology and node feature distribution. Additionally, these generated graphs achieve high utility on downstream tasks such as link prediction. Finally, we provide a privacy assessment of the generated graphs to show that, even though they have excellent utility, they also achieve reasonable privacy scores. △ Less

Submitted 27 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: 15 pages, 1 figure, 2 algorithms, 4 tables

A Fair Classifier Embracing Triplet Collapse

Authors: A. Martzloff, N. Posocco, Q. Ferré

Abstract: In this paper, we study the behaviour of the triplet loss and show that it can be exploited to limit the biases created and perpetuated by machine learning models. Our fair classifier uses the collapse of the triplet loss when its margin is greater than the maximum distance between two points in the latent space, in the case of stochastic triplet selection. In this paper, we study the behaviour of the triplet loss and show that it can be exploited to limit the biases created and perpetuated by machine learning models. Our fair classifier uses the collapse of the triplet loss when its margin is greater than the maximum distance between two points in the latent space, in the case of stochastic triplet selection. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 9 pages, 7 figures, CAp2023

ACM Class: I.2.6; I.5.1; K.4.2

Calibrate to Interpret

Authors: Gregory Scafarto, Nicolas Posocco, Antoine Bonnefoy

Abstract: Trustworthy machine learning is driving a large number of ML community works in order to improve ML acceptance and adoption. The main aspect of trustworthy machine learning are the followings: fairness, uncertainty, robustness, explainability and formal guaranties. Each of these individual domains gains the ML community interest, visible by the number of related publications. However few works tac… ▽ More Trustworthy machine learning is driving a large number of ML community works in order to improve ML acceptance and adoption. The main aspect of trustworthy machine learning are the followings: fairness, uncertainty, robustness, explainability and formal guaranties. Each of these individual domains gains the ML community interest, visible by the number of related publications. However few works tackle the interconnection between these fields. In this paper we show a first link between uncertainty and explainability, by studying the relation between calibration and interpretation. As the calibration of a given model changes the way it scores samples, and interpretation approaches often rely on these scores, it seems safe to assume that the confidence-calibration of a model interacts with our ability to interpret such model. In this paper, we show, in the context of networks trained on image classification tasks, to what extent interpretations are sensitive to confidence-calibration. It leads us to suggest a simple practice to improve the interpretation outcomes: Calibrate to Interpret. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: 16 pages, 9 figures, accepted at ECML PKDD 2022

ACM Class: I.2.6; I.2.10; I.4.8; I.5.2

Estimating Expected Calibration Errors

Authors: Nicolas Posocco, Antoine Bonnefoy

Abstract: Uncertainty in probabilistic classifiers predictions is a key concern when models are used to support human decision making, in broader probabilistic pipelines or when sensitive automatic decisions have to be taken. Studies have shown that most models are not intrinsically well calibrated, meaning that their decision scores are not consistent with posterior probabilities. Hence being able to calib… ▽ More Uncertainty in probabilistic classifiers predictions is a key concern when models are used to support human decision making, in broader probabilistic pipelines or when sensitive automatic decisions have to be taken. Studies have shown that most models are not intrinsically well calibrated, meaning that their decision scores are not consistent with posterior probabilities. Hence being able to calibrate these models, or enforce calibration while learning them, has regained interest in recent literature. In this context, properly assessing calibration is paramount to quantify new contributions tackling calibration. However, there is room for improvement for commonly used metrics and evaluation of calibration could benefit from deeper analyses. Thus this paper focuses on the empirical evaluation of calibration metrics in the context of classification. More specifically it evaluates different estimators of the Expected Calibration Error ($ECE$), amongst which legacy estimators and some novel ones, proposed in this paper. We build an empirical procedure to quantify the quality of these $ECE$ estimators, and use it to decide which estimator should be used in practice for different settings. △ Less

Submitted 8 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures, ICANN2021

ACM Class: I.2.6; I.5.2

DAEMA: Denoising Autoencoder with Mask Attention

Authors: Simon Tihon, Muhammad Usama Javaid, Damien Fourure, Nicolas Posocco, Thomas Peel

Abstract: Missing data is a recurrent and challenging problem, especially when using machine learning algorithms for real-world applications. For this reason, missing data imputation has become an active research area, in which recent deep learning approaches have achieved state-of-the-art results. We propose DAEMA (Denoising Autoencoder with Mask Attention), an algorithm based on a denoising autoencoder ar… ▽ More Missing data is a recurrent and challenging problem, especially when using machine learning algorithms for real-world applications. For this reason, missing data imputation has become an active research area, in which recent deep learning approaches have achieved state-of-the-art results. We propose DAEMA (Denoising Autoencoder with Mask Attention), an algorithm based on a denoising autoencoder architecture with an attention mechanism. While most imputation algorithms use incomplete inputs as they would use complete data - up to basic preprocessing (e.g. mean imputation) - DAEMA leverages a mask-based attention mechanism to focus on the observed values of its inputs. We evaluate DAEMA both in terms of reconstruction capabilities and downstream prediction and show that it achieves superior performance to state-of-the-art algorithms on several publicly available real-world datasets under various missingness settings. △ Less

Submitted 30 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: 12 pages, 2 figures, to be published in ICANN 2021, for official implementation see https://github.com/euranova/DAEMA

ACM Class: I.2.6; I.5.1

Anomaly Detection: How to Artificially Increase your F1-Score with a Biased Evaluation Protocol

Authors: Damien Fourure, Muhammad Usama Javaid, Nicolas Posocco, Simon Tihon

Abstract: Anomaly detection is a widely explored domain in machine learning. Many models are proposed in the literature, and compared through different metrics measured on various datasets. The most popular metrics used to compare performances are F1-score, AUC and AVPR. In this paper, we show that F1-score and AVPR are highly sensitive to the contamination rate. One consequence is that it is possible to ar… ▽ More Anomaly detection is a widely explored domain in machine learning. Many models are proposed in the literature, and compared through different metrics measured on various datasets. The most popular metrics used to compare performances are F1-score, AUC and AVPR. In this paper, we show that F1-score and AVPR are highly sensitive to the contamination rate. One consequence is that it is possible to artificially increase their values by modifying the train-test split procedure. This leads to misleading comparisons between algorithms in the literature, especially when the evaluation protocol is not well detailed. Moreover, we show that the F1-score and the AVPR cannot be used to compare performances on different datasets as they do not reflect the intrinsic difficulty of modeling such data. Based on these observations, we claim that F1-score and AVPR should not be used as metrics for anomaly detection. We recommend a generic evaluation procedure for unsupervised anomaly detection, including the use of other metrics such as the AUC, which are more robust to arbitrary choices in the evaluation protocol. △ Less

Submitted 30 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: 16 pages, 7 figures, to be published in ECML-PKDD 2021, for official implementation see https://github.com/euranova/F1-Score-is-Biased

ACM Class: I.2.6; I.5.1

Automated Estimation of the Spinal Curvature via Spine Centerline Extraction with Ensembles of Cascaded Neural Networks

Authors: Florian Dubost, Benjamin Collery, Antonin Renaudier, Axel Roc, Nicolas Posocco, Gerda Bortsova, Wiro Niessen, Marleen de Bruijne

Abstract: Scoliosis is a condition defined by an abnormal spinal curvature. For diagnosis and treatment planning of scoliosis, spinal curvature can be estimated using Cobb angles. We propose an automated method for the estimation of Cobb angles from X-ray scans. First, the centerline of the spine was segmented using a cascade of two convolutional neural networks. After smoothing the centerline, Cobb angles… ▽ More Scoliosis is a condition defined by an abnormal spinal curvature. For diagnosis and treatment planning of scoliosis, spinal curvature can be estimated using Cobb angles. We propose an automated method for the estimation of Cobb angles from X-ray scans. First, the centerline of the spine was segmented using a cascade of two convolutional neural networks. After smoothing the centerline, Cobb angles were automatically estimated using the derivative of the centerline. We evaluated the results using the mean absolute error and the average symmetric mean absolute percentage error between the manual assessment by experts and the automated predictions. For optimization, we used 609 X-ray scans from the London Health Sciences Center, and for evaluation, we participated in the international challenge "Accurate Automated Spinal Curvature Estimation, MICCAI 2019" (100 scans). On the challenge's test set, we obtained an average symmetric mean absolute percentage error of 22.96. △ Less

Submitted 11 December, 2019; v1 submitted 4 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.